Ken Follett has written novels that have sold tens of millions of copies, but perhaps his most lasting claim to fame will forever be the Century Trilogy that he launched in 2010. In each of these mammoth, 900+-page epics, this famed author has followed the lives of five intertwined families of different nationalities from the early twentieth century through the tumultuous changes of the sixties, seventies, and eighties. In the latest installment, the American, English, Russian, German, and Welsh extended families grapple with unforeseen changes in their personal and collective lives.
Edge of Eternity (The Century Trilogy #3)by Ken Follett
In Fall of Giants and Winter of the World, Ken Follett followed the fortunes of five international families—American, German, Russian, English, and Welsh—as/i>/i>/b>/i>
- Editorial Reviews
- Product Details
- Related Subjects
- Read an Excerpt
- What People Are Saying
- Meet the author
Ken Follett's extraordinary, #1 New York Times bestselling historical epic, the Century Trilogy, reaches its sweeping, passionate conclusion.
In Fall of Giants and Winter of the World, Ken Follett followed the fortunes of five international families—American, German, Russian, English, and Welsh—as they made their way through the twentieth century. Now they come to one of the most tumultuous eras of all: the 1960s through the 1980s, from civil rights, assassinations, mass political movements, and Vietnam to the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis, presidential impeachment, revolution—and rock and roll.
East German teacher Rebecca Hoffmann discovers she’s been spied on by the Stasi for years and commits an impulsive act that will affect her family for the rest of their lives . . . . George Jakes, the child of a mixed-race couple, bypasses a corporate law career to join Robert F. Kennedy’s Justice Department and finds himself in the middle of not only the seminal events of the civil rights battle but a much more personal battle of his own . . . . Cameron Dewar, the grandson of a senator, jumps at the chance to do some official and unofficial espionage for a cause he believes in, only to discover that the world is a much more dangerous place than he’d imagined . . . . Dimka Dvorkin, a young aide to Nikita Krushchev, becomes an agent both for good and for ill as the United States and the Soviet Union race to the brink of nuclear war, while his twin sister, Tanya, carves out a role that will take her from Moscow to Cuba to Prague to Warsaw—and into history.
The final volume in Follett's latest trilogy (after Fall of Giants and Winter of the World) is worth the wait. The formula is the same as in previous books: the continuing history of five families, now conflated into four—British, American, German, Russian—traced against the background of dramatic public events. The second book ended in 1948 with the Rosenberg spy trial, and now Follett starts in 1961, when Rebecca Hoffman learns an unpleasant truth about her East German husband. George Jakes, the biracial son of a white senator from the previous volume, is hired by the White House as window dressing—the Kennedys mustn't look like bigots—but soon becomes a trusted aide to Bobby Kennedy. Thus he witnesses what goes on in the Kennedy White House and in the civil rights campaign. German families are separated for decades by the Berlin Wall. Two grandchildren—German and English—form a successful rock band, our entrée to the everything-goes 1960s. Follett covers all the bases in this sprawling, energetic novel. Bad things abound, but, the tone is upbeat. The book ends with the televising of Obama's 2008 election speech. Watching with his family, George has tears in his eyes for the fallen martyrs who made the event possible. VERDICT Once again, Follett has written pitch-perfect popular fiction that readers will devour. [See Prepub Alert, 3/24/14.]—David Keymer, Modesto, CA
“Edge of Eternity is as compulsively readable a mighty page-turner as its two predecessors."
–The Seattle Times
“Hugely ambitious, the trilogy serves as a massive history lesson as well as an example of good, old-fashioned storytelling.”
–The New York Daily News
“The historical events are the backdrop but the characters are the focal point. Good storytellers know this and Follett is an excellent one.”
–The Huffington Post
“Mesmerizing....flowing with spicy, expertly paced melodrama, character-rich exploits, familial histrionics, and international intrigue.”
– Publishers Weekly (starred review)
"Worth the wait"
– Library Journal (starred review)
"A fascinating, sprawling, epic conclusion to Ken Follett's Century Trilogy."
-- The Minneapolis Star Tribune
"A glorious conclusion to a remarkable trilogy that is wonderful, exhilarating reading for all ages. Fine, fine historical fiction."
– Historical Novel Society
"Follett does an outstanding job of interweaving and personalizing complicated narratives set on a multicultural stage."
Another sprawling, multigenerational, continent-spanning saga from long-practiced pop-fiction writer Follett (Winter of the World, 2012, etc.). One might forgive the reader for taking Follett's title literally at first glance; after all, who has time for the eternity of a 1,100-plus-page novel, especially one that's preceded by a brace of similarly hefty novels? Happily, Follett, while not delivering the edge-of-the-seat tautness of Eye of the Needle (1978), knows how to turn in a robust yarn without too much slack, even in a book as long as this. The latest and last installment in the Century Trilogy spills over into our own time, closing with Barack Obama's electrifying speech in Chicago on winning his first term as president—an emotional moment, considering the struggle some of Follett's protagonists have endured to see it happen. His Freedom Riders make plenty of history of their own, risking violence not just for stirring up the disenfranchised, but also for engaging in more personal forms of protest. One, George Jakes, comes near the top of Follett's dauntingly long dramatis personae (in which more than 100 named characters figure); he's a crusader for justice and often in fraught places at the times in which he's most needed. George has his generational counterparts behind the Iron Curtain, some of them pretty good guys despite their Comintern credentials, along with a guitar-slinger from East Germany swept into the toppermost of the poppermost in the decadent West. ("They quickly realized that San Francisco was the coolest city of them all. It was full of young people in radically stylish clothes.") Follett writes of those young hipsters with a fustiness befitting Michener, and indeed there's a Michenerian-epic feeling to the whole enterprise, as if The Drifters had gotten mashed up with John le Carré and Pierre Salinger; it's George Burns in Pepperland stuff. Still, fans of Follett won't mind, and, knowing all the tricks, he does a good job of tying disparate storylines together in the end. A well-written entertainment, best suited to those who measure their novels in reams instead of signatures.
Read an Excerpt
***This excerpt is from an advance uncorrected proof***
Copyright © 2014 Ken Follett
Rebecca Hoffmann was summoned by the secret police on a rainy Monday in 1961.
It began as an ordinary morning. Her husband drove her to work in his tan Trabant 500. The graceful old streets of central Berlin still had gaps from wartime bombing, except where new concrete buildings stood up like ill-matched false teeth. Hans was thinking about his job as he drove. “The courts serve the judges, the lawyers, the police, the government—everyone except the victims of crime,” he said. “This is to be expected in Western capitalist countries, but under Communism the courts ought surely to serve the people. My colleagues don’t seem to realize that.” Hans worked for the Ministry of Justice.
“We’ve been married almost a year, and I’ve known you for two, but
I’ve never met one of your colleagues,” Rebecca said.
“They would bore you,” he said immediately. “They’re all lawyers.”
“Any women among them?”
“No. Not in my section, anyway.” Hans’s job was administration:
appointing judges, scheduling trials, managing courthouses.
“I’d like to meet them, all the same.”
Hans was a strong man who had learned to rein himself in. Watching him, Rebecca saw in his eyes a familiar flash of anger at her insistence. He controlled it by an effort of will. “I’ll arrange something,” he said. “Perhaps we’ll all go to a bar one evening.”
Hans had been the first man Rebecca met who matched up to her father. He was confident and authoritative, but he always listened to her. He had a good job—not many people had a car of their own in East Germany—and men who worked in the government were usually hardline Communists, but Hans, surprisingly, shared Rebecca’s political skepticism. Like her father he was tall, handsome, and well dressed. He was the man she had been waiting for.
Only once during their courtship had she doubted him, briefly. They had been in a minor car crash. It had been wholly the fault of the other driver, who had come out of a side street without stopping. Such things happened every day, but Hans had been mad with rage. Although the damage to the two cars was minimal, he had called the police, shown them his Ministry of Justice identity card, and had the other driver arrested for dangerous driving and taken off to jail.
Afterward he had apologized to Rebecca for losing his temper. She had been scared by his vindictiveness, and had come close to ending their relationship. But he had explained that he had not been his normal self, due to pressure at work, and she had believed him. Her faith had been justified: he had never done such a thing again.
When they had been dating for a year, and sleeping together most weekends for six months, Rebecca wondered why he did not ask her to marry him. They were not kids: she had then been twenty-eight, he thirty-three. So she had proposed to him. He had been startled, but said yes.
Now he pulled up outside her school. It was a modern building, and well equipped: the Communists were serious about education. Outside the gates, five or six older boys were standing under a tree, smoking cigarettes. Ignoring their stares, Rebecca kissed Hans on the lips. Then she got out.
The boys greeted her politely, but she felt their yearning adolescent eyes on her figure as she splashed through the puddles in the school yard.
Rebecca came from a political family. Her grandfather had been a Social Democrat member of the Reichstag, the national parliament, until Hitler came to power. Her mother had been a city councilor, also for the Social Democrats, during East Berlin’s brief postwar period of democracy. But East Germany was a Communist tyranny now, and Rebecca saw no point in engaging in politics. So she channeled her idealism into teaching, and hoped that the next generation would be less dogmatic, more compassionate, smarter.
In the staff room she checked the emergency timetable on the notice board. Most of her classes were doubled today, two groups of pupils crammed into one room. Her subject was Russian, but she also had to teach an English class. She did not speak English, though she had picked up a smattering from her British grandmother, Maud, still feisty at seventy.
This was the second time Rebecca had been asked to teach an English class, and she began to think about a text. The first time, she had used a leaflet handed out to American soldiers, telling them how to get on with Germans: the pupils had found it hilarious, and they had learned a lot too. Today perhaps she would write on the blackboard the words of a song they knew, such as “The Twist”—played all the time on American Forces Network radio—and get them to translate it into German. It would not be a conventional lesson, but it was the best she could do.
The school was desperately short of teachers because half the staff had emigrated to West Germany, where salaries were three hundred marks a month higher and people were free. The story was the same in most schools in East Germany. And it was not just teachers. Doctors could double their earnings by moving west. Rebecca’s mother, Carla, was head of nursing at a large East Berlin hospital, and she was tearing her hair out at the scarcity of both nurses and doctors. The story was the same in industry and even the armed forces. It was a national crisis.
As Rebecca was scribbling the lyrics of “The Twist” in a notebook, trying to remember the line about “my little sis,” the deputy head came into the staff room. Bernd Held was probably Rebecca’s best friend outside her family. He was a slim, dark-haired man of forty, with a livid scar across his forehead where a shard of flying shrapnel had struck him while he was defending the Seelow Heights in the last days of the war. He taught physics, but he shared Rebecca’s interest in Russian literature, and they ate their lunchtime sandwiches together a couple of times a week. “Listen, everybody,” Bernd said. “Bad news, I’m afraid. Anselm has left us.”
There was a murmur of surprise. Anselm Weber was the head teacher. He was a loyal Communist—heads had to be. But it seemed his principles had been overcome by the appeal of West German prosperity and liberty.
Bernd went on: “I will be taking his place until a new head can be appointed.” Rebecca and every other teacher in the school knew that Bernd himself should have got the job, if ability had been what counted; but Bernd was ruled out because he would not join the Socialist Unity Party, the SED—the Communist Party in all but name.
For the same reason, Rebecca would never be a head teacher. Anselm had pleaded with her to join the party, but it was out of the question. For her it would be like checking herself into a lunatic asylum and pretending all the other inmates were sane.
As Bernd detailed the emergency arrangements, Rebecca wondered when the school would get its new head. A year from now? How long would this crisis go on? No one knew.
Before the first lesson she glanced into her pigeonhole, but it was empty. The mail had not yet arrived. Perhaps the postman had gone to West Germany, too.
The letter that would turn her life upside down was still on its way.
She taught her first class, discussing the Russian poem “The Bronze Horseman” with a large group seventeen and eighteen years old. This was a lesson she had given every year since she started teaching. As always, she guided the pupils to the orthodox Soviet analysis, explaining that the conflict between personal interest and public duty was resolved,
by Pushkin, in favor of the public.
At lunchtime she took her sandwich to the head’s office and sat down across the big desk from Bernd. She looked at the shelf of cheap pottery busts: Marx, Lenin, and East German Communist leader Walter Ulbricht. Bernd followed her gaze and smiled. “Anselm is a sly one,” he said. “For years he pretended to be a true believer, and now— zoom, he’s off.”
“Aren’t you tempted to leave?” Rebecca asked Bernd. “You’re divorced, no children—you have no ties.”
He looked around, as if wondering whether someone might be listening; then he shrugged. “I’ve thought about it—who hasn’t?” he said. “How about you? Your father works in West Berlin any way, doesn’t he?”
“Yes. He has a factory making television sets. But my mother is determined to stay in the East. She says we must solve our problems, not run away from them.”
“I’ve met her. She’s a tiger.”
“That’s the truth. And the house we live in has been in her family for generations.”
“What about your husband?”
“He’s dedicated to his job.”
So I don’t have to worry about losing you. Good.”
Rebecca said: “Bernd—” Then she hesitated.
“Spit it out.”
“Can I ask you a personal question?”
“You left your wife because she was having an affair.”
Bernd stiffened, but he answered: “That’s right.”
“How did you find out?”
Bernd winced, as if at a sudden pain.
“Do you mind me asking?” Rebecca said anxiously. “Is it too personal?”
“I don’t mind telling you,” he said. “I confronted her, and she admitted it.”
“But what made you suspicious?”
“A lot of little things—”
Rebecca interrupted him. “The phone rings, you pick it up, there’s a silence for a few seconds, then the person at the other end hangs up.”
She went on: “Your spouse tears a note up small and flushes the shreds down the toilet. At the weekend he’s called to an unexpected meeting. In the evening he spends two hours writing something he won’t show you.”
“Oh, dear,” said Bernd sadly. “You’re talking about Hans.”
“He’s got a lover, hasn’t he?” She put down her sandwich: she had no appetite. “Tell me honestly what you think.”
“I’m so sorry.”
Bernd had kissed her once, four months ago, on the last day of the autumn term. They had been saying good-bye, and wishing one another a happy Christmas, and he had lightly grasped her arm, and bent his head, and kissed her lips. She had asked him not to do it again, ever, and said she would still like to be his friend; and when they had returned to school in January both had pretended it had never happened. He had even told her, a few weeks later, that he had a date with a widow his own age.
Rebecca did not want to encourage hopeless aspirations, but Bernd was the only person she could talk to, except for her family, and she did not want to worry them, not yet. “I was so sure that Hans loved me,” she said, and tears came to her eyes. “And I love him.”
“Perhaps he does love you. Some men just can’t resist temptation.”
Rebecca did not know whether Hans found their sex life satisfactory.
He never complained, but they made love only about once a week, which she believed to be infrequent for newlyweds. “All I want is a family of my own, just like my mother’s, in which everyone is loved and supported and protected,” she said. “I thought I could have that with Hans.”
“Perhaps you still can,” said Bernd. “An affair isn’t necessarily the end of the marriage.”
“In the first year?”
“It’s bad, I agree.”
“What should I do?”
“You must ask him about it. He may admit it, he may deny it; but he’ll know that you know.”
“And then what?”
“What do you want? Would you divorce him?”
She shook her head. “I would never leave. Marriage is a promise. You can’t keep a promise only when it suits you. You have to keep it against your inclination. That’s what it means.”
“I did the opposite. You must disapprove of me.”
“I don’t judge you or anyone else. I’m just talking about myself. I love my husband and I want him to be faithful.”
Bernd’s smile was admiring but regretful. “I hope you get your wish.”
“You’re a good friend.”
The bell rang for the first lesson of the afternoon. Rebecca stood up and put her sandwich back in its paper wrapping. She was not going to eat it, now or later, but she had a horror of throwing food away, like most people who had lived through the war. She touched her damp eyes with a handkerchief. “Thank you for listening,” she said.
“I wasn’t much comfort.”
“Yes, you were.” She went out.
As she approached the classroom for the English lesson, she realized she had not worked out the lyrics to “The Twist.” However, she had been a teacher long enough to improvise. “Who’s heard a record called ‘The Twist’?” she asked loudly as she walked through the door.
They all had.
She went to the blackboard and picked up a stub of chalk. “What are the words?”
They all began to shout at once.
On the board she wrote: “Come on, baby, let’s do the Twist.” Then she said: “What’s that in German?”
For a while she forgot about her troubles.
She found the letter in her pigeonhole at the midafternoon break. She carried it with her into the staff room and made a cup of instant coffee before opening it. When she read it she dropped her coffee.
The single sheet of paper was headed: “Ministry for State Security.” This was the official name for the secret police: the unofficial name was the Stasi. The letter came from a Sergeant Scholz, and it ordered her to present herself at his headquarters office for questioning.
Rebecca mopped up her spilled drink, apologized to her colleagues, pretended nothing was wrong, and went to the ladies’ room, where she locked herself in a cubicle. She needed to think before confiding in anyone.
Everyone in East Germany knew about these letters, and everyone dreaded receiving one. It meant she had done something wrong— perhaps something trivial, but it had come to the attention of the watchers. She knew, from what other people said, that there was no point protesting innocence. The police attitude would be that she must be guilty of something, or why would they be questioning her? To suggest they might have made a mistake was to insult their competence, which was another crime.
Looking again, she saw that her appointment was for five this afternoon.
What had she done? Her family was deeply suspect, of course. Her father, Werner, was a capitalist, with a factory that the East German government could not touch because it was in West Berlin. Her mother, Carla, was a well-known Social Democrat. Her grandmother, Maud, was the sister of an English earl.
However, the authorities had not bothered the family for a couple of years, and Rebecca had imagined that her marriage to an official in the Justice Ministry might have gained them a ticket of respectability. Obviously not.
Had she committed any crimes? She owned a copy of George Orwell’s anti-Communist allegory Animal Farm, which was illegal. Her kid brother, Walli, who was fifteen, played the guitar and sang American protest songs such as “This Land Is Your Land.” Rebecca sometimes went to West Berlin to see exhibitions of abstract painting. Communists were as conservative about art as Victorian matrons.
Washing her hands, she glanced in the mirror. She did not look scared. She had a straight nose and a strong chin and intense brown eyes. Her unruly dark hair was sharply pulled back. She was tall and statuesque, and some people found her intimidating. She could face a classroom full of boisterous eighteen-year-olds and silence them with a word.
But she was scared. What frightened her was the knowledge that the Stasi could do anything. There were no real restraints on them: complaining about them was a crime in itself. And that reminded her of the Red Army at the end of the war. The Soviet soldiers had been free to rob, rape, and murder Germans, and they had used their freedom in an orgy of unspeakable barbarism.
Rebecca’s last class of the day was on the construction of the passive voice in Russian grammar, and it was a shambles, easily the worst lesson she had given since she qualified as a teacher. The pupils could not fail to know that something was wrong and, touchingly, they gave her an easy ride, even making helpful suggestions when she found herself lost for the right word. With their indulgence she got through it.
When school ended, Bernd was closeted in the head’s office with officials from the Education Ministry, presumably discussing how to keep the school open with half the staff gone. Rebecca did not want to go to Stasi headquarters without telling anyone, just in case they decided to keep her there, so she wrote him a note telling him of the summons.
Then she caught a bus through the wet streets to Normannen Strasse in the suburb of Lichtenberg.
The Stasi headquarters there was an ugly new office block. It was not finished, and there were bulldozers in the car park and scaffolding at one end. It showed a grim face in the rain, and would not look much more cheerful in sunshine.
When she went through the door she wondered if she would ever come out.
She crossed the vast atrium, presented her letter at a reception desk, and was escorted upstairs in an elevator. Her fear rose with the lift. She emerged into a corridor painted a nightmarish shade of mustard yellow. She was shown into a small bare room with a plastic-topped table and two uncomfortable chairs made of metal tubing. There was a pungent smell of paint. Her escort left.
She sat alone for five minutes, shaking. She wished she smoked: it might steady her. She struggled not to cry.
Sergeant Scholz came in. He was a little younger than Rebecca— about twenty-five, she guessed. He carried a thin file. He sat down, cleared his throat, opened the file, and frowned. Rebecca thought he was trying to seem important, and she wondered whether this was his first interrogation.
“You are a teacher at Friedrich Engels Polytechnic Secondary School,” he said.
“Where do you live?”
She answered him, but she was puzzled. Did the secret police not know her address? That might explain why the letter had come to her at school rather than at home.
She had to give the names and ages of her parents and grandparents. “You’re lying to me!” Scholz said triumphantly. “You say your mother is thirty-nine and you are twenty-nine. How could she have given birth to you when she was ten years old?”
“I’m adopted,” Rebecca said, relieved to be able to give an innocent explanation. “My real parents were killed at the end of the war, when our house suffered a direct hit.” She had been thirteen. Red Army shells were falling and the city was in ruins and she was alone, bewildered, terrified. A plump adolescent, she had been singled out for rape by a group of soldiers. She had been saved by Carla, who had offered herself instead. Nevertheless that terrifying experience had left Rebecca hesitant and nervous about sex. If Hans was dissatisfied, she felt sure it must be her fault.
She shuddered and tried to put the memory away. “Carla Franck saved me from . . .” Just in time, Rebecca stopped herself. The Communists denied that Red Army soldiers had committed rape, even though every woman who had been in East Germany in 1945 knew the horrible truth. “Carla saved me,” she said, skipping the contentious details. “Later, she and Werner legally adopted me.”
Scholz was writing everything down. There could not be much in that file, Rebecca thought. But there must be something. If he knew little about her family, what was it that had attracted his interest?
“You are an English teacher,” he said.
“No, I’m not. I teach Russian.”
“You are lying again.”
“I’m not lying, and I have not lied previously,” she said crisply. She was surprised to find herself speaking to him in this challenging way. She was no longer as frightened as she had been. Perhaps this was foolhardy. He may be young and inexperienced, she told herself, but he still has the power to ruin my life. “My degree is in Russian language and literature,” she went on, and she tried a friendly smile. “I’m head of the department of Russian at my school. But half our teachers have gone to the West, and we have to improvise. So, in the past week, I have given two English lessons.”
“So, I was right! And in your lessons you poison the children’s minds with American propaganda.”
“Oh, hell,” she groaned. “Is this about the advice to American soldiers?”
He read from a sheet of notes. “It says here: ‘Bear in mind that there is no freedom of speech in East Germany.’ Is that not American propaganda?”
“I explained to the pupils that Americans have a naïve pre-Marxist concept of freedom,” she said. “I suppose your informant failed to mention that.” She wondered who the snitch was. It must be a pupil, or perhaps a parent who had been told about the lesson. The Stasi had more spies than the Nazis.
“It also says: ‘When in East Berlin, do not ask police officers for directions. Unlike American policemen, they are not there to help you.’ What do you say to that?”
“Isn’t it true?” Rebecca said. “When you were a teenager, did you ever ask a Vopo to tell you the way to a U-Bahn station?” The Vopos were the Volkspolizei, the East German police.
“Couldn’t you find something more appropriate for teaching children?”
“Why don’t you come to our school and give an English lesson?”
“I don’t speak English!”
“Nor do I!” Rebecca shouted. She immediately regretted raising her voice. But Scholz was not angry. In fact he seemed a little cowed. He was definitely inexperienced. But she should not get careless. “Nor do I,” she said more quietly. “So I’m making it up as I go along, and using whatever English-language materials come to hand.” It was time for some phony humility, she thought. “I’ve obviously made a mistake, and I’m very sorry, Sergeant.”
“You seem like an intelligent woman,” he said.
She narrowed her eyes. Was this a trap? “Thank you for the compliment,” she said neutrally.
“We need intelligent people, especially women.” Rebecca was mystified. “What for?”
“To keep their eyes open, see what’s happening, let us know when things are going wrong.”
Rebecca was flabbergasted. After a moment she said incredulously: “Are you asking me to be a Stasi informant?”
