Healthy Women, Healthy Lives: A Guide to Preventing Disease, from the Landmark Nurses' Health Studyby Susan E. Hankinson, Graham A. Colditz, Joann E. Manson, Frank Speizer
Since 1976, the world-famous Harvard Medical School Nurses' Health Study has followed more than 120,000 real women, leading real lives, to discover what factors contribute to improving the health of women. The most important findings are made accessible to the general public in this easy-to-understand book that will revolutionize the way women live.… See more details below
Since 1976, the world-famous Harvard Medical School Nurses' Health Study has followed more than 120,000 real women, leading real lives, to discover what factors contribute to improving the health of women. The most important findings are made accessible to the general public in this easy-to-understand book that will revolutionize the way women live.
Healthy Women, Healthy Lives goes beyond simply labeling preventive measures and risky behavior -- it provides practical tips and strategies from clinical experts at Harvard Medical School for making healthy lifestyle changes. Here are the best ways to lower the risk of a host of chronic diseases, as well as tips for losing weight, stopping smoking, eating healthily, and exercising regularly. With easy-to-read graphs that clarify complex information and personal stories from nurses who have contributed to the remarkable study, Healthy Women, Healthy Lives is an extraordinary health book that will prove invaluable to women everywhere.
- Free Press
- Publication date:
- Product dimensions:
- 6.33(w) x 9.57(h) x 1.30(d)
Read an Excerpt
Chapter Five: Lowering the Risk of Breast Cancer
You likely recognize the ratio one in eight as an American woman's lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. In addition to being an alarming reminder to some women of how common breast cancer is, the one in eight ratio can also raise a host of important questions. Why is the lifetime risk so high? What causes the disease? And most important, how can I lower my risk? While the recent attention given to breast cancer by the media and various health organizations has increased general awareness of the disease, many women are still confused about the answers to these questions. And with media reports on scientific studies appearing to contradict each other on a weekly basis, it is easy to understand why. One story says eating too much fat increases the risk of breast cancer; another says the fat found in olive oil actually lowers risk; and the next week a different issue altogether goes through this type of cycle.
Despite the confusion that often seems to surround the topic, breast cancer deserves much of the attention it gets. Approximately 180,000 American women are newly diagnosed with the disease each year, and it is the leading killer of women in midlife (ages forty to fifty-five). The only cancer that kills more women overall is lung cancer, but breast cancer is actually responsible for more years of life lost because it generally afflicts younger women. On top of the physical health problems, breast cancer can also exact a large emotional and psychological toll, because it affects a part of the body that many women associate directly with their femininity. Surveys have consistently found that women perceive breast cancer to be their greatest health threat.
Over the last twenty years, substantial strides have been made in treating breast cancer and in identifying factors that contribute to its development. Today, quality of life is significantly better for women treated for breast cancer than in the past, and the rate of new cases of the disease has leveled off and even started to decline slightly in some groups of women. Much work remains, however, as overall rates of the disease remain high and not all women have benefited equally from the recent decrease in disease rates. The rate of new cases of breast cancer is actually increasing in African American women, and even though white women have higher rates of breast cancer overall, African American women are still more likely to die from the disease.
The Breast and Breast Cancer
Breasts are made up of several sections called lobes. Each lobe has smaller sections called lobules, which produce milk when a woman is breast-feeding. The lobes and lobules are linked by tubes called ducts. Ducts are the tubes that carry the milk from the lobules to the nipple. The rest of the breast is mostly made up of fat but also consists of veins, arteries, nerves, and other tissue.
In breast cancer, cells in the breast divide and grow at an abnormal rate, clump together, and form a malignant (cancerous) tumor. There are two main types of breast cancer. Most common is breast cancer that begins in the ducts and spreads to nearby tissue, called invasive ductal carcinoma. The other main type is breast cancer that begins in the lobes and spreads to nearby tissue, called invasive lobular carcinoma.
There is also a condition called carcinoma in situ, where there are abnormal cells in the breast, but they are not cancerous and have not spread to other nearby tissue. In situ means "in place." Still, carcinoma in situ is a sign that breast cancer may develop at a later time. The two main categories of carcinoma in situ are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) -- where the abnormal cells originate in the milk ducts -- and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) -- where the abnormal cells originate in the lobules.
The most common outward sign of breast cancer is a hard lump in the breast that is usually not movable and may or may not be painful. The skin over the lump may be thickened and dimpled (like the skin of an orange) or indented in areas where the cancer has spread. The nipple may be inverted (turned inward) or leak dark fluid.
The best chance of surviving breast cancer comes from the early detection of cancerous tumors through regular clinical breast exams and mammograms. Reducing the risk of the disease ever occurring, however, should be every woman's goal.
The Importance of Early Life in Breast Cancer Risk
Ideally the prevention of breast cancer would start in youth and young adulthood, as this period has been found to be extremely important in determining a woman's risk of developing breast cancer later in life. Breast tissue during this time (from youth up until a woman gives birth to her first child) appears to be more susceptible to elements that can cause cells to subsequently become cancerous. Exposure to radiation is a good example. The risk for adult breast cancer is very high for a girl under ten exposed to a high dose of radiation (such as exposure to the atomic bomb in 1945 Japan), moderate for a teenager, and small for a young adult.
Unfortunately, by the time an individual woman begins to think concretely about how she can lower her risk of breast cancer, this critical period has likely passed. Parents, however, can help their daughters adopt healthy lifestyles that can impact some of the factors that affect risk during young adulthood, as we discuss later in this chapter. Important factors include age at menarche (the first menstrual period), alcohol consumption, and smoking. Especially important is encouraging daughters to be physically active and to maintain a healthy weight, which, along with many other health benefits, can delay age at menarche.
It has been estimated that breast cancer rates could be reduced by as much as half in the United States by focusing prevention efforts on youth and making certain social changes (for example, so that women who give birth at an early age are not handicapped professionally). While the social changes to support such efforts may be far off, this estimate highlights the fact that rates of breast cancer in the United States can be reduced and that women are far from helpless in the fight against the disease.
LESSONS FROM THE NURSES' HEALTH STUDY AND OTHER STUDIES
To many women it would seem that just about everything affects the risk of developing breast cancer. While this is not the case, the scientific community has come a long way in identifying many factors that increase the risk of the disease. These factors can range from family history to lifestyle factors to reproductive variables.
Although there are a few factors that substantially increase a woman's risk of breast cancer, most individually elevate or lower risk by only a small amount. Some of these factors are those over which a woman has control (such as alcohol consumption and use of postmenopausal hormones) and some are not (such as breast cancer in an immediate family member and age at menarche). By knowing how each of these factors affects her risk, a woman can take appropriate steps to try to protect herself from the disease.
Ultimately, it seems that most cases of breast cancer are caused by a combination of factors, some of which are known and some of which are currently unknown.
Factors You Cannot Control
There are a number of factors beyond a woman's control that affect her risk of developing breast cancer. Understanding these may lead a woman to be more vigilant about those factors under her control and, if necessary, seek more frequent check ups or screening tests.
Age is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. In general, the older a woman is, the greater her risk of the disease. National data show that rates of breast cancer are low in women under forty, begin to increase after forty, and are highest in women over seventy. Only after the age of about eighty does the risk stop increasing with age.
In a group of 100 women who are fifty years old, 9 will develop breast cancer before they reach the age of eighty. The 1 in 8 number that many women recognize is the lifetime risk of breast cancer. This means that for all adult women, 1 in 8 (or approximately 12 percent) is at risk of developing breast cancer in her lifetime. While a 12 percent lifetime risk is high for a serious disease like breast cancer, the lifetime risk of coronary heart disease is much higher (about 32 percent), and both coronary heart disease and lung cancer kill more women overall.
FAMILY HISTORY AND GENETICS
It should come as no surprise that family history is linked to the risk of breast cancer. Most people realize that the risks of many diseases are associated with the experiences of their parents and siblings. In the Nurses' Health Study, we have found that having an immediate family member (mother or sister) who has been diagnosed with breast cancer approximately doubles the risk of the disease. The age at which the mother was diagnosed, however, influenced the level of risk as well. The younger the mother was when she was diagnosed with the disease, the higher her daughter's risk of developing breast cancer. A woman whose mother was diagnosed before age forty has a large increase in risk, while a woman whose mother was diagnosed after age seventy has only a moderate increase in risk.
The number of immediate family members with the disease also influences risk. When both a woman's mother and her sister had been diagnosed with breast cancer, we found that the risk of the disease increased to about 2.5 times that of a woman without a family history of the disease. Numerous other studies have also found a similarly strong relationship.
Genetics. Family members usually have very similar lifestyles and therefore may have similar "environmental" risk factors for breast cancer -- such as weight, activity level, and alcohol intake. While this may account for the increased risk of breast cancer experienced by some families, in some cases genetics likely plays a large role.
Much has been written in scientific journals and reported in the media recently on inherited genetic mutations that greatly increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Two of the most well-known examples are BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 (which stands for BReast CAncer gene 1 and 2). Studies have found that women who have the BRCA 1 mutation have approximately 15 times the risk of developing breast cancer compared to women without the BRCA 1 mutation. A BRCA 2 mutation appears to impart a slightly lower risk. Women found to have a breast cancer gene mutation, as well as other high risk women, have certain options that may help lower their risk of getting breast cancer or at least increase their chances of identifying the disease early when it is most treatable. (See Dr. Nancy Rigotti's advice for high risk women at the end of this chapter.)
Although genetic mutations like BRCA 1 are powerful predictors of who will get breast cancer, such mutations do not account for a large portion of breast cancer cases. It is estimated that only 5 to 10 percent percent of breast cancers can be attributed to inherited gene mutations, an approximation in line with our experience in the Nurses' Health Study.
BENIGN BREAST DISEASE
The term benign breast disease is often used to describe a wide range of noncancerous conditions that can affect the breast. In the Nurses' Health Study, we have found that two specific types of benign breast disease -- hyperplasia and radial scars -- increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Other benign breast conditions, such as cysts and fibroadenomas, do not appear to influence risk.
Hyperplasia. Hyperplasia is a noncancerous condition where cells begin to multiply in the breast ducts or lobules. Supporting the results of smaller studies, we have found in the Nurses' Health Study that women with cases of hyperplasia confirmed by a biopsy have a moderate to large increase in the risk of developing breast cancer compared to women without hyperplasia. The greatest increase in risk is found in one specific type of hyperplasia, in which the multiplying cells look abnormal (atypical hyperplasia). Hyperplasia in which the multiplying cells still look normal (hyperplasia without atypia) results in a modest increase in risk.
Radial Scars. Like hyperplasia, histologic radial scars are a type of benign breast disease that is identified only on breast biopsy. They are usually microscopic in size and are not scars as most people think of them. The name refers to the type of tissue that makes up the condition and not to a scar that results from a healed cut or injury. Previous studies of radial scars have had varied findings, with some showing a link to an increased risk of breast cancer and some showing no link at all. When we examined the association of radial scars with breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study, we found that women with radial scars had about twice the risk of developing breast cancer as women without. The size and number of radial scars also affected risk: the larger and more numerous the radial scars, the greater the risk of developing breast cancer.
The density of a woman's breasts has been shown in many studies to be strongly related to the risk of breast cancer. Breast density is most often assessed by mammogram and depends on the proportion of fat and tissue that make up a woman's breasts. When the X-rays used in a mammogram take an image of the breast, fat appears dark and tissue appears light. Breasts with a high density have a relatively high proportion of tissue and low proportion of fat. Breasts with a low density have a relatively low proportion of tissue and high proportion of fat. We are currently assessing this issue in the Nurses' Health Study and hope to have results soon. Of note, one very large cohort study found that women with the most dense breasts had approximately 5 times the risk of breast cancer compared to women with the least dense breasts. And as breast density increased, so did the risk of the disease.
Right now, breast density is not being regularly used to assess women's risk of breast cancer, but it may become standard practice in the future.
RADIATION EXPOSURE IN CHILDHOOD OR ADOLESCENCE
Exposure to high doses of radiation to the chest in childhood or adolescence has been consistently linked to an increased risk of breast cancer in later adulthood. Although not specifically evaluated in the Nurses' Health Study, other studies have found that women who were exposed in their youth to atomic bomb blasts (in Hiroshima or Nagasaki, Japan) or radiation therapy for disorders like Hodgkin's disease or tuberculosis had 2 to 4 times the risk of breast cancer compared to women who were not exposed to such radiation. The greatest risk is generally in those women who were very young when exposed, and the risk decreases as the age at the exposure increases. Women over forty who have been exposed to high doses of radiation to the chest have only a small increase in risk.
That breast cancer risk is highest in those women who were exposed to radiation when very young illustrates the importance that early life may play in breast cancer risk. Breast tissue during this time may be more susceptible to elements that can cause cells to become cancerous later in life.
It is still unclear how exposure to low dose radiation, such as that received from an X-ray or mammogram, influences the risk of developing breast cancer. It is possible that there is some small risk associated with such procedures, but the health benefits they provide greatly outweigh any potential increase in breast cancer risk.
PERSONAL HISTORY OF CANCER
Just as family history can affect the risk of breast cancer, so can a personal history of cancer. Women who have been previously diagnosed with cancer in one breast are at increased risk of developing cancer in the other breast. Studies other than the Nurses' Health Study that have assessed the issue have found the risk to be increased two- to fourfold for women previously diagnosed with breast cancer (including ductal carcinoma in situ) compared to those without a previous diagnosis.
Having a personal history of lobular carcinoma in situ -- which is usually not treated after diagnosis, just closely followed -- also increases the risk of cancer. Women with this condition are 7 to 10 times more likely to develop breast cancer than women without the condition.
A history of other cancers can also increase the risk of breast cancer. Studies have shown that women who have been diagnosed with colon or ovarian cancer have a slightly increased risk of developing breast cancer as well. The likely explanation for this is that the three cancers share some of the same genetic or lifestyle factors that are key to cancer development.
Not all groups of women in the United States are equally impacted by breast cancer. Latina, Asian American, and American Indian women tend to have the lowest risk of breast cancer in the United States, and white women tend to have the highest risk -- followed closely by Hawaiian American and African American women. For breast cancer occurring before midlife, however, African American women are at highest risk. This is likely due, at least in large part, to differences in the ages at which white women and African American women first give birth. While having children is protective against breast cancer overall, giving birth to the first child after thirty is actually linked to a modest increase in the risk of breast cancer in the short term. Since African American women tend to give birth for the first time earlier than white women, they may experience this increase in breast cancer risk earlier in life, pushing their rates of breast cancer before midlife past those of white women. Across the entire lifetime, though, these differences in reproductive behaviors seem to benefit African Americans, whose lifetime risk of breast cancer is lower than that of whites.
Unfortunately, as overall rates of breast cancer are leveling off or slightly decreasing in white women, they continue to increase in African American women.
Jewish women are another ethnic group at increased risk of breast cancer. Particularly affected are Ashkenazi Jewish women -- Jews who immigrated from central or eastern Europe. One likely reason is that Ashkenazi Jews have an unusually high rate of BRCA 1 and 2 gene mutations compared to the national average.
There is a substantial amount of evidence that height is associated with the risk of breast cancer both pre- and postmenopause. In the Nurses' Health Study, we found that risk was slightly increased in all women who were 5 feet 3 inches or taller compared to those under 5 feet 3 inches. In another large cohort study, the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women was found to increase steadily with height. The tallest women in the study had a little more than twice the risk of the disease compared to the shortest women.
Height is generally thought to reflect, at least in part, the quantity and quality of the diet in childhood. Well fed children generally have more rapid, bigger growth spurts than children fed poor diets. This may contribute to breast cancer risk because such rapid growth can increase the chance that the DNA in some breast cells will become permanently damaged, which can lead to cancer later in life. One other possibility is that levels of a hormone called insulin-like growth factor are higher in taller children than in shorter children. In some studies (including ours), high levels of insulin-like growth factor have been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer.
Factors You Can Control
It is important to know how all of the factors related to breast cancer make up a woman's risk. However, when given a choice, most women would prefer to focus on those things they have control over and can change for the better. These so-called modifiable factors are discussed in this section and range from alcohol intake to use of postmenopausal hormones.
Aside from a small number of factors related to diet, most of the modifiable factors are thought to affect the risk of breast cancer by influencing levels of female hormones (such as estrogen and progesterone) in the body. Estrogen is believed to be a key promoter of breast cancer development, and findings from the Nurses' Health Study have helped support this conclusion. We found that postmenopausal women with the highest blood levels of certain estrogens had almost double the risk of breast cancer compared to women with the lowest levels. Most strikingly, in a subset of women who had never used postmenopausal hormones (hence, their blood hormone levels could be better measured), those with the highest blood estrogen levels had almost four times the risk of developing breast cancer. This increase in risk is similar in size to that between blood cholesterol levels and heart disease.
When asked if the food we eat plays an important role in breast cancer development, most people would respond with a definite yes. In reality, however, very few aspects of diet have been linked to breast cancer risk.
Vitamin A, Carotenoids, and Fruits and Vegetables. A number of studies have linked a low intake of vitamin A and carotenoids, such as beta-carotene, with an increased risk of breast cancer. Found in high amounts in green and yellow vegetables and certain fruits, vitamin A is important for cell growth, and carotenoids are powerful antioxidants that can help protect cells from the damaging effects of oxygen free radicals in the body. In the Nurses' Health Study, we found that premenopausal women who had a modest to high total intake of vitamin A from food had a 10 to 30 percent lower risk of the disease compared to women with the lowest intake. This reduction in risk was even more pronounced in premenopausal women with a family history of breast cancer: a 60 percent lower risk for those women with the highest intake of vitamin A compared to those with the lowest. This finding, though, was unexpected and needs to be explored further.
Similarly, when we assessed carotenoids, we found that, compared to premenopausal women with the lowest intake of certain carotenoids (beta-carotene, lutein, and zeaxanthin), those with greater intake had a slightly lower risk of breast cancer. No link was found between either carotenoids or vitamin A and breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Because people eat foods and not specific nutrients, we have also assessed the link between fruits and vegetables and breast cancer risk. What we found was very similar to the relationship seen with vitamin A: premenopausal women who ate modest to high amounts of fruits and vegetables (over two servings per day) had a slightly lower risk of breast cancer than women who ate the least amount of fruits and vegetables (less than one serving). Again, no link was found in postmenopausal women.
When researchers combined our study results with those of seven other large studies, they found similar results: total intake of fruits and vegetables had very little effect on the risk of breast cancer. However, specific types of fruits and vegetables, such as those rich in carotenoids, do appear to reduce risk modestly, primarily in premenopausal women.
Dietary Fat. Eating high amounts of total fat in adulthood appears to have little, if any, effect on the risk of developing breast cancer. In the Nurses' Health Study, we found that, compared to women with a moderate fat intake, women with a high fat diet did not have a greater risk of developing breast cancer. Similarly, women who ate little fat (20 percent or less of total calories) did not have a lower risk of the disease compared to women who ate a moderate amount. These findings corroborate those of an analysis that pooled together the data from a number of large cohort studies (including the Nurses' Health Study). This analysis found that neither a high fat diet nor a low fat diet was related to the risk of breast cancer.
Most Americans today get about 33 percent of their total calories from fat. In the Nurses' Health Study, the women in the cohort eat a diet ranging from approximately 20 percent of total calories from fat, to approximately 50 percent. Because very few of the women eat very low amounts of fat (10 to 15 percent of total calories), we cannot assess how this extremely low intake influences breast cancer risk. It seems, though, that even very low fat intake may not provide protection from the disease. A large case-control study performed in China found no link between fat intake and the risk of breast cancer, even though some women ate a diet containing less than 15 percent of total calories from fat. The analysis that pooled data from a number of studies also found no protection from a very low fat diet (under 15 percent of total calories from fat). Upcoming results from the Women's Health Initiative will provide additional information on the relationship between breast cancer and a low fat diet in postmenopausal women.
Despite there being no apparent link between total fat intake and breast cancer, there may be a link between the type of fat women consume and their risk of the disease. High intake of monounsaturated fat (found in olive and canola oil) has been found in some studies to lower the risk of breast cancer. In the Nurses' Health Study, we have had mixed findings on this issue, with our most recent data showing no relationship between specific types of fat and the risk of breast cancer. One possible reason that our findings contradict those of some others may have to do with the source of the monounsaturated fat. Most of the studies that have shown monounsaturated fats to protect against breast cancer have been performed in Europe and specifically evaluated olive oil intake. In the Nurses' Health Study, animal products (such as red meat and cheese) have been the primary source of monounsaturated fats. That the fat comes from such different food sources could account for the difference in findings.
Although our data from the Nurses' Health Study provide information about how fat intake in midlife relates to breast cancer risk, we cannot address how fat intake in adolescence or early adulthood relates to the risk of the disease. Other studies are currently examining these issues, including our Nurses' Health Study II.
FACTORS THAT AFFECT ESTROGEN LEVELS
Many modifiable factors can increase the level of estrogen in the body, and therefore increase the risk of breast cancer. Examples of such factors include gaining substantial weight as an adult; being overweight and physically inactive after menopause; drinking modest amounts of alcohol; or using postmenopausal hormones.
Overweight and Weight Gain. Studies that have assessed the effect of weight on the risk of developing breast cancer have found that it affects women differently at different ages.
PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. In the Nurses' Health Study, when we examined weight's association with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, we found that as weight increased, the risk of breast cancer decreased. Even though being overweight premenopause lowers the risk of breast cancer, younger women should not take this as carte blanche to gain weight. First, being overweight does not provide premenopausal women with any substantial protection against dying from the disease. This may be due, in part, to the fact that overweight women are often diagnosed with the disease at a more advanced stage than leaner women, making treatment less effective. Second, almost 80 percent of breast cancer cases develop in postmenopausal women, and any weight gained in the premenopausal years will likely track into the postmenopausal years, where it can increase the risk of the disease.
POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. When we assessed postmenopausal women, we found that results differed substantially from those of premenopausal women. For a subgroup of postmenopausal women -- those who had never used postmenopausal hormones -- obesity was linked to a moderate increase in breast cancer risk. For all other postmenopausal women, there was no link between weight and the risk of developing breast cancer.
Weight gain, however, was linked to an increase in risk for all postmenopausal women. Those women who had gained more than 45 pounds since age eighteen had a small increase in risk of developing breast cancer. For women who had gained more than 45 pounds but had never used postmenopausal hormones, breast cancer occurred twice as often as in those who experienced little weight gain as adults.
Being overweight is thought to increase the risk of breast cancer after menopause primarily by increasing levels of the hormone estrogen. Although a woman's ovaries stop producing estrogen after menopause, her fat tissue converts estrogen precursors to estrogen. The more weight put on after menopause, the more estrogen that is produced -- a point the Nurses' Health Study helped confirm. This relation of weight to hormone levels explains why breast cancer risk in overweight postmenopausal women appears to be more pronounced in those who have never taken postmenopausal hormones. The amount of estrogen contained in postmenopausal hormones far outweighs that produced by the fat tissue in overweight and obese women. Therefore, the full effect of weight on breast cancer risk can become masked when a woman uses postmenopausal hormones. It is not that taking postmenopausal hormones eliminates the risk of breast cancer associated with being overweight; it is that using hormones likely hides the effect of weight on risk.
Other large cohort studies assessing the link between weight and breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women have had results similar to ours.
Body Shape. Body shape also seems to influence the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Women who are apple-shaped -- those who tend to carry extra weight around the waist -- seem to be at higher risk of breast cancer than women who are pear-shaped -- those who tend to carry extra weight in their hips and thighs. Similar to the results of other studies, we found that postmenopausal women with the largest waist sizes have about a 35 percent greater risk of breast cancer compared to those with the smallest waist size. As with overall weight, the full effect of waist size on breast cancer risk may be obscured by the use of postmenopausal hormones. When we included only women who had never used postmenopausal hormones, the increase in risk was even greater: women with the largest waist sizes (36 to 55 inches) had about a 90 percent greater risk of breast cancer compared to those with the smallest waist size (15 to 28 inches).
Physical Activity. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer risk, but results to date have been somewhat inconsistent. This variability in findings likely relates to the different approaches researchers use to assess a woman's level of physical activity, which can be difficult to measure accurately.
In the Nurses' Health Study, we found that the effect of physical activity seems to depend on a woman's stage of life. Postmenopausal women who engaged in at least one hour of physical activity a day were 15 to 20 percent less likely to develop breast cancer than women who were sedentary. When we studied premenopausal women, we saw no clear association between amount of physical activity and risk of the disease. However, most other studies with premenopausal women have seen an association.
Physical activity may help lower the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by helping curb weight gain, which in turn helps keep estrogen levels in check. In young girls, physical activity may have the added benefit of putting off the age at which a girl first has her period, therefore reducing lifetime exposure to estrogen.
Alcohol. Although news that moderate alcohol intake can lower the risk of coronary heart disease has been welcomed with enthusiasm by many, drinking alcohol does not come without accompanying risks as well -- especially for women. The results of many studies have consistently shown that alcohol intake can increase the risk of breast cancer. An analysis evaluating data from five large cohort studies (including the Nurses' Health Study) showed that women who drank two or more drinks a day -- whether beer, wine, or hard liquor -- were 40 percent more likely to develop breast cancer than women who did not drink any alcohol. In our own analysis of the Nurses' Health Study data, we found that even fewer than 2 drinks per day could increase risk. Compared to women who did not drink, those who drank about half a drink to one drink a day had a small increase in the risk of breast cancer, and those who drank more than one drink a day had a moderate increase in risk.
There are a number of ways that alcohol may affect breast cancer risk. In addition to possibly lowering the level of vitamin A in the body, it has been demonstrated in some studies (including the Nurses' Health Study) that alcohol consumption may be linked to increased blood levels of estrogen. Alcohol may also hamper the body's ability to use folate, a vitamin that may help protect against tumor growth. Interestingly, we found in the Nurses' Health Study that the risk of breast cancer associated with one drink or more a day was lower in those women with a high intake of folate compared to those with a low intake. This finding, however, still needs to be confirmed.
For more information on the risks and benefits of alcohol, see Chapter 20.
Postmenopausal Hormones. A large number of U.S. women take postmenopausal hormone therapy to alleviate the short-term symptoms and longer-term health effects of menopause. While such hormone therapy appears to be beneficial in many ways -- lowering the risk of osteoporosis and possibly coronary heart disease and colon cancer -- it also increases the risk of breast cancer in certain users.
After menopause, when a woman's ovaries stop producing estrogen, postmenopausal hormone therapy is a key source of estrogen in those women choosing to use it. After examining many different aspects of the link between breast cancer risk and postmenopausal hormones, we have found in the Nurses' Health Study that risk is substantially increased only in those women who are currently using postmenopausal hormones and have been using them long term (over 5 years). Women who are long-term current users have an approximately 50 percent greater risk of developing breast cancer than women who did not use postmenopausal hormones, and, in general, the longer women use hormones, the greater the risk.
Because postmenopausal hormones that contain only estrogen have been shown to increase the risk of cancer of the uterus, more and more women are choosing to take hormones that contain both estrogen and progestin. It was initially thought this combined therapy might reduce the excess risk of breast cancer linked to postmenopausal hormones. However, we in the Nurses' Health Study -- along with others -- have found that the risk of breast cancer was actually higher in those women using estrogen and progestin than in those using estrogen alone.
The findings from the Nurses' Health Study assessing postmenopausal hormones and breast cancer risk are very similar to those of numerous other reports, including a very large analysis based on over fifty international studies. Though the details are complicated, the bottom line message about postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer is fairly simple.
- Women who use postmenopausal hormones for less than five years do not seem to be at significantly increased risk of breast cancer.
- Those who use hormones for more than five years are at an increased risk while they are on the hormones, and their risk increases the longer they use them. Once they stop, however, their risk returns to that of someone who has never used hormones. Formulations that contain estrogen and progestin increase risk more than formulations that contain estrogen alone.
Issues other than breast cancer, however, also need to be considered when deciding whether or not to use hormones after menopause. Several studies suggest that the risk of osteoporosis, coronary artery disease, and colon cancer can all be reduced with postmenopausal hormones. And some very preliminary data suggest that hormone therapy may possibly even lower the risk of Alzheimer's. Ultimately, a woman and her health care provider need to consider her risk of the various disorders before deciding what approach is best for her. Chapter 22 provides a detailed discussion of the potential risk and benefits of postmenopausal hormone use.
Birth Control Pills. The use of birth control pills moderately increases the risk of breast cancer in those women who are currently using them. In the Nurses' Health Study, we found that women who were currently taking the pill had a 50 percent increase in risk compared to women who had never used the pill. Women who had used the pill in the past (but were not doing so currently) did not show any increase in breast cancer risk. Moreover, how long a woman had been on the pill did not seem to change the results.
Although a number of other studies have found no association between use of the pill and an increased risk of breast cancer, a very large analysis that combined over 50 international studies corroborated our results, finding that current users of birth control pills had a small increase in breast cancer risk and that this excess risk slowly returned to zero ten years after stopping taking the pill.
As with postmenopausal hormone therapy, there is a lot to consider when deciding whether or not to use the pill. Although the pill seems to slightly increase breast cancer risk in current users, it also has many benefits. In addition to preventing unwanted pregnancy, it lowers the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers. Also, when women use the pill, it is during a time in life when their absolute risk of breast cancer is low, so even though a 50 percent increase in risk is substantial, it will actually result in only a few extra women developing breast cancer who otherwise would not have. Assessing such individual risks and benefits and the impact they have on a woman's lifestyle is key to determining whether or not she uses birth control pills. Chapter 23 discusses these issues in greater detail.
Reproductive factors -- such as age at first menstrual period (menarche), age at menopause, and age at first giving birth -- have been linked to the risk of breast cancer in a wide range of studies. Much of the effect these factors have on breast cancer risk is thought to be related to their influence on levels of female hormones, such as estrogen, as well as on the maturation of the breast.
AGE AT FIRST MENSTRUAL PERIOD (MENARCHE)
Girls in the United States are having their first menstrual periods (menarche) at an increasingly early age -- with an accompanying elevation in breast cancer risk later in life. For many years, young age at menarche has been well established as a factor that increases the risk of breast cancer. In the Nurses' Health Study, we have found that women who were over thirteen when their periods began had a 35 percent lower chance of developing breast cancer than women whose periods started at age twelve or younger. A late age at menarche is thought to lower breast cancer risk by creating a shorter interval between the time a woman's period starts and the time she gives birth to her first child, reducing her exposure to the female hormones (such as estrogen and progestin) released during the menstrual cycle.
AGE AT FIRST GIVING BIRTH AND NUMBER OF CHILDREN
For a number of reasons, more and more women are putting off starting a family. Unfortunately, beginning a family at a later age increases the risk of breast cancer. Numerous studies have found that the older women are when they give birth to their first child, the higher their risk of breast cancer. Our data from the Nurses' Health Study also show that women who have given birth have a lower risk overall than women who have not, and women who have more children have a lower risk than women who have fewer children. In addition, we have found that when women have more than one child, the spacing of births can influence risk. Women whose births were spaced closer in time have a slightly lower risk of breast cancer than women whose births were spaced further apart.
Our study and others have found that the risk of breast cancer associated with giving birth to a first child varies over a woman's life. Although the first birth lowers the risk of breast cancer in the long term, there is actually a short-term increase in risk for ten or more years immediately following the event. After this time, the risk begins to drop.
In the short term, a first full-term pregnancy may increase the risk of breast cancer because of the high levels of hormones associated with fetal development that can promote a preexisting breast cancer. But pregnancy also confers long-term protection from the disease, possibly by causing changes to breast cells that make them less susceptible to becoming cancerous as well as by permanently lowering levels of estrogen in the body.
Breast-feeding has many benefits for mother and child, and it has been postulated for many years that it may reduce women's risk of breast cancer. Although there is still debate on the issue, a majority of studies have found that breast-feeding can lower women's risk of the disease, particularly for breast cancer that develops before menopause. In the Nurses' Health Study, we did not find a difference in breast cancer risk for premenopausal or postmenopausal women who had breast-fed. However, we were limited in our ability to assess the long-term effects of breast-feeding.
One possible reason that some studies show a benefit of breast-feeding and other do not may relate to the fact that women use breast-feeding in many different ways. Some use it as the only source of food for their infants, and some use it to supplement other modes of feeding. And over time, women may use a combination of these two approaches. The result is that two women who report that they have both breast-fed their child for six months may have, in fact, spent very different amounts of time actively breast-feeding. Better delineating the exact approaches women have used during their periods of breast-feeding -- as we are currently doing in the Nurses' Health Study -- may help clarify the relationship between breast-feeding and the risk of breast cancer. Aside from possibly protecting against breast cancer, breast-feeding also means fewer childhood infections, less work time lost to care for a sick child, and a quicker return to pre-pregnancy weight.
AGE AT MENOPAUSE
Studies have long shown that women who go through early menopause, whether naturally or through surgical removal of the ovaries (oophorectomy), have a reduced risk of breast cancer. As with late age at menarche, early age at menopause is thought to decrease risk by shortening the lifelong exposure to the hormones released during the menstrual cycle. Our data from the Nurses' Health Study show that for every one-year increase in age at natural menopause, a woman's risk for breast cancer increases by 3 percent. This translates to an approximately 35 percent increase in risk for a woman going through menopause at age fifty-five or older compared to one going through it at forty-five.
Unproven Factors and Factors Found to Have No Effect on Breast Cancer
Many factors discussed in the media and certain health circles are said to affect the risk of breast cancer but have not actually been proven to do so. Some of these may in the future be linked to breast cancer. Some, though, have been conclusively proven to have no influence on the risk of the disease. Here are some examples of these factors, many of which we have assessed in the Nurses' Health Study.
ISOFLAVONOIDS AND SOY ESTROGEN
Isoflavonoids are specific types of estrogen that are found abundantly in soy products. In laboratory studies, isoflavonoids seem to protect breast cells from becoming cancerous by blocking the cancer initiating action of other estrogens. To date in the Nurses' Health Study, we have not studied this issue, primarily because exposure to isoflavonoids has historically been low in the United States. Since women have greatly increased their intake in recent years, we will be able to examine this thoroughly in the future. Results from the few studies that have looked at the issue have been mixed, with some showing a benefit and others showing no relationship. Before any conclusions can be drawn about the link (if any) between isoflavonoids, soy, and breast cancer, there must be more human studies on the topic.
Selenium is a substance found in food and nutrition supplements that has been shown in laboratory experiments to lower the risk of certain kinds of cancer in animals. When we assessed the link between selenium and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study, we found no association with the risk of disease in either premenopausal or postmenopausal women.
Organochlorine chemicals, found in certain pesticides and industrial chemicals, have often been discussed as potential risk factors for breast cancer because they have qualities similar to estrogen. Early studies suggested a link with breast cancer, but now it seems that organochlorines may have no effect on risk. When we examined a sub-sample of the Nurses' Health Study cohort, we found that blood levels of two specific organochlorine chemicals -- DDE and PCBs -- were not linked to breast cancer risk.
Heterocyclic amines are substances produced by cooking meat at high temperatures; they have been demonstrated to increase risk of cancer in laboratory experiments with animals. Heterocyclic amines appear in the greatest amount in meat that has been charred or flame-broiled. Though some studies have found a link between heterocyclic amines and breast cancer in humans -- including the Iowa Women's Health Study -- in an initial assessment in the Nurses' Health Study we found no link between the two.
As with isoflavonoids, it is thought that the herb ginseng may help protect against breast cancer by blocking the cancer-initiating action of estrogen. Some laboratory studies have shown positive results, but few studies have been conducted in humans. We have yet to assess this issue in the Nurses' Health Study but hope to do so in the future.
Because smoking lowers the age at which a woman enters menopause as well as affects the metabolism of estrogen, it has been thought that it may actually reduce the risk of breast cancer. However, we found in the Nurses' Health Study that smoking in adulthood had no influence on the risk of breast cancer. Smoking early in youth may modestly increase the risk of breast cancer, as some studies have suggested. However, we have not yet evaluated this in the Nurses' Health Study.
Permanent hair dye contains substances called aromatic amines that have been shown in laboratory studies to increase the risk of breast cancer in some animals. In the Nurses' Health Study, we have repeatedly found no association between the use of permanent hair dyes and the risk of breast cancer.
The association between abortion and breast cancer has been controversial in the past, but it now seems clear that abortion has no influence on the risk of the disease. As with other studies on the topic, our Nurses' Health Study II found no link between the two.
Other factors that have not been proven to increase the risk of breast cancer include electromagnetic fields, antiperspirants/deodorants, and the use of bras. For each of these, there is no clear way biologically that they could increase the risk of the disease.
WHAT IT ALL MEANS
As is apparent from the lengthy list of factors discussed above, breast cancer is a very complex disease. But the messages are relatively simple when it comes to the steps a woman can take to try to reduce the risk of breast cancer, and the good news is that these same steps also help prevent coronary heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic disorders.
Maintain a healthy weight and avoid substantial weight gain (more than about fifteen to twenty pounds) during adulthood. Maintaining a healthy weight at every age protects women against breast cancer, even if they are not physically active. A healthy weight in childhood increases the age at which the first menstrual period occurs and slightly decreases the age at which menopause occurs: together, these two factors lead to a lower lifetime exposure to estrogen. Maintaining a healthy weight also appears to have some protective effects over and above its effects on the age at menarche and menopause.
Lead a physically active lifestyle. Physical activity at every age protects women against breast cancer. When young girls are physically active, the age at which they experience their first menstrual period is delayed. This lowers their lifetime exposure to estrogen, and this in turn lowers their risk of breast cancer. Being physically active throughout life may directly reduce the risk of breast cancer after menopause, even in women who are not overweight. When physical activity leads to weight loss or prevents weight gain, that also protects you.
Eat a diet rich in fruits and vegetables. Fruits and vegetables contain a number of substances that may help the body fight cancer, including vitamin A and carotenoids.
Drink less than one alcoholic drink a day on average. A drink a day or more has been linked to an increase in breast cancer risk. There may be no safe level of alcohol consumption in relation to breast cancer risk, but moderate alcohol intake has been linked to a decreased risk of coronary heart disease.
Avoiding long-term use of postmenopausal hormones can also lower the risk of breast cancer, but because hormone use carries both risks and benefits, it is important for women to discuss this issue individually with their health care providers.
WHAT I TELL MY PATIENTS ABOUT LOWERING THEIR RISK OF BREAST CANCER
DR. NANCY RIGOTTI
Ask one of my patients which disease she fears most, and chances are that she will answer breast cancer. Most women do. Breast cancer cuts right to the heart of our identity as women, and the constant stream of stories, research findings, and advice about breast cancer keeps the disease at the forefront of women's concerns. It can, in fact, be difficult for women not to fear breast cancer.
There are two and possibly three ways in which you can help to protect yourself from breast cancer:
- Adopt a healthy lifestyle.
- Get breast cancer screening tests, when indicated.
- If you are at unusually high risk of getting breast cancer, consider whether to use certain preventive treatments (such as taking the drug tamoxifin).
Adopt a Healthy Lifestyle
We know less about how to prevent breast cancer than we do about preventing some other diseases like heart disease, but fortunately we do have effective tests that can find the disease early, when treatment has the best chance of cure. And although breast cancer is influenced by many factors that you cannot control, it is also influenced by factors you can control. Diet and physical activity, the main components of a healthy lifestyle, may also lower the risk of getting breast cancer.
Most of my patients know that regular physical activity is good for their heart and bones. But most of them don't know that it also reduces their risk of developing breast cancer after they reach menopause. It's yet another reason to get moving. The Surgeon General recommends thirty minutes of moderate physical activity on most days of the week. You don't have to go to a gym to become physically active! You can do things like take a brisk walk, garden, bicycle with your children, or swim with a friend. If you feel you don't have time to fit another thirty minutes into your hectic day, then aim for three ten-minute periods of activity a day.
KEEP YOUR WEIGHT UNDER CONTROL
Your weight affects your risk of developing breast cancer after you reach menopause. If you have gained more than forty-five pounds since you were eighteen, you are at increased risk of developing breast cancer. To reduce your risk, try not to gain more than fifteen to twenty pounds during adulthood. You can do this by eating a healthy diet and remaining physically active.
EAT PLENTY OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
Although you may be worrying about whether pesticides on the food you eat can cause breast cancer, you should really be thinking about what you're not eating. Americans are notorious for not eating enough fruits and vegetables. That's a shame, because fruits and vegetables contain substances that prevent normal cells from turning cancerous. The American Cancer Society recommends a diet that includes five servings of fruits and vegetables a day. So eat as many fruits and vegetables as you can manage every day. Put fruit on your cereal in the morning and lettuce on your sandwiches. Pack carrots, an apple, or a banana for a snack. Substitute a glass of orange juice for a cup of coffee at work. Try to eat vegetables or a salad every night with dinner. These small steps add up.
COOK WITH MONOUNSATURATED FATS
For years people worried that a high fat diet might increase the risk of breast cancer. Further studies have failed to confirm this. In fact, there is growing evidence that cooking with oils that are high in monounsaturated fats (found in olive oil and canola oil) may actually lower the risk of breast cancer. These oils have many other health benefits as well.
HAVE LESS THAN ONE ALCOHOLIC DRINK PER DAY
Who hasn't heard by now that there may be some health benefits from drinking alcohol? There are some benefits to moderate drinking, which has been linked to a reduced risk of coronary heart disease. The problem is that many of these studies have been done in men, who metabolize alcohol differently than women. So the best advice is that, if you want to drink alcohol, drink less than one drink per day (or less than seven drinks per week). Any more and you may increase your risk of breast cancer.
THINK CAREFULLY ABOUT POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONES
The decision about whether to take postmenopausal hormones when you reach menopause is a complicated one. But when it comes to the impact on breast cancer risk, the issue is not so much whether to take hormones, but if you do, how long to continue it. Women who take hormones for less than five years following menopause do not appear to increase their risk of breast cancer. But taking hormones longer than five years may increase your risk. The picture is complicated by other issues, such as your individual risk of breast cancer based on family history and other factors. This is definitely an issue you should discuss with your health care provider.
Get Regular Breast Cancer Screening Tests
In addition to taking steps to try to prevent the disease, all women, once they reach a certain age, should be screened regularly for breast cancer. Although screening tests, like mammograms and clinical breast exams, cannot help prevent the disease from developing, they can identify it early when it is most treatable. The earlier a cancer is found, the more likely it is that a woman can be treated successfully.
Mammograms are special X-rays of the breast. Virtually everyone agrees that you should get a yearly mammogram once you turn fifty and continue until you turn sixty-nine. After that, you should get a mammogram every one to two years. This is hands-down the best way to catch breast cancer early.
Almost everyone also agrees that if you have an unusually high risk of breast cancer, such as from a strong history of breast cancer in your mother or sisters, regular mammograms are probably valuable starting at a younger age. If my patient's mother or sister has had breast cancer, I'll advise annual mammograms for her starting at age forty, or ten years before the age at which the close relative was diagnosed with breast cancer, whichever age comes first.
The evidence to support having regular mammograms before age fifty is not nearly as good as the evidence that mammograms starting at age fifty save lives. There are a couple of reason why this is so. First, the risk of breast cancer in this age group is much smaller, and second, the test appears to be less accurate because younger women tend to have denser breasts (more tissue and less fat) than older women. This makes reading mammograms and detecting abnormalities more difficult: a negative or normal result may be reported in a woman who actually has breast cancer. Both of these factors make it more difficult to prove a benefit to screening mammograms for women under age fifty. Furthermore, more mammograms in women aged forty to forty-nine lead to positive or abnormal results that result in a biopsy showing there was no cancer, after all. Having an abnormal mammogram result is scary for a woman and her family, even if the biopsy shows that no cancer was present. The wisest course of action is to discuss the decision about mammography with your health care provider, who can help you to factor in your individual risk and arrive at the best decision for you.
For women ages seventy and over, there is currently not enough evidence for me or most health care providers to make any concrete recommendation about mammograms. However, because breast density decreases with age, there appears to be no reason that mammography should be less effective in women as they advance into this age group, and the risk of breast cancer continues to rise over age seventy. A woman aged seventy or older should discuss the decision about whether to get regular mammograms with her health care provider. I generally recommend it for my patients who are otherwise in good health and who could withstand breast cancer treatment if it were necessary.
CLINICAL BREAST EXAMS
A clinical breast exam is a physical examination of the breasts by a health care provider (most often a physician, but a nurse practitioner or nurse may also perform it). Clinical breast exams are most effective in women aged fifty to sixty-nine, but I advise my patients to have them every year, as part of their regular physical. As with other kinds of screening tests, experts disagree on the age at which you should start, or the frequency with which the exam should be done.
You have probably seen laminated breast self-exam cards made to hang in the shower that outline how to properly do a breast self-exam. The main advantage of this technique is that it enables you to become more familiar with your breast tissue so that you may notice any changes or even detect a lump. Breast self-exam is vigorously promoted by many health organizations as an effective way for women to find breast cancers that develop during the period between regular mammograms and clinical breast exams. Unfortunately, very little data actually support this claim. Neither the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force nor the National Cancer Institute recommend that women of any age regularly perform breast self-exam. I do not discourage my patients from doing breast self-exam, but I stress that it should never take the place of getting regular mammograms and clinical breast exams.
When My Patient Has a High Risk of Getting Breast Cancer
ESTIMATING THE RISK
Fortunately, most women are at average or low risk for the disease and do not need to take extra precautions -- aside from leading a healthy lifestyle and getting regular screening tests. However, some women are at high risk and do need to consider taking special steps to protect themselves. We now have pretty good information on factors that increase your risk of getting breast cancer, even though the details are still being worked out.
You are clearly at a higher risk of getting breast cancer if you have any one of the following risk factors:
- A mutation in the BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 genes
- A mother who developed breast cancer before she turned sixty, or a sister or daughter who developed breast cancer
- Breast abnormalities (such as atypical hyperplasia) in the past
- Repeated exposure as a child or adolescent to high dose radiation
You also are at a higher risk of getting breast cancer if you have several of the following risk factors:
- Your first menstrual period was at a relatively young age (twelve or younger).
- You reached menopause at a relatively late age (fifty-five or older).
- You first gave birth later in life (age thirty or older).
- You have high estrogen levels in your blood.
For patients of mine who are at a relatively higher risk of getting breast cancer, I generally recommend that they consider getting regular mammograms and clinical breast exams starting at age forty, even though the value of this has not yet been proven conclusively.
TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR UNUSUALLY HIGH RISK WOMEN
Some of my patients are at unusually high risk of breast cancer. Those who I tend to put in this category have a very strong family history or have been diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ or ductal carcinoma in situ. If you are at unusually high risk of breast cancer, you basically have two options to try to lower your risk: chemoprevention or prophylactic mastectomy.
Chemoprevention. This is the use of drugs to prevent b reast cancer, and it is a very active area of research. Tamoxifen and raloxifene are two of the most promising chemoprevention drugs that are in a class called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). SERMs act by blocking estrogen from attaching to breast cells.
In a National Cancer Institute-funded clinical trial of tamoxifen that included over 13,000 women at high risk of breast cancer, women who took tamoxifen over a five-year period had about half the risk of developing invasive cancer as women who did not take the drug. Though their risk of breast cancer was lower, the women on tamoxifen also experienced increased rates of some serious side effects, including endometrial cancer and blood clots in the lung (pulmonary embolism) and large veins of the legs (deep venous thrombosis). Raloxifene works in a similar fashion to tamoxifen, and early reports on its effectiveness show that it reduces the risk of breast cancer by more than half. It also seems to have an added benefit over tamoxifen in that women taking raloxifene seem to suffer fewer serious side effects.
High risk women should certainly talk with their health care providers about the risks and benefits associated with taking a chemoprevention drug. Drugs like tamoxifen and raloxifene seem to have a substantial benefit for some high risk women over a relatively short time period. However, the long-term benefits (and risks) related to these drugs have yet to be determined.
Prophylactic mastectomy. This is a drastic procedure that involves the surgical removal of both breasts in order to reduce the chances that breast cancer will develop. In my judgment, it is rarely indicated. The one exception may be for women who have the BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 genes that increase the risk of breast cancer (and ovarian cancer). Their risk is sufficiently high that -- as radical as it seems -- removing the breasts may be the right thing to do. One study has found that a thirty-five-year-old woman with BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations can gain three to five years of life by having the procedure. Still, you never can know whether this radical approach was justified in the individual, because you will never know if she would have developed breast cancer or not.
And although the procedure does afford substantial protection, it does not guarantee complete protection. Breast cancer can still develop in the small amount of tissue that remains after surgery. Because it is such a disfiguring procedure, if you are at high risk I think you should consider prophylactic mastectomy only after a careful discussion with your health care provider about all of the associated risks and benefits.
Yes. The thought of breast cancer is frightening. But all women should feel they have the power to take action against the disease. The lifestyle factors I've outlined may help lower the risk of breast cancer and regular screening can find it when it's most curable. Perhaps most heartening is the great progress we've made over the past twenty-five years in our understanding of the disease, and as research continues to advance at an astounding pace, each new year will bring with it further understanding of the causes of breast cancer as well as the ways my patients and I together can combat it.
Copyright © 2001 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College
and post it to your social network
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews >
This book deserves more than five stars. It is by far the best resource on women's health issues that I have seen. Review Summary: How can women improve their health by changing their lifestyle, diet, and activities? That's the question that this book answers. Based on the longest running and most authoritative sources of information, you should prefer the information here to what you will read in other resources. The book deals with factors like age, race, exercise, diet, use of supplements, weight, birth control pill and hormone replacement usage, smoking, and drinking in order to define how these affect the incidence of disease. In addition, the book also tells women how to improve their chances for avoiding diseases where where behavior counts for a lot. Review: The detailed focus of this book is remarkable. Unlike most books about health that look at men and women together, this one drills down to many different perpectives on women. For instance, if you took oral contraceptives in the 1970s, what is the effect on your risk of breast cancer today? If you take supplementary calcium now, how does that affect your risk of having a bone fracture when you are past 70? These are the kind of specific, and important questions that this book looks at. And the data are not necessarily what you think. Calcium supplements, for instance, don't seem to help with reducing fractures. If you discontinued oral contraceptives some time ago, the impact on breast cancer incidence seems to drop off to nil. The data for the book come from several long-term studies. The most significant is Harvard Medical School's Nurses' Health Study, which began in 1976. The base was 120,000 R.N.s aged 30-55. The original focus of this work was on oral contraceptives, but many other data were assembled in two page questionnaires sent every other year. Since then, biological samples have been added liked toenail clippings and blood. In 1989 116,000 more nurses were added in the Nurses' Health Study II, which tracks younger women than those in the earlier group who are now increasingly elderly. Nurses were originally chosen because it was thought they would be more accurate in their data and more likely to be open about sharing information about contraceptive and reproductive practices. Since then the National Institutes of Health have also started a tracking study focusing on the use of postmenopausal hormones, low fat diets, and the impact of calcium and other supplements on postmenopausal health. All three studies are used extensively in this book. The book's first section looks at the studies and how to interpret the data that come from them. The second section (and the longest) looks at a different diseases. Instead of lumping cancer together, for instance, you get separate looks at breast, lung, colon, endometrial, ovarian, and skin cancer. Other dieases covered include heart disease, stroke, diabetes, osteoporosis, asthma, arthritis, eye ailments, and Alzheimer's. The final section is on advice about how to do better with physical activity, weight control, smoking, nutrients, foods, alcohol, vitamins and minerals, postmenopausal hormones, birth control, and aspirin. Unlike many books coming from physicians, this book is easy to understand and apply. You get a lot of scientific data, but you also get lots of instances of plain English. For example, there are quotes from nurses and how one doctor provides advice in each section for what she or he tells patients about that subject. Also, each chapter has a simple, useful summary that you can use to put everything in perspective. If the book has a weakness, it's that you cannot learn as much as you need to know about how to change difficult behaviors like smoking and eating foods that lead to excess weight in brief chapters. So, once you've decided you want to improve your behavior, I suggest that you also seek out other books that are more specialized on those issues. Obviously, thi