Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice / Edition 1

Paperback (Print)
Buy Used
Buy Used from BN.com
$16.17
(Save 41%)
Item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging.
Condition: Used – Good details
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $9.06
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 67%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (14) from $9.06   
  • New (6) from $14.83   
  • Used (8) from $9.06   

Overview

In the past thirty years, historians have broadened the scope of their discipline to include many previously neglected topics and perspectives. They have chronicled language, madness, gender, and sexuality and have experimented with new forms of presentation. They have turned to the histories of non-Western peoples and to the troubled relations between “the West” and the rest. Allan Megill welcomes these developments, but he also suggests that there is now confusion among historians about what counts as a justified account of the past.

In Historical Knowledge, Historical Error, Megill dispels some of the confusion. Here, he discusses issues of narrative, objectivity, and memory. He attacks what he sees as irresponsible uses of evidence while accepting the art of speculation, which incomplete evidence forces upon historians. Along the way, he offers succinct accounts of the epistemological road historians have traveled from Herodotus and Thucydides through Leopold von Ranke and Alexis de Tocqueville, and on to Hayden White, Natalie Zemon Davis, and Lynn Hunt.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Choice

"With this rigorous and lucid work, Megill has made a major contribution to the understanding of historical thought. . . . In brief, this is a work of exceptional value. Essential."—Choice

Journal of American History

"This is a rewarding book. In ten essays, Allan Megill explores some of the most pressing challenges and worrisome pitfalls in modern historical practice. . . . These challenging and stimulating essays succeed well . . . in affirming that history works best when it is sharply distinguished from the present. Indeed, by remaining true to its core disciplinary methods and ideals, history can serve, Megill movingly concludes, 'as a model of honesty and intelligence in the investigation of the human world.'"—Journal of American History

— Christopher Layne

Journal of Southern History

"This is an engaged book: it energetically attempts to provide 'a contemporary guide to practice,' to ward off historical error by the discriminating constitution of historical knowledge. At the heart of the book is Megill's long-standing engagement with the concept of 'objectivity,' and his effort to reconstitute the notion in terms of its many and nested significations."

— John H. Zammito

Journal of Interdisciplinary History

"Demanding intellectual rigor, Megill re-defines familiar terms and interjects his own firm opinions, leading readers along a circuitous path through the brambles of his own impressive learning. Readers can only trail along after this insightful and candid guide as he provocatively cites noted philosophers and historians, chastising them for solecisms. . . . To read his essays is like auditing a bracing seminar conducted by a stimulating, opinionated teacher."

— Raymond Grew

H-France

"The essays are to acquaint students with contemporary challenges of improper methodology or epistemology, to be overcome like the (more numerous) labors of Hercules."

— John L. Harvey

Choice

"With this rigorous and lucid work, Megill has made a major contribution to the understanding of historical thought. . . . In brief, this is a work of exceptional value. Essential."
H-France
The essays are to acquaint students with contemporary challenges of improper methodology or epistemology, to be overcome like the (more numerous) labors of Hercules.

— John L. Harvey

Journal of American History
This is a rewarding book. In ten essays, Allan Megill explores some of the most pressing challenges and worrisome pitfalls in modern historical practice. . . . These challenging and stimulating essays succeed well . . . in affirming that history works best when it is sharply distinguished from the present. Indeed, by remaining true to its core disciplinary methods and ideals, history can serve, Megill movingly concludes, 'as a model of honesty and intelligence in the investigation of the human world.'

— Christopher Layne

Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Demanding intellectual rigor, Megill re-defines familiar terms and interjects his own firm opinions, leading readers along a circuitous path through the brambles of his own impressive learning. Readers can only trail along after this insightful and candid guide as he provocatively cites noted philosophers and historians, chastising them for solecisms. . . . To read his essays is like auditing a bracing seminar conducted by a stimulating, opinionated teacher.

— Raymond Grew

Journal of Southern History
This is an engaged book: it energetically attempts to provide 'a contemporary guide to practice,' to ward off historical error by the discriminating constitution of historical knowledge. At the heart of the book is Megill's long-standing engagement with the concept of 'objectivity,' and his effort to reconstitute the notion in terms of its many and nested significations.

— John H. Zammito

Bruce Kuklick

Historical Knowledge, Historical Error is part of a resurgence of interest in the philosophy of history. Allan Megill knows his history and is more than usually sophisticated as a philosopher. He has useful and wise things to say on a host of topics including memory, counterfactuals, narrative, and professionalization. By no means do I agree with all that Megill has argued, but he is intelligent, clear, and displays a scholarly integrity that is rock-solid. The book deserves our extended attention.”--Bruce Kuklick, University of Pennsylvania

 

 

Dipesh Chakrabarty

“Megill’s book represents a major and much-needed intervention in the debates that have engaged historians and philosophers of history in the last two or three decades. Coming from someone who has thought deeply, carefully, and long on the meanings of historical objectivity for our times, this is a book that presents a fresh and clear point of view. Megill’s argument deserves attention from everybody who wonders about where the discipline of history might be headed once the dust has settled on the tired debates over objectivity versus relativist skepticism.”--Dipesh Chakrabarty, University of Chicago

 

 

H-France - John L. Harvey

"The essays are to acquaint students with contemporary challenges of improper methodology or epistemology, to be overcome like the (more numerous) labors of Hercules."
Journal of American History - Christopher Layne

"This is a rewarding book. In ten essays, Allan Megill explores some of the most pressing challenges and worrisome pitfalls in modern historical practice. . . . These challenging and stimulating essays succeed well . . . in affirming that history works best when it is sharply distinguished from the present. Indeed, by remaining true to its core disciplinary methods and ideals, history can serve, Megill movingly concludes, 'as a model of honesty and intelligence in the investigation of the human world.'"

Journal of Interdisciplinary History - Raymond Grew

"Demanding intellectual rigor, Megill re-defines familiar terms and interjects his own firm opinions, leading readers along a circuitous path through the brambles of his own impressive learning. Readers can only trail along after this insightful and candid guide as he provocatively cites noted philosophers and historians, chastising them for solecisms. . . . To read his essays is like auditing a bracing seminar conducted by a stimulating, opinionated teacher."
Journal of Southern History - John H. Zammito

"This is an engaged book: it energetically attempts to provide 'a contemporary guide to practice,' to ward off historical error by the discriminating constitution of historical knowledge. At the heart of the book is Megill's long-standing engagement with the concept of 'objectivity,' and his effort to reconstitute the notion in terms of its many and nested significations."
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780226518305
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press
  • Publication date: 2/1/2007
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 304
  • Sales rank: 925,105
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author

Allan Megill is professor of history at the University of Virginia. He is the author of Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida and Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason (Why Marx Rejected Politics and the Market), and editor of Rethinking Objectivity.

 

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction: The Need for Historical Epistemology

Part I. Memory
            1. History with Memory, History without Memory
                Memory versus History
                History and the Present
                Conflicting Attitudes toward the Past 
                History’s Legitimate Roles
            2. History, Memory, Identity
                Identity and the Memory Wave
                Identity, Memory, and Historical Understanding 
                History, Memory, and the Unknown

Part II. Narrative and Knowledge
            3. Does Narrative Have a Cognitive Value of Its Own?
                The “Crisis” of Narrative
                The Epistemological Limits of Narrative
            4. Narrative and the Four Tasks of History-Writing 
                Explanation and Description
                Narrative and Braudel’s Mediterranean
                The Four Tasks of History-Writing

Part III. Objectivity and Speculation
            5. Objectivity for Historians
                Objectivity and Commitment
                Defining Objectivity
            6. A Case Study in Historical Epistemology: What Did the Neighbors Know about Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings?
                (by Steven Shepard, Phillip Honenberger, and Allan Megill)
                A Disputed Case
                Inference to the Best Explanation 
                Thagard’s Three Criteria
                A Fourth Criterion
                Inferring the Relationship
                The Case for Our Alternative Account
            7. Counterfactual History: On Niall Ferguson’s Virtual History and Similar Works

Part IV. Fragmentation
            8. Fragmentation and the Future of Historiography: On Peter Novick’s That Noble Dream
            9. “Grand Narrative” and the Discipline of History
                  Four Ideal-Typical Attitudes toward the Overall Coherence of History
                  Four Postulates Suggested by the Preceding Account
            10. Coherence and Incoherence in Historical Studies: From the Annales School to the New Cultural History
                 The Annales School and the Problem of Coherence
                 The Annales School: From Convergence to Multiplicity
                 Coherence as a Willed Commitment
                 Conclusion: Against Current Fashion

Notes
Index

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)