A New York Times Editors’ Choice
A Most Anticipated Book of 2023 from The Millions and Literary Hub
Inc. Non-Obvious Book Awards Best Book of 2023 Winner
“Provocative… An indictment of sexism in the field.” — New York Times
"Penaluna tacks between rage and humor, biography and theory. Her writing is sharp and rousing. Her message is consoling and motivating. If this is what it means to think like a woman, sign me up." — Wall Street Journal
“Through her studies, Penaluna confirms not only that women have always engaged in philosophy, but that they have made unique and substantial contributions to the field… By giving us their names, she not only counteracts their omission from the canon, but fashions the beginnings of a new one entirely.” — The Atlantic
“Penaluna deftly tells the stories of four 17th and 18th century female philosophers, skillfully weaving their narratives into a rich exploration of her own experiences of patriarchy and sexism in academia.” — Observer
“An alternate philosophical canon, where women and their intellect are deeply and rigorously examined.” — The Millions, Most Anticipated Books of 2023
“How to Think Like a Woman is a much-needed revelation.” — Literary Hub, Most Anticipated Books of 2023
“Incisive…Penaluna skillfully captures the thinking of these four women in impassioned prose as she challenges sexism in the canon…Lucid and frank, this blend of memoir, biography, and criticism makes a solid case for why representation matters.” — Publishers Weekly
“Thought-provoking…Engaging…A considerable achievement.” — Booklist, starred review
“[Penaluna’s] story of rebuilding and reimagining personally and professionally demonstrates defiant independence from patriarchal prescriptions and their shame and an embrace of feminist anger, ambiguity, and diversity of thought….[A] redemptive reclamation of the female voice in the study of philosophy.” — Kirkus "A feminist rallying cry informed by centuries of thought on the 'woman question,' this elegantly written and intellectually rigorous memoir is a gift to women in male-dominated fields—and to everyone living a life of the mind while also trying to be a decent human being." — Ada Calhoun, Author of Why We Can't Sleep: Women's New Midlife Crisis
"How to Think Like a Woman is a fascinating and illuminating work of non-fiction by a writer of real style and critical intelligence. Regan Penaluna has created an elegant synthesis of intellectual history, memoir and feminist polemic that deserves to be widely read as a corrective to centuries of misogyny and erasure in philosophy."—Mark O’Connell, author of Notes from an Apocalypse
“In a world in which philosophy is not only sexist in underestimating women's actual and potential contributions, but actively misogynistic in pushing women out of the field, we need this book. Regan Penaluna's How To Think Like a Woman is at once a deeply personal and philosophically riveting meditation on four brilliant and inspiring female philosophersMary Astell, Damaris Masham, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Catharine Cockburnthat I learned so much from. A must-read for anyone who cares about what happens to women, young and old, in this needlessly and harmfully male-dominated profession.”—Kate Manne, author of Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women
“Regan Penaluna’s courageous book is a walk along the bluffs, amid the drowned gardens, telling of the sun and flood of her life. Along those bluffs four women from the past keep her company, awaiting the words she will speak of them and herself.”—Alexander Nemerov, author of Fierce Poise: Helen Frankenthaler and 1950s New York
“A sharp-eyed reappraisal of four brilliant women in history — and a provocative challenge to the philosophy bros.” — Helen Lewis, author of Difficult Women
“An alternate philosophical canon, where women and their intellect are deeply and rigorously examined.”
“Penaluna tacks between rage and humor, biography and theory. Her writing is sharp and rousing. Her message is consoling and motivating.”
2022-12-13
A writer and journalist fuses her memoir with the forgotten writings of four female philosophers to carve an intellectual space that is all her own.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, Penaluna, a former editor at Nautilus Magazine and Guernica, discovered the study of philosophy in the university to be stiflingly sexist and systematically silencing. In this debut, she recounts her love for—and eventual separation from—both her academic discipline and her philosopher husband. She shares her narrative alongside accessible biographies and critiques of four “lost feminist philosophers”: Mary Astell, Damaris Masham, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Catherine Cockburn. Contextualizing the “woman question,” Penaluna punctuates the text with discussions of the male-dominated philosophical canon, women who had relationships with famous philosophers, and the teachings of various women intellectuals. The book is full of interesting tidbits and thought-provoking observations, but some sections are more compelling than others, and a sense of scholarly detachment infiltrates the author’s personal account. Still, Penaluna provides an incisive exploration of the forces that exclude women from the pursuit of knowledge and the ways that women sometimes abet their own oppression. Her reflections on academic life—often characterized by loneliness, unease, and self-doubt—emphasize the tensions between the pursuit of objective truth and the indulgence of subjective sensibilities long considered the domain of women. Her work is an astute alternative to both the study of philosophy as currently practiced and its assumed classics, and Penaluna lays the foundation for a new genre—and community—in which women can more easily participate in the life of the mind. Her story of rebuilding and reimagining personally and professionally demonstrates defiant independence from patriarchal prescriptions and their shame and an embrace of feminist anger, ambiguity, and diversity of thought. While the author struggles some to make all components work powerfully, the book is a solid, entertaining, and intellectually stimulating attempt at a new kind of work.
An occasionally tepid but ultimately satisfying, redemptive reclamation of the female voice in the study of philosophy.