- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
A plain-English primer on crime scene investigation that's a must for fans of CSI or Patricia Cornwell Since the O. J. Simpson case, popular interest in forensic science has exploded: CBS's CSI has 16 to 26 million viewers every week, and Patricia Cornwell's novels featuring a medical examiner sleuth routinely top bestseller lists, to cite just a few examples. Now, everyone can get the lowdown on the science behind crime scene investigations. Using lots of fascinating case studies, forensics expert Dr. D. P. Lyle...
A plain-English primer on crime scene investigation that's a must for fans of CSI or Patricia Cornwell Since the O. J. Simpson case, popular interest in forensic science has exploded: CBS's CSI has 16 to 26 million viewers every week, and Patricia Cornwell's novels featuring a medical examiner sleuth routinely top bestseller lists, to cite just a few examples. Now, everyone can get the lowdown on the science behind crime scene investigations. Using lots of fascinating case studies, forensics expert Dr. D. P. Lyle clues people in on everything from determining cause and time of death to fingerprints, fibers, blood, ballistics, forensic computing, and forensic psychology. With its clear, entertaining explanations of forensic procedures and techniques, this book will be an indispensable reference for mystery fans and true crime aficionados everywhere-and even includes advice for people interested in forensic science careers.
D. P. Lyle, MD (Laguna Hills, CA), is a practicing cardiologist who is also a forensics expert and mystery writer. He runs a Web site that answers writers' questions about forensics, dplylemd.com, and is the author of Murder and Mayhem: A Doctor Answers Medical and Forensic Questions for Writers, as well as several mystery novels. John Pless, MD, is Professor Emeritus of Pathology at Indiana University School of Medicine and former President of the National Association of Medical Examiners.
Part I: Cracking Open the Case.
Chapter 1: Understanding the World of Forensics.
Chapter 2: Uncovering Who Does What When: The Forensics Team in Action.
Chapter 3: Working the Scene: Evidence Collection and Protection.
Chapter 4: Peering into the Criminal Mind.
Part II: Uncovering the Evidence.
Chapter 5: Fingerprints: Your Personal Signature.
Chapter 6: Those Messy Bloodstains.
Chapter 7: Making Good Impressions: Shoes, Tires, and Tools.
Chapter 8: The Burning Question: Is It Arson?
Part III: Looking at the Body.
Chapter 9: Determining the Hows and Whys of Death: Forensic Autopsies.
Chapter 10: Identifying John and Jane Doe.
Chapter 11: Estimating the Time of Death.
Chapter 12: Yeow! That Hurts: Traumatic Injuries and Deaths.
Chapter 13: Asphyxia: Where’s the Oxygen?
Part IV: Working in the Crime Lab.
Chapter 14: Working with Blood and Other Bodily Fluids: Serology.
Chapter 15: What’s the Deal with DNA?
Chapter 16: Finding Drugs and Poisons: The Toxicology Lab.
Chapter 17: Analyzing Trace Evidence.
Chapter 18: Going Ballistic: Analyzing Firearms Evidence.
Chapter 19: Questioning the Validity of Documents.
Part V: The Part of Tens.
Chapter 20: Ten Famous Forensic Cases.
Chapter 21: Ten Ways Hollywood Gets It Wrong.
Chapter 22: Ten Great Forensic Careers.
In This Chapter
* Defining forensic science and checking out its origins
* Understanding why the principle of evidence exchange is important
* Unveiling how forensic science is organized
* Revealing what services a crime lab offers
Turn on the TV any night of the week, and you'll find crime scene investigators, or criminalists, tracking down criminals, crime lab technicians evaluating evidence, and even forensic pathologists conducting autopsies on shows detailing cases real or imagined. I don't think this newfound interest in all things forensic stems from some macabre fascination with death or a guilty enchantment with the criminal world. If you ask me, people simply are curious by nature and have a strong appetite for scientific knowledge. Remember everyone's fascination with the space program not too many years ago? The cool tools and magical feats of forensic science - making fingerprints appear out of nowhere, identifying suspects by their shoeprints, sniffing out a forger by the unique signature of a laser printer - are proving equally fascinating.
In this chapter, you get your feet wet with the basic definitions and organizational elements of the field of forensic science. Most of the topics that I touch on here are explored further in the chapters that follow.
Defining Forensics: The Science of Catching Criminals
If you lived in ancient Rome, you'd head to the forum when you wanted to discuss the news of the day. The town forum was a community meeting place for merchants, politicians, scholars, and citizens that doubled as a center for public justice. Steal your neighbor's toga, and the case would be tried at the forum.
The term forensic stems from the Latin word forum and applies to anything that relates to law. Forensic science, or criminalistics, is the application of scientific disciplines to the law.
The same tools and principles that drive scientific research in universities and identify cures in hospitals are used by forensic scientists to find out how a victim died and, ideally, who was responsible. In the same way modern hospital laboratories employ professionals to deal with pathology (the study of diseases of the human body), toxicology (the study of drugs and poisons), and serology (the study of blood), modern forensic laboratories employ experts in forensic pathology, forensic toxicology, and forensic serology, all of whom use the principles and testing procedures of their medical specialties to help resolve legal issues and answer questions like:
Integrating science into the practice of law
Not long ago identifying, capturing, and convicting criminals depended primarily upon eyewitnesses and confessions. The world was a small place, communities were close-knit, and the extent of travel basically was only as far as you could walk. Whenever anyone witnessed a crime, he or she likely knew the perpetrator. Case closed.
Trains, planes, and automobiles changed all that. Criminals can now rapidly travel far and wide, and with this newfound mobility they are less and less likely to be recognized by an eyewitness. Besides, eyewitness evidence these days frequently is proven to be unreliable (see Chapter 3).
For law enforcement to keep pace with criminal advancements, other techniques for identifying criminals had to be developed. Science came to the rescue with methods that depend less on eyewitnesses to identify perpetrators or at least link them to their victims or crime scenes. Fingerprinting (Chapter 5), firearms identification and gunshot residue analysis (Chapter 18), hair and fiber studies (Chapter 17), blood typing (Chapter 14), DNA analysis (Chapter 15), and many other scientific techniques have solved crimes that would've remained unsolved in the past.
The marriage of science and law hasn't been without its setbacks. Many scientific breakthroughs are viewed with suspicion, if not downright hostility, until they become widely accepted. And before a science can ever enter the courtroom, it must be widely accepted. It should come as no surprise that before forensic science could develop, science in general had to reach a certain level of maturity.
Drawing from other sciences
A CLOSER LOOK
The development of modern forensic science parallels general advancements in science, particularly the physical and biological sciences. Take a look at how a few milestones in science pushed forensics several steps forward:
Getting the Big Picture: Forensics in Action
You witness a burglar sneaking away from a store late at night. You call the police, and when they arrive, you identify the thief as someone you know. That person is arrested. However, fingerprints from the store's broken window, cracked safe, and tools used to open the safe don't match up with those of the person you've fingered. Instead, they match the fingerprints of a known safecracker. What do you think police, prosecutors, and more important, the jury are going to believe? After all, it was dark and raining, you were 100 feet away, you caught only a glimpse of the thief, and you'd just left a bar where you'd had a couple of drinks with friends. The fingerprints, on the other hand, match those of a known thief in each and every detail, meaning they came from him and only him. Which bit of evidence, the fingerprints or your eyewitness account, is more reliable?
This scenario represents what forensics does or at least attempts to do. Each and every forensic technique that you discover in this book is designed to either identify a perpetrator or connect him or her to the crime.
Starting out small: Basic forensic services
Properly identifying, collecting, documenting, and storing evidence are at the heart of the forensic services offered by virtually all law enforcement agencies, from village cop to major metropolitan police department. They need the basic services in the list that follows to be able to investigate and solve crimes and to convict the criminals who commit them:
Finding out about physical forensic science
Tracking down trace evidence, checking the ballistics of bullets fired from a gun, examining the penmanship of a signature on an important document, and checking out the swirling ridges of fingerprints under a microscope all are part of the physical side of forensic science.
Delving into biological forensic science
Forensics deals not only with physical evidence but also with biological evidence, which may take the form of a corpse, skeletal remains, drugs and poisons, teeth, bite marks, insects, and plant materials, to name a few. It also includes analysis of the criminal mind. Biological evidence is often what makes or breaks a case.
