- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Bonds had recently remarried, but on this trip he was accompanied by his girlfriend, Kimberly Bell, a slender, attractive woman with long brown hair and green eyes whom he had met four years earlier in the players' parking lot at Candlestick Park. Bell had been looking forward to the trip, and it was pleasant in many ways-a big hotel room with a view of St. Louis's famous arch; a wonderful seat eight rows behind home plate; and even tornado warnings, which were exotic to a California girl. But Bonds was sulky and brooding. A three-time winner of the National League Most Valuable Player award, he was one of the most prideful stars in baseball. All that weekend, though, he was overshadowed by McGwire.
Even by the standards of the modern game, the Cardinals' first baseman was a player of exceptional size and power. That summer the 6-foot-5 McGwire weighed 260 muscular pounds and was hitting balls that traveled in long, soaring arcs. The season was less than two months old, but healready had hit 20 home runs. McGwire's pace was ahead of Babe Ruth's when he hit 60 home runs in 1927, and also ahead of Roger Maris's when he hit 61 to break Ruth's record in 1961. Players, fans, and the media were already anticipating that McGwire could break baseball's most storied record, and the noisy attention he received as a result was impossible to ignore.
Before Friday night's game, even the Giants' coaches acted like fans, gathering behind the batting cage and watching as McGwire hit 10 batting practice pitches into the stands. During the game itself, McGwire crushed a home run into an area of Busch Stadium's upper deck called "Big Mac Land." The home run entitled everyone in the sellout crowd of 43,000 to a free hamburger. For the Giants, Bonds went 1 for 4 with a double. The Cardinals won 4-3.
On Saturday night, McGwire singled in the first inning and scored from second when Bonds made a poor throw on a hit to left field. Then McGwire hit two more home runs, the second one bouncing off the Chevrolet sign on the left-field scoreboard. The Cards won 11-10.
On Sunday, Bonds himself hit a dramatic two-run homer, his 11th of the season, to tie the game in the 9th inning. But in the 12th, after the Giants had pulled ahead 6-4, McGwire hit an equally dramatic shot to tie the game again. It was his fourth home run of the series, and his 24th of the young season. The Giants finally won in 17, but Bonds's mood remained irretrievably foul.
On that trip, Bonds began making racial remarks about McGwire to Kimberly Bell. According to Bell, he would repeat them throughout the summer, as McGwire and Sammy Sosa, the buffed, fan-friendly Chicago Cubs slugger who also was hitting home runs at an amazing rate, became the talk of the nation.
"They're just letting him do it because he's a white boy," Bonds said of McGwire and his chase of Maris's record. The pursuit by Sosa, a Latin player from the Dominican Republic, was entertaining but doomed, Bonds declared. As a matter of policy, "They'll never let him win," he said.
As he sometimes did when he was in a particularly bleak mood, Bonds was channeling racial attitudes picked up from his father, the former Giants' star Bobby Bonds, and his godfather, the great Willie Mays, both African-American ballplayers who had experienced virulent racism while starting their professional careers in the Jim Crow South. Barry Bonds himself had never seen anything remotely like that: He had grown up in an affluent white suburb on the San Francisco Peninsula, and his best boyhood friend, his first wife, and his present girlfriend all were white. When Bonds railed about McGwire, he didn't articulate who "they" were, or how the supposed conspiracy to rig the home run record was being carried out. But his brooding anger was real enough, and it continued throughout a year in which he batted .303, hit 37 home runs, made the All-Star team for the eighth time, and was almost completely ignored. For, as the 1998 season unfolded, the attention of all baseball focused on McGwire's home run chase and on his gentlemanly rivalry with Sosa. The quest to hit 61 home runs transfixed even casual fans, in the way that a great pennant race used to do in the old days.
Something about McGwire's appearance-the red hair and the freckled, craggy face that sometimes burst into a winning smile-seemed to invite affectionate hyperbole. The sportswriters who covered him wrote that McGwire had Popeye's forearms and shoulders as broad as Paul Bunyan's. The nature of his quest also was expressed in hyperbolic terms. McGwire's home run chase was "a metaphor for the best in America," a newspaper editor told an Iowa professor who was studying the chase as a cultural phenomenon. It was more significant than "the ascent on Mt. Everest," as San Francisco Giants' marketing man Pat Gallagher proclaimed. And from acting baseball commissioner Bud Selig down to its ordinary fans-anybody who cared about the game and worried about its future-all agreed that McGwire's pursuit of the home run record was hugely important. It had made watching the sport of baseball enjoyable again, for the first time in quite a while.
Baseball's fans are among the most forgiving in all sports, but the toxic relations between team owners and the players union had put the fans' patience to the test for a generation. From 1971 through 1990, seven baseball seasons had been interrupted by labor disputes. The eighth interruption, which began in August 1994, lasted 234 days and led to the cancellation of the World Series for the only time since World War I. It also nearly killed the game.
As always, both the union and the owners claimed the dispute was about baseball's future. Actually, it was just another fight about money. For fans, the dispute was dispiriting and pointless, an argument between millionaires and billionaires.
The owners finally reopened the ballparks, and the players slunk back into them two weeks after the 1995 season had been scheduled to start. In park after park they were greeted with a cascade of boos. Many fans just stayed away. Attendance in 1995 was down 28 percent, nearly 20 million, from 1993, the last pre-strike season. It crept back in the following seasons, but in 1997, attendance was still down 10 percent, or more than 7 million fans, from the pre-strike high. By some estimates the lockout had cost the owners $500 million in lost revenues in 1994, and $800 million more in 1995. More worrisome still were the many signs that interest in the game might have permanently ebbed.
Then, in 1998, McGwire's assault on Maris's record brought the fans back to baseball in droves. The Cardinals' home attendance, which had languished since the lockout, would top 3.1 million, a club record, and other National League clubs saw big gains as well. For fans, McGwire's escalating home run totals became a daily reminder of the game's underlying drama and intensity-and its history, for the ghost of Ruth hovered about all summer long. And if McGwire's chase of the home run record evoked baseball's past, Sosa was a charming connection to its future, one of a stream of talented Latin players who were flooding into the game. Fans were drawn to Sosa, McGwire's friendly rival, and the complex ritual he went through each time he crossed home plate after a homer, including the blown kiss and the tap of his heart to honor his mother.
By mid-summer the home run chase took on a traveling circus atmosphere. One night in Phoenix, 25,000 people showed up to watch McGwire take his hacks in batting practice, while a TV station provided pitch-by-pitch commentary and the scoreboard registered the distance of each practice home run. A media pack worthy of a presidential candidate on election night tailed McGwire across the country, recording his every word and action.
In August, when McGwire had already hit 43 bombs, a veteran Associated Press writer named Steve Wilstein stopped by the big Cardinal's locker in Busch Stadium. As he waited for McGwire to emerge from the shower, Wilstein noted items in plain view on a locker shelf: a photo of McGwire with his 10-year-old son; a can of Popeye-brand Spinach; a bottle of a product called androstenedione. Wilstein assumed it was some sort of vitamin.
But Andro was more than that. The product was a testosterone booster marketed by Patrick Arnold, a renegade chemist who was pioneering the development of steroids that would be undetectable by the most sophisticated laboratory tests. Andro was legal. But it had been banned by the International Olympic Committee, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, and the National Football League. Olympic doping experts told Wilstein that Andro had the same muscle-building effects as anabolic steroids, which Congress had outlawed in 1991. Andro was a steroid by another name. In the Olympics, using Andro was considered cheating. Users who got caught were banned.
Baseball, however, had no rules against steroid use, and a different attitude about cheating. From corking bats to doctoring balls to hiding a coach with binoculars in the scoreboard to steal signs, the impulse to cut corners was almost as old as the game itself. Players did what they could to get an edge, without shame or serious consequence. Performance-enhancing drugs had become another way to accomplish that. For decades, the game's drug of choice was not steroids but "greenies," or amphetamines, which were popped by players seeking to kick their performance up a notch, hoping to overcome fatigue, aches and pains, hangovers, even boredom.
Perhaps because of the sport's antipathy to weight lifting, steroids were slow to catch on. For much of the game's history, players were discouraged from pumping iron, lest they lose the flexibility and quick wrists needed to get around on the pitched ball.
That began to change in the mid-to-late 1980s. By his own account, the Typhoid Mary of steroid use in the big leagues was the Cuban slugger Jose Canseco, the first player to hit 40 home runs and steal 40 bases in the same season. Canseco also was McGwire's teammate on the dominating Oakland Athletics clubs of the 1980s. In 2005, out of baseball, financially strapped, and on probation for assault, Canseco would write a confessional memoir, claiming to have "single handedly changed the game of baseball" by popularizing weight training and performance-enhancing drugs. Canseco said his own career proved that strength conditioning, when combined with steroids and human growth hormone, translated into a higher batting average and more power. He claimed that the drugs could transform a good player into a great one. After his Rookie of the Year season in 1985, when he hit 33 home runs, Canseco claimed other players began to emulate him, and weight training and juicing swept the game.
In the book's most enduring image, Canseco described going into the bathroom at the Oakland Coliseum with McGwire before A's games. There, he wrote, the two sluggers would inject themselves with the steroid Deca-Durabolin, then take the field.
But in 1998, Canseco's disclosures about his famous teammate were far in the unanticipated future. And in 1998, McGwire had been caught only with Andro, not with Growth or Deca. Still, the AP's revelation that McGwire was using a drug that would have gotten him banned from the Olympic Games pushed its way into the headlines. Many in baseball's establishment reacted with outrage-not at McGwire, but at Wilstein, the writer who broke the story.
Leading the attack was Tony La Russa, the Cardinals' tightly wound manager. He lashed out at the media, agitating to ban the Associated Press from the Cards' clubhouse on the spurious grounds that Wilstein had violated an unwritten baseball rule by looking in McGwire's locker.
Acting commissioner Selig promised baseball would commission a scientific study about the health effects of performance-enhancing drugs. But he made clear he would take no action regarding McGwire and Andro.
Selig's deepest fear was that the Andro story would develop into a scandal that would ruin McGwire and kill baseball's lucrative Renaissance just as it was beginning. Fans loved the long ball; crowds were packing the parks; the rancor of the strike was being forgotten; McGwire and Sosa were bringing baseball back from oblivion's edge. And if it sometimes seemed that baseball was devolving into an arcade game, with double-digit scores resembling those in football, and if players were showing up at spring training 15 pounds heavier and displaying the physiques of bodybuilders, those were concerns for another time.
Soon, the Andro story faded. Stubborn pitchers continued to challenge McGwire, and he continued to drive the ball. The rate at which he hit homers was unprecedented-once every 7.27 at bats, far above Ruth's career average of 11.76-and the distances they traveled inspired awe. At Busch Stadium, where the center field fence was 402 feet from home plate, he hit a 545-foot shot that slammed into a seat in the second deck. The club marked the spot by painting a big picture of a Band-Aid there. A home run in the thin air of Denver sailed out of Coors Field, bounced through the players' parking lot, and finally came to rest against a fence 700 feet from the plate.
McGwire hit number 62 on September 8 in St. Louis, amidst a wild celebration and before a national TV audience, and then continued hitting bombs: five of them in his final 11 at bats, including two on the last day of the season, to finish with 70, four ahead of Sosa. In 36 seasons, no baseball player had topped the 60 home run mark-and now two players had blown past it in the same year. Many at the time said McGwire's 1998 season was the greatest offensive performance in the history of the sport.
On the West Coast, Barry Bonds was astounded and aggrieved by the outpouring of hero worship for McGwire, a hitter whom he regarded as obviously inferior to himself. Bonds was 33 years old, had played in the big leagues for 12 years, and was known for an unusual combination of speed and power. In 1993, when he joined the Giants, Bonds had signed what was then the richest contract in the game: $43.75 million for six years. In 1996 he had become the second player in history, after Canseco, to hit 40 home runs and steal 40 bases in the same season. Bonds knew he was on his way to the Hall of Fame. For as long as he had played baseball, Bonds had regarded himself as better than every other player he encountered, and almost always he was right.
But as the 1998 season ended, Bonds's elite status had slipped a notch. The game and its fans were less interested in the complete player who could hit for average and power, and who had great speed and an excellent glove. The emphasis was shifting to pure slugging. From now on, the biggest contracts and the most adulation would go to big, muscular players who could put up home run numbers unlike anything the game had ever seen: players like Mark McGwire. As McGwire's pursuit of the home run record became the constant topic of the nation's media, and as McGwire was celebrated as the best slugger of the modern era and perhaps the greatest slugger who had ever lived, Bonds became more jealous than people who knew him well had ever seen.
To Bonds, it was a joke. He had been around enough gyms to recognize that McGwire was a juicer. Bonds himself had never used anything more performance enhancing than a protein shake from the health-food store. But as the 1998 season unfolded, and as he watched Mark McGwire take over the game-his game-Barry Bonds decided that he, too, would begin using what he called "the shit."
Excerpted from Game of Shadows by Mark Fainaru-Wada Lance Williams Copyright ©2006 by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Posted February 19, 2014
Game of Shadows by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams is a detailed and
groundbreaking novel about some of the most notorious steroid scandals in the
history of American sports. The authors uncover the scandalous lies behind the Bay
Area Laboratory Co-Operative, or BALCO for short, and go in depth to reveal the
major role they played in the Barry Bonds steroid scandal. The main culprit of the
novel is Victor Conte, a self-proclaimed nutritionist and discrete steroid-dealer on
the side. He used the desperation of athletes to expand his new side business and
pulled professional coaches and trainers into his little plot to earn more cash. The
biggest star using Conte’s drugs that miraculously enhanced performance, weight,
and competitive edge was Barry Bonds, and this novel does an almost immaculate
job of unraveling the web of lies that these cheats got tangled up in. One major
theme in this novel is the appeal of steroids that seems to attract so many athletes
and trainers. It’s quite well known that steroids are bad for your health and not to
mention illegal in athletics, but Williams and Fainaru-Wada go deeper and discover
the reason that so many athletes risk their futures to gain the competitive edge. As
the book reveals, Barry Bonds’ attraction to steroids was triggered at the peak of
Mark McGwire’s career. Seeing a newer slugger take his spotlight really hit the spot
and sent Bonds over the edge and into the world of enhancing drugs. Another major
theme in the novel is the intensity behind the world of journalism. The two authors
started as investigative reporters for The San Francisco Chronicle, and eventually
made it to writing this novel. The backlash they felt from baseball fans, lawyers of
athletes, and the MLB organization was so immense, but the authors continued to
reveal all the details instead of holding back. In fact, the authors were sentenced to
18 months in prison but were able to avoid jail time by pleading guilty to leaking
information and lying to prosecutors. What I really liked about this novel was that
they really explained every detail of the scandal. A reader who knew absolutely
nothing about baseball would still be able to understand the attraction of steroids,
the regulations and the impacts. However, I did find it a little confusing when the
authors moved back and forth from one subject to another. The main focus of the
novel was a little blurry and vague due to the fact that there were so many different
stories and sides brought in. I definitely think that this book is a fantastic read for
anyone interested in learning more about steroids in athletics, Barry Bonds, or just a
baseball fan in general. Williams and Fainaru-Wada were one time novelists, and
mainly work as journalists, so to read other pieces by them, The San Francisco
Chronicle and ESPN are the most reliable sources.
Posted February 25, 2012
When GAME OF SHADOWS arrived on the scene, the clamor was to know about Barry Bonds and what, if any, illegal drugs he took to fuel his pursuit of Major League Baseball’s all time home run record. To a lesser degree people wanted to know why. Those questions are answered painstakingly throughout the book. In fact, the presentation of Barry Bonds in this book is so brutal, like a villain from a penny dreadful novel, that if it wasn’t true he would have sued. Truth be told, I have been a Bonds hater since he signed with the San Francisco Giants---rival to my LA Dodgers. But even I often blushed at the broad strokes of distasteful behavior that he is shown to be capable of. That, however, is the prurient part of the book. What makes GAME OF SHADOWS a book of historical note is the depth it plumbs into the entire performance enhancing drug culture. The book was criticized upon arrival for not being all about Barry Bonds—as if the rest of it were just padding. Bond’s outsized personality is used to shine a light on the rest of what was going on at the time. Tempting to just use the term steroids when talking about performance enhancing drugs as a short cut, most people have some sense of what those are, but the book reveals that the many different drugs used come from many different places and medical disciplines. Following the drugs from creation to distribution to use is fascinating and the extent to which they have permeated the sports world—including to a very large degree our Olympic athletes who seemingly should have held themselves to a higher standard—is astonishing. Basically an extended newspaper article, the book remains fresh and lively throughout by deftly dropping one story line for another so by the end there is the feeling of having followed the story for months and staying on top of it the whole time. Don’t be scared off if you are not a baseball fan. Or a sports fan. The book reminds us that we may think we have air tight characters, but one wrong decision and we sink like stones.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted November 10, 2011
Posted August 11, 2011
Posted May 5, 2006
Having been an athletic coach and teacher for over forty years this book points out the biggest problem in athletics today, not only at the professional level but also at the college and high level as well. If one doesn't believe what is presented in this book isn't 100% honest then he/she hasn't looked at the pictures. Also if one believes the athletes referred to are not guilty of steroid use, including Mr. Bonds himself, said person must also believe that the English alphabet doesn't begin with A.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 14, 2006
Finally a comprehensive look at the breadth and scope of the most damaging sports scandal in recent memory. This is a must read for anyone who is concerned with the dangers that doping poses to the fairness of athletic competition and to the comparability of records between generations of athletes in baseball, track and other sports.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 9, 2006
The book does bring to light what many believed to be true (the olympics, MLB, NFL). I don't argee with the book basing its claim of evidence on two major athletes. If others are guilty, than their story needs to be equally portrayed however, this is a very good book. I have recommended it to numerous people.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 30, 2006
