The Fourth Mega Market, Now Through 2011: How Three Earlier Bull Markets Explain the Present and Predict the Future

Overview

A proven leader in the financial world explains the current bull market--and how to profit from it--by comparing it to the great bull markets of the past.

Were you surprised by Wall Street's incredible performance over the past few years Ralph Acampora wasn't. In fact, Acampora, Prudential's top technical analyst, predicted the current bullish trend -- and helped countless clients profit from it. Now you can too.

Acampora coined the term ...

See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (46) from $1.99   
  • New (4) from $2.19   
  • Used (42) from $1.99   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$2.19
Seller since 2007

Feedback rating:

(1330)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
0786866519 New - Never read, May contain Publishers remainder marks, Fast Shipping!

Ships from: Cypress, TX

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$2.19
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(253)

Condition: New
2000 Hardcover New in New dust jacket 9780786866519. New. No remainder marks. BookNest-providing professional service for more than 16 years.; 9.30 X 5.90 X 1 inches; 320 pages.

Ships from: Blairstown, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$4.99
Seller since 2009

Feedback rating:

(102)

Condition: New
Brand new and never been read. Pages are crisp with no markings on the cover.

Ships from: Bellerose Village, NY

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$45.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(178)

Condition: New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by

Overview

A proven leader in the financial world explains the current bull market--and how to profit from it--by comparing it to the great bull markets of the past.

Were you surprised by Wall Street's incredible performance over the past few years Ralph Acampora wasn't. In fact, Acampora, Prudential's top technical analyst, predicted the current bullish trend -- and helped countless clients profit from it. Now you can too.

Acampora coined the term mega-market to describe a bull market that lasts a minimum of ten years and a maximum of eighteen years with Dow gains of between 400% and 500%. In The Fourth Mega-Market, Acampora helps readers take advantage of the staggering performance of the current market by showing its similarities with the three previous mega-markets in American history. In an entertaining and straight-forward style, and with a wealth of informative charts and graphs, he helps readers recognize patterns that can explain market performance, showing how to use technical analysis to "hear the voices" of the market. He offers valuable tips, such as how to spot and protect yourself from a correction; how psychology and politics influence the market; and how to analyze the performance of various market segments. Finally, he makes exciting predictions on just where the market will go before it ends and how it will get there, giving specific recommendations. While today's information overload keeps us on the edge of our seats, scanning the numbers for subtle clues as to the market's next seismic shift, Ralph Acampora shows us the value of a larger perspective, one that not only explains today's mega-market, but also shows us how to keep investing our money wisely and ride high on the current wave.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Best known for his correct 1995 prediction that within three years the market would hit 7000 (rising 60% above the market's level at that time), Acampora believes that investors who understand how the stock market has performed historically will be able to make wiser decisions about their portfolios. To explain his view, Acampora, who is chief technical analyst at Prudential Securities, first discusses the tools he and other analysts use. Followers of value investing, including Warren Buffett, look at a company's management, dividend and P/E ratio. However, that provides only part of the picture, according to Acampora, who says that investors should also consider price, volume and the psychological climate (whether investors are feeling bullish or bearish). He goes on to explain how to read charts to discern the trends related to the price and trading activity on a particular stock. He also evaluates the parallels between the four "mega-markets" or bull periods--1877-1891, 1921-1929, 1949-1966 and today's upswing, which, he contends, began in 1995--and explains their dramatic turns in language that makes sense. No doubt, value investors will find flaws in the author's theories. Those looking for a rational perspective on the unpredictable stock market as well as some useful investment tools and tips, however, will find them here. Agent, Brian DeFiore. 100,000 first printing; 20-city author tour; radio satellite tour. (Oct.) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780786866519
  • Publisher: Hyperion
  • Publication date: 9/20/2000
  • Edition description: 1ST
  • Pages: 320
  • Product dimensions: 6.25 (w) x 9.50 (h) x 1.00 (d)

Read an Excerpt




Chapter One


Out Of The Box


You know, you should write this down."

    It was October 2, 1997, and I was having breakfast with my boss, Hardwick "Wick" Simmons, chairman of Prudential Securities. Our conversation meandered around many topics but it always returned to the stock market. We marveled at how rewarding the previous couple of years had been for all those who were willing to take a risk in equities. The Dow had gone from 3,600 to 8,300 over that time. Wick kept talking about risk and what it meant to the firm's clients. Those who had been willing to go along with the firm's recommendations, and assumed a modicum of risk, had made a lot of money.

    This reminded me that Prudential had taken risks too, on me. I thanked Wick for being willing to stake the firm's reputation on my research. I reminded him of how proud I was when our firm allowed me to publish what appeared to be an outrageous report (forecasting Dow 7,000) back in June 1995. Prudential and its clients had depended on my risk assessment to invest enormous sums of money. They had been rewarded with a doubling in the market.

    This was the point at which Wick told me I should "write this down." At first I didn't quite understand what he was saying. He explained himself bluntly.

    "I think you should write a book."

    I was flabbergasted. "Why in the world would anyone want that?" I asked.

    "Well, all of us are curious about what made you `step out of the box' and write that bullish report. Some of usstill don't know what made you do it. I think a lot of people would want to know what you were thinking about. What did you see that nobody else did?"

    I hesitated for a moment. While I had thought about writing a book, I had never let myself say it out loud. "Well," I said, "there really is a story behind this story. It's got something to do with me personally — the books I like to read and the intellectual discipline I developed during my years in a Catholic seminary. But mostly it's about history and about technical analysis."

    "Then do it," Wick told me.


TIMING


I can honestly say that I have dedicated most of my professional career to proselytizing for technical analysis. For example, this Monday night, just like on every other Monday night for the last three decades, you will be able to find me in classroom 8 at the New York Institute of Finance teaching the basic course in technical analysis. That doesn't surprise anyone who knows me even casually. I have a mission. I will convince the financial community that technical research is a legitimate form of stock market analysis.

    This fire in my belly was ignited in the mid-1960s when I was first introduced to charting, something that we will explore in detail in later chapters. Once I truly understood how to use the charts that are the core of technical analysis, I realized my career in investment research was not doomed because of a lack of education in fundamental analysis and traditional economic theories. (My college degree was in history and political science. In the seminary I had worked toward a Master's in theology.) I began to think that I might be able to make a living on Wall Street after all.

    Don't get me wrong. All forms of research are needed to do a credible job of determining how individual stocks should be valued. But technical analysis provides a critical element — timing. We technicians are market timers. We try to determine when to get into (buy) and out of (sell) a stock.

    Fundamental analysts research and create important numbers (earnings, revenues, price/earnings multiples, etc.) and then tell you where they think the stock should go based on their findings. They compare a company to its competitors and try to gauge whether its price is a good value. The idea, to oversimplify, is to buy a good stock, at let's say $20 a share, and hold on to it for a while and presumably sell it years later for $60.

    Now, in the process of climbing to $60, that stock may go to $40, then back down to $25, before it eventually rises to $60. But by the time you sell, the proponents of this approach argue, you will have a nice $40 profit.

    Market timers don't have any quarrel with making $40 on a $20 stock. But we try to do better. Our goal, again to oversimplify, is to buy that stock at $20, and then sell it when it is rising, say, at $37.

    Now wait, you might say. You missed the run-up to $40. That's true. But we also missed the drop back down. If fact, we might take our profits and reinvest in the same issue at $27, during its fall to $25. If our technical analysis is correct, we'll ride up again to say $57. Yes, we might not ride the stock all the way up. But the important thing is we don't ride it all the way back down.

    This approach takes a bit more work on our part, and it's not for people who can't pay constant attention to their portfolios. But in our fictional example we end with a $47 gain, instead of $40. That's a 17.5 percent greater return (before factoring in commissions).


As I've said, I don't think there is anything wrong with fundamental analysis. In fact, if I could do my formal education over, I would love to be an economist — one trained in the fundamentals — with a technical bias. Unfortunately, many economists and fundamental analysts do not recognize the value of technical analysis.

    Traditionally most people in academia and on Wall Street were never taught technical analysis. The reason is that very few colleges or universities actually offer the subject to their students. This is because most academics believe in the efficient market hypothesis — that is, they believe that all information that could move a stock price is known to just about everyone simultaneously. They argue that since news about a company's sales, earnings, marketing efforts, or technical snafus is communicated just about instantly to everyone, it is impossible for one person to see a trend earlier than anyone else. To them, it's impossible to anticipate a market turn, and technical analysis is useless.

    Historically, the academy has attacked the notion of anyone being able successfully to time the market with any regularity. But the success of many market timers has caught the attention of more open-minded professors and investors. Our reputation is improving rapidly, and credible research is being done that shows you can successfully use price momentum to time the market.

