Federalism & Rights

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
Buy Used
Buy Used from BN.com
(Save 25%)
Item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging.
Condition: Used – Good details
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 94%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (14) from $1.99   
  • New (6) from $32.31   
  • Used (8) from $1.99   


The authors of this engaging book discuss whether federalism promotes or undermines rights. With emerging democracies in Europe and elsewhere currently attempting to design constitutions that combine effective government, recognition of ethnic diversity within their populations, and protection of individual rights, the importance of these questions cannot be overstated. The authors examine both the theoretical perspectives on the relationship between federalism and rights, and the historical and contemporary relationship between federalism and rights in the United States. The contributors to this volume analyze the U.S. federal system as a potential model for contemporary constitution-makers as well as explore how its system can serve as a cautionary example. Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Federalism. Contributors include: Dorthy Toth Beasley; Irwin Cotler; Talbolt Dölemberte; Daniel J. Elazar; A.E. Dick Howard; Gary J. Jacobsohn; Koen Lenaerts; Jean Yarborough; Michael P. Zuckert.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Amy L. Toro
Federalism was born in the eighteenth century, a legitimate child of modern democracy. In its adolescence, it ran with the wrong crowd. Its reputation as a co-conspirator in the perpetuation of slavery and the denial of basic civil rights to nonwhite Americans kept federalism out of proper "rights" circles. Given its illustrious credentials, however, the time has come to return federalism to its proper position as a protector of rights. This is the message (with some exceptions) conveyed by Federalism and Rights, a collection of scholarly essays edited by Ellis Katz and G. Alan Tarr. Professors Tarr and Katz ask in their introduction "Does federalism promote or undermine rights?" (ix). An important question in light of current experiments in federalism around the world, its answer remains illusive. Yet this collection of essays, written by professors and judges from the United States, Europe and Canada, seeks to answer the question from theoretical, historical and doctrinal angles and provides many insights certainly worthy of further exploration. The reader quickly learns that questions of federalism cannot be answered without also addressing questions about the nature of democracy and self-governance, the origins of rights, the role for group rights and more. The collection begins with essays by two prominent scholars in the field, A.E. Dick Howard and Daniel J. Elazar. Professor Howard defines federalism as "not simply formal federalism, but a cluster of related values--federalism, localism, pluralism, [and] diversity" (11)--and then provides an excellent short review (invaluable to anyone unfamiliar with the topic) of the pluses and minuses of federalism that covers a range of topics from the value of civil participation to "[t]he tyranny of small places." He concludes that despite the "dark chapters" (25) of federalism, one "might draw an idea or two from American federalism." (26) Professor Elazar defines federalism as "more than simply intergovernmental relations" and more than "the linking of constituent entities into larger wholes to maintain both self-rule and shared-rule." (2) Rather it is "partnership and power sharing on a non-centralized basis through discussion and deliberation" that "creates a balancing of interests, voices and diversity in such a way that there is no permanent majority, but rather all majorities are aggregates of the various minorities that express their interests." (2) Elazar uses this definition to help the reader understand how federalism stands along side the other two "most important inventions of modern democratic government . . . the protection of individual rights, and the idea of civil society." (1) Elazar asserts that with the exception of slavery and civil rights, federalism and rights "have actually complemented each other in the development of a more successful, a more democratic, a more peaceful, a more just, and a more progressive civil society." (7) But rights must be linked to obligations to preserve the public good and to provide balance among the three pillars of democracy. Professor Gary Jacobsohn discusses universal and positivist notions of rights and how these different conceptions influence our views of federalism, providing a very helpful discussion of this issue as debated by contemporary luminaries from Ronald Dworkin to Robert Bork. If "rootedness of community" is "surely one of the most treasured values secured by federalism," Jacobsohn asks whether ascriptive representation would be an appropriate modern substitute for the geographic representation of federalism and answers "no." It would reflect "a wholly different conception of rights," because although the framers were "defining distinct communities with distinct interests," they did so in a way that "the nature of the interests were such that the peopleÆs rights were not linked to their deepest primordial attachments." (47) A move to ascriptive representation would create "an unfriendly constitutional environment for the enhancement of those deliberative processes that distinguish the rights of democratic citizenship." (48) If federalism and rights are as compatible as the essays above suggest, then why do we (meaning most 20th century Americans) think they arenÆt? Professor Jean Yarbrough explains that both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had similar conceptions of rights, but disagreed about the threat to those rights, with the Federalists fearing local oppression and the Anti-Federalists fearing centralized oppression. What distinguishes them from us is our inattention to what were their central concerns: "the distribution of political power, the meaning of limited government, and how the right of self-government could best be secured." (58) These questions, which clearly have implications for rights and liberties, are given "short shrift today." (58) Professor Michael Zuckert reminds us that natural rights philosophy was a prerequisite to modern federalism. Then, through his analysis of American history and the ideas of Madison, Hamilton, Field and Bingham, he concludes that different versions of federalism are more compatible with rights than others. Neither dual federalism nor a unitary system promotes rights. In contrast, the model of "corrective federalism," a system that would provide a national check on state laws, would also provide both protection of rights and the benefits of federalism. Judge Lenaerts discusses how the European Community developed basic building blocks of federalism, such as the relationship between Community law and national courts that enforce it and ensuring uniformity of application across nations. In particular, he points to the creation and recognition of private rights under the Community treaties and legislation against the individual national governments as a critical part of creating a system of federalism. Lenaerts notes, however, the other side of the coin--that people may be derived of rights held under national law in order to achieve the market integration goal of the EEC. The realities of the European Community require that rights may need to be balanced or harmonized as the federal structure takes hold. Professor Irwin ColterÆs description of CanadaÆs balance between federalism and rights bears some resemblance to the balancing noted by Judge Lenaerts. Colter takes CanadaÆs 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms as his centerpiece. He concludes that prior to 1982 "[t]he best protection" of rights "came from the dialects of legal federalism." Whenever a statute (usually a provincial law) violated civil liberties such that it particularly offended judicial sensibilities," (180) the courts would use federalism as a tool for striking down the law. For the period after the Charter, Colter finds that the relationship between the new written bill of rights and federalism has been largely contingent on the politics and culture of Canada. He also focuses on the defeat of the Charlottetown Accord at the polls, a provision designed "æto bring Quebec back into the constitutional process with honour and enthusiasm.Æ" (186) The two remaining essays draw their inspiration from Justice BrennanÆs notion of independent state grounds. Georgia Judge Dorothy Todd Beasley provides a positive spin in the context of privacy rights. She examines the interplay of state and federal interpretations of the right to privacy, suggesting that we pay attention to what goes on at the state level because that is where dynamic constitutional interpretation is taking place. While the U.S. Constitution provides an "inner zone" of rights, the action in the rights field is "on the edges." Former ABA President Talbot DÆAlemberte is sympathetic in theory but skeptical about how well the state courts can do as protectors of rights in light of the majoritarian influences over state courts and problems of corruption and incompetence at the state court level. The editors have made a laudable effort to tie these diverse and interesting essays together, yet the reader is not left with a truly coherent picture. At one level, we all know what "federalism" is. Yet each author has his or her subtle and particular meaning for federalism, sometimes explicit (e.g. Professor HowardÆs and Professor ElazarÆs) and sometimes implicit. This problem is particularly acute when we are talking not just about U.S. federalism but about federalisms around the world. A similar problem emerges with respect to "rights," which these essays together describe as the right of self-governance, traditional negative rights, the right of privacy, statutory rights and more. Thus, although in theory answering the same question, the authors sometimes appear to be talking about different things. Nonetheless, if the reader treads carefully with attention to explicit and implicit definitions, he or she will find the reading experience a rich and more rewarding one. After all, the choice of definitions itself is interesting and challenging work. Finally, a word for the future? The essays as a whole make clear that a verdict in favor of federalism and its relationship to rights means that federalismÆs relationship to slavery and civil rights for African-Americans is an exception. If so, the question then becomes "why the exception?" An answer to this question would clearly enrich a theory of federalism and rights, and thereby prevent federalism from being deemed guilty by association. In addition, the presence of this "exception" begs the question of how we should choose between federalism and rights in those situations where they do conflict. Perhaps these are tasks that these authors (or others) would be interested in taking on.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780847680900
  • Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group Inc
  • Publication date: 12/19/1995
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Pages: 234
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 0.53 (d)

Table of Contents

1 Federalism, Diversity, and Rights 1
2 Does Federalism Secure or Undermine Rights? 11
3 Contemporary Constitutional Theory, Federalism, and the Protection of Rights 29
4 Federalism and Rights in the American Founding 57
5 Toward a Corrective Federalism: The United States Constitution, Federalism, and Rights 75
6 Federalism and the Protection of Individual Rights: The American State Constitutional Perspective 101
7 Rights and Federalism: An Agenda to Advance the Vision of Justice Brennan 123
8 Federalism and Rights in the European Community 139
9 Can the Center Hold?: Federalism and Rights in Canada 173
Index 193
Contributors 207
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)