Druidism Exhumed In Two Parts, Part I. Proving That The Stone Circles Of Britain Were Druidical Temples; An Analysis And Refutation Of The

Overview

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free.
This is an OCR edition with typos.
Read More Show Less
... See more details below
Sending request ...

Overview

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free.
This is an OCR edition with typos.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780217205047
  • Publisher: General Books LLC
  • Publication date: 10/14/2010
  • Pages: 72
  • Product dimensions: 7.44 (w) x 9.69 (h) x 0.15 (d)

Read an Excerpt


Division I. Section iI. THE USE OF GROUPS. SHE use of groups of pillars for monuments in different countries is traced " by Dr. Stuart, " and the question is considered whether there be any reason for drawing distinctions between small circles admitted to be sepulchres, and those of larger size like Stonehenge and Stennis." " Some writers," he says, p. 25, " while they admit that the smaller stone circles may have been sepulchres, are not disposed to believe that the larger and more complicated structures like Stonehenge and Avebury in England, or Stennis and Classernish in Scotland, could have been designed for such a purpose. " But, if there be no reason, except the great size and importance of these circles, for supposing them to have been of a different character, the objection does not appear of much weight. " In Egypt, there were myriads of interments in little chambers built in the sand; while the great pyramids were reserved for the monarchs of Memphis, but both were the depositories of the dead. '' The royal mausoleum of our own day differs more in character from the humble headstone, and the great mounds at Kertch from a common grave, than does Stonehenge from the circle at Crichie, although all have a common design. " In the like manner, if we must recognise the smaller stone circles to be ancient sepulchres, I think it is reasonable that we should regard the larger examples as of the same kind, but of greater importance. Such structures as Stonehenge and Stennis may have resulted from some great national effort to commemorate mighty chiefs." We agree with Dr. Stuart that Stonehenge does not differ more from the circle at Crichie than the royal mausoleum of our own daydiffers from the humble headstone ; and we are of opinion that what is suff...
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)