Dogs Bark, but the Caravan Rolls On: Observations Then and Now by Frank Conroy | NOOK Book (eBook) | Barnes & Noble
Dogs Bark, but the Caravan Rolls On: Observations Then and Now

Dogs Bark, but the Caravan Rolls On: Observations Then and Now

by Frank Conroy

View All Available Formats & Editions

For thirty years, Frank Conroy's commentaries on life, music, and writing have appeared regularly in the New York Times Magazine, Harper's Magazine, Esquire, and GQ. DOGS BARK, BUT THE CARAVAN ROLLS ON collects these pieces into an autobiography in journalistic snapshots. They evoke Conroy's southern childhood, his teen years in New York as a truant hanging out at


For thirty years, Frank Conroy's commentaries on life, music, and writing have appeared regularly in the New York Times Magazine, Harper's Magazine, Esquire, and GQ. DOGS BARK, BUT THE CARAVAN ROLLS ON collects these pieces into an autobiography in journalistic snapshots. They evoke Conroy's southern childhood, his teen years in New York as a truant hanging out at pool halls and Harlem jazz clubs, his first glimmers of the power of language and the writing life in college, his romantic life, and his experiences as a teacher and as director of the Iowa Writers' Workshop. Here, too, are profiles of the musicians he has come to know -- and jammed with: Keith Jarrett, Wynton Marsalis, Peter Serkin, even the Rolling Stones.
New essays fill out the collection from Conroy's wry retrospective viewpoint. DOGS BARK, BUT THE CARAVAN ROLLS ON is imbued with the honesty, humor, and insight that made his memoir STOP-TIME a classic.

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Conroy (Body & Soul) delivers a running commentary on life in this collection of articles and essays, at once subtle and dazzling, written over the past 25 years. His observations range from warmly intimate (ruminations on sex and love, shooting pool as a kid) to anonymously civic (the meaning and vitality of smalltown America). In the first half of the book, he grapples with the memory of his remote father, embraces fatherhood himself and peruses the mysteries of life especially those he finds in reading ("escape") and writing ("experiment"), and even riffs on his position as chair of the famed Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa. The second half leads readers into a foray of pieces Conroy has written on his second and well-known love, jazz. He trips into jam sessions with the Rolling Stones, waxes on his evolution as a pianist and profiles the great provocateurs in jazz. His exploration of Wynton Marsalis at 23 and later at 34 minutely reflects the arc of developments in the author's own life. Curiously, key moments in the essays resurface within each other as if in coda; the overlapping details makes reading them even more enjoyable. (Apr.) Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
The director of the famous Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa, Conroy has contributed to such publications as Esquire, Harper's magazine, and the New York Times Magazine, as well as to books on writing, for many years. His miscellaneous essays are now collected in this interesting and well-done anthology. Conroy takes on such topics as learning to play pool, fatherhood, the value of now-disappearing small towns in instilling family values, the enthusiasms of jazz musician Wynton Marsalis, and, of course, the Writers' Workshop. Conroy is a jazz pianist as well as a teacher and writer, so it is natural that a number of essays deal with music and musicians. Previous works by this author include a well-received memoir, Stop-Time, and the novel Body & Soul, whose reception was more mixed. Academic and public collections, particularly those strong in modern American literature or music, will want to consider this title. Nancy P. Shires, East Carolina Univ. Lib., Greenville, NC Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Conroy compiles 22 sketches he has published in various elite American magazines from the 1970s to the 1990s, punctuated with contemporary commentary, into an autobiographical collage. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (
Kirkus Reviews
Essays old and new from writer's writer Conroy (Body and Soul, 1993, etc.), who eschews fireworks in favor of the dead-on observation as he considers topics ranging from fatherhood to the Rolling Stones to leaving New York. The author kicks off this collection of pieces spanning 30 years with a few anecdotes that got left out of the original published versions (in periodicals ranging from the New York Times Magazine to GQ). There was the time he went to movie actor Steve McQueen's house to do an interview for Esquire and found the actor stark naked; and Conroy's profile of the Rolling Stones went a lot smoother after an accidental jam session with drummer Charlie Watts, even though Mick Jagger was a "narcissistic egomaniac" (another observation that never made it into print). The writer quickly moves away from these quirky celebrity moments to circle around to a more intimate topic: himself. We learn of young Conroy's relationship with his mostly absent father, conducted almost entirely through Frank's absorption in Dad's book collection. We read about the author's obsession with scouting, which endured until a pivotal moment of disillusionment in Madison Square Garden. We continue through his personal life, learning of his failed first marriage, his departure from New York, and his meeting his second wife on the road to a garbage dump. The centerpiece here is an essay about the Iowa Writers' Workshop (of which Conroy is director) that distills his philosophy and approach into 14 tight pages. Among the typically laconic comments: "Writing is a mixture of knowing what you're doing and not knowing what you're doing." The collection's final third focuses on Conroy's jazz writing; in hisaccount of sitting in on keyboards as a teenager at Sugar Ray's in Harlem, the "pure glee of a kid jumping up and down on the theater seat" leaps off the page. Seemingly effortless, entirely transportive
From the Publisher
Barking can be interpreted as an unleashed enthusiasm/eagerness...This superb blend of personal essays and journalistic articles certainly proves that...
The Chicago Sun-Times

Uniformly well written, amiable, smart and, in this age of literary narcissism, something unusual: almost wholly self-absorbed, yet self-effacing.
The Washington Post

Conroy combines improvisational oomph with meticulous control when writing about Wynton Marsalis and his own history at the pool table.
Entertainment Weekly

Seemingly effortless, entirely transportive.
Kirkus Reviews

Conroy delivers a running commentary on life in this collection of articles and essays, at once subtle and dazzling...
Publishers Weekly

Highly enjoyable and illuminating..."Dogs Bark" is simply one of the best books published in a long, long time.
Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Interesting and well-done anthology Library Journal

Product Details

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Publication date:
Sold by:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
File size:
927 KB

Read an Excerpt

Some Observations Now

In 1968 a pal of mine who worked for The New Yorker was sent to cover the Democratic convention in Chicago. During the infamous police riots he was struck two or three times by a cop with a nightstick, and when he managed to get back to his hotel he found himself pissing blood. He eventually recovered, wrote his piece and left out the attack on himself. “Michael,” I asked my always elegantly dressed, highly polite friend, “how could you leave it out? You weren’t protesting. It shows the scope of the violence. It’s important.” He respectfully disagreed. “I wasn’t sent to write about myself,” he said, with a certain amount of hauteur. New Journalism was in the air back then--an approach in which the observer was taken to be as important, or more important, than the stuff observed (Tom Wolfe, for instance, writing about auto shows, well before taking on the more ambitious role of American Balzac). The New Yorker frowned on New Journalism. People took sides. I never did, whether from laziness or a reluctance to box myself in, I don’t know. I dealt with each piece I wrote as seemed appropriate at the time.
The closest I came to New Journalism was probably a long piece (endlessly long, in fact) about the late movie star Steve McQueen, written for what was then considered not the best but the hippest magazine around, Esquire. McQueen, whom I had never thought much of as an actor, turned out to be a nice guy. Unassuming, straightforward, easygoing if a touch wired, he was good company. We had fun riding 250 cc dirt bikes in the desert around Palm Springs, drinking beer, eating Mexican food at out-of-the-way joints and swimming in the pool behind his Palm Springs house, his getaway pad (his mansion was in Beverly Hills, of course). It was my first “big” magazine piece. Still in my twenties, I was thrilled by the whole experience. I left something out of my piece, though, something I knew the editors would probably like, and, so too, the readers. On my third visit to his house--“Come over for lunch,” he said, “around eleven”--he surprised me.
It was an ordinary suburban neighborhood, and I drove into the circle at precisely eleven a.m., parked the car and rang his front door bell. After a long time the door opened. McQueen, his entirely naked body wet and gleaming, peeked out at the street and then looked at me. “Come on back to the pool.” Was he showing off ? His body was flawless, front and back, and quite beautiful. One did not have to be gay (and neither of us was) to be moved by its perfection. Was he saying he had nothing to hide to a writer who would, he knew, be writing about him? Was he asserting his freedom to do whatever he wanted to do--the kid from the orphanage who grew up to be a movie star? Was it an expression of trust? Who knows? Perhaps he just didn’t think it was that important.
He lent me a pair of trunks, though, because he didn’t know when his wife and kids would be back.