For example, an autopsy (postmortem examination of the body - see Chapter 9) may reveal the nature and cause of any injuries, the presence of any poisons, and ultimately why and how the victim died. These findings alone may lead to the perpetrator. Blood and DNA analysis can positively identify a suspect and link him or her to a crime. DNA and dental pattern records can be used to identify an unidentified corpse, and plant and insect evidence can reveal the time of death and link a suspect to the crime scene. Find out more about these sciences and the people who conduct them in Chapter 2.
Investigating the Crime Lab
Although they use much of the same equipment and follow similar research procedures, a forensics (crime) lab is quite different from a medical (clinical) lab. The latter deals with the living by carrying out testing aimed at diagnosing and treating the sick. On the other hand, a forensics lab is geared toward testing evidence with the hope of establishing links between a suspect and a crime.
Creating the first crime lab
The United States' first forensic laboratory was established in 1923 by August Volmer in the Los Angeles Police Department. Shortly thereafter, the first private forensic lab was created in Chicago in 1929 as a result of the investigation of Chicago's infamous St. Valentine's Day Massacre (see nearby sidebar). This case involved the expertise of Calvin Goddard, then America's leading firearms identification expert, who was able to link the killings to Al "Scarface" Capone. Two businessmen who served on the coroner's inquest jury were so impressed with Goddard and his scientific use of firearms identification that they funded the development of a crime lab at Northwestern University. The lab brought together the disciplines of firearms identification, blood analysis, fingerprinting, and trace evidence analysis and served as a prototype for other labs.
In 1932, Goddard helped the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) establish a national forensics laboratory that offered virtually every forensic service known to law enforcement across the United States. It too served as a model for all future state and local labs. Now many states have networks of regional and local labs that support law enforcement at all levels.
Identifying common procedures
Scientific services offered by modern crime labs and medical examiners' offices are varied and complex. The number of services supplied by a particular laboratory depends on its size and budget. State and regional labs may provide a wide array of services, and local labs may provide only basic testing. These smaller labs typically outsource more sophisticated testing to larger regional labs. In addition, the FBI's National Crime Lab offers services to law enforcement throughout the country. Not only does the FBI lab perform virtually every type of test, it also possesses or has access to databases on everything from fingerprints and tire-track impressions to postage stamps.
Larger labs may feature separate departments for each discipline, while smaller labs tend to combine services, perhaps even relying on a single technician to do all the work. Obviously, in this circumstance, a great deal of the work must be sent to larger reference labs.
Excerpted from Forensics For Dummies by Douglas P. Lyle Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Posted April 13, 2013
I thought this was an amazing book. I want to go into forenics and I believe that it helped me make up my decision of wanting to go into that field.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 12, 2013
Posted January 11, 2009
Even though I'm pretty young, this book really has given me a good insight into the world of Forensic Science. With the detailed accounts of how forensic science has helped solve hundreds of cases in the last few decades really lets me know what I'm up against! The "for dummies" series has done it again!
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 17, 2013
Posted December 27, 2010
Forensics for dummies will defenitely give you some backround on this subject. It'll keep you interested from start to finish. The knowledge in this book is easily absorbed.This guide is good for those looking for a career in forensics and those who are just interested.Its organized, educational, and fascinating.Its one of a kind because theres not many guides on this subject that are helpful like this one.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted November 11, 2009
D.P. Lyle has given us simple explanations for very complicated processes. Anyone who is writing a mystery novel that contains forensics should buy this book.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted July 18, 2009
I Also Recommend:
Entertaining forensics reference for mystery writers and serious mystery readers who want to check the verisimilitude of story events. If a mystery takes place in England in the 1890s, will fingerprints be taken at the crime scene? What about hypnotism? This book answers these questions and oh so many ore. It contains an excellent section on crime scene evidence, determining the hows, whys, whens of death, working with fluids, including blood, and ends with ten famous forensic cases and the ways Hollywood gets it wrong. If you need an easy-to-read quick picker-upper, this book is for you.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 28, 2008
For anyone wanting to know about forensics, this is a great start. Everything is easy to read and well formatted. Throughout the book it provides real-life examples and more detailed information. Each chapter is on a different area of forensics. It even lists potential careers for those interested in forensics. Highly recommended.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 7, 2010
No text was provided for this review.