“It’s important, public-spirited work,” he said. “And vital in schools, where young people’s attitudes are formed.”
“I see that.” What Rebecca saw was that this young secret policeman had blundered. He had checked her out at her place of work, but he knew nothing about her notorious family. If Scholz had looked into Rebecca’s background he would never have approached her.
She could imagine how it had happened. “Hoffmann” was one of the commonest surnames, and “Rebecca” was not unusual. A raw beginner could easily make the mistake of investigating the wrong Rebecca Hoffmann.
He went on: “But the people who do this work must be completely honest and trustworthy.”
That was so paradoxical that she almost laughed. “Honest and trustworthy?” she repeated. “To spy on your friends?”
“Absolutely.” He seemed unaware of the irony. “And there are advantages.” He lowered his voice. “You would become one of us.”
“I don’t know what to say.”
“You don’t have to decide now. Go home and think about it. But don’t discuss it with anyone. It must be secret, obviously.”
“Obviously.” She was beginning to feel relieved. Scholz would soon find out that she was unsuitable for his purpose, and he would withdraw his proposal. But at that point he could hardly go back to pretending that she was a propagandist for capitalist imperialism. Perhaps she might come out of this unscathed.
Scholz stood up, and Rebecca followed suit. Was it possible that her visit to Stasi headquarters could end so well? It seemed too good to be true.
He held the door for her politely, then escorted her along the yellow corridor. A group of five or six Stasi men stood near the elevator doors, talking animatedly. One was startlingly familiar: a tall, broad-shouldered man with a slight stoop, wearing a light-gray flannel suit that Rebecca knew well. She stared at him uncomprehendingly as she walked up to the elevator.
It was her husband, Hans.
Why was he here? Her first frightened thought was that he, too, was under interrogation. But a moment later she realized, from the way they were all standing, that he was not being treated as a suspect.
What, then? Her heart pounded with fear, but what was she afraid of?
Perhaps his job at the Ministry of Justice brought him here from time to time, she thought. Then she heard one of the other men say to him: “But, with all due respect, Lieutenant . . .” She did not hear the rest of the sentence. Lieutenant? Civil servants did not hold military ranks— unless they were in the police . . .
Then Hans saw Rebecca.
She watched the emotions cross his face: men were easy to read. At first he had the baffled frown of one who sees a familiar sight in an alien context, such as a turnip in a library. Then his eyes widened in shock as he accepted the reality of what he was seeing, and his mouth opened a fraction. But it was the next expression that struck her hardest: his cheeks darkened with shame and his eyes shifted away from her in an unmistakable look of guilt.
Rebecca was silent for a long moment, trying to take this in. Still not understanding what she was seeing, she said: “Good afternoon, Lieutenant Hoffmann.”
Scholz looked puzzled and scared. “Do you know the lieutenant?”
“Quite well,” she said, struggling to keep her composure as a dreadful suspicion began to dawn on her. “I’m beginning to wonder whether he has had me under surveillance for some time.” But it was not possible— was it?
“Really?” said Scholz, stupidly.
Rebecca stared hard at Hans, watching for his reaction to her surmise, hoping he would laugh it off and immediately come out with the true, innocent explanation. His mouth was open, as if he were about to speak, but she could see that he was not intending to tell the truth: instead, she thought, he had the look of a man desperately trying to think of a story and failing to come up with something that would meet all the facts.
Scholz was on the brink of tears. “I didn’t know!”
Still watching Hans, Rebecca said: “I am Hans’s wife.”
Hans’s face changed again, and as guilt turned to anger his face became a mask of fury. He spoke at last, but not to Rebecca. “Shut your mouth, Scholz,” he said.
Then she knew, and her world crashed around her.
Scholz was too astonished to heed Hans’s warning. He said to
Rebecca: “You’re that Frau Hoffmann?”
Hans moved with the speed of rage. He lashed out with a meaty right fist and punched Scholz in the face. The young man staggered back, lips bleeding. “You fucking fool,” Hans said. “You’ve just undone two years of painstaking undercover work.”
Rebecca muttered to herself: “The funny phone calls, the sudden meetings, the ripped-up notes . . .” Hans did not have a lover.
It was worse than that.
She was in a daze, but she knew this was the moment to find out the truth, while everyone was off balance, before they began to tell lies and concoct cover stories. With an effort she stayed focused. She said coolly: “Did you marry me just to spy on me, Hans?”
He stared at her without answering.
Scholz turned and staggered away along the corridor. Hans said: “Go after him.” The elevator came and Rebecca stepped in just as Hans called out: “Arrest the fool and throw him in a cell.” He turned to speak to Rebecca, but the elevator doors closed and she pressed the button for the ground floor.
She could hardly see through her tears as she crossed the atrium. No one spoke to her: doubtless it was commonplace to see people weeping here. She found her way across the rain-swept car park to the bus stop.
Her marriage was a sham. She could hardly take it in. She had slept with Hans, loved him, and married him, and all the time he had been deceiving her. Infidelity might be considered a temporary lapse, but Hans had been false to her from the start. He must have begun dating her in order to spy on her.
No doubt he had never intended actually to marry her. Originally, he had probably intended no more than a flirtation as a way of getting inside the house. The deception had worked too well. It must have come as a shock to him when she proposed marriage. Maybe he had been forced to make a decision: refuse her, and abandon the surveillance, or marry her and continue it. His bosses might even have ordered him to accept her. How could she have been so completely deceived?
A bus pulled up and she jumped on. She walked with lowered gaze to a seat near the back and covered her face with her hands.
She thought about their courtship. When she had raised the issues that had got in the way of her previous relationships—her feminism, her anti-Communism, her closeness to Carla—he had given all the right answers. She had believed that he and she were like-minded, almost miraculously so. It had never occurred to her that he was putting on an act.
The bus crawled through the landscape of old rubble and new concrete toward the central district of Mitte. Rebecca tried to think about her future but she could not. All she could do was run over the past in her mind. She remembered their wedding day, the honeymoon, and their year of marriage, seeing it all now as a play in which Hans had been performing. He had stolen two years from her, and it made her so angry that she stopped crying.
She recalled the evening when she had proposed. They had been strolling in the People’s Park at Friedrichshain, and they had stopped in front of the old Fairy Tale Fountain to look at the carved stone turtles. She had worn a navy blue dress, her best color. Hans had a new tweed jacket: he managed to find good clothes even though East Germany was a fashion desert. With his arm around her, Rebecca had felt safe, protected, cherished. She wanted one man, forever, and he was the man. “Let’s get married, Hans,” she had said with a smile, and he had kissed her and replied: “What a wonderful idea.”
I was a fool, she thought furiously; a stupid fool.
One thing was explained. Hans had not wanted to have children yet. He had said he wanted to get another promotion and a home of their own, first. He had not mentioned this before the wedding, and Rebecca had been surprised, given their ages: she was now twenty-nine and he thirty-four. Now she knew the real reason.
By the time she got off the bus she was in a rage. She walked quickly through the wind and rain to the tall old town house where she lived. From the hall she could see, through the open door of the front room, her mother deep in conversation with Heinrich von Kessel, who had been a Social Democrat city councilor with her after the war. Rebecca walked quickly past without speaking. Her twelve-year-old sister, Lili, was doing homework at the kitchen table. She could hear the grand piano in the drawing room: her brother, Walli, was playing a blues. Rebecca went upstairs to the two rooms she and Hans shared.
The first thing she saw when she walked into the room was Hans’s model. He had been working on this throughout their year of marriage. He was making a scale model of the Brandenburg Gate out of matchsticks and glue. Everyone he knew had to save their spent matches. The model was almost done, and stood on the small table in the middle of the room. He had made the central arch and its wings, and was working on the quadriga, the four-horse chariot on the top, which was much more difficult.
He must have been bored, Rebecca thought bitterly. No doubt the project was a way of passing the evenings he was obliged to spend with a woman he did not love. Their marriage was like the model, a flimsy copy of the real thing.
She went to the window and stared out at the rain. After a minute, a tan Trabant 500 pulled up at the curb, and Hans got out.
How dare he come here now?
Rebecca flung open the window, heedless of the rain blowing in, and yelled: “Go away!”
He stopped on the wet sidewalk and looked up.
Rebecca’s eye lit on a pair of his shoes on the floor beside her. They had been hand-made by an old shoemaker Hans had found. She picked one up and threw it at him. It was a good shot and, although he dodged, it hit the top of his head.
“You mad cow!” he yelled.
Walli and Lili came into the room. They stood in the doorway, staring at their grown-up sister as if she had become a different person, which she probably had.
“You got married on the orders of the Stasi!” Rebecca shouted out of the window. “Which of us is mad?” She threw the other shoe and missed.
Lili said in awestruck tones: “What are you doing?”
Walli grinned and said: “This is crazy, man.”
Outside, two passersby stopped to watch, and a neighbor appeared on a doorstep, gazing in fascination. Hans glared at them. He was proud, and it was agony for him to be made a fool of in public.
Rebecca looked around for something else to throw at him, and her gaze fell on the matchstick model of the Brandenburg Gate.
It stood on a plywood board. She picked it up. It was heavy, but she could manage.
Walli said: “Oh, wow.”
Rebecca carried the model to the window.
Hans shouted: “Don’t you dare! That belongs to me!”
She rested the plywood base on the windowsill. “You ruined my life, you Stasi bully!” she shouted.
One of the women bystanders laughed, a scornful, jeering cackle that rang out over the sound of the rain. Hans flushed with rage and looked around, trying to identify its source, but he could not. To be laughed at was the worst form of torture for him.
He roared: “Put that model back, you bitch! I worked on it for a year!”
“That’s how long I worked on our marriage,” Rebecca replied, and she lifted the model.
Hans yelled: “I’m ordering you!”
Rebecca heaved the model through the window and let it go.
It turned over in midair, so that the board was uppermost and the quadriga below. It seemed to take a long time to drop, and Rebecca felt suspended in a moment of time. Then it hit the paved front yard with a sound like paper being crumpled. The model exploded and the matchsticks scatted outward in a spray, then came down on the wet stones and stuck, forming a sunburst of destruction. The board lay flat, everything on it crushed to nothing.
Hans stared at it for a long moment, his mouth open in shock.
He recovered himself and pointed a finger up at Rebecca. “You listen to me,” he said, and his voice was so cold that suddenly she felt afraid. “You’ll regret this, I tell you,” he said. “You and your family. You’ll regret it for the rest of your lives. And that’s a promise.”
Then he got back into his car and drove away.
What People are Saying About This
“Just as potent, engrossing, and prolix as the opening opus, Fall of Giants. [Follett’s] dedication and ability to keep so many plots spinning while delivering a story that educates, entertains…Will leave fans eagerly awaiting the trilogy’s crowning capstone."
“It’s a book that will suck you in, consume you for days or weeks… then let you out the other side both entertained and educated."
— USA Today
“Meticulously researched and deftly weaves together historical fact, fictional characters and engrossing storytelling.”
— Associated Press
"A tireless storyteller...grippingly told, and readable to the end."
—The New York Times Book Review
"Suspenseful, tightly constructed, sharply characterized, plot-driven...some of the biggest-picture fiction being written today."
—The Seattle Times
"Lively and entertaining."
—The Washington Post
"Epic yarns in prose"
—The Wall Street Journal
Meet the Author
Ken Follett burst into the book world with Eye of the Needle, an award-winning thriller and international bestseller. After several more successful thrillers, he surprised everyone with The Pillars of the Earth and its long-awaited sequel, World Without End, a national and international bestseller. Follett’s new, magnificent historical epic, the Century Trilogy, includes the bestselling Fall of Giants, Winter of the World, and Edge of Eternity. He lives in England with his wife, Barbara.
From the Paperback edition.
- Hertfordshire, England
- Date of Birth:
- June 5, 1949
- Place of Birth:
- Cardiff, Wales
- B.A. in Philosophy, University College, London, 1970
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews
Unfortunately, this book is terrible. I love historical fiction and Follett usually does it well. This time, instead a good story intertwined with what was occurring in real time, Follett allows the fictional characters to make history. The book is very poorly researched and is committed to preaching a political perspective at the expense of what really went on. All the interesting characters from the first two books contribute nothing and the new characters are not very interesting. If, as I did, you want to finish all three, wait until it goes on sale.
I rarely take the time to rate a book, but thought I may be able to save some people the time of reading this 1,000 page disappointment. I have read 5 Ken Follett books and he is one of my favorite authors. That being said, this book fell short of the standard I have come to expect. The story line seemed forced and in an attempt to cover too many historical events character development was thrown out the window. Despite all that, about 1/10 of the book seemed dedicated to cheating, affairs, “free love”, and undercover husbands. Ken Follett’s books always have this to some degree, but I had no idea I was sitting down to read a soap opera. I think almost every single character was involved in some sort of sex scandal, making this book predictable, repetitive, and completely ridiculous. Very disappointed. Despite this fluke of a book, I strongly recommend other Ken Follett books.
Very disappointed. Follett's political leanings are very obvious. I was really looking forward to this book after enjoying the first two books. Do not buy this book!
Rarely have I been so disappointed in an author's book as I am with Ken Follett's new release. I have read many of his books and have enjoyed most of them. Unfortunately, this newest offering goes to the bottom of the list. First, writing style: Did Mr. Follett actually write everything in this book? If so, his style has deteriorated badly. It is much below previous works in its almost sophomoric use of adverbs, short sentences and repetitive situations for the fictional characters. His verbal usage is significantly below standard of a mature writer, relying all too often on trite phrasing. This alone is enough reason for a "poor" rating. Secondly, character development: There is little variety in Mr. Follett's male characters and not much more in most of the female characters. Most of them are little more than stick figures of the various human characteristics they portray only fleetingly. Rebecca is one exception, although there is room for more depth. Walli is a sad cartoon of a rock star, drugs and all. The historical figures themselves are wooden, two-dimensional pictures of people who all had far more personality and layers than what is written in this book. Thirdly: historical presentation: I believe one of the biggest difficulties in trying to write a book of this scope is that there is far too much material to present and to treat with any depth and understanding. What worked so well in the first of the trilogy has become an unwieldy behemoth where nothing more than the barest facts can be included. Unfortunately, there is virtually nothing of the historical events themselves included beyond what is readily available online or through other readily available sources, all produced for mass regurgitation without critical considerations. Since one of my career positions was as a research writer for a museum of historical documents, I have some basis for knowing how and where to look "behind the scenes" at what various historical figures were writing, along with the circumstances surrounding the events about which they have written, to whom and why. That kind of writing takes painstaking research, going beyond the fluff we usually see and/or hear otherwise. There was nothing new in Mr. Follett's presentation of post-World War II history and much was glossed over. Indeed, any depth would have made this book 2000 pages long. I was ready to stop reading long before I reached the halfway point in the book but persevered, hoping for improvement and more variety in the characterizations. At least, by reading to the end, I was able to enjoy the one high point of the ponderous, poorly written tome - the fictional characters present at the destruction of the Berlin Wall. THAT was Ken Follett writing as he can write so well. At least it ended on a high note.
Follet usually deals with history very well, but this book is nothing other than a leftist propaganda treatise. The nuances of history are ignored by making the liberals the good guys and the conservatives the bad guys.
I've always ben a big fan of Ken Follet. However I can't quite swallow his personal version of 20th century history, where all the bad guys happen to be conservative and all the heros and underdogs are liberal. He lost me on this one.
I enjoyed all of Ken Follett's books, but Edge of Eternity was not one of them. I got to page 440 and stopped.. Why wast my time. I skimmed much too much. Some of the history was worth reading. I would not recommend this book.
This could have been a very good book however, Mr. Follett decided to become political to describe his characters as good if you were a liberal and bad if you were a conservative. Up to this point in his writing, I have not seen this attitude. So Sad. Dave Denning
Follett is one of my go to authors. I have read every book he has written. This is unfortunately his worst work. Character development was weak. Character situations were unbelievable and sophmoric. The preachy manner in which the author's personal politics came through was annoying. Not what I expected from Ken Follett. I finished the entire book. Not sure why. I dont know if I will be purchasing his next work.
The first few chapters were interesting, but it then turned into the Liberal Democrat revisionist history of the last 50 years. All of the Democratic presidents were portrayed as heroic, while all the Republican presidents were portrayed as criminals. The fall of the Berlin Wall was a key event in the book, and the only mention of Reagan's "tear down this wall" speech was after the wall had fallen, and even then the importance of the speech was downplayed. Being a white, Southern, Republican, it was also disappointing that every single white Southerner in the book was an evil racist. Every single black person was a saint, but that doesn't bother me. As another reviewer stated, life is more nuanced than that. There are good and bad people on all sides.
I believe I've read all of Ken Follett's books, some more than once. He's one of the great historical fiction writers out there. I truly enjoyed the first two in the Century Trilogy but this one was nothing more than a thousand page thinly veiled political rant. Apparently the liberals only flaw is that they can't keep it in their pants but conservatives are all flat out evil. Follett then has a deeply skewed view of history regarding the Civil Rights era, the Vietnam War, and the fall of Communism. An exchange between a couple of the characters at the end of the book discussing who deserves credit for the Berlin Wall coming down is literally a laugh out loud moment that has you disbelieving Follett actually went that far and wasn't even subtle about it. I look forward to his next book, which will be a follow up to the Pillars of the Earth story line, but I'll be waiting on reviews before picking up his next historical fiction novel. VERY disappointing read.
I love the genre, but this conclusion of the trilogy was wooden and not well developed. Dialogue was at times awkward, and the author was compelled to frequently remind the reader what happened just a few hundred pages earlier. The topics highlighted during each presidency and the "fictional" dialogue of the characters also overloaded the author's political bias and distorted what could have been good historical fiction, had it been accurate and even handed.
