Good Reasons for Better Arguments: An Introduction to the Skills and Values of Critical Thinking

by Jerome E. Bickenbach, Jacqueline M. Davies

Overview

This text introduces university students to the philosophical ethos of critical thinking, as well as to the essential skills required to practice it. The authors believe that Critical Thinking should engage students with issues of broader philosophical interest while they develop their skills in reasoning and argumentation. The text is informed throughout by philosophical theory concerning argument and communication—from Aristotle’s recognition of the importance of evaluating argument in terms of its purpose to Habermas’s developing of the concept of communicative rationality. The authors’ treatment of the topic is also sensitive to the importance of language and of situation in shaping arguments, and to the necessity in argument of some interplay between reason and emotion. Unlike many other texts in this area, then, Good Reasons for Better Arguments helps to explain both why argument is important and how the social role of argument plays an important part in determining what counts as a good argument.

If this text is distinctive in the extent to which it deals with the theory and the values of critical thinking, it is also noteworthy for the thorough grounding it provides in the skills of deductive and inductive reasoning; the authors present the reader with useful tools for the interpretation, evaluation and construction of arguments. A particular feature is the inclusion of a wide range of exercises, rich with examples that illuminate the practice of argument for the student. Many of the exercises are self testing, with answers provided at the back of the text; others are appropriate for in-class discussion and assignments. Challenging yet accessible, Good Reasons for Better Arguments brings a fresh perspective to an essential subject.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781551110592
Publisher:	Broadview Press
Publication date:	09/19/1996
Edition description:	New Edition
Pages:	408
Product dimensions:	6.50(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.75(d)

About the Author

Jerome E. Bickenbach and Jacqueline M. Daviesis both teach in the Department of Philosophy at Queen’s University. Previous publications include Professor Bickenbach’s Canadian Cases in the Philosophy of Law (Broadview, 3/e 1998).

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

1. CRITICAL THINKING: WHAT AND WHY

1. What’s in a Name?
2. Critical Thinking and the Search for Good Reasons
3. Who’s to Say What a Good Reason Is?
4. Good Reasons, Better Arguments and Rationality
5. Rational Discourse: Giving Reasons
6. Communicatively Rational Speech Acts, or Good Reasons for Better Arguments
7. Communicative Norms: Expectations and Obligations
1. Comprehensibility
2. Sincerity
8. Transparent Persuasion: The Goal of Better Arguments
9. A Brief Overview of this Book
   Exercises

2. ARGUMENTS

1. Critical Thinking Skills, Phase 1: Argument Structure and Construction
2. The Argument: Form and Function
3. Arguments and Non-arguments
1. Arguments and Opinions
2. Arguments, Explanations and Definitions
4. Units of Meaning
5. Standard Form for Simple Arguments
6. Enthymemes and the Principle of Charity
7. Standard Form for Complex Arguments
8. Expressing Yourself in Argument Form
   Exercises

3. LANGUAGE

1. Language as Context
2. Definitions: Explaining Meaning
3. Definitions: Arguing Meaning
1. Paradigm Case/Counter-example
2. Genus/Differentia
4. Understanding Conditionals and the Relationship of Implication
5. Language and the Gap between Intention and Communication
1. Ambiguity
2. Vagueness
3. Euphemism and Hyperbole
4. Jargon and Obfuscation
5. Disempowering Language
6. Linguistic Considerations in the Construction of Your Own Arguments
   Exercises

4. GOOD ARGUMENTS

1. Phase 2: Evaluating Arguments
2. Arguments, Arguers and Conclusions: Where to Start Your Evaluation
3. Facts, Values and Opinions: Are They All Open to Evaluation?
4. The Normativity of Argument Evaluation
5. What Are Good Enough Arguments Good Enough For?
6. General Criteria of Argument Evaluation
7. Acceptability
8. Relevance
9. Sufficiency
10. Cogency: The Overall Judgement
11. A Few More Words on Expressing Yourself in Argument Form
    Exercises

5. BAD ARGUMENTS

1. Fallacy-Spotting and Building a Better Argument
2. Dubious Premises
1. Premises that Mean Too Much, or Not Enough
2. Premises Bearing Illicitly Imported Assumptions
3. Irrelevance
1. Irrelevant Attacks on the Source of Opinion
2. Illegitimate Manipulation of Emotion
3. Changing the Subject
4. Improper Appeals to Authority
4. Hasty Conclusions and Suppressed Evidence
5. Building a Better Argument
   Exercises

6. DEDUCTION

1. Three Modes of Argumentation
2. Aspects of Deductive Reasoning
3. Validity
4. Categorical Logic
1. Translation
5. Venn Diagrams
6. Immediate Inferences
7. Syllogisms
1. Fallacies of Distribution and Other Violations of the Rules for Syllogisms
8. Propositional Logic
9. The Strengths and Weaknesses of Deduction
   Exercises

7. INDUCTION

1. Induction and Reasoning from Observation
2. Enumerative Induction
3. Representative Sampling and Justified Confidence in Induction
4. Reasoning about Causation
1. Types of Causes
5. Inductive Justification and Scientific Methods
   Exercises

8. PRACTICAL REASONING

1. The Scope of Practical Reasoning
2. Intersubjectivity, Open-endedness and Criterial Reasoning
3. Conductive Reasoning
4. Reasoning from Analogy
5. Communicative Rationality: The Sufficiency Criterion in Practical Reasoning
   Exercises

Answers to Selected Exercises

Appendix A: Procedure for Standardizing Complex Arguments
Appendix B: Procedure for Expressing Yourself in Argument Form

Index