God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions. by John W. Loftus, Randal Rauser | | NOOK Book (eBook) | Barnes & Noble
God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions.

God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions.

3.5 2
by John W. Loftus, Randal Rauser
     
 

View All Available Formats & Editions

Perhaps the most persistent question in human history is whether or not there is a God. Intelligent people on both sides of the issue have argued, sometimes with deep rancor and bitterness, for generations. The issue can't be decided by another apologetics book, but the conversation can continue and help each side understand the perspectives of the other.

In

Overview

Perhaps the most persistent question in human history is whether or not there is a God. Intelligent people on both sides of the issue have argued, sometimes with deep rancor and bitterness, for generations. The issue can't be decided by another apologetics book, but the conversation can continue and help each side understand the perspectives of the other.

In this unique book, atheist John Loftus and theist Randal Rauser engage in twenty short debates that consider Christianity, the existence of God, and unbelief from a variety of angles. Each concise debate centers on a proposition to be resolved, with either John or Randal arguing in the affirmative and the opponent the negative, and can be read in short bits or big bites. This is the perfect book for Christians and their atheist or agnostic friends to read together, and encourages honest, open, and candid debate on the most important issues of life and faith.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9781441240699
Publisher:
Baker Publishing Group
Publication date:
04/15/2013
Sold by:
Barnes & Noble
Format:
NOOK Book
Pages:
208
Sales rank:
563,697
File size:
820 KB

Related Subjects

Meet the Author

John W. Loftus is a former Christian minister and apologist with degrees in philosophy, theology, and the philosophy of religion from Lincoln Christian University and Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He also did PhD studies at Marquette University in theology and ethics. John is the founder of an influential blog called Debunking Christianity (http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/). He is the author of Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity and the editor of The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails, and The End of Christianity. He lives in Indiana.

Randal Rauser (MCS, Regent College; PhD, King's College London) is associate professor of historical theology at Taylor Seminary, Edmonton, Canada. He is the author of several books, including Finding God in the Shack, You're Not as Crazy as I Think, and The Swedish Atheist, the Scuba Diver, and Other Apologetic Rabbit Trails. He is a popular speaker and gifted communicator who seeks to bring the truth of Scripture to bear on the real-life issues of today and who blogs regularly at www.randalrauser.com. He lives in Alberta.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

God or Godless?: One Atheist. One Christian. Twenty Controversial Questions. 3.5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 2 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Picking cherries off the 30 foot cherry tree without using the proper tools was difficult. However, after renting a boomlift, the job was expidited, entertaining for children, and productive. God or Godless? Is a "debate" between a now atheist former minister (with an affection for biblical illiteracy and liberal view of the Bible) and a liberal doctor of theology who likes to have "orthodox" views when they are convienient. While John, the atheist, stays on topic more often, his arguments are weak and easily desmissed. If he would have read the vereses he referenced much of the time, he would not have used them. The thought that an all loving, knowing, and wise Creator does not exist because he cannot fathom how he would allow suffering (65 percent of his argument), is irrational. I cannot fathom the temperature variation on Mars, but don't deny it. On the other hand, Randal the Christian, cannot make it through a topic without an illustation that requires most of the topic to explain how it aids his argument. And when he does attempt to stay on topic, his arguments often do not affirm his position when he is in the affirmative. Like me referencing picking cherries, these men pick their responses without a well thought out rationalization. Their tools are "you too," "no, your wrong," and "the Bible isn't trustworthy on this topic" (stupidly used by both debater). The best argument comes from John when Randall says he doesn't believe what the Bible says, and John encourages to finish the step to denying all of the Bible if he is going to deny a lot of it. Randall's denial of biblical truth is a really egnoramous statement from a really ignorant professor. If he would follow his own advise in his closing argument, then he would see the Bible is true and trustworthy. Alas, neither is a clear victor, and the main loser in this debate is orthodox Christianity. But that is the result when liberal theologians come together. It would behoove the reader of this review to read Tozer (who argues for orthodoxy and Biblical trustworthiness in fewer pages).
JessLucy More than 1 year ago
Highly recommended. Rauser is no match for John Loftus; if you are already a non-believer I could almost advise skipping Rauser's contributions as they don't really say anything at all. It's basically just him saying that we need to believe b/c the bible says so or stating that the texts don't mean what they actually say. Sadly, at the time they were written, the texts meant a lot of what they said and even sadder is that people in 2013 still use the bible as their moral compass. (Sacrifice your virgin daughters to gang-rape since homosexuality is wrong, anyone?) Loftus has the power of reason and science on his side and is actually providing proven, factual information to the reader while Rauser is simply twisting words and telling boring stories about people who have experienced so-called miracles. Anyway, it is a very good read and I would also recommend to anyone interested in this subject any of the books written by Richard Dawkins.