Writing for money. Not very much money, to be sure, but I did it occasionally. (My first book, Stop-Time, had been a critical success, but brought in next to nothing.) The New Yorker had printed chapters from my book, and Mr. Shawn, who ran the place, suggested I might want to try a “Notes and Comment” now and then. I wrote a dozen or so over the next couple of years, but finally stopped because I overreacted to rejection. Whenever he turned one down, even with good reason, it broke my heart. (In my teaching I emphasize that a writer must learn how to deal with rejection, and must never be weakened or slowed down because of it. I have dealt with it badly myself, so I know what I’m talking about.) I also overreacted to acceptance. Once I wrote a short story in a single go, nine hours of continuous immersion which left me manic and exhausted. Mr. Shawn bought the story and printed it a week later. I wasted a month celebrating.
Magazines had once been an important part of American culture. Hemingway’s Old Man and the Sea was first printed in Life, read by millions of people. The Saturday Evening Post, Collier’s and others published fiction in every issue, thousands of stories a year, lots of nonfiction, and thus supported all kinds of writers. Television ended that era, but when I was young we still read what was left pretty faithfully. The New Yorker was important to us. As my drinking buddy Terry Southern used to say, “It’s the top of the quality-lit biz.” One night I walked into a favorite literary hangout and sat down with Willie Morris, the flamboyant editor of Harper’s Magazine. Charles Manson had just been arrested and the whole country was agog. “Who’s going to do Manson for Harper’s?” I asked, genuinely curious. Willie was, of course, drunk. “You are,” he said immediately. “You are. You.” I thought it was the booze talking, but he asked the waiter for some paper and wrote out a contract on the spot. We both signed, and two waiters signed as witnesses, and Willie bought a round of drinks. A month later I delivered the article, a “think piece” as they used to call them at The New Yorker, which Willie liked well enough to make the cover story. A terrific editor, who knew when to simply let a writer go.
Some editors were insupportable. A young guy at one of the bigger “slicks” asked me to go out to California and do a story on Anouk Aimée, the ethereally beautiful French actress who’d hit it big with a movie called A Man and a Woman. “She’s going to see Disneyland, according to her PR guy.” I accepted the assignment, spent three or four days with Anouk and her guitar-playing boyfriend, went to Disneyland with them, came back to New York and wrote an article. It was hard work. Anouk was indeed beautiful, but a dim bulb. A soul under water, really. I thought I captured a certain poignancy in her situation, but the editor killed the piece. “I was thinking of the irony of it,” he said. “You know, French sophistication against the vulgarity of Disneyland.” In other words, he had a piece in mind despite the fact that he’d never met Anouk Aimée and never been to California. A few experiences of this kind taught me to be very careful about assignments. I backed off from magazine work almost entirely, in fact, earning money doctoring movie scripts instead. (Cleaning up dialogue, mostly, for princely sums. It didn’t seem to matter whether the producers made the movie or not. But I began to hate the work itself--the movies were stupid--and eventually the well went dry.) Years later, after my marriage had ended and I left New York to live in the boondocks, broke, jobless and confused, I was to look back with mild alarm at how casual I’d been about money, how spoiled I’d been by a decade of modest income from my trust funds (which ran out) and my wife’s (which, thank God, did not), wrapped in a comfortable fog of well-being. The cliché is true: when you don’t really need money, it’s easy to get, and when you absolutely must have it, it’s hard to come by--particularly if you’ve left town. New Yorkers tend to think of anyone who’s left as having died. They simply forget about you. For quite some time I scrabbled around, playing the piano at jazz bars, doing whatever pickup journalism I could get. I was grateful when an acquaintance at the New York Times Magazine called long distance to ask if I wanted to do a piece on the Rolling Stones. “You bet,” I said. “Thanks.” I knew nothing about rock, never listened to it except in passing on the car radio and had no interest in it. (The Beatles were another story. I bought all their records and even played a few of their tunes with my trio.) I had to ask my twenty-four-year-old girlfriend, “Who are the Rolling Stones? I mean, I’ve heard of them, but what’s the big deal?” She looked at me suspiciously, as if I’d started playing some unspecified word game. “You mean you really don’t know?” “No.” “Does the name Mick Jagger ring a bell?” “He’s in the group, right? He sings?” (Let me digress with another note about New York. My male pals understood me well enough to know I couldn’t live alone--indeed, I tried it for a