Fixing Intelligence: For a More Secure America


William Odom is the highest-ranking member of the United States Intelligence Community ever to write a book outlining fundamental restructuring of this vast network of agencies, technology, and human agents. In the wake of 9/11, Odom has revised and updated a powerful critique he wrote several years ago for staffs of the U.S. congressional committee overseeing the vast American intelligence bureaucracy. His recommendations for revamping this essential component of American security are now available for general ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (35) from $1.99   
  • New (5) from $9.74   
  • Used (30) from $1.99   
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any coupons and promotions
Seller since 2007

Feedback rating:



New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

Gift quality, Fine. 8vo. A superior copy in new condition. Clean, unmarked pages. Good binding and cover. Hardcover and dust jacket. Ships daily.

Ships from: Boonsboro, MD

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Seller since 2006

Feedback rating:


Condition: New
Hardcover New 100% satisfaction guaranteed. No Remainder Mark, No Damage. Ship twice daily.

Ships from: Plano, TX

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:


Condition: New
2003 Hardcover New 0300099762. BRAND NEW! No remainder mark.; 9.10 X 6.20 X 1 inches; 272 pages.

Ships from: Blairstown, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:


Condition: New
Hardcover New 0300099762 This is a hardcover book with dust jacket.

Ships from: Staten Island, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:


Condition: New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Sort by
Fixing Intelligence: For a More Secure America

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$11.49 price
(Save 42%)$20.00 List Price


William Odom is the highest-ranking member of the United States Intelligence Community ever to write a book outlining fundamental restructuring of this vast network of agencies, technology, and human agents. In the wake of 9/11, Odom has revised and updated a powerful critique he wrote several years ago for staffs of the U.S. congressional committee overseeing the vast American intelligence bureaucracy. His recommendations for revamping this essential component of American security are now available for general readers as well as for policymakers.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

The New York Times
The book builds on a study that Odom, an adjunct professor at Yale University and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, completed in 1997. He offers a cogent if sometimes labored primer on how the intelligence community works (and doesn't work) and why its labyrinth of competing agencies has impeded the flow of information within the government. He traces the roots of modern American intelligence to the fallout over Pearl Harbor and the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1947. For the last 40 years, he says, the intelligence community ''has remained essentially unchanged,'' unwilling because of bureaucratic intransigence and proprietary turf wars to make the structural reforms needed to keep it relevant and effective. — Eric Litchblau
The Washington Post
In Fixing Intelligence, William Odom dissects this bureaucratic jellyfish with remarkable precision. — Lorraine Adams
Publishers Weekly
"The weakness of U.S. counterintelligence is difficult to exaggerate," says Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, and "patching and repairing here and there" won't solve the problem. Here he presents a far-reaching proposal for revamping the intelligence community, but it's no page-turner. Based on a report originally published in 1997 by a think tank, this book argues that intelligence gathering must be streamlined and cooperation increased among the many existing intelligence agencies. Perhaps Odom's most broad-ranging reform would be to create a national counterintelligence service, which he says would eliminate both competition among the various agencies and the gaps in knowledge that result from such competition. Elsewhere, he proposes broad changes in the makeup of both the FBI and the CIA. These ideas, while presented six years ago by the author, were rarely seriously discussed before September 11, and the author himself admits they are likely to meet resistance from the turf-protecting intelligence community. Odom makes a strong case that they are necessary to fight the changing threats to U.S. security. All too often, though, his language makes his points difficult to follow ("until greater resource management rationality is achieved, progress in integrating the tactical intelligence capabilities will be erratic and more by chance than design"). The book still reads too much like a report to command the wide readership its arguments warrant. It probably will, however, feed media discussions about intelligence reform and the new Homeland Security Department. (Mar.) Copyright 2003 Cahners Business Information.
Foreign Affairs
With a background in Army intelligence and as the former head of the National Security Agency, Odom is well placed to write about how the intelligence community might be usefully restructured following September 11, although this book is based on a 1997 study. Given the inherent limitations of books about organizational structures and an explicit reluctance on the part of Odom to discuss what intelligence agencies should be looking for rather than how, this is a forcefully and cogently argued book.

It is a necessary read for anyone concerned about the future of intelligence. Odom has an insider's sense of where the bureaucratic obstacles lie. He is clearly no fan of the CIA and damns the fbi when it comes to counterintelligence. His main proposals are to make the director of central intelligence completely independent of the CIA,to improve capacities for intelligence to support military operations, and to have a separate manager for each of the "collection disciplines" of signals, Imagery, and Human Intelligence.

Library Journal
The United States has a huge and powerful intelligence community, but its widespread flaws and gross failures have been highlighted since 9/11. Odom, a retired army general and former director of the National Security Agency, as well as the author of The Collapse of the Soviet Military, certainly has the high-level background needed for this book. He argues that our dysfunctional bureaucracy has led to unproductive turf battles, missed signals, fumbled opportunities, and expensive defeats. The new Homeland Security Department does not promise to end these dangerous problems. Chapters explain what the current setup is, where the problems are, and what might be done. Odom feels that there should be a separate counterintelligence unit that is not controlled by law enforcement personnel (as the FBI is) and that there need not be national managers of types of intelligence across the agencies. This book is a revision of the author's Modernizing Intelligence: Structure and Change for the 21st Century. As such, those knowledgeable about this subject will get the most out of it. Suitable for the intelligence collections of academic and large public libraries.-Daniel K. Blewett, Coll. of DuPage Lib., Glen Ellyn, IL Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780300099768
  • Publisher: Yale University Press
  • Publication date: 3/28/2003
  • Pages: 272
  • Product dimensions: 6.44 (w) x 9.24 (h) x 0.98 (d)

Read an Excerpt

Fixing Intelligence

By William E. Odom

Yale University Press

Copyright © 2003 Yale University
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-300-09976-2

Chapter One

Why Intelligence Reform?

Studies on intelligence reform have become a cottage industry. Why do we need another one? The answer is simple: most of them have attempted to doctor the symptoms, not the illness. The skeptical reader will object that this claim is not self-evident. But consider the public record.

Since Congress began investigating the Intelligence Community in the mid-1970s, the issue of intelligence reform has been raised repeatedly. During the Carter administration several initiatives were taken to implement some of the ideas produced by a committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D-Idaho), but no fundamental structural change occurred. Several times in the 1980s congressional oversight committees raised the reform issue, and Senator David Boren (D-Okla.) actually drafted legislation for several structural changes in the Intelligence Community. The House committee offered an alternative draft, but neither bill became law. In 1994 Senator John Warner (R-Va.) introduced legislation for a presidential commission to consider Intelligence Community reforms, and his bill became law. The resulting commission produced its report in early 1996. At the same time, several unofficial intelligence reform studies produced a flurry of activity and a wide variety of proposals.

Most of these reform efforts were inspired by sensational problems and episodes within the Intelligence Community, especially in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The Church committee was outraged by evidence that the CIA had attempted assassinations as part of covert actions in the past, and that the army's counterintelligence units had been used to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) keep track of antiwar movement leaders in the late 1960s and early 1970s. In the late 1980s, CIA covert actions in Central America and related activities by National Security Council staff members became the focus of renewed interest in intelligence reform. In the 1990s a number of incidents within the CIA, some having to do with personnel policies, others involving serious operational failures, and still others involving National Reconnaissance Office accountability for funds, brought the issue once again to congressional and public attention. The revelation in 1994 that Aldrich Ames of CIA's Directorate of Operations was a KGB agent produced a new and unprecedented level of concern.

After almost three decades of such episodes, no fundamental reform has occurred. Virtually all congressional investigations and reform studies have merely focused on the scandals and raised policy issues. For example, should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counterintelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists? Should the Intelligence Community budget be made public? And so on.

Almost none of the congressional committees' efforts at reform have addressed structural, organizational, and management issues. The major exception was Senator Boren's draft legislation that directed certain organizational changes, notably the creation of a national agency specializing in intelligence gleaned from photography, radar and more sophisticated imaging technologies imagery. A second partial exception was the 1996 organizational redesign proposal by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. A presidential commission of 1996 was instructed to examine the roles and missions of all the parts of the Intelligence Community-an invitation to deal with the structural issues-but it effectively declined the invitation.

One major feature of the Boren bill of the late 1980s, the creation of a national imagery agency, was actually accepted, and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency was created on 1 October 1996. A few additional but minor organizational steps have been taken in connection with the support staff for the director of central intelligence (DCI), formerly called the Intelligence Community Staff, now reorganized and renamed the Community Management Staff. Immediately after the Ames case broke, a flurry of activity centered on the traditional FBI-CIA dispute over counterintelligence turf, but interest soon abated.

With few exceptions, however, structural reform has been largely ignored. This is both strange and unfortunate. Several senators and House members proved reluctant to delve into the structural issues. The CIA and most directors of central intelligence have also resisted serious review of the structural problems. Thus a quiet and informal consensus that nothing structurally is wrong has prevailed, not only in Congress and in the Intelligence Community itself but in the presidential commission as well. Private-sector intelligence reform studies have followed suit.

The reasons why are not entirely clear, especially after Senator Boren opened the question of deeper problems in need of structural solutions. Senator Dennis DeConcini (D-Ariz.) complained that the problem was the "culture" at the CIA. Organizational cultures are normally the products of structural conditions. The accumulation of dangerously embarrassing incidents should have suggested to both administration officials and the congressional committees that they were looking at the symptoms, not the underlying ills.

Do serious structural and organizational problems really exist? One does not need access to classified information to answer yes. It would be extraordinarily surprising if there were not. That Aldrich Ames of the CIA and Robert Hanssen of the FBI could be recruited by the KGB, meet KGB case officers undetected for years, and make "dead drops" in Washington, D.C., under the nose of the FBI suggests that more than policy problems are involved. Little known to the public but notorious in military circles, failures in CIA intelligence contributed to the failed attempt in 1980 to rescue hostages in Iran and compromised operations in the Persian Gulf War. Other intelligence failures, as well as bureaucratic turf fights between the National Reconnaissance Office and other agencies, are evidence of deeper problems. Regardless of the individuals in charge, the structural arrangements and the problems they create have remained constant or have worsened.

Since the Intelligence Community structure settled into place some forty years ago, it has remained essentially unchanged. Meanwhile, technologies have advanced at a blinding pace over those decades. In the 1960s transoceanic communications were fairly limited. As a result, many technical intelligence activities had to be located in Europe and East Asia. A decade later, many of those activities had been moved to the United States, as space-based communication capabilities made possible radically different and more effective ways of gathering, processing and producing, and distributing intelligence. In the quarter-century since, communication has advanced exponentially in speed and sophistication. The communications revolution alone provides grounds for suspecting that major structural reforms in the Intelligence Community are long overdue. Some adaptations have been made, but not enough to allow full exploitation of the technologies.

The introduction of intelligence collection systems in space, for example, created radically new possibilities, and many of them were exploited in the 1960s and 1970s. As time passed, however, and as the number and variety of space systems increased, new ways to exploit them became possible that could not have been foreseen. Most such opportunities, however, require organizational changes, and very few were made. A national imagery agency should have been created at least twenty years ago, but bureaucratic turf concerns kept the very idea from being considered. Nor does the belated creation in 1996 of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency assure that it will be given all the authority required to make the most of imaging systems.

Structural problems afflict not only intelligence collection but also intelligence analysis. During the Cold War this was conspicuous in the continuing debate between the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) on estimates of Soviet military capabilities. The gross underestimate of Soviet military expenditures can be explained largely as the result of competition that caused each of these agencies to be less concerned with the truth of matters in the Soviet Union than with proving the other wrong in the eyes of the Congress. The needs of executive branch policymakers, for whom this intelligence was primarily produced, tended to be secondary in both agencies' calculations. The handling of intelligence analysis on al Qaeda in the weeks and days leading up to the events of 11 September 2001 offers another example of problems in both analysis and distribution of intelligence. The FBI's jealousy over its counterintelligence turf, not only vis-a-vis the CIA but also vis-a-vis the military services' counterintelligence analysis (as well as operations), is a similar symptom of structural problems.

These examples suggest that structural problems distorted U.S. perceptions of Soviet military and economic capabilities and permitted the KGB to penetrate our own intelligence services to a degree that was preventable.

Failure to make appropriate organizational changes to exploit evolving technology has also wasted money. The costs of technical intelligence collection systems dwarf the costs of intelligence analysis and clandestine human intelligence operations. Yet efficiency has rarely been considered in the purchase of technical systems. In the 1950s and 1960s, there was not yet adequate experience with most new technologies to allow meaningful efficiency comparisons. In some cases it could also be argued that Intelligence Community technologies more than paid for themselves as they migrated into the civilian economy. For example, development of modern digital computational means-computers-occurred almost entirely as a result of the National Security Agency's research and development efforts in the 1950s. IBM and CDC essentially got their start in modern computers from National Security Agency funding, and without it, we might be two decades behind where we are in computers today.

By the 1970s and 1980s, however, these arguments for ignoring the burgeoning costs of technical collection programs were as outdated as the displaced technologies. But bureaucratic processes and organizational interests stood in the way of examining costs and reducing them. Predictably, inefficiencies mounted. Covered by secrecy, arcane organizational practices, and technical complexities, these accumulating structural-management issues have remained largely opaque to the congressional oversight committees and also to high-level officials in the executive branch. Neither DCIs nor secretaries of defense have really understood them fully.

None of the accumulating inefficiencies and missed opportunities for better and more efficient exploitation should be terribly surprising in organizations dealing with fairly rapid change in leading-edge technologies. IBM, AT&T, GMC, Chrysler, and other large industrial firms have been slow to make fundamental structural changes, too, but they did make them, in the face of serious financial difficulties resulting from business competition. Management at all levels in organizations tends to resist change, especially structural reform. But if change is necessary for AT&T, is it not also necessary for the Intelligence Community?

Critical scrutiny of the Intelligence Community is clearly justified, scrutiny of its structure, organization, and management arrangements. I am not concerned here with issues that received a lot of media attention in the 1990s, like whether or not the CIA should put agents under cover as journalists. I am not concerned with whether or not the CIA predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union. I am not concerned with proper security rules and techniques for preventing another Ames case. I am not concerned with whether more intelligence attention should be put on the Third World, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, Russia, or economic affairs. Nor am I concerned with whether the United States should engage in covert actions, or whether the United States should have an Intelligence Community. (Those last questions, however, are relevant to the structural arrangements for intelligence support to a new Department of Homeland Security.) These are issues treated elsewhere, and all of them are policy problems. They are important, but they are different from management and structural problems. Thus they will be treated here only when they appear as symptoms of structural problems. As the events of 11 September have once again forced intelligence issues onto the agenda, the initial reactions have been to treat them primarily as policy matters, ignoring the underlying structural issues.

To clarify this distinction with a metaphor, assume that the Intelligence Community is a ship which has had numerous problems on its recent voyages. It is now in harbor for repairs. Most of the ship's investors ask where it should sail next, when it should sail, what flag it should fly, what color to paint the ship. Here those questions will be set aside and primary attention focused on the ship's hull, its engines, its navigation gear; I will look for malfunctions and prescribe needed repairs. When the repairs are completed, it can then sail anywhere, any time, under any flag, with any passengers. These choices are up to executive branch policymakers and military officials served by the Intelligence Community.


Excerpted from Fixing Intelligence by William E. Odom Copyright © 2003 by Yale University. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 Why Intelligence Reform? 1
2 Essential Dogma and Useful Buzzwords 8
3 Making Dollars Yield Useful Intelligence 53
4 The World of Military Intelligence 89
5 Listening to Learn: Signals Intelligence 115
6 Looking to See: Imagery Intelligence 130
7 Spying to Know: Human Intelligence 142
8 Spying on Spies: Counterintelligence 167
9 Conclusion: What It All Means 185
App Intelligence Organizations and the Intelligence Process 195
Notes 207
Index 213
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)