- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Ships from: acton, MA
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
The Dracula mythology has inspired a vast subculture, but the story has never been better told than by Stoker.
1. Dracula relies on journal fragments, letters, and newspaper clippings to tell its story. Why might Stoker have chosen to narrate the story in this way? Do letters and journal entries make the story seem more authentic or believable to you? Likewise, discuss the significance that many of the male protagonists are doctors (Dr. Seward) or men of science (Dr. Van Helsing). Why is this important to the story?
2. How does the novel invert Christian mythology in its description of Count Dracula's reign of terror? For instance, what specific elements of Stoker's story parallel scenes or images from the New Testament? Why might this subversion of Christian myth be significant?
3. Discuss the roles of Lucy Westenra and Mina Harker in the novel. How are the two women similar? Different? What accounts for their differences? To what extent does the novel depend on both of these women to propel the narrative forward?
4. Discuss the role of sexuality in Dracula. Would you say that Dracula attempts to reproduce himself sexually or by some other means? In what ways does the figure of Dracula subvert conventional notions of heterosexuality? Consider, for instance, his predilection for drinking blood and his habit of making his victims feed from his chest.
5. What are the elements of vampire folklore? For example, what, according to the novel, attracts or repels a vampire? How do you kill a vampire for good? Although Stoker did not invent the mythology of the vampire, his novel firmly established the conventions of vampire fiction. Choose another novel that deals with vampires and compare it with Dracula. (Consider, for example, one of Anne Rice's vampirebooks.) In what ways are the novels similar? Different?
6. Consider Freud's essay "The Uncanny" in relation to Stoker's Dracula. How would Freud describe the world that Stoker evokes in the novel? Is this a world of common reality? Or is it a world governed by supernatural belief? Or both? Discuss Freud's claim that the writer of gothic fiction is "betraying to us the superstitiousness which we have ostensibly surmounted; he deceives us by promising to give us the sober truth, and then after all overstepping it." In what ways does Stoker's narrative strategy of employing newspaper clippings and journal entries promise the "sober truth"? To what extent do you think Dracula achieves a sense of the uncanny?
Posted December 6, 2011
Posted June 18, 2005
this is a very intense book, one of the greatest classics ever written, great vocabulary, and a great way of writing. i also liked the format, all journals and letters, it was kind of like poking your nose in other peoples business, but not really. it is a horrific, monstrous story, great for vampire lovers. but the reason i didn't give it 5 stars was because it was kind of boring at some parts. i didn't like the parts that didn't have all the action. (it may seem like i'm copying another review on this page, but this is honestly what i think.)Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 1, 2004
Posted October 16, 2001
This book is intense and pretty scary good vocabulary and the way the book was written is great. I gave this book 4 stars instead of 5 because I got bored at some points of the book do to lack of action, but other than that this boook has planty of action for vampire lovers. If you are thinking of reading book your thinking should stop now and you should buy and read this book!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 29, 2009
No text was provided for this review.