BN.com Gift Guide

Exploring the Da Vinci Code: Investigating the Issues Raised by the Book and Movie [NOOK Book]

Overview

Exploring the Da Vinci Code takes you on a fascinating journey to London, Paris, and California with Lee Strobel and Garry Poole as they investigate the claims made by Dan Brown in his novel, The Da Vinci Code. It provides quick, straightforward answers to the most troubling aspects of the popular novel and major motion picture, which is scheduled to release in theatres May 19, 2006. This outreach book is designed so readers can give multiple copies to friends, family, coworkers—anyone who may be struggling with ...
See more details below
Exploring the Da Vinci Code: Investigating the Issues Raised by the Book and Movie

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$2.99
BN.com price

Overview

Exploring the Da Vinci Code takes you on a fascinating journey to London, Paris, and California with Lee Strobel and Garry Poole as they investigate the claims made by Dan Brown in his novel, The Da Vinci Code. It provides quick, straightforward answers to the most troubling aspects of the popular novel and major motion picture, which is scheduled to release in theatres May 19, 2006. This outreach book is designed so readers can give multiple copies to friends, family, coworkers—anyone who may be struggling with the misconceptions fostered by The Da Vinci Code. Exploring the Da Vinci Code is not to be confused with Zondervan’s DVD Group discussion resource, Discussing the Da Vinci Code. The latter links a DVD to a group discussion guide and equips group members to personally combat the misunderstandings that many readers of The Da Vinci Code have.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780310867272
  • Publisher: Zondervan
  • Publication date: 1/4/2011
  • Sold by: Zondervan Publishing
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 112
  • Sales rank: 478,417
  • File size: 299 KB

Meet the Author

Lee Strobel was the award-winning legal editor of The Chicago Tribune and is the best-selling author of The Case for Faith, The Case for Christ, and The Case for a Creator, all of which have been made into documentaries by Lionsgate. With a journalism degree from the University of Missouri and a Master of Studies in Law degree from Yale, Lee wrote 3 Gold Medallion winners and the 2005 Book of the Year with Gary Poole.  He and his wife live in Colorado.  Visit Lee's website at: www.leestrobel.com.


 


As Willow Creek Community Church's key evangelism leader for over sixteen years, Garry Poole is the innovator of seeker small groups and a strategist of creative outreach initiatives. Passionate about reaching people for Christ, Garry and his team have trained thousands of leaders to launch seeker small groups in their own settings. His award-winning book, Seeker Small Groups, provides a detailed blueprint for facilitating small group discussions that assist spiritual seekers with investigating Christianity. He also wrote The Complete Book of Questions, a collection of 1001 conversation starters and numerous group study guides including The Three Habits of Highly Contagious Christians; The Tough Questions Series, and Experiencing the Passion of Jesus (with Lee Strobel) to accompany Mel Gibson’s film, The Passion of the Christ. In 2005, it became the first discussion guide ever to receive the prestigious Charles “Kip” Jordon Christian Book of the Year award. Garry lives in suburban Chicago.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Exploring the Da Vinci Code

Investigating the Issues Raised by the Book and Movie
By Lee Strobel Garry Poole

Zondervan

Copyright © 2006 Lee Strobel and Garry Poole
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-310-27372-2


Chapter One

WHAT CAN HISTORY REALLY TELL US?

Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes! Leonardo da Vinci

Breathtaking Lincoln Cathedral, towering atop Lindum Hill in a quaint community two hours by train north of London, can be seen from twenty miles away. Some say it's among the finest medieval buildings in all of Europe. Its edifice, parts of which date back to 1072, is awash in spotlights at night, creating a spectacular golden glow.

I pulled open the massive black door and walked inside. The cavernous sanctuary, with its arched ceilings and elegant stained glass, still functions as a church today. Exploring a long hallway, our footsteps echoing as we went, Garry and I came upon a small room to the right and opened the door, which creaked eerily on its hinges. Our eyes immediately were captured by an elegant statue along the wall-a finely carved marble image of a winged and bearded figure bearing a written proclamation. How ancient was it? Fifteenth century? Earlier?

I smiled and picked it up, easily holding it above my head. "Look!" I exclaimed. "Styrofoam!"

Sure enough, the statue was a clever fake. Next to it was amonument that purported to date back centuries-but it was made of plywood. And the stone wall with beautiful frescos painted on it? The whole thing was drawn on heavy canvas-including the stones themselves.

Ron Howard had been here.

As director of The Da Vinci Code movie, he had been faced with a challenge. The plot of the book climaxes with a confrontation at London's Westminster Abbey, but officials there refused to let Howard film his movie inside their historic walls. The reason, they said, is that the novel is filled with "factual errors" and was "theologically unsound."

So Howard went hunting for another ancient building that could pass for the interior of the 940-year-old Abbey. That brought him to Lincoln Cathedral.

Cathedral officials were critical of Brown's book too, calling it "speculative and far-fetched," and even heretical in places, "based on ideas put forward rather late in the church's history." Still, they opted to open their doors for the filming of three of the movie's scenes. "The book claims that the church has suppressed important facts about Jesus," the Cathedral's dean said in a statement. "The way to counter this accusation is to be open about the facts as we understand them and welcome vigorous debate."

Once inside, Hollywood did what it does best: create illusions. Phony paintings, crypts, and statues were skillfully designed and constructed. To the casual observer, they appeared every bit as real as the other historic artifacts in the medieval cathedral. On camera, they would undoubtedly fool viewers.

In a way, this harmless Hollywood trickery is a metaphor for the more insidious illusions that, according to Dan Brown, have fooled students of history for generations. His basic charge in The Da Vinci Code is that people have been misled and deceived by historical accounts about Jesus that have no basis in reality. History, Brown asserts, is written by the winners, who naturally paint themselves in positive ways while disparaging their defeated foes-and so we're left with a biased and tainted record that only tells one side of the story.

"Almost everything our fathers taught us about Christ," says a character in the novel, "is false."

What can we know for sure about history? How can we assess whether an ancient document is trustworthy? Are there legitimate criteria we can use to test historical claims? And what about some of the eye-popping historical allegations that Brown makes, such as his assertion that the Priory of Sion has been protecting the secrets about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and their descendants for centuries? Or that it was Emperor Constantine, an ersatz Christian, who deified Jesus, collated the Bible, and destroyed competing gospels in order to eliminate the real story about Jesus' identity?

I placed a call to Dr. Paul Maier, a well-respected and straight-shooting professor of ancient history, and made an appointment to question him about these issues. It was time to get some answers.

1. What was your overall reaction to The Da Vinci Code? What are three things you liked most about the book or movie? What did you like least-and why?

2. Are there any questions, issues, or concerns about historical Christianity that The Da Vinci Code raises in your mind? If so, what are they specifically?

3. Can historical events be verified? Why or why not? What do you think determines whether or not a historical event actually occurred?

Dr. Maier, a wiry and feisty professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University, has achieved acclaim as a scholar, teacher, and author of both academic and popular writings. Since earning his doctorate at the University of Basel in Switzerland in 1957, he has become a recognized expert on ancient Near East history, ancient Greek and Roman history, and Christianity and the Roman Empire. He has written more than 250 articles and reviews for professional journals, including the Harvard Theological Review. His teaching awards include Professor of the Year from the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education.

Maier has written such books as In the Fullness of Time, which examines secular evidence about Jesus and early Christianity; a new translation and commentary on the first-century historian Josephus; and a similar book on Eusebius, the first church historian. He's also the author of historical novels, including Pontius Pilate and The Flames of Rome. His thriller A Skeleton in God's Closet became the top national bestseller in religious fiction and led to a sequel, More Than a Skeleton.

Maier has more than just a passing interest in The Da Vinci Code. Together with Hank Hanegraaff, host of the popular national radio program The Bible Answer Man, he conducted an in-depth analysis of Brown's novel. From that research, he and Hanegraaff wrote The Da Vinci Code: Fact or Fiction?, which provides answers to historical issues raised by the book.

When we rendezvoused in California, sitting across from each other in a borrowed room, I opened my copy of The Da Vinci Code and read aloud this quote: "History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated and the winner writes the history books-books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe."

I looked up at Maier. "Do you agree with that?" I asked. "Is history always written by the winners?"

Maier didn't hesitate. "No, the whole premise is false," he declared. "I can give you some interesting instances where history was written by the losers. For example, one of the greatest civil wars in the ancient world was the famous Peloponnesian War. [Its history] was written by Thucydides, who was an Athenian, and the Athenians lost the war. Sparta won. And yet, Thucydides wrote a very objective treatment of what happened in the Peloponnesian War."

With that quick refutation of one of Brown's major premises, our conversation continued to unfold:

Q: What determines whether a historical event actually occurred? How do you know, as a historian, that any event in ancient history really took place?

Maier: There are various methods. First of all, "multiple attestations," or different authors writing about the same event, is one criteria for authenticity. For example, we have three different versions of the great fire of Rome in 64 AD. Basically, all three of them attest that Rome was totally destroyed, or at least that Rome was only partially destroyed, so this does not deny that the great fire of Rome actually happened. We know it did happen.

Q: So there might be some differences in secondary details, but the core is trustworthy because you have multiple reports on the same event?

Maier: Exactly. Another interesting criterion is the "criterion of embarrassment." In other words, very often we can bring more truth out of a hostile source than a friendly one. A friendly source can beef up or exaggerate its particular role, but when a hostile source concedes something because everybody knows it really occurred, then the ancient historian concludes that's the truth.

There are other methods of determining the truth behind historical events as well. Archaeologists give us hard evidence that sheds light on a particular source, like geographical data and background. If the setting of the event is accurate and one can go see it today, we know it's true. Flavius Josephus, the famous first-century Jewish historian, talks about the siege of Masada. Well, you can go to Masada today and see the very snake path that he talked about two thousand years ago on the east side of that great crag. This confirms that Josephus was not just making this up.

Q: But as a Christian, doesn't that bias your view of history?

Maier: I try the best I possibly can to be objective in historical research. I think every true historian is digging for the truth. In the case of archaeology or ancient historical research, we look for the truth and let the chips fall where they may. And what is so incredibly interesting about the chips in the case of Christianity is how they fall on the side of supporting the biblical record.

Q: What about the bias of the person in ancient history who is doing the reporting? You mentioned that Josephus was a Jewish historian of the first century. He certainly had his biases. How do you sort through that as a historian?

Maier: You've got to learn to put on filters. For example, we know that Josephus in the War of the Jews was very partisan to the Roman side and he tries to favor his own benefactors in Rome. So we must neutralize that somewhat in reverse against his admiration for things Roman. Now, later on, he's a little more honest when he does the Antiquities. And so, you always try to check out the source's bias, and then put a reverse negative filter on that to get at the truth.

Maier's basic point-that historians use sensible and proven approaches to figure out what really happened in ancient times-did make sense to me. I was particularly fascinated by his comment about how these approaches tend to support the biblical record-but I knew I'd be delving deeper into this topic in future interviews. In the meantime, I turned our conversation to a historical claim by Brown that a clandestine organization called the Priory of Sion has spent centuries guarding the secret about the descendants of Jesus. I was curious about how well this assertion would withstand a historian's scrutiny.

"The book makes the claim that this information about the Priory is contained in secret documents that were discovered in the National French Library," I said. "Would you not concede that those documents do exist?"

Clearly, I had struck a nerve. "The documents exist-but they're all fraudulent!" Maier exclaimed. "On the first page of The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown lists two items as 'FACT': Opus Dei and the Priory of Sion. Now, this is his method. He will offer a little truth-maybe 15 to 20 percent-and the rest is falsehood. But people will think it's all true because they know that part of it is true. The claim in The Da Vinci Code is that the Priory of Sion was founded in 1099 AD in Jerusalem. Well, the fact of the matter is that it was founded in 1956, in Paris, by a crook and forger named Pierre Plantard, who planted secret documents in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris."

Maier was gravely offended by the notion. "The central strand in The DaVinci Code is based on fraud," he said. "This is just incredible!"

Indeed, it was amazing! "So the documents are real; the problem is that they're phony," I said.

"They're totally phony!" he replied. "Exactly!"

Suddenly, it was as if a crucial thread had been pulled out of The Da Vinci Code and its central premise began to unravel. So many of its allegations, including the supposed involvement of Leonardo Da Vinci as a Grand Master of the Priory, can be traced back to counterfeit documents that have absolutely no basis in reality. And with the claims about the Priory being so confidently labeled as "fact" by Brown, what repercussions does this have for the overall credibility of his work?

"When you see this as a historian," I asked Maier, "what does that do to you?"

"Well, I worry about the truth. I really do," Maier replied. "What happens if a majority of the readers of this novel will believe all the lies that are included in the second half of the book? Will this become the majority opinion? And will those historians who are really seeking the truth be crowded out in the future?

"Actually, I am far more furious at The Da Vinci Code as a professor of ancient history than I am as a Christian. The church has been attacked for two thousand years now. Well, what's new? But I cannot stand it when universally accepted facts of the past are falsified. This I cannot take."

(Continues...)


Excerpted from Exploring the Da Vinci Code by Lee Strobel Garry Poole Copyright ©2006 by Lee Strobel and Garry Poole. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Contents
About the Authors 6
Introduction 7
Chapter 1 What Can History Really Tell Us? 11
Chapter 2 Can We Trust the Four Gospels? 32
Chapter 3 What’s the Role of Women in Christianity? 54
Chapter 4 Is Jesus the Son of God? 76
Appendix 1 For Further Study 97
Appendix 2 FAQs about The Da Vinci Code 98
Appendix 3 Evidence for the True Identity of Jesus 104
Read More Show Less

First Chapter

C h a p t e r 1
What Can History
Really Tell Us?
Blinding ignorance does mislead us.
O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!
Leonardo da Vinci
Breathtaking Lincoln Cathedral, towering atop Lindum
Hill in a quaint community two hours by train north of
London, can be seen from twenty miles away. Some say it's among the finest medieval buildings in all of Europe.
Its edifice, parts of which date back to 1072, is awash in spotlights at night, creating a spectacular golden glow.
I pulled open the massive black door and walked inside. The cavernous sanctuary, with its arched ceilings and elegant stained glass, still functions as a church today.
Exploring a long hallway, our footsteps echoing as we went, Garry and I came upon a small room to the right and opened the door, which creaked eerily on its hinges.
Our eyes immediately were captured by an elegant statue along the wall --- a finely carved marble image of a winged and bearded figure bearing a written proclamation. How ancient was it? Fifteenth century? Earlier?
I smiled and picked it up, easily holding it above my head. 'Look!' I exclaimed. 'Styrofoam!'
Sure enough, the statue was a clever fake. Next to it was a monument that purported to date back centuries ---
but it was made of plywood. And the stone wall with beautiful frescos painted on it? The whole thing was drawn on heavy canvas --- including the stones themselves.
Ron Howard had been here.
As director of The Da Vinci Code movie, he had been faced with a challenge. The plot of the book climaxes with a confrontation at London's Westminster Abbey,
but officials there refused to let Howard film his movie inside their historic walls. The reason, they said, is that the novel is filled with 'factual errors' and was 'theologically unsound.'
So Howard went hunting for another ancient building that could pass for the interior of the 940-year-old
Abbey. That brought him to Lincoln Cathedral.
Cathedral officials were critical of Brown's book too,
calling it 'speculative and far-fetched,' and even heretical in places, 'based on ideas put forward rather late in the church's history.' Still, they opted to open their doors for the filming of three of the movie's scenes. 'The book claims that the church has suppressed important facts about
Jesus,' the Cathedral's dean said in a statement. 'The way to counter this accusation is to be open about the facts as we understand them and welcome vigorous debate.'
Once inside, Hollywood did what it does best: create illusions. Phony paintings, crypts, and statues were skill fully designed and constructed. To the casual observer,
they appeared every bit as real as the other historic artifacts in the medieval cathedral. On camera, they would undoubtedly fool viewers.
In a way, this harmless Hollywood trickery is a metaphor for the more insidious illusions that, according to Dan Brown, have fooled students of history for generations. His basic charge in The Da Vinci Code is that people have been misled and deceived by historical accounts about Jesus that have no basis in reality. History,
Brown asserts, is written by the winners, who naturally paint themselves in positive ways while disparaging their defeated foes --- and so we're left with a biased and tainted record that only tells one side of the story.
'Almost everything our fathers taught us about
Christ,' says a character in the novel, 'is false.'
What can we know for sure about history? How can we assess whether an ancient document is trustworthy?
Are there legitimate criteria we can use to test historical claims? And what about some of the eye-popping historical allegations that Brown makes, such as his assertion that the Priory of Sion has been protecting the secrets about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and their descendants for centuries? Or that it was Emperor Constantine, an ersatz Christian,
who deified Jesus, collated the Bible,
and destroyed competing gospels in order to eliminate the real story about Jesus' identity?
I placed a call to Dr. Paul Maier, a well-respected and straight-shooting professor of ancient history, and made an appointment to question him about these issues. It was time to get some answers.
1. What was your overall reaction to The Da Vinci Code?
What are three things you liked most about the book or movie? What did you like least --- and why?
2. Are there any questions, issues, or concerns about historical
Christianity that The Da Vinci Code raises in your mind? If so, what are they specifically?
Gauging Historical Accuracy
'Many historians now believe (as do I) that in gauging the historical accuracy of a given concept, we should first ask ourselves a far deeper question: How historically accurate is history itself?'
Dan Brown
3. Can historical events be verified? Why or why not?
What do you think determines whether or not a historical event actually occurred?
Dr. Maier, a wiry and feisty professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University, has achieved acclaim as a scholar, teacher, and author of both academic and popular writings. Since earning his doctorate at the University of
Basel in Switzerland in 1957, he has become a recognized expert on ancient Near East history, ancient Greek and
Roman history, and Christianity and the Roman Empire.
He has written more than 250 articles and reviews for professional journals, including the Harvard Theological
Review. His teaching awards include Professor of the Year from the Council for the Advancement and Support of
Education.
Maier has written such books as In the Fullness of Time,
which examines secular evidence about Jesus and early
Christianity;
a new translation and commentary on the first-century historian Josephus; and a similar book on
Eusebius, the first church historian. He's also the author of historical novels, including Pontius Pilate and The
Flames of Rome. His thriller A Skeleton in God's Closet became the top national bestseller in religious fiction and led to a sequel, More Than a Skeleton.
Maier has more than just a passing interest in The Da
Vinci Code. Together with Hank Hanegraaff, host of the popular national radio program The Bible Answer Man,
he conducted an in-depth analysis of Brown's novel. From that research, he and Hanegraaff wrote The Da Vinci
Code: Fact or Fiction?, which provides answers to historical issues raised by the book.
When we rendezvoused in California, sitting across from each other in a borrowed room, I opened my copy of The Da Vinci Code and read aloud this quote: 'History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated and the winner writes the history books --- books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe.'
I looked up at Maier. 'Do you agree with that?' I
asked. 'Is history always written by the winners?'
Maier didn't hesitate. 'No, the whole premise is false,'
he declared. 'I can give you some interesting instances where history was written by the losers. For example,
one of the greatest civil wars in the ancient world was the famous Peloponnesian War. [Its history] was written by Thucydides, who was an Athenian, and the Athenians lost the war. Sparta won. And yet, Thucydides wrote a very objective treatment of what happened in the Peloponnesian
War.'
With that quick refutation of one of Brown's major premises, our conversation continued to unfold:
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 5
( 4 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(4)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews
  • Posted April 16, 2011

    Excellently presented

    Well written document defending the bible truths and dispelling Brown's unfounded claims and skewed historical references.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 5, 2012

    Know Of What Thou Speakth

    Bright factual light on the bizarre phenomenon that is the Code. The truth far more beautiful, powerful, historical and interesting than marketable fantasy!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 23, 2012

    Enlightening

    Provides the facts needed to make an informed decision and proves that the book and movie are not based on fact, and nothing but a work of fiction.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 10, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)