This was the worst writing I've read from the author. I read directly from book.two to book three, and was amazed by the lack of character depth as from the other novels. I am so spurned by this book. Follett rushed through the second half of the century omitting much between Kennedy and Regan. Vietnam started, but never ended. Follett's horrid rendering of the strength and skills of the American politburo is retching. He wrote America as bumbling and irrelevant with an unabashed extreme liberal bias that is inexcusable. I'll finish the Kingsbridge series, maybe, but I'll never read another publication of his again for fear of blatant bias. Here democrats and staff are golden while Republicans need hand jobs from prostitutes. Sadly the book is garbage.
What a disappointment this book turned out to be. I was half afraid this would happen when the characters in the second fo the trilogy started to become unbelievable. By this third book they were totally so. Because it was history the plot was apparent of course, but in this case it was amateurish. I did enjoy the first book a lot and the second almost as much, but save your money and your time unless you don't know your history.
For an historical fiction ,99%of the sexual scenes were trashy and added nothing to the book. I was truely dissappointed. Follett trivialized what could have been a great historical novel with all the sex garbage!! What a waste.
very disappointing--no where near as good as the previous two novels
Over the years I have thoroughly enjoyed Follett's first two books in this series and I was looking forward to this last of the trilogy. Unfortunately, it was disappointing. I found the characters to be shallow, and the story thin. I lived through many of the events covered in the book: President Kennedy's death, Viet Nam, Martin Luther King, Bobby Kennedy, etc. The portrayal of each of these events was even thinner than the character development. Maybe having been part of the events gave me more insight than Follett was able to put into the book without over inflating the final size. I have to also say, that after a while the sex got boring. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy sex as much as any other guy, but after a while I got tired of the repetitive bedroom scenes. A truly great writer does not need to resort to this tactic to keep his/her readers interested. More attention should have been paid to the historical events and character development. This could have been a terrific book. It is not.
Recidivist history of the US by a socialist. Reads like a cheap romance.
I have enjoyed many of the author's books in the past, from Eye of the Needle, Key to Rebecca and at least 20 more, including the first two books of the Century Trilogy. Hence, I waited patiently for the final volume, Edge of Eternity. In short, the last volume was disappointing. The book is fiction but does refer to historical figures, including Ronald Reagan. If you admire Reagan, for example for his famous speech "Tear down this wall Mr. Gorbachev, it is better to skip this book. If you think based on standard history, that actions by President Regan, helped end the Cold War, with out a shot being fired --don't waste your time or money on this book. With this book, the author has lost me as a fan.
I am not a hard core Follett follower, only becoming aware of his work when I was given Pillars of the Earth as a gift 2007. I thoroughly enjoyed that work and read the first two books of The Century Trilogy along with the sequel to Pillars. One of the key themes in each of the previous works was class warfare and it was clear to me in Fall of Giants that the author viewed liberal causes as the righteous path, and it is hard to disagree based upon the conditions and environment of that era. Perhaps it was the distance of time that separated those events that I have no personal knowledge of that allowed me to be sympathetic to the characters and their cause and accept them, fighting the good fight. But the third book failed miserably at this, and to steal a term from the television business, jumped the shark. In Edge of Eternity, the three establishment characters are outsized disappointments topped off by bumbling sexual frustration which no doubt represents failure in the area society and most judge an individual at the core level. Those fighting the establishment are brave and of course have passionate, fulfilling and satisfying sexual encounters representing success and vindication for their struggle. I tried to keep an open mind while reading the book, and realized he was using this as his vehicle along with rock and roll and youth’s desire for freedom as the force that brought down communism to convey his message, but I was not able to accept his view. Did those things have a role, probably so, but not as THE FORCE he gave them. I found it interesting that JFK still retains status as an idol, LBJ took some lumps, Nixon, well he was Nixon, but I do not recall Carter and his failed term even being mentioned before Reagan is taken to task. Follett could have done a much better job, perhaps maybe even made it less obvious with his points, but he didn’t. I am sure that my own personal view of the events he described in the third book created some of the conflict that I have with it. Having lived within the time he wrote about and having my own opinions is just part of it. Perhaps if I had lived at the turn of the last century I would have held a different view of the first book in the series? Even though it closes out the trilogy, I could not recommend this to anyone, I have simply said, you will be disappointed when asked.
I used to enjoy KF books. This until he decided to fill in his book with his skewed political views. I got very upset since all those views are totally biased and not substantiated. At least when you read political books you have a large section of references where to check the information supporting points of view. I got so upset I never even finished the book and it is a very rare thing for me as when I do not like books I manage to finish. This time I cruised through the last 150 pages only to get more upset: I collected all KF books from my bookshelves and threw them in the trash. Will never buy his books again and you shouldn't either.
HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT! I asked for and got a B&N gift card for Christmas. I was so excited to get and read this book - I'd been waiting for months! Follett not only wrote a ridiculous diatribe of 1000+ pages against republicans/conservatives, he wrote a blame-America-First-and Always book. When writing about Bull Connor and Mayor Daley, no mention that they were both liberal democrats. When writing about the 1964 civil rights act, no mention that a higher percentage of republicans than democrats voted for it. And ridiculing President Reagan's demand to "tear down this wall" made me want to scream. I cannot believe I wasted my gift card for this tripe. I will never purchase another Follett book.
I agree with several other readers. I loved the first book of the series. The second was okay but not as good as the first. The third book was awful! Why any author thinks he /she has the right to charge $24.99 to express their unwanted political opinion on an unsuspecting consumer is beyond me. Follett's political ideology overshadowed his historical research. He reached overly broad conclusions in order to make his political point. I refuse to read any more of his works because of his overreaching political views.
I can see where a lot of folks loved loved loved Ken Follett until they found out he was a liberal. FYI, Stephen King is too.
I have read all of Ken Follett's books and was looking forward to this one. I have to say that that I was seriously disappointed. The liberal slant was so obvious and really annoying. I am not sure what he was trying to prove with how he wrote these characters but his portrayal of all conservatives as evil rose to the point of comical. His last two books had a liberal leaning but at least they were well written. This was just kind of sad and felt like a waste of my time. If you are going to use your time to read this, at least get it from the library so you don't waste your money too.