    As I write, a historic alliance is being formed by the Market Technicians Association, the official organization for technicians, and a very highly respected business school on the East Coast. (I'll give you a hint. It's a member of the Ivy League.) Together they are in the early stages of setting up a center for research into technical analysis. Great news indeed, not only for technicians but for all serious students and investors alike.

    But, in the words of one of the professors at that prestigious school: "There is one problem. The word `technical' has a black eye!" This is true. Too many tenured professors will not accept the word "technical," but they are now willing to research the concept, convinced that the underlying ideas have validity. These newly enlightened professors feel more comfortable with the phrase "behavioral analysis."

    My guess is whatever we end up calling the center it will have "behavioral analysis" in the official name. As far as I am concerned, you can call it what you want. What is important is that more and more people will get to understand the technical factors that govern the market's performance. This is a breakthrough that I would have had trouble imagining back in the early years of my career, when I began to believe what history and data were telling me.


THE MOST DIFFICULT MARKET


The year was 1970, and I was part of a scorned breed, scorned at least on Wall Street. People who did what I did — recommending stocks based on historical price patterns — were literally laughed at by many of the Street's citizens. I couldn't accept this. I talked this over with two new friends, John Brooks and John Greeley at the brokerage firm of Francis I. Dupont and Co., who like me were succeeding with technical analysis. We knew it worked and, in an effort to improve the credibility of our methods, we started talking about creating a trade association for technicians. It would be a way for us to meet, share thoughts, and compare ideas, the way other Wall Street professionals did.

    To raise our profile, we enlisted the help of the two top names in our field, Robert "Bob" Farrell at Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith and my boss, Alan R. Shaw of Harris Upham and Co., which is now part of what is known as Salomon Smith Barney. After much debate over whether or not we would actually get taken seriously enough to create what would be the first national organization of technicians, we decided to give it a try. And then Alan suggested something that was as daunting to me as starting the association itself.

    "You know, of course, you'll have to get the blessing of the Old Man."

    I didn't need to ask whom he meant. The Old Man was Ken Ward of Hayden Stone and Co. At the time, he was one of the oldest living technicians. Mr. Ward was close to seventy years old. He had seen it all, from the Roaring 1920s and the Crash of 1929 to the Great Depression, World War II, and the long bull market of the 1960s.

    Alan was right, of course; we would need Ken Ward's support. So after working up my nerve, I called him on the phone. At first he told me in a clipped, serious voice, that any campaign to improve the image of technicians would fail. He called me "young man," and said we would never be taken seriously. There were too many obstacles. It was too soon. People weren't ready to believe that you could actually determine how the market and individual stocks would behave in the future based on stock charts and analysis of their past performance.

    But of course I was young and wouldn't take no for an answer. Both John Brooks and I kept pushing and finally Ken did agree to participate. But he required two things in trade. First, every member would have to be a technical analyst who followed equities — corporate stocks not commodities. Second, he or she had to be the author of a technical market letter sent to clients or be the writer of technical reports that were sent to portfolio managers at an investment management firm.

    Ken Ward was determined that our members be working for either an established Wall Street brokerage firm or an investment company where the firm had to be taking them seriously enough to let them make recommendations to clients. In the end, we could find only eighteen people who met those requirements at the time. Together we became the Market Technicians Association (MTA).

    At our first meeting, I finally got to meet Ken Ward in person. This, for me, was the equivalent of meeting my childhood baseball idol, Joe DiMaggio. Ken Ward had lived through most of the bull and bear markets of the century. I wanted to know everything he had learned from this experience.

    I asked him, "Mr. Ward, what was the most difficult market you ever experienced?" And as I asked the question I remember feeling really stupid. I anticipated his response and said, "Of course, it was the Crash of 1929." Then he surprised me with his answer.

    "No, kid. That was a layup. The toughest market I ever saw, by far, was the one from 1962 to 1966. If you go through something like that, it will be the roughest thing you'll ever experience."

    I did a double take.

    "But the market went up during that time" I blurted out. "It was a steep bull market that went on for several years. In fact, between 1962 and 1966 didn't the Dow go up about 75 percent?"

    "That's right, kid," Ken Ward replied. "It went up and up and up, and rolled right over all of us, bulls and bears alike. Nobody believed it. And it made us look like fools."

    As he talked I realized just how remarkable that climb had been. That bull market continued, on and on, despite events that could have crippled it, including: the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy's assassination, and President Johnson's heart attack.

    "The biggest mistake we all made was that we sold the good-looking stocks too early," Ken Ward continued. "It was a time of vicious rotation [when investors move out of one sector and into another], very vicious rotation, and a time when one really had to believe that we were in a secular bull market to benefit, and very few of us were able to understand that we were, in fact, in a secular bull market."

    Ken Ward was absolutely right. The market he was describing had gone way up and rolled over everyone. From June 1962 through January 1966, a period of three and a half years, the Dow Jones Industrials climbed 75 percent. Impressive indeed.

    But the increase of that market, from 1962 to 1966, was only a tiny fraction of the bull market we've seen recently. Between November 1994 and today, in early 2000, the Dow rose more than 200 percent. Unfortunately for many, many people on Wall Street, and even for many technical analysts, this bull market did the same thing that the bull market of the 1960s did to Ken Ward and his colleagues. It has rolled over all the bears and even the bulls. The market made the careers of those who chose not to fight the trend, but it destroyed the reputations of those on Wall Street who chose to fight it.

    As a technical analyst I watch the market. The entire market. And by tracking individual stocks (the bottom up approach) I can assess the direction of not only groups, but of the market as a whole. Why do I devote this much attention to such details? Because the most important thing to an individual investor is his or her specific portfolio.

    I know from my many years of experience that you also have to take a top-down approach (study overall indicators and indices). Once you have established to your satisfaction that you are either in a bull or bear market, then you can trade accordingly. Deciding where you think the market is going to go is an important first step because you need to think and act differently in a bull market than you do when you expect the market to be bearish.

    Naturally, every type of analyst tries to predict the future. Fundamentalists focus on the earnings of companies within specific sectors. Quantitative analysts (a.k.a. the quants) take the numbers generated by all the fundamentalists and back test them for all sectors and all companies. They try to explain whether a company is overvalued or undervalued relative to itself, to its peers, and to the overall market.

    In contrast, we technicians plot and study a different set of numbers — price and volume — and read the resulting charts in light of important historical factors. We watch trends in actual trading: Has a stock been steadily rising or falling in price? And then we look for the exceptions and ask ourselves: Is the trend changing? We search for recurring price patterns, and increases or decreases in volume. We respect market psychology and live by the dictum that buyers (demand) push stock prices up while sellers (supply) force stock prices lower.

    This dictum is absolute. It implies that someone out there knows more about the company in question than we do. And if enough of these "informed investors" decide to buy or sell on information that we do not have, then we must respect their action.

    This bias — that the marketplace includes wise buyers and sellers — results in the old adage: "Don't fight the tape." If enough investors want a specific stock, or the market in general, to go higher, it will, regardless of what any one individual thinks is right. In this situation, technicians believe it is better to get on the moving train than to stand in front of it.

    We technicians also look at recurring factors such as presidential cycles, and seasonal events such as year-end rallies. I personally take one more giant step and ask "why?" I accept without questioning that a certain trend is unfolding — I have no intention of getting in front of a moving train — but I insist on finding out what is causing prices to move.

    Understanding the cause will help me anticipate how long a trend may last. It's hard to overemphasize how different this approach is from the typical Wall Street bias. The "establishment" on the Street actually does the opposite of what I do. They predict where the market should go based on their estimates of value, earnings per share, and the like, and then complain when the market doesn't respond the way they think it should or does something that they can't explain. Quite often they wind up fighting the tape, or to use another image, they get trampled by a rampaging bull.

(Continues...)

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Foreword 1
1 Out of the Box 7
2 Technical Analysis 101 29
3 How to Read Charts 51
4 The First Mega-Market: 1877-1891 83
5 The Second Mega-Market: 1921-1929 109
6 The Third Mega-Market: 1949-1966 135
7 The Fourth Mega-Market 165
8 Why the Mega-Bull Will Continue to Run 191
9 More Promise Than Peril 205
Acknowledgments 227
Index 231
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 7 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 27, 2001

    Fourth Mega-Market: Now Through 2011

    if Acamporo believes this is a bull market beyond out imaginations, then why is he only forecasting 10% per year over the next 10 years. That may sound good in today's market (he actually wrote this when the market was at an all-time high), but it is only marginally better than historic returns. I read nothing new in this book except for a lame forecast.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 24, 2000

    Very shallow---and self-promotional

    I expected much more out of this book--such as depth. If you take out all the fluff, you'd be left with a couple of pages of mediocre research. There are much better books of this kind out there.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 13, 2000

    A Technical Look at Similar Market Conditions to Today

    Technicians are those who look at a stock's history of prices and volumes to estimate what will happen to price in the future. Mr. Acampora is the chief technical analyst at Prudential Securities, and extends beyond the normal limits of technical analysis to predict the future for the current bull market. Using analogies to three earlier markets, he argues that the peak of the market should probably be above 20,000 on the Dow Jones Industrial Average and that peak should occur between now and 2011. Notice that at current levels, this could be as little as 6-7 percent annual compound gains. He argues that the current market is being driven by a combination of peace, low interest rates, low inflation, and technological innovation. He points to 1877-1891 (the age of railroads and industrial expansion), 1921-1929 (the age of cars and radio), and 1949-1966 (the age of television, computers, and copiers) as similar periods. A critical part of his argument is that the current bull market started in 1994 (rather than 1982, as many would argue). His argument is based on the cold war not ending until the late 1980s. If the bull market actually stared in 1982, then we have little additional gain to expect. A weakness in his argument is that the advance-decline line should be strong now, but it has been fading for a long time. Another weakness is in insisting that stock prices are not high now. The average p/e is enormous compared to earlier markets (his counterarguments is that most stocks are trading at 12 times earnings). You can read the counterarguments to his thesis (and his responses) in chapter 9. Many Wall Street professionals will tell you that technical analysis is about as good as going to your local palm reader. People who believe in an efficient market think that technical analysis is a waste of time. On the other hand, Mr. Acampora has been right more often than not in the last 10 years in forecasting the bull market. You should decide for yourself. Many top professionals now use fundamental and technical analysis (but, of course, most of them fail to beat the market averages). If you don't know anything about technical analysis, you will find a brief, simple explanation in chapter 2. One of the most interesting parts of the book is a comparison of the characteristics of the overall market since 1994 to the three earlier markets. The sizes of the drops in the market are similar, but the speed of the drops is much faster now. On the other hand, the speed of the drops is similar to the 1920s. I couldn't help but wonder if the end of the current bull market may also be like 1929. Certainly, the drop in Internet stocks has been similar. I came away unconvinced by the argument here. I just don't think that the future repeats the past that closely. Here are some examples of things that are different now: the rate of technological change and impact is much faster and broader; inflation is low in the U.S. but not in many other places; the dollar could easily fall if foreigners decide to stop propping it up by buying U.S. securities to recycle the trade deficit; and there are many shortages (such as of trained engineers) that could greatly increase the rate of inflation. Nevertheless, I thought that the book was worth 4 stars just for making these data available about comparable markets so that we can each think about them, and draw our own conclusions. After you have read and evaluated this book, I suggest you think about other places where history has not proven to be a very good predictor . . . and where it has. Then consider whether the stock market is likely to be more like the former . . . or the latter. Good luck with your investments in any event!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 4, 2000

    There are better books out there

    Out of the 100+ investment-related books out there that I've read, this might rank last.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 4, 2000

    Something to KNOW,BELIEVE, AND DO

    I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It was written in layman's terms and I walked away with SOMETHING TO KNOW--todays bull market is very similar to at least 3 previous post-war periods and is likely to continue. SOMETHING TO BELIEVE--the future has never looked better and if technical analysis is used properly to identify risk and opportunity I will continue to enjoy this MEGA MARKET for years to come. SOMETHING TO DO--its time to review all of my porfolios to be sure that my stocks based on Ralph's thesis are 4th Mega Market compliant. He predicted Dow 7000,Dow 10,000 and now a sustained run through 2011, let the good times roll! Thanks Ralph.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 12, 2000

    Fourth Mega-Market: Now Through 2011

    The premise behind Acampora's theory is (too) simple: There were a couple of other bull markets which sort of looked like the current one (if in fact it hasn't already ended). This should have been a 4-page research report, not a book. This really was more of a brochure.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 19, 2000

    A palm reader wouldn't have predicted Dow 10,000

    I work with Ralph, so I am biased, but I couldn't disagree more with the first reviewer. The Fourth Mega Market is a fascinating, thoughtful overview of the historic patterns that explain today's market. I was particularly struck by his comparisons of the railroads of the late 1800s and today's Internet. Unlike most books on the market, it is far more than just a how-to-get-rich quick scheme. And it's an easy read; I read it in a couple hours on the airplane. I should have listened to Ralph when he was the first to predict the Dow reaching 10,000.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 7 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)