year, housesitting in Connecticut and feeling very, very sorry for myself--and many of them argued that I should stay in the city because I’d never find a woman in the boondocks. They were wrong, as New Yorkers are so often wrong about the outside world. The twenty-four-year-old girlfriend who proceeded to tell me all she knew about the Rolling Stones eventually married me, and is still with me thirty years later. We have a fifteen-year-old son who listens to Tony Bennett.) Once again I was to leave something out of the story. I had no choice, really, given the venue. But I can tell it here. The Rolling Stones were about to begin an American tour, and had rented Andy Warhol’s estate at the northern tip of Long Island to go over their repertoire. Flashing my coded telegram at various checkpoints, I arrived at a sprawling one-story house with wings in all directions. I found a door, knocked and, after some time, simply entered. To my left, an enormous kitchen. “Hello? Anybody home?” I moved past the entrance hall and through an arch on my right to what looked like a large, informal living room. “Hello?” Complete silence. It was around four o’clock in the afternoon.
I sat down on a couch, feeling a bit nervous, and flipped through some magazines from a side table. After perhaps three quarters of an hour I got up and walked over to the French windows, stared out at the lawn and came back again. On the other side of the room were amplifiers, mike stands, stacks of speakers, a drum set, cables on the floor and a Steinway baby grand. I sat down at the piano and played some Thelonious Monk. Then some Jaki Byard. I got into it, as they say--concentrating. I played the blues, and suddenly the sound of the drums came from behind my back. Crisp, light ride cymbal, steady high hats and short riffs on the snare, echoing little licks from my right hand. Classic jazz drums, something like Kenny Clark. I just kept on playing when a bass joined in, completing the trio with a swinging four-to-the-bar walking line. It sounded so good to me I couldn’t stop, and we must have done fifty choruses. Finally I played the head to “Blues in the Closet,” lifted my hands and turned around.
“Hey,” said the skinny guy behind the drums. “I’ve played with you before.” This was Charlie Watts, the Stones’ drummer, but I had never seen the group and didn’t recognize him.
“I--uh, well,” I mumbled.
“The Establishment!” he said. “Back in the old days.” Ah, yes. London. A nightclub with a downstairs jazz scene where the house pianist, Dudley Moore, let me sit in now and then. (This was before rock hit England, when Gypsy caravans might be spotted in the countryside.) “Right,” I said. “Good Lord.” Charlie introduced me to Bill Wyman, the bassist, and we all reminisced about the nightclub, the swinging Soho scene, Ronnie Scott’s jazz club, Lenny Bruce’s first gig in London and other matters of no particular importance. Although Mick Jagger turned out to be a narcissistic egomaniac, Watts and Wyman were open, friendly and masters of a certain kind of fast British working-class humor. I went along to rehearsals at an old air base in Newburgh, New York, and then to a performance in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. My acquaintance with Watts, and his generosity with his time, gave me almost completely free access to the whole elaborate process of launching a big tour. I got to know everybody--roadies, the cook, sound people, stage managers and all the rest. Through nothing more than good luck, I had more than enough material for the article. I had fun, too, but that couldn’t go in. At least not all of it.
Twenty-five years later, the Stones piece is included in this book, slightly altered in chronology and its mention of jazz. The McQueen piece and dozens of other journalistic pieces have been left out. They seem dated now. A number of essays that were not written for magazines have been included.
A long time ago I wrote a memoir, Stop-Time, which ended when I was eighteen. A lot of people expected me to continue the story of my life, but I was determined not to write that kind of book again. Stop-Time stands alone, and I’m glad of that. I did not think of the book as the start of a career, I thought of it as a thing unto itself, and was astonished that I’d been able to make it. Decades later I wrote a novel, Body & Soul, as an homage both to music and to the traditional novels of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, which I loved and which had awakened my imagination. But all along I was doing smaller things: stories, articles and essays that now seem-- although this was never the intent--to extend the line of the eighteen-year-old boy, however faintly, into the present. But I hope the pieces collected here can be read for pleasure as is. It’s the caravan that counts, after all, not the dog.


Copyright © 2002 by Frank Conroy. Reprinted by permission of Houghton Mifflin Company.

Meet the Author

FRANK CONROY is the director of the Writers’ Workshop at the University of Iowa. He is also an accomplished jazz pianist.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >