BN.com Gift Guide

The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College [NOOK Book]

Overview

In the fall of 1999, New York Times education reporter Jacques Steinberg was given an unprecedented opportunity to observe the admissions process at prestigious Wesleyan University. Over the course of nearly a year, Steinberg accompanied admissions officer Ralph Figueroa on a tour to assess and recruit the most promising students in the country. The Gatekeepers follows a diverse group of prospective students as they compete for places in the nation's most elite colleges. The first book to reveal the college ...
See more details below
The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$12.99
BN.com price

Overview

In the fall of 1999, New York Times education reporter Jacques Steinberg was given an unprecedented opportunity to observe the admissions process at prestigious Wesleyan University. Over the course of nearly a year, Steinberg accompanied admissions officer Ralph Figueroa on a tour to assess and recruit the most promising students in the country. The Gatekeepers follows a diverse group of prospective students as they compete for places in the nation's most elite colleges. The first book to reveal the college admission process in such behind-the-scenes detail, The Gatekeepers will be required reading for every parent of a high school-age child and for every student facing the arduous and anxious task of applying to college.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Based on a much discussed New York Times front-page series, The Gatekeepers takes you inside the admissions department of a top American college to reveal every step of the decision-making process. Granted unfettered access to the admissions offices at Connecticut's prestigious Wesleyan University, Steinberg follows several high school seniors as they vie for entry into college. He takes you through every phase of the selections; from reading applicants' essays to evaluating interviewees to comparing test scores. While examining factors such as high school grades, SAT scores, and extracurricular activities, he discusses hot educational topics such as affirmative action, standardized testing, test preparation courses, and the real value of "name-brand" colleges. Fascinating; intense; required reading for parents.
Publishers Weekly
Education reporter Steinberg presents a compelling tale in this account, told from the perspective of Ralph Figueroa, an admissions officer at Wesleyan University. Expanding on a series of articles in the New York Times, Steinberg provides an insider's look at how Figueroa and the school's admissions committee factored grades, test scores, essays, extracurricular activities and race into account as they winnowed 700 students for the class of 2004 from nearly 7,000 applicants. Using real names, applications and interviews, Steinberg follows six applicants of varying backgrounds from their first encounter with Figueroa to their final acceptance or rejection. Although not a how-to book per se, Steinberg's work does include helpful advice, such as "there's no way to outthink this process" and "if you've got something you want to write, then write it the way you want." Steinberg portrays Figueroa and the other admissions officers as doing the best they can to give each applicant a fair assessment, despite their responsibility for 1,500 of them. Among the book's surprises are that supplementary material, no matter how impressive, carries no weight in deciding who gets in, while honesty about a mistake in one case, an incident involving a pot brownie can influence an admissions officer to admit. Wesleyan's high standards e.g., a 1350 combined score on the SAT may put some readers off, but the process that Steinberg describes is similar at most private colleges and universities. Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
New York Times education reporter Steinberg takes us behind the scenes to experience the arduous and even grisly process of admissions at a major New England college. From fall 1999 to spring 2000, Steinberg shadowed Wesleyan University admissions officer Ralph Figueroa as he traversed the country recruiting students. The author had the unprecedented opportunity to attend admissions meetings with Figueroa and his colleagues in which the applicant pool of 7000 was reduced to 700 openings. Steinberg also followed six students through the admissions process and carefully documented their personal experiences, backgrounds, and interactions with the admissions officers to discover why some students stand out in the officers' memories and actually become bargaining chips in meetings with their colleagues. Although the author explicitly states that this is not another "how-to" manual for gaining admission to college, it nonetheless reveals that there are no set formulas and that the decision rests on factors that may not be wholly within the control of the applicant. This insightful and readable book should be purchased by all academic and large public libraries. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 5/15/02.]-Mark Alan Williams, Web Lib. & Document Storage Svcs., Hines VA Hosp., Chicago
School Library Journal
Adult/High School-Steinberg had unparalleled access to the admissions process for the class of 2004 at Wesleyan, an elite liberal arts college in Connecticut. Originally presented as a series of articles in the New York Times, the stories were so compelling and the subject matter so topical, that he was convinced to expand them to book length. He followed Ralph Figueroa, a veteran admissions officer, for eight months, encompassing initial "marketing" trips, contacts with high school guidance counselors, the early-decision process, reading thousands of applications for final admissions, wooing reluctant candidates, and fighting for specific marginal cases. Evident throughout is the truth of Figueroa's assertion that there is no way to guarantee admission or any one thing that will make a certain candidate successful. Several high school seniors allowed the author to record their thoughts and concerns as he simultaneously followed the progress of their applications. While the close examination emphasizes the seeming inconsistency of the process, the resulting epiphanies and changes in perspective of the individuals followed in the year's march to college allow readers to see that a big name is not necessarily everything and that some students are much happier in a different atmosphere. The stories are so well written that teens will find this title a pleasurable read in the midst of much practical advice.-Susan H. Woodcock, Fairfax County Public Library, Chantilly, VA Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781101200315
  • Publisher: Penguin Group (USA)
  • Publication date: 7/29/2003
  • Sold by: Penguin Group
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 336
  • Sales rank: 164,333
  • File size: 655 KB

Meet the Author

Jacques Steinberg has been a staff reporter for The New York Times for more than ten years and currently is a national education correspondent. In 1998, he was awarded the grand prize of the Education Writers Association for his nine-part series on a third-grade classroom on Manhattan's Upper West Side.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

One
The Tortilla Test

The lime-green Saturn raced along the winding roads of northern New Jersey, past trees strung with leaves that glowed tangerine, gold and maroon. But the driver was too preoccupied to notice the glorious foliage, his eyes continually darting to the passenger seat. There he had laid out travel directions printed from the Internet, along with a well-worn road atlas pocked with green asterisks spread across a half dozen states. Each designated a community that he had visited previously.

On that bracing morning in early November of 1999, Ralph Figueroa was beginning his fifth year as an admissions officer at Wesleyan University, in Middletown, Connecticut, one of the nation's premier liberal arts colleges. But from the vantage point of a passing driver, Ralph was just another motorist wearing a gray wool suit, white starched shirt and deep red tie. He sat hunched over the wheel of a rental car that was too small to contain his body, which unfolded to more than six feet and weighed well over two hundred pounds. With his thick, blown-back black hair, which he had neatly arranged at a Courtyard by Marriott just after daybreak, Ralph looked like someone on his way to sell a $350 vacuum cleaner, rather than the product of a $35,000-a-year education that came with the unwritten guarantee of a happy and meaningful life.

At ten-thirty, a few minutes early as usual, Ralph pulled up in front of Northern Valley Regional High School in Demarest, a boxy, tan-brick public school that looked nothing like the private Tudor-style academy that he had left a half hour before. This was his second sales call of the day, and one of four visits that he had scheduled within a fifty-mile radius. He had allotted just six hours for the day's work, so he would have to speak quickly. As he moved purposefully past green-tiled walls and gray lockers on the way to the guidance office, he fumbled to pin on a plastic badge embossed with his name and that of Wesleyan in big letters.

The popular image of university admissions officers is not unlike that of Hollywood studio executives. Both are assumed to spend most days sitting imperiously behind desks well out of reach of the general public, from which they deign to approve only a fraction of the endless series of pitches that are presented to them in rapid-fire succession. But to the handful of seniors and juniors who sat around a conference table that autumn morning listening to this smiling emissary on leave from his ivory tower, the message was unmistakable: Wesleyan Wants You! The university's gates, it seemed, had been flung wide open. And here, before their very eyes, was one of the gatekeepers who could escort them in.

From his seat beneath a giant map of the United States that a guidance counselor had labeled "College Acceptances"-so far, it had only one pin pushed into it, in the vicinity of Wilkes University in the Pocono Mountains-Ralph belied the familiar notion of admissions officer as intimidator. His voice was as soothing as a pediatrician's. He urged them to call him Ralph, not Rafael, his given name, and certainly not Mr. Figueroa.

The pitch Ralph delivered to his small audience seemed to promise that Wesleyan could fulfill virtually anyone's fantasy of higher education, if only the students would give the university the chance. And just to make sure that the students kept a vivid snapshot of the Connecticut campus projected on the screens in their minds, the university had sent along piles of posters of a Wesleyan landmark, Foss Hill, photographed on a fall day as beautiful as this one.

Even a devoted alumnus might not have noticed that the creaky football bleachers had been digitally removed, as had the many patches of brown dead turf. Instead, the late-fall grounds had the freshly tended appearance of the infield at Fenway Park. While the poster made a good first impression, some applicants would be disappointed when they saw the real thing. The curriculum, as described by Ralph, sometimes received a similar gloss.

"One of the first things to remember about the university is that there are no requirements," Ralph told the assembled group, tantalizing them with the prospect of never again having to take a dreaded subject like math or chemistry. "Wesleyan stresses a real-world approach."

Moreover, Ralph explained, while other institutions had begun only recently to appreciate and celebrate the differences among students, "We started our focus on diversity in 1965."

"That's the year I was born," he said, before adding that thirty-four years was indeed "a long time ago."

Almost immediately, the students' hands shot up. Would there be opportunities at Wesleyan to perform in a musical? one girl asked.

"Wesleyan does a lot of theater," Ralph responded. He mentioned that a first-string quarterback had played the lead in a recent production of Sweeney Todd, and that Wesleyan had a disproportionate share of alumni working in Hollywood. They included the writer of Batman Forever, the director of American Pie and the actor William Christopher, who, Ralph assured his listeners, would be well known to their parents as Father Mulcahy on M*A*S*H.

Just then a girl interrupted: Was the biology department any good?

"The physical sciences faculty does more research than just about any other liberal arts college," Ralph said. "Haverford beat us," he added. "But don't tell anyone."

Was there enough time for students at Wesleyan to study and to play sports?

"We want students to be scholar-athletes," Ralph said. Nearly two-thirds of Wesleyan undergraduates played an intramural or team sport. "The only thing that students do more of than sports at Wesleyan is community service."

How's the food?

One of the high school seniors, who had already visited a friend on the Wesleyan campus, answered before Ralph could. "There's always free frozen yogurt in the cafeteria," she said, describing the unique donation of a wealthy alumnus with a sweet tooth.

"Ice cream, too," Ralph added, sounding like Willie Wonka beckoning kids to the chocolate factory.

How fast are the Internet connections?

"Very fast," Ralph said.

Were there cable television jacks in the dorm rooms?

Ralph smiled. "There actually are," he said.

Only two questions drew answers that dimmed the Technicolor portrait that Ralph was painting that morning. But, then, an admissions officer from almost any other college would have had to give the same responses, if he or she was being honest. One was posed by a serious-looking boy, who inquired: "Do you have any Nobel Prize winners on the faculty?"

"We don't have any Nobels," Ralph admitted, momentarily taken aback. "But we do have professors who have won Guggenheim and MacArthur and other grants."

The boy had been advised by his father, a Yale-educated ophthalmologist, to ask Ralph this question, and was obviously unimpressed.

The other tough question was a follow-up to Ralph's earlier point about diversity.

"Do the races mix?" he was asked.

"Yes and no," Ralph answered. Wesleyan had acquired nicknames like "PCU" and

"Diversity U" by attracting and admitting more black and Hispanic students than nearly any other top school, Ralph told his audience. "People think it's a place where students are holding hands and singing 'Kumbaya.' "

But, he had to acknowledge, "There is a tension. It's a process to address these issues and forge a community. Students will mix together one moment, only to segregate afterward."

And then, nearly an hour after his sales call had begun, it was over.

After making a note to contact the campus rabbi on behalf of one student, and passing out business cards with his e-mail address to several others, Ralph was back in his rental car and on his way to the next group of potential customers: a high school in the neighboring community of Ridgewood. He had spoken too long, and as he turned right onto Oradell Avenue, he was going to have to rush to make it on time.

But in all the talking he had done at Northern Valley Regional High, Ralph had neglected to mention a fact that the students surely would have found relevant: Wesleyan had just come off a year in which it had attracted a record number of applicants. Nearly 7000 students had sought the 715 spots available in the freshman class-almost 10 applicants for each seat. Though the university had offered admission to more than 715, because some of those accepted would invariably choose to go elsewhere, Wesleyan had still rejected 7 of every 10 who applied. The median SAT score of those admitted-a combined 1370 on a scale of 1600-was not only the highest in Wesleyan's history, but also higher than that of all but a handful of other colleges.

And as Ralph spoke, two months before all applications were due, there were already indications that this year would be even more competitive, with thousands more students projected to graduate from American high schools than in the previous school year. Rather than spend six weeks of the fall on the road courting applicants, as Ralph and his eight other colleagues from the admissions office were doing, they could easily have stayed home and still assembled a stellar class-several classes, in fact, given the pool of highly qualified applicants. But like a politician wading into a room full of strangers, Ralph and his colleagues were not going to rest until they had given every last college applicant a reason to cast a vote for Wesleyan.

Ralph had a particular voter in mind. He was hoping to seize the imagination of that elusive senior who hadn't given Wesleyan much thought, if he or she had given it any thought at all, but who appeared to have credentials so impeccable as to fairly sail through the admissions process. Ralph knew, though, that in his quest to find such a prize he was inviting most of his listeners to submit a fifty-five-dollar application fee sheerly for the privilege of being rejected.

"You realize that, further down the line, a lot of these kids will end up applying and being denied," Ralph said later. "But you can't really think about that at this stage. This stage is about figuring out which students should be considering Wesleyan, which students really need to have us on their radar screens. At this stage, I want everyone who could possibly benefit from Wesleyan to have that chance. They'll never get in if they don't try."

That may seem like a cute way to do business, but at the very moment that Ralph and his colleagues were fanning across the country and around the world, admissions officers from four dozen other highly selective colleges-including Harvard and Haverford, Swarthmore and Stanford, Princeton and Pomona-were spending tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of hours, on similar expeditions. Like Wesleyan, each had received a record or near-record number of applicants the previous winter. Nonetheless, each was intent on assembling a class that was a little bit better than last year's-and, if possible, a little bit better than almost every other institution's. As Ralph and his colleagues saw it, so worthy was the goal of putting together such a community that it justified the difficult and sometimes cruel practicalities that were required to make it happen. In recent years, the elite colleges had become something like combatants in a global arms race, a contest in which strength would be measured by stockpiles of candidates arranged by test scores, grade point averages, outside interests and skin color. None of the institutions was willing to be the first to stand down and pronounce itself content with its lot.

"No one is staying static," said Barbara-Jan Wilson, who had left the deanship of the Wesleyan admissions office over the previous summer to become the university's vice president for university relations, which meant she had gone from sweet-talking applicants to sweet-talking donors.

"Schools under us are trying to pick off the kids in our applicant pool," she explained, ticking off college names like Trinity, Bates, Muhlenberg and Connecticut. "Meanwhile, we're trying to pick off Brown's kids and Yale's kids." "Maybe we're just keeping up with the Joneses," she added. "But it's bigger than that."

In truth, Wesleyan was part of a distinct minority within the academy that fall: one of only about fifty American colleges that reject more students than they accept. The lion's share of the nation's two thousand four-year colleges take almost anyone who applies. Yet each year, an increasing number of American teenagers flood those brand-name institutions with a disproportionate number of applications. One explanation for this, apart from the larger student population, surely lies with their parents, who were impressing ever more strongly on their offspring that a blue-chip education is the key to a successful life. First- and second-generation Americans, whose own parents had been content to see them graduate from any college, were now advising their own children and grandchildren that only a marquee name would be acceptable. In addition, elaborate online tours were now making it possible for students and parents from as far away as Wyoming and New Mexico to roam the academic epicenter of the northeast without ever leaving home.

A university is only as good as its students, so why shouldn't Ralph seek to lure the best that were out there? Those turned back from the Wesleyan gate would surely find a place elsewhere, a fact in which Ralph took great comfort. More important, since Harvard and Yale and Brown were rejecting more applicants than ever, Wesleyan had a real shot at getting some students whom it might have lost to the Ivies a decade ago-if only enough of them knew Wesleyan's name and philosophy, and could be persuaded to choose Wesleyan over its more immediate competitors, including Williams and Amherst.

Other than those fortunate enough to be accepted, the most immediate beneficiaries of all this wooing would be Wesleyan's professors. Like gardeners, the university's faculty members needed fertile minds in which to plant the seeds of knowledge, and when they weren't satisfied with the quality in a given year-if there were too few Russian majors or not enough budding microbiologists, for example-the professors were never shy about telling the administration. Also paying close attention to Ralph's efforts were the university's alumni, who were particularly gratified when Wesleyan snared a hot prospect-academic, as well as athletic-from a competitor. That swelling pride was often all it took to nudge a willing alumnus to contribute upward of a million dollars to his alma mater, which in turn made it possible for the institution to seek to attract even better applicants.

But in building its arsenal of top students-with "top" variously defined as those who checked "valedictorian" on their applications; those with decent test scores who identified themselves as black or Hispanic; or those who played the bassoon-Wesleyan was also seeking to impress demanding audiences far from its Connecticut campus.

For the last two decades, much of the pressure on admissions officers like Ralph had been applied by a group of observers who had assigned themselves the task of rating universities as if they were sports teams or stocks. Chief among the unofficial evaluators was U.S. News & World Report. In 1985 the magazine, long obscured by the more widely read Time and Newsweek, stumbled upon a niche by developing its own formula to handicap the top educational institutions in America. One crucial component in the magazine's assessment was the percentage of applicants that an institution accepted-the lower the better, as the editors believed. U.S. News also tabulated the percentage of accepted students who chose to matriculate at that institution, a number it wanted to be as high as possible. At once responding to and stoking Americans' obsession with elite colleges, U.S. News's annual education issue had become essential reading for teenagers, joined on their bookshelves by similar book-length guides published by such disparate companies as The Yale Daily News, Barron's, Peterson's and the test-prep upstart Princeton Review. All compiled admissions statistics liked those that filled U.S. News. Edward B. Fiske, a one-time education editor of The New York Times (and a 1959 Wesleyan graduate), had, with his annual Fiske Guide to Colleges, assumed the mythic status of a Broadway theater reviewer, his recommendations so influential that they could determine how tens of thousands of students might perceive a college for an entire year and beyond.

If Ralph had stayed home that fall, and Wesleyan's numbers fell, its rankings in these publications could plummet. And as a study coauthored by a Cornell professor in 2000 suggested, after an institution's standing in U.S. News fell, so, at times, did the number and quality of its applicants.

"I am an agent of the institution," Ralph said in an interview that fall. "And as an agent of the institution, I am trying to get as many students to apply to the institution as I can. Yet I like to focus on the more human perspective: there are going to be students who discover Wesleyan who wouldn't have otherwise."

Whatever was motivating Ralph, his journey remained forever uphill, the summit always seeming to move higher. That was evident as he wearily took stock at the end of that day he spent in northern New Jersey. At the first three high schools he had visited, each of which was considered among the better-performing in the state, fewer than ten students had turned out to see him. And while nineteen juniors and seniors filled a conference room at his final stop, a relatively new public school called the Bergen Academies, the students had been required to attend by their guidance counselor.

Asked later by another visitor if Ralph's talk had swayed them in any way, most of those he met that day listed first choices that were not Wesleyan. One boy with a high SAT score at Dwight-Englewood School, a respected prep school, said he was seeking early admission to Connecticut College because he "had a feeling" about the place. Another girl said she'd consider Wesleyan "if I don't get into Hopkins." Students at Bergen Academies ranked Princeton and Brown, as well as Vassar and Rutgers, ahead of Wesleyan.

Almost all of the students, though, promised Ralph that they would apply to Wesleyan, and experience had taught him that such students usually did. Wesleyan's numbers might well be up this year, and that would mean he was doing a critical part of his job well.

Still, the more successful he was in the fall, the more applications he would have to read in the winter. And that would only make it harder to make his final selections in the spring.

—from The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College by Jacques Steinberg, Copyright © September 2002, Viking Press, a member of Penguin Putnam, Inc., used by permission.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction vii
1 The Tortilla Test 1
2 Don't Send Me Poems 27
3 Istanbul (Not Constantinople) 55
4 Considered Without Prejudice 89
5 Read Faster, Say No 119
6 Thundercats and X-Men 149
7 Nothing to Do with the Dope 173
8 Things Seem to Have Gone Well 199
9 420-ed 219
10 Unnamed Gorgeous Small Liberal Arts School 235
Epilogue 263
Acknowledgments 287
Selected Bibliography 291
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 22 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(11)

4 Star

(7)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(2)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 22 Customer Reviews
  • Posted September 5, 2009

    I wouldn't recommend.

    This author is under the impression that all white students have advantages like personal tutors for SAT prep etc. He believes that minority students deserve extra "points" so to speak, in the admissions process because they are disadvantaged. I resent this line of thinking because my son is a white student who will be applying to college next year, and we most definitely can NOT afford a tutor, or any of the other advantages he refers to. Not all white students are rich, and conversely, not all minority students are poor. There is much too much stereotyping in this book. The author also focuses all of his "journeys" in the book on minority students ONLY.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 22, 2013

    I couldn't find a lot of books about the admission process from

    I couldn't find a lot of books about the admission process from the perspective of the admissions officer that allowed me to empathize with them as well as other prospective college students. I found it grounding in that I don't feel that I will be completely destroyed or ecstatic when I hear back from the rest of my colleges. I'm pleased to know that I will just get in *somewhere* based on my own experiences and from what I read in this novel. Admissions officers have quite a difficult job and I highly respect them for it as I would not be able to do what they do.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 5, 2011

    A Great Read!

    The Gatekeepers is a great book for any parent or child who wants a taste of the college admissions process. Being a senior in high school, however, I found this book to be a difficult read- After hearing from my colleges already, I had little interest in the in- depth look Jacques Steinberg flooded his readers with. I would have definitely been more interested in this book if it provided perspective from multiple college admissions office, not just Wesleyan's. There are great ideas in this book, but I think it would have been a better read for someone who had not just finished applying to college.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 5, 2011

    Highly Recommended

    It is a great book for high school seniors getting ready to fill out their college applications. Steinberg shares the secrets behind the walls of the admission offices and how each applicant is reviewed. It is a must read for parents and students alike.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 6, 2010

    HIGHEST POSSIBLE RATING !

    This book is simply superb. Not only informative but so readable. I passed this around in the family and we all enjoyed it. He did a marvelous job in making the students come alive. You really care what happened to these kids. This will be very helpful to all families whose children are headed off to college. I highly recommend this.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 3, 2009

    There are always two sides to a coin

    This book is great for incoming college freshmen and high school seniors who have to deal with college process. You see the other side of the admissions and the stress they have to deal with as well. It's not just hard for the students applying but for the people who have to deal with reading your applications and reviewing your test scores and evaluating your essays,etc. It's a tough decision for them to make as to who they should accept and reject. I thought this was a very insightful book for people having to go through the hassles of college.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 7, 2006

    Most frightening book of my life

    I read this while I was going through the college admissions process and it scared me half to death. It's an excellent book, but not one I'd suggest reading during such a stressful time. I'd say that students should read this book in ninth grade to see what admissions officers are really looking for.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 23, 2005

    I'm a 29 year old college graduate and I still loved this book!

    This book was incredible! I picked it up at a bookstore on vacation because it looked interesting. Needless to say, I didn't do much sightseeing. It reads like a novel, and you just can't wait to find out what happens to the high school students featured in it. Strongly recommended!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 9, 2005

    Nothing else like it!

    Everything an applicant/parent/guidance counselor needs to know about the college admissions process of a private institution. You will not be disappointed!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 19, 2004

    A 'must-read' for prospective college students everywhere.

    I stumbled across this book while looking for college admission books for my brilliant baby sister. J. Steinberg depicts the admission process in a new light as admissions officers, often portrayed as cold and calculating, are depicted as caring humans who genuinely want the best for their applicants. This book gives first hand accounts of students, parents, guidance counselors, and admissions officers throughout all phases of the college selection process. There are definite 'admission tips' to be gained from this book, although they are interwoven throughout the book as themes. For those who want quick ways to 'outsmart the system' this is not the book for you; rather, read it to make sense of the sometimes, seemingly arbitrary game of college admissions. I think this would be a great book for any high school student (my own children will receive a copy in their freshman year of HS!) with plans of attending college.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 26, 2002

    Compelling insight and true-life stories

    Jacques Steinberg has pulled the covers off the highly selective college admissions processes. With access to every twist and turn, he provides compelling insight to this harrowing rite of passage. Using Wesleyan University as an archetype, his characters are real, adding a personal element to intrigue as riveting as a mystery novel. The passion and professionalism of the admissions Gatekeepers inspires admiration, assuring that there is a school for every kid, and usually the right one. Parents of college-bound students should read this for its humanity, not to get a leg-up on the process. Leave that to the college prep jackals that profit so bountifully by agitating our anxieties.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 3, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 27, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 19, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 4, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 19, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 1, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 15, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 24, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 30, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 22 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)