- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Then one morning in March those newspapers gave us a brand-new myth: the tale of the Collyer brothers: Homer and Langley. On March 21st, someone made a call to the police, saying that there was a dead man in the four-story brownstone at 2078 Fifth Avenue, on the corner of 128th Street in Harlem. The cops knew the house for its two ancient inhabitants, its boarded-up windows, its vile summer stench. Neighbors knew the men as ghostly nocturnal figures.
To be sure, the brothers, like the house they lived in, were survivors from another time. In the late 19th century, Harlem was white and prosperous, a perfect setting for characters out of Edith Wharton's splendid fictions. The Collyer brothers did not grow up rich; but they were "well off." Their father was a doctor. Their mother had ambitions to sing opera. The 1947 newspapers said that Homer was born in 1881 (the year that Henry James published The Portrait of a Lady and some other mythic Americans fought the gunfight at the O.K. Corral). His brother Langley arrived in 1885. They moved into the house in 1909 and stayed on after the parents died. In March 1947, when the cops started investigating the report of a death, the revelations burst from the front pages of newspapers. Thousands of New Yorkers started arriving in Harlem for a look.
Far away in Brooklyn, the emerging myth of the Collyer brothers was made personal to us because one of our neighbors, a detective named Joe Whitmore, was assigned to the investigation. "You never seen anything like that place," he told my father one morning, while I listened in awe. "It's like a trip to Purgatory." His eyewitness accounts of filth, rats, newspapers stacked to ceilings, pianos everywhere (14 of them), a Model T automobile, and narrow tunnels through the densely packed trash were verified by the newspaper stories. Or, rather, Joe Whitmore verified the newspaper stories.
The cops found Homer first. He was propped up in a chair, crippled and twisted by rheumatism, his hair wild and white, his beard falling below his chest. He wore only a tattered blue bathrobe. He had starved to death. They didn't find Langley for another three weeks. Despite reports of sightings all over New York and as far away as Atlantic City, his body lay only eight feet away from Homer's, crushed by thick walls of trash he had rigged as a booby trap. Rats had been dining on his aging flesh.
Within days of the first discoveries, the Collyer brothers had entered the mythology of New York, while becoming part of the city's language for at least two generations. Millions of New York mothers must have scolded their children with variations on the same lines: "Look at this room! You guys are like the Collyer brothers!" In my own life, even today, I aim the same accusing words at myself, gazing at the thousands of books, magazines, newspapers that I'm so reluctant to throw away. I never call myself Homer, or Langley, but I often feel like a card-carrying member of the Collyer brotherhood.
Now E. L. Doctorow has brought his extraordinary literary art to bear on this enduring New York story. The result is a wonderful novel. As in The Book of Daniel, Ragtime, The Waterworks, Billy Bathgate, and other fictions, Doctorow is here less concerned with factual truth than with imagining the lives within the myth. This is not unique to him. After all, Stephen Crane did not fight in the Civil War. Leonardo da Vinci was not present at the Last Supper.
For Doctorow, history is almost always the first draft of myth. But it is more than that too. In my reading, what distinguishes him from most other makers of historical fictions is that he approaches the subject matter like a musician. Sometimes directly -- it was impossible for me to read Ragtime without hearing Scott Joplin. In this new novel, I hear John Coltrane, the great tenor sax player. The first line is certainly as direct as Coltrane.
"I'm Homer, the blind brother."
The notes that matter are "blind" and "brother." But the narration goes on as Homer explains how he realized in his late teens what was happening to him. He would stand near the lake in Central Park in winter when it was filled with ice skaters.
The houses over to Central Park West went first, they got darker as if dissolving into the dark sky until I couldn't make them out, and then the trees began to lose their shape, and then finally, this was toward the end of the season, maybe it was late February of that very cold winter, and all I could see were these phantom shapes of the ice skaters floating past me on a field of ice, and then the white ice, that last light, went gray and then altogether black, and then all my sight was gone though I could hear clearly the scoot scut of the blades on the ice, a very satisfying sound, a soft sound though full of intention, a deeper tone than you'd expect made by the skate blades, perhaps for having sounded the resonant basso of the water under the ice, scoot scut, scoot scut.
In this and other passages, Doctorow brilliantly gives us the sense of blindness in all its varieties, including its compensations. Homer Collyer learns to see through sound and smell and texture. In Doctorow's version of the myth, Homer is also a trained musician, saying early that "my skill as a pianist rendered my blindness acceptable in the social world." He goes to dinner parties with his older brother Langley and often plays for the guests and the young women. Langley goes off to World War One and comes back a changed, obsessive man. In "real" life, the musician was Langley, not Homer, and Homer was older than Langley by four years. Langley apparently did not serve in World War One (too old). This playing with the facts doesn't truly matter, any more than the true story of Frankie and Johnny matters, or the biography of Stagger Lee. What should matter in a work of imagined art is the imagination and the art.
Doctorow supplies both, in what is a story of a grand refusal of the world and its conventions. The brothers eventually ask nothing of the world. No charity. No acclaim. They want to be left alone. There is a brief time when servants provide the illusion of family, but eventually they leave. One, a young Irish girl, is the object of Homer's affections, but she goes off to become a nun. Homer says at one point, about a girl he met at summer camp: "Is there any love purer than this, when you don't even know what it is?" But the most enduring love story in Doctorow's novel is the love of each brother for the other.
Homer always speaks with affection about Langley, even realizing that his brother's habit of collecting things might be getting out of hand. Newspapers were a huge problem. Langley's major project was "the collection of the daily papers with the ultimate aim of creating one day's edition of a newspaper that could be read forevermore as sufficient to any day thereof."
Across half a century, Langley's first act every morning is to buy the newspapers. He never throws them away.
Langley's project consisted of counting and filing news stories according to category: invasions, wars, mass murders, auto, train, and plane wrecks, love scandals, church scandals, robberies, murders, lynchings, rapes, political misdoings with a subhead of crooked elections, police misdeeds, gangland rubouts, investment scams, strikes, tenement fires, trials civil, trials criminal, and so on.
Eventually, "he would have enough statistical evidence to narrow his findings to the kinds of events that were, by their frequency, seminal human behavior." And goes on: "He wanted to fix American life finally in one edition, what he called Collyer's eternally current dateless newspaper, the only newspaper anyone would ever need."
(In a 1977 panel at Harvard, Doctorow said: "If I could get Punch Sulzberger to agree to issue the paper as written in its entirety by me, on just one day, I would spend many, many years preparing that particular city edition. And I would consider it -- it would be my life's work." The roads to art are often long and surprising.)
In the final 40 pages of this novel, Doctorow makes another great leap of the imagination. The Collyer brothers don't die in 1947. They live on, through the 1960s and after, trying to make sense of the violent and unjust world and their own lives. Homer goes deaf. He huddles in the labyrinth of the packed house, hungry, inert, with "only the touch of my brother's hand to know that I am not alone." In this lean, deep novel about time, memory, and love, neither is the reader. --Pete Hamill
Pete Hamill is the author of North River, Forever, Downtown, A Drinking Life, and many other works of fiction and nonfiction.
From the Hardcover edition.
1. Discussion Questions for HOMER & LANGLEY Submitted by Random House Reader's Circle book clubs
There were several unusual sets of people who came into Homer and Langley's lives. Do you feel that Homer collected people the way that he collected objects? Why do you suppose that is or is not?
2. What do you think of Langley' s Theory of Replacements? Given today's 24-hour news environment in which historical context is rarely addressed, does Langley's theory and perspective have some merit?
3. Langley is obsessive in his quest to create one universal newspaper of "seminal events". What categories were used by Langley so that the newspaper would be "eternally current, dateless"? What categories would you add or change? Why?
4. What effect did the war have on Langley — did he come back mentally damaged along with his medical problems? How would the brothers' lives have been different if there had been no war?
5. Discuss the importance of Jacqueline in the story. Would the story have been as effective without this "muse"? Do you think she really existed?
6. On page 76 Homer talks about how things were for him when he and Langley returned to the house after their night in jail. He said, "this time marked the beginning of our abandonment of the outer world." He also said that for the first time he felt that his sightlessness was a physical deformity. What was it about the night in jail, the end of their community dances, and/or their return home that caused such a drastic shift in their lives?
7. One of the novel's themes is isolation/a feeling of being separate from the world. Some characters do this by choice, others not. Discuss how Homer, Langley, and their various houseguests feel isolated from the world around them.
8. In what ways is the house a character as well as the setting? How does the house's condition reflect the brothers' physical and mental conditions?
9. The brothers' paranoia became ever-increasing, causing them to lay booby traps and close themselves in with physical as well as emotional shutters. Homer's last thoughts were, I wish I could go crazy so I might not know how badly off I am. Could Homer and Langley have been "saved" from themselves?
10. The book is told from Homer's point of view. Why do you think the author chose Homer to tell the story of the brothers? How did Homer's disability affect his telling of the story? How would the story be different if Langley had been the voice?
its a story that blooms inside you. memorable characters. reading it was like chatting with an old friend and getting deep inside their personal ideology. the story tells of how the blind see deeply and how blind the sighted can be. definitely a permanent library book. great piece of american literature.
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 1, 2009
Doctorow has an incredible ability to bring his characters to life. He draws you into this story with his unique and poetic use of the language and one can't help but to get hooked by his prose.
A must read!
3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Sorry to say that I could only get 50 pages into this book. Boring would be a kind description of the story.
2 out of 9 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.AlexLovesToRead
Posted February 10, 2010
My family often refers to the Collyer brothers as a way to (hopefully) inspire some house cleaning. My parents are native New Yorkers and clearly remember the tale of these wealthy siblings, trapped by their mental illnesses and the inherited money that allowed them to exist in such a bizarre manner. Although this is a fictionalized account of the real life Collyers, it reads as non-fiction. The plan to write a "memoir" is very well executed. I truly enjoyed this.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.lavendergreen
Posted February 8, 2010
E. L. Doctorow's take on these historical brothers is masterful. He has crafted a story for the reader to understand how the two privileged Collyer brothers might have ended up reclusive and lonely. This epic tale encompasses wars, political movements, police corruption and advancing technology in a spellbinding way. The reader of this audiobook brilliantly made the pages come alive and the characters real. I highly recommend this book, which is in the class of Ragtime and Billy Bathgate.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted October 26, 2009
I enjoyed the book but frankly was annoyed by the factual inaccuracy. Am not sure why it was necessary to change the story of two very real and very weird eccentrics.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.I like reading this style of story. If you read it, just be sure to do a little bit of research first. Don't take the storyline as gospel truth, but Doctorow certainly does pesent a very plausible look into the mind of Homer. I do even know some people with similar housekeeping habits!
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 13, 2009
The wrtting style was fine. The story of Brother whom my Mother used to say I was like was really interesting.
I thought the book lacked direction. It seemed the writer was taking my from place to place with no real pattern, or meaning for being there.
All in all, it was not bad. I think the best part for me, was I was able to re-live the New York City area.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 12, 2009
While I would not classify this as Doctorow's finest work, even when he's mediocre, quite honestly, he's so far superior to most of what else is out there, that this is well worth the read. Doctorow's ability to create fiction based upon historical events and people is always pleasing and satisfying. I'm a fan of Doctorow and have read all of his work and would have no problem recommending "Homer and Langley" to other readers.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.AmericanPirate
Posted July 27, 2011
The book was interesting and enjoyable right up until the last 20 pages or so. Doctorow did a good job developing the main characters, and his first person narrative style is incredibly engaging. The way that Homer relates his life is moving, and it's delivery makes one feel like one is listening to an old man on his back porch thinking aloud about his younger days.
The part that makes the book horrible is its ending. The author takes this tale of life, with all of its ups and downs, and ends it in such a depressing manner completely unbefitting the rest of the book. I'm not asking for a happy ending to all of the tales that I read, but this one was way out of line.
I do not recommend this book to anyone, but if you feel the need to read it, put it down early before the ending ruins the entirety of the tale.
Anonymous
Posted March 18, 2010
I enjoyed this fascinating journey through history from the viewpoint of the two brothers.
But I don't recommend this book as an e-book until B & N fixes the problem with the disappearing margins. Half-way through the book, the nicely spaced margins disappeared. This was on the Medium Font setting. The words were right next to the edges of the screen which made for uncomfortable reading. I just read a review of another e-book and a similar problem was described as an 'e-book format problem'.
This is only the second book I've purchased to read on my new Nook. Barnes & Noble should not release books in e-book form until they get the formatting correct. I look forward to reading many more books on my Nook and trust this book-seller will address this issue.
Illiniforever
Posted February 20, 2010
When wealthy,reclusive brothers succumb to hoarding behavior their collection is not only about them it is also about us.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted February 13, 2010
Intelligent, fictionalized account of two brothers in NY who became famous in death for their compulsive hording -
Gives humanity and understanding to a family that was castigated in their time for such odd behavior.
Anonymous
Posted January 23, 2010
This is a fascinating book about a very strange compulsive behavior. Doctorow does a masterful job in describing the relationship between these two brothers in a very implausable living situation. Highly recommend.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.kmzcg
Posted January 11, 2010
I Also Recommend:
Enjoyed the insight on hoarding. Writing style was light,but enjoyable. Very descriptive. You could "see" the home. Like the musical references,too. Plot was thin. Characters were well developed. Liked how one brother commented on other brother. Made me laugh aloud.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.jeannetoma
Posted December 19, 2009
I decided to purchase this book after hearing E.L. Doctorow read the first few pages at one of the "Writers on a New England Stage" events we enjoy here in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. I was immediately pulled into the drama of the lives of the Collyer brothers, their privileged upbringing and the view of life from Homer, the blind brother and narrator of the story. However, Doctorow's reading of the first few evocative pages was only a taste of the fascinating tale to come. The story gets much more interesting when you discover Langley, who is a bright yet injured man with an obsessive-compulsive disorder of the hoarding variety. E.L. Doctorow said that he first became interested in the Collyer brothers when the New York City Fire Department had to go through the roof of the Collyer Mansion to reach the brothers because the home was otherwise inaccessible...and they lived on Fifth Avenue so it must have been quite a spectacle. The cover photograph is taken from Central Park and shows the mansion surrounded by taller buildings dwarfing the residence.
The adventures of the brothers, who were orphaned when they were young men, are a reflection of the life and times in New York as well as the influence of the outer world on their increasingly insular world. As E.L. Doctorow stated, it is a historical novel. He took the skeletal framework of the facts of the two brothers lives and hung the story on that framework as a a dresser drapes clothing on a dress model. It is a lovely draping.
There are events and changes that happened in the world over the years that managed to enter the brothers sphere and touch them profoundly. The brothers themselves are compelling. Homer, the blind musician, is an acute observer who seduces women easily into his later years. Langley, the damaged intellectual, is a miser who nevertheless becomes an extravagent collector of oddities until the end. One is stable, the other completely unpredictable, yet they both co-exist and depend upon each other in a world all their own.
I liked this book because of the way the "world all their own" was drawn so beautifully by E.L. Doctorow's writing. There is nothing wasted in the writing, nothing peripheral or distracting in the story, and every word falls into place perfectly. As such, it is a fast and completely enjoyable read.
This book tends to drag on-a slow read. There were too many thoughts and memories coming from Homer and not enough about the character of Langley. I am disappointed.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.thewrightstuff136
Posted November 27, 2009
An interesting version of the brothers Collyer. But by the time I was done, it only made me want to know what REALLY happened by culling as much as possible from articles online. There were immediate discrepancies - big ones - so I guess I'd prefer the real thing. Still, Doctorow of course is worthy of the material.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.shafferprin
Posted November 21, 2009
This novel contains the usual exquisite writing style of Doctorow with its impeccable english and grammar style. The story is very original as is often the case in his novels. This reader found it hard to identify with the characters and the plot of their lives through the changing times of this countries history during the twentieth century. The novel is really a look at America in the last century through the eyes of one of its more unusual set of brothers. Interesting, but not grabbing.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted November 15, 2009
I continue to think about the story of this book and find it difficult to disengage from the idea that it is historical rather than fiction. There are, for me, a lot of hidden meanings, metaphors, and politically-charged ideas. This is not a book that makes you feel good; it makes you want to meet the characters and engage them in conversation.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
Homer and Langley Collyer are brothers—the one blind and deeply intuitive, the other damaged into madness, or perhaps greatness, by mustard gas in the Great War. They live as recluses in their once grand Fifth Avenue mansion, scavenging the city streets for things they think they can use, hoarding the daily newspapers as research for Langley’s proposed dateless newspaper whose reportage will be as prophecy. Yet the epic events of the century play out in the lives of the two brothers—wars, political movements, technological advances—and even though they want nothing more than to shut out the world, history seems to pass through their cluttered house in the persons of immigrants, prostitutes, society women, government