Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness

Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness

by Isaac Kramnick, Laurence Moore (With), Isaac Krammick, R. Laurence Moore
The godless Constitution offers a bracing return to the first principles of American governance.


The godless Constitution offers a bracing return to the first principles of American governance.

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
While neither a full nor a particularly sophisticated treatment of the issue of church/state separation, this is a compelling rebuttal to those who claim that America is a Christian nation. The authors don't address the many recent judicial controversies about public expression of religion. Instead, they explore the Constitution's origins and its ``intentionally secular base.'' They point out that even the religious men among those who ratified the Constitution wanted to distance religion from government. Also, they discuss the views of Roger Williams, who wanted to keep the church pure and thus separate; of John Locke, whose liberalism limited the role of the state; and of Thomas Jefferson, who incorporated Locke's ideas in America. Indeed, the authors note that the godless Constitutional structure was undermined only later, when God entered U.S. currency, in 1863, and in such institutions as the Pledge of Allegiance. The authors believe that while the Constitution does not exclude religion from the public square, it offers no special privileges; thus, they say, religious faith should not be a litmus test for political leaders. Kramnick teaches government at Cornell University; Moore teaches history there. (Jan.)
Library Journal
Scholars Kramnick (government, Cornell) and Moore (history, Cornell) have abandoned the "scholarly apparatus" of footnotes and bibliography in favor of an impassioned polemic on separation of church and state aimed at a popular audience. They present the case that strict separation of church and state, while a source of debate from the nation's founding onward, was indeed the intent of the founders. The vision of a limited, secular state populated by a religious and moral citizenry was at the heart of the new American republic. Using well-selected historical examples, they distinguish "between a religiously informed politics and the politics of religious correctness." The debate about the proper balance between church and state continues today, perhaps approaching its highest pitch since the Constitutional period. The authors ably present a timely and important topic in this election year in all its historical context and complexity. For most large collections.-Linda V. Carlisle, Southern Illinois Univ., Edwardsville

Product Details

Norton, W. W. & Company, Inc.
Publication date:
Edition description:
Older Edition
Product dimensions:
5.50(w) x 8.28(h) x 0.47(d)

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews