What a farce
I liked a trilogy of Orson Scott Card's and the premise in 'Empire' sounded interesting. But politics in the US has changed a lot just since he finished the book in 2006. And he didn't even have things quite straight for 2006! Card's pivotal character, A. Tennant, is the best thing in the book, and yet he is not fully realized. Just maddening hints at his true character and intentions. He is revealed in the early pages of the book as the genius with an obsession about how empires emerge. The other characters are smart, good-hearted, but so one dimensional that they can be manipulated endlessly. Many unanswered questions. The battle scenes were so obviously like a video game. Is that what literature is sinking to? Just super good guys and super bad guys with space-age weapons? The novel is doomed by Card's didacticism and his woeful mischaracterizations of progressives as well as conservatives. Michael Crighton's 'State of Fear', trying to discredit the science behind global warming, failed for the same reason. Both these fine, seasoned writers come off looking foolish. The divide between the two ideologies is very real, very old and very firmly imbedded in the minds and hearts of American culture. Card relied on sterotypes invented by the Mainstream Media and internet blogs. He needs to research more widely and be open to our vast diversity created by our centuries of free thinking. In 2006 and still today, the Corporate-owned Media are worthless as honest news sources and are mere toole of their bosses, who also control the government, regardless of party labels, with a few brave individual exceptions. Card's notion of the major intellectual institutions being dominated by the far left is not true today, if it ever was. The novel paints a false picture. There is no way Progressives 'aka liberals' would mount such a ridiculous 'coup'. Progressives are much too disorganized and anti-authoritarian to pull that off. They love to talk, not fight. The deep divide is not Red State/Blue State invented by the Media. And Card is right that it's not geographically based. It's not even urban vs. rural. It's super-capitalists run amuck 'all over the world' versus everybody else! But the catch-22 is a dirty little secret. The rest of us are also capitalists at heart - with a love of cars, clothes, fancy homes and stock holdings 'or the desire to have them' just like the obscenely wealthy CEOs we despise. Just a matter of degree. There is a growing movement to reject such materialistic values, however. Those people are the true progressives. There are many differences between 'left' and 'right' but the basic defining ones are hard-wired into each of us. Progressives are just that: They look forward with optimism to change. They see group consensus as a more effective way to solve problems. Conservatives prefer the status quo or at least - slow, controlled change. They value individualism more than community when the two are in conflict. They like the order and security of a hierarchical system of authority. And here's the clincher: Almost everyone has some of both progressive AND conservative in his or her view of the ideal society. If there's a real civil war in our future, it will be like a huge boil that bursts open. It will be chaos, the 'rebels' will be the desperate poor, and it will be a genocide. No, there will be no civil war with two sides having at it. The American Empire exists today. Everything is in place for the emperor. The Constitution has been already marginalized. But more likely, the USA will collapse of its own weight or something totally unpredictable will happen. It is fun to speculate, tho, isn't it?
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.