×

Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Imperfect Equality: African Americans and the Confines of White Ideology in Post-Emancipation Maryland.
     

Imperfect Equality: African Americans and the Confines of White Ideology in Post-Emancipation Maryland.

by Richard Fuke
 

See All Formats & Editions


In Imperfect Equality, Richard Fuke has explores the immediate aftermath of slavery in Maryland, which differed in important ways from the slaveholding states of the South: it never left the Union; white radicals had a period of access to power; and even prior to legal emancipation, a large free black population resided there. Moