The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900 available in Paperback, eBook
The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900
- ISBN-10:
- 0691151164
- ISBN-13:
- 9780691151168
- Pub. Date:
- 04/17/2011
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
- ISBN-10:
- 0691151164
- ISBN-13:
- 9780691151168
- Pub. Date:
- 04/17/2011
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900
Buy New
$39.95Buy Used
-
-
SHIP THIS ITEM
Temporarily Out of Stock Online
Please check back later for updated availability.
-
Overview
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780691151168 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Princeton University Press |
| Publication date: | 04/17/2011 |
| Edition description: | Reprint |
| Pages: | 336 |
| Sales rank: | 972,413 |
| Product dimensions: | 6.10(w) x 9.20(h) x 0.70(d) |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
The Idea of Greater Britain Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900
By Duncan Bell Princeton University Press
Copyright © 2007 Princeton University Press
All right reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-691-12865-8
Chapter One Introduction: Building Greater Britain
When we have accustomed ourselves to contemplate the whole Empire together and call it England, we shall see that here too is a United States. Here too is a homogeneous people, one in blood, language, religion, and laws, but dispersed over a boundless space. -J. R. Seeley, The Expansion of England (1883) A firm and well-compacted union of all the British lands would form a state that might control the whole world. -Charles Oman, England in the Nineteenth Century (1899)
The history of modern political thought is partly the history of the attempt to confront increasing global interdependence and competition. The Idea of Greater Britain focuses on an important but neglected aspect of this chronicle: the debate over the potential union of the United Kingdom with its so-called settler colonies-the lands we know now as Australia, Canada, New Zealand, as well as parts of South Africa-during the late Victorian age. Straddling oceans and spanning continents, this polity was to act, so its advocates proclaimed, as a guarantor of British strength and of a just and stable world. I explore the languages employed in imagining the settler empire as a singletranscontinental political community, even as a global federal state, with the intention of contributing to the history of imperial thought and Victorian intellectual life. I seek to shed light on the ways in which the future of world order-the configuration and dynamics of economic and geopolitical power, and the normative architecture justifying this patterning-was perceived in an age of vital importance for the development of politics in the twentieth century and beyond.
The quest for Greater Britain was both a reaction to and a product of the complex evolution of nineteenth-century international politics. The turbulent economic and political conditions of the era engendered profound anxiety, leading to the belief that a colossal polity was indispensable for preserving strength in a world in flux. In this sense it was reactive. But it was a product in the sense that the communications technologies facilitating increasing levels of economic interdependence also generated the cognitive shift that was necessary for people to conceive of the scattered elements of the colonial empire as a coherent and unified political unit, and even as a state. In the last three decades of the century, a significant number of commentators responded to the widespread perception that the world was both shrinking and becoming increasingly competitive, and that this was a world in which Britain was losing (or had already lost) its midcentury preeminence. A strong and vibrant Greater Britain was one of the most prominent solutions offered to the crisis of confidence in national supremacy. The debate signaled an important moment in the reconfiguration of national consciousness in a late Victorian world subject to the vicissitudes of international relations and a transfiguration of the prevailing norms of domestic political culture. It was driven in part by the perceived need to theorize and construct a bulwark against the encroachment of a powerful set of global challengers, most notably Germany, the United States, and Russia. As such it illustrates the disquieting effect that the impending loss of great power status had on a generation of thinkers. But the debate also constitutes a chapter in the intricate story charting the advent of democracy. Seen by many in Britain as a world-historical development, the emergence and spread of democracy (at least among the so-called civilized) was regarded as inevitable, as the culmination, whether intended or not, of many of the social, economic, and political trends of the previous two centuries, and it spawned a constantly mutating blend of optimism and anxiety. Imperial commentators reacted in divergent ways. For some, the spread of the Anglo-Saxon peoples across the face of the earth was the main engine of global progress; Greater Britain was, as such, a virtuous agent of democratic transformation. It foreshadowed the future. The majority, however, were more skeptical, and more nervous: the arrival of democracy prompted apprehension, and sometimes even fear. It was unclear what sort of path it would carve through the modern world, and in particular how both empire and state would be reconfigured. This group often saw Greater Britain as a counterrevolutionary response, capable of taming the transition to democracy. These concerns provided the fertile soil in which ideas about Greater Britain blossomed, flourished, and finally wilted.
The dates that I have chosen for the title of the book-namely c.1860-1900-act as a rough guide rather than a precise measure for the range of materials covered. In some chapters I reach further back in time, exploring dimensions of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century imperial thought, while in the conclusion I discuss some developments in the early twentieth century. The bulk of the text, however, focuses on the closing decades of Victoria's reign. Both the proximate cause of the explosion of interest in Greater Britain, and the shifts in the perception of the planet that helped underpin the idea of an integrated global polity, can be traced principally to the 1860s. The early 1870s saw a surge in proposals for an imperial federal system; during the 1880s this turned into a flood. From the mid-1890s confidence in the project of transforming the constitutional structures of the empire began to decline, as legislative success eluded the imperialists, as the leaders of the colonies displayed limited enthusiasm for such ideas, and as imperial priorities were increasingly focused on southern Africa. The war in South Africa (1899-1902) redirected imperial political thought in numerous ways, and it is for this reason that I stop at the turn of the century. Tracing the changes, as well as the various lines of continuity, would require another book.
The remainder of this introduction sets the scene for the following chapters. In the next section I explore some of the meanings of the term "Greater Britain." I then examine the role of the imperial federation movement within the wider discourse of Greater Britain and locate the book in relation to recent work in the history of political thought and imperial history. The final section provides an outline of the arguments presented, and a breakdown of the individual chapters.
The Boundaries of Imperial Discourse: Imagining Greater Britain
During the 1830s and 1840s the relationship between the rapidly expanding settler colonies and London came under increasing scrutiny. The Canadian rebellions (1837-38) marked a watershed, catalyzing interest in conceding limited self-government to the settlers. The late 1840s and 1850s saw many of them granted "responsible government," which meant, in essence, the creation of limited representative institutions. It was generally assumed that such changes would eventually result in the independence of the colonies; the point of reform was to push such a moment far into the future and to make sure that when it came the terms of separation would be amicable. "Every colony," argued the radical politician J. A. Roebuck in 1849, "ought by us to be looked upon as a country destined, at some period of its existence, to govern itself," a point echoed in 1856 by Arthur Mills, an esteemed Tory colonial commentator, who stated that "to ripen those communities to the earliest possible maturity- social, political, and commercial-to qualify them, by all the appliances within the reach of a parent State, for present self-government, and eventual independence, is now the universally admitted object and aim of our Colonial policy." During the 1860s, however, many watchful observers perceived an imminent threat to the empire. This trepidation resonated throughout sections of the British elite for the remainder of the century, shaping the debate over the aims and the structure of Greater Britain.
Two distinct but related fears helped to generate and sustain the debate. From the 1860s onward many imperial thinkers were concerned with the potential impact of a socially and morally corrosive "materialism" on the population as a whole, and on the Liberal party in particular. While this fear was sharpened by a growing awareness of the constraints on British global power, the chief source of alarm was domestic. It was widely thought that under the pernicious influence of Cobdenite "Manchesterism" (as well as the rigor of Gladstonian fiscal prudence), the newly enfranchised middle and working classes would become increasingly selfish and introverted. Their sense of patriotism would evaporate. To such people, the empire would seem a burden rather than a source of greatness. Had not Adam Smith and many of his disciples derided the value of the colonies? Claiming to follow in his footsteps, the radical polemicist Gold-win Smith made a strident intervention in political debate with The Empire (1863), a collection of essays demanding the emancipation of the colonies. Gesturing in his direction, one exasperated imperialist complained that there "have been springing up of late years a number of half-political charlatans, half ignoramuses, who are contending that the colonies are of no use to the mother country." It was feared that this attitude would lead invariably to either benign neglect or explicitly "anti-imperial" legislation. In either case, the empire faced a dangerous challenge. Then, secondly, during the 1880s apprehension was heightened by further turmoil over democracy, Irish Home Rule, and mounting economic and geopolitical competition. This was the decade in which "socialism" came to be seen as an imminent threat to the body politic and in which the global political horizon darkened perceptibly. The two fears inspired intense disquiet about the future stability and greatness of the polity.
A number of options were canvassed, and the period witnessed rivalry between diverse conceptions of empire. During the 1870s Benjamin Disraeli propounded a vision of a military empire focused on Asia, stressing the value of India, the danger of Russia, and the imperative of bringing "civilization" to "backward" peoples. It was this particular rendition of a long-standing theme in British imperial thought and practice that served as the target of Gladstone's successful Midlothian campaign (1879-80). Throughout the last three decades of the century, however, the focus increasingly shifted to the "Anglo-Saxon" empire. Grandiose visions of colonial unity found emotive and symbolic expression in poetry, prayer, song, and major architectural projects, as well as through the more conventional media of political thought. A small minority continued to advocate independence for the settler colonies, most notably Cobden, Bright, and Goldwin Smith; others recommended limiting reform to minor tinkering, such as conferring more honors on colonial statesmen. Many still believed, even if they did not seek to support, an argument that since self-government had been awarded to the settler communities, it was inevitable that they would eventually become independent. Decreed by fate, this process should be left to follow its natural course. The most persistent, ambitious, and from the perspective of political thought, the most interesting response, however, was the demand for a united Greater Britain.
During the late nineteenth century political theorizing was, as Jose Harris has observed, "virtually a national sport of British intellectuals of all ideological and professional complexions." Debate over the empire was no exception and it drew in a wide range of participants. Who were the proponents of Greater Britain, and what was their intended audience? Most of the figures examined in this book can be classified, to employ Stefan Collini's felicitous phrase, as "public moralists." They formed part of the elite class of academics, businessmen, lawyers, politicians, and journalists-often combining several of these roles simultaneously-who shaped public debate in London, the imperial metropolis. Some were prominent colonial politicians who entered the metropolitan intellectual fray only occasionally. A further category comprised the stalwarts of the organizations central to imperial debate-in particular the Colonial Society (founded in 1868) and the Imperial Federation League (1884-1893)- who served as propagandists and prophets of a new world. Virtually all of the high-profile advocates were men; this was a heavily gendered discourse. The colonial unionists generated a vast amount of material, penning hundreds of books, pamphlets, speeches, and essays published in the leading periodicals of the day. It is on these sources that I mainly focus. Although the movement itself stretched around the globe, with outposts located in the towns and cities of the empire, the debate centered on London, for it was considered vital to fight and win the ideological battle in the heart of the imperial system. The proponents of Greater Britain, and in particular the imperial federalists, represented one of a large number of competing and intersecting movements aiming to challenge and transform the way in which the British empire (and state) was understood. Expounding their views in the most high-profile outlets in British political culture, they succeeded in drawing the support, as well as the opprobrium, of some of the leading thinkers, public commentators, and politicians of the day.
Greater Britain meant different things to different people; therein resided both its wide appeal and ultimately one of its chief weakness. The term was employed in three main ways. Firstly, it could denote the totality of the British empire, the vast ensemble of disparate territories coloring the map of the world red. Secondly, it could refer to the settlement colonies, which by the 1870s were growing very rapidly in population, economic power, and strategic importance. And thirdly, it could mean the "English-speaking," or Anglo-Saxon, countries of the world, encompassing not only the settlement empire but also the United States. This conceptual multivalency reflected conflicting views over the future direction of the empire, and it exposed some of the fault lines running through the political thought of the period. Although all three modulations circulated widely, the most frequent usage was in reference to the settler colonies. In his pioneering Short History of British Colonial Policy (1897), H. E. Eger-ton argued that "The Period of Greater Britain" commenced in 1886. This was to place the starting point at least fifteen years too late, however, for intense argument over the future of the settler empire began in earnest in the early 1870s, drawing its terminological inspiration from Charles Dilke's best-selling travelogue Greater Britain (1868). Some thinkers preferred other labels for the colonial empire. The celebrated historian J. A. Froude named this incipient polity "Oceana," in a deliberate republican echo of James Harrington's utopian vision. Another commentator suggested the creation of the "United States of England." Francis de Labilllière, one of the most prolific advocates of colonial unity, referred to a global "Federal Britain." The most common appellation, however, was "Greater Britain." The writings of Dilke, who soon rose to national prominence as a radical politician and strategic thinker, exemplified both the conflicting visions of political destiny common at the time and the inconsistency of imperial vocabulary. In Greater Britain he initially employed the term as a synonym for the British empire as a whole, although later in the book he declared that it should be confined to the "Englishspeaking, white-inhabited, and self-governed lands." In his Problems of Greater Britain (1890), he observed that the elements of the empire "vary infinitely in their forms of government, between the absolutism which prevails in India and the democracy of South Australia and Ontario," but he also lamented that "in popular usage" the term "Greater Britain" was "applied ... chiefly to the English countries outside of the United Kingdom remaining under British government." This was problematic because he thought that discussions of the past, present, and future of Greater Britain ought to recognize the vital role of the United States.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from The Idea of Greater Britain by Duncan Bell
Copyright © 2007 by Princeton University Press. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments ix
Abbreviations xi
Chapter 1: Introduction: Building Greater Britain 1
The Boundaries of Imperial Discourse: Imagining Greater Britain 3
Greater Britain and Imperial Federation: Variations on a Theme 12
Empire and Ideology 20
Outline of the Book 25
Chapter 2: Global Competition and Democracy 31
Balances of Power: Global Threats and Imperial Responses 35
Democracy and the Moral Economy of Empire 40
Emigration and the Social Question 46
Radical Visions of Greater Britain 55
Chapter 3: Time, Space, Empire 63
"The Eternal Law": Empire and the Vicissitudes of Distance 66
Nature in Flux, c. 1830-1870 74
Imperial Political Thought in the Age of Scientific Utopianism, c. 1870-1900 81
Remaking the Global Political Imagination 89
Chapter 4: Empire, Nation, State 92
The Turn to Federalism 93
Statehood and Empire 98
J. R. Seeley and the "World-State" 108
Race and Nation 113
Chapter 5: The Politics of the Constitution 120
The Virtues of Vagueness 122
Imperial Patriotism and the Constitution 128
Civic Imperialism 137
J. A. Froude and the "Commonwealth of Oceana" 143
Chapter 6: The Apostle of Unity 150
The Love of Humanity: Toward a New "Political Religion" 152
The Political Theology of Nationalist Cosmopolitanism 158
The Darkening of an English Mind 164
On the Necessity of Imperial Federation 168
The Ambiguities of Unity: India and Ireland 171
Chapter 7: The Prophet of Righteousness 179
Colonial Emancipation and the "Glorious Future" of the Anglo-Saxon Race 181
Empire and Character 188
Religion and Liberty 193
India, Ireland, and the Necessity of Despotism 202
Chapter 8: From Ancient to Modern 207
The Functions of the Ancients 210
The End of Empire: Two Models 217
On Novelty 226
Back to the Future 229
Chapter 9: Envisioning America 231
The Model of the Future: America as Template 235
Size Matters: America as Competitor 238
Peace and Justice: The Benefits of Hegemony 247
Through a Glass, Darkly: America as Lesson 250
America, Empire, and Racial Unity 254
Chapter 10: Conclusion: Lineages of Greater Britain 260
Global Consciousness and the Imperial Imagination 260
Reverberations: Some Afterlives of Greater Britain 266
Select Bibliography 273
Index 313
What People are Saying About This
Globalization, empire, and the uncertain future of the state are all topics high on the contemporary intellectual agenda, but ours is not the first generation to have viewed their interconnections with both anxiety and expectation. Duncan Bell's masterly survey of late-nineteenth-century British political thought shows how a generation of creative thinkers tackled transnationalism almost a century before the term was invented. The book is a major contribution to modern intellectual history and will surely become one of the foundational texts in the emerging field of the history of international thought.
— David Armitage, Harvard University
Victorian conceptions of empire have generally been considered in isolation from domestic political debate: the province of the economic or imperial historian rather than the historian of politics. In this impressive study, Duncan Bell resituates the arguments about a union of English-speaking peoples as an integral part of an anxious post-1870 debate about the condition of Britain in what contemporaries saw as a newly globalized world. Greater Britain was put forward as one solution to mass democracy or national decline. This is a pioneering work of research, which invites reconsideration of Victorian political thought as a whole.
— Gareth Stedman Jones, University of Cambridge
In this fine book, Bell has performed a real service by refocusing attention on the grand late-nineteenth-century debate about creating a 'Greater Britain' capable of rivaling the United States. It injects vigorous new life into a subject hitherto often a byword for dullness.
— Peter Cain, Sheffield Hallam University
The Idea of Greater Britain is an erudite presentation of an important but neglected stream of Victorian political thought. Duncan Bell convincingly demonstrates the conceptual inventiveness of the idea of Greater Britain through a comprehensive investigation of the political and intellectual context in which it was born. One of the book's most original contributions is to offer an alternative genealogy of global theorizing and global consciousness emerging directly from the paradoxes and possibilities born of the imperial experience.
— Karuna Mantena, Yale University
"Victorian conceptions of empire have generally been considered in isolation from domestic political debate: the province of the economic or imperial historian rather than the historian of politics. In this impressive study, Duncan Bell resituates the arguments about a union of English-speaking peoples as an integral part of an anxious post-1870 debate about the condition of Britain in what contemporaries saw as a newly globalized world. Greater Britain was put forward as one solution to mass democracy or national decline. This is a pioneering work of research, which invites reconsideration of Victorian political thought as a whole."—Gareth Stedman Jones, University of Cambridge"In this fine book, Bell has performed a real service by refocusing attention on the grand late-nineteenth-century debate about creating a 'Greater Britain' capable of rivaling the United States. It injects vigorous new life into a subject hitherto often a byword for dullness."—Peter Cain, Sheffield Hallam University"Globalization, empire, and the uncertain future of the state are all topics high on the contemporary intellectual agenda, but ours is not the first generation to have viewed their interconnections with both anxiety and expectation. Duncan Bell's masterly survey of late-nineteenth-century British political thought shows how a generation of creative thinkers tackled transnationalism almost a century before the term was invented. The book is a major contribution to modern intellectual history and will surely become one of the foundational texts in the emerging field of the history of international thought."—David Armitage, Harvard University"This is a very serious and illuminating study of a range of debates around the question of Britain as a focal point of an imperial or even a world order in the second half of the nineteenth century. Duncan Bell offers a comparative analysis of great subtlety and frequent insight concerning the ways an important political discourse was shaped, what background factors influenced and constrained it, and why political theorists and historians of political thought should take that discourse seriously. Readers interested in the antecedents of current debates on globalization will benefit from locating those debates historically."—Michael Freeden, University of Oxford"The Idea of Greater Britain is an erudite presentation of an important but neglected stream of Victorian political thought. Duncan Bell convincingly demonstrates the conceptual inventiveness of the idea of Greater Britain through a comprehensive investigation of the political and intellectual context in which it was born. One of the book's most original contributions is to offer an alternative genealogy of global theorizing and global consciousness emerging directly from the paradoxes and possibilities born of the imperial experience."—Karuna Mantena, Yale University
This is a very serious and illuminating study of a range of debates around the question of Britain as a focal point of an imperial or even a world order in the second half of the nineteenth century. Duncan Bell offers a comparative analysis of great subtlety and frequent insight concerning the ways an important political discourse was shaped, what background factors influenced and constrained it, and why political theorists and historians of political thought should take that discourse seriously. Readers interested in the antecedents of current debates on globalization will benefit from locating those debates historically.
— Michael Freeden, University of Oxford