Wonderfully wriiten - a must for any and all baseball fans! Eye-opening - facts are straight forward and leave little room for speculation. Hopefully now 'Commissioner' Selig will clean up the disgusting problem that is ruining our beloved game! M.F.W. and L.W. did an extraordinary job!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 28, 2006
I'm sure everyone knows the general story by now, but Game of Shadows delves into this controversial tale in astounding detail. Fainaru-Wada and Williams recount the seedy relationships and events so efficiently and confidently that it's extremely difficult to not finish the book in only a couple of days. The book really opens your eyes as to just how prevalent performance-enhancing drugs have been in professional (and amateur) sports. If you watch and follow sports, Game of Shadows is a must-read.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted April 1, 2006
You have to be a complete fool to ignore the overwhelming evidence... but as far as the book goes, there's absolutely NOTHING new that a person should have already read in the 'free' press. Bonds is about 1/3 of the book, the rest focuses on the comical lout Victor Conte and the dirty world of track and field. If you don't believe Bonds did anything before reading this book, you won't afterwards either. I suggest that if you're inclined that way, that you take our oversized boated head out of the sand and join reality. Don't expect anything remotely investigative. This book is a rehash.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 31, 2006
I read the excerpt of the book that was in Sports Illustrated, then decided to buy the book to read about its coverage of baseball steroids. About 1/2 the book covers baseball and the other 1/2 covers the world of track and field. To be honest, the excerpt in SI covered pretty much all the pertinent info for baseball--they just add more details about Victor Conte and pad it out a lot. The evidence against Bonds--whom the authors clearly make the primary subject of the book--isn't as solid or conclusive as the authors try to lead you to believe. Many people claim someone else told them Bonds was taking all kinds of steroids, but it all goes back to Conte bragging about everything. There were a few charts with Bonds's names on them that could very likely indicate illegal steroid use, but I was surprised by the real lack of info that the authors seemed to have. I'm not going to say that Bonds did not take steroids--just that the facts in this book wouldn't be able to convince an educated person that it was 100% likely that he did. Besides their steroid coverage, the authors seem to have two other slants that are quite obvious throughout the book: (a)make their hometown newspaper the San Francisco Chronicle look like it was a Godsend for steroid reporting (without which nothing would have ever happened) and (b)make Bonds look like the most despicable human you could imagine. We all know he's rude and arrogant, but it was a little too obvious that the authors were unable to contain their biases. There were also several typos in the book--leaving out words and even one case where they listed an event as taking place in December in one paragraph and then said it took place in September two paragraphs later, indicating the book was prepared hastily. A definite read if you're interested in steroid use in the world of track/field, or in the evolution of BALCO, but I'd save the money and just buy the SI with the excerpt in it if you want to read about what the book covers relating to Bonds and steroids.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 24, 2006
There's been much talk over the recent months regarding steroids in baseball and questions regarding certain players who may have used them while playing. I'm a huge Barry Bonds fan, for many reasons. He's been the best all round ball player in the majors, for the last 10-15 yrs. But I also liked Sosa and McGwire as well. They were both nice guys and who helped baseball very much a few years ago. Baseball would have been dead if it wasn't for both Sosa and McGwire's home run record seasons. In the US, you are innocent until proven guilty. Mr. Bonds has not tested positive for any known steroid as of today. None! Sosa, McGwire and Palmeiro all have been on it and based on their testimony before congress. They all failed. There are many assumptions about Bonds and his use of steroids. But I don't convict a baseball player or anyone for that matter, based on newspaper, or magazine articles. Just give me the facts and facts are not hear say or what someone heard, said or allegedly witnessed. I want a POSITIVE drug test. Something illegal found is his blood/urine. Please tell me someone has that and I'll include him (Bonds) with the rest of the dirty ball players. But for now, I hope and know he will break Babe Ruth's record easily this season and then retire. Just show me Proof. That's all I asked for. Proof as in a failed drug test. Rumors and assumptions mean nothing, when Bonds will keep playing ball and breaking records this season, while others are just talking, trying to smear his name and making money from their books about him. As of today, Bonds has started legal action against those who have written books about his alleged use of steroids.Here's some interesting questions. Has MLB ever tested Bonds for steroids within the last 3-4 yrs? If so, what were the results? Is it all confidential? Hopefully the truth will come out soon. ALL players should compete fairly and clean. That includes Barry Bonds!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 13, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
Posted January 6, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Posted March 10, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Posted January 30, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
Posted May 11, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Posted February 17, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Posted July 21, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Posted June 30, 2011
No text was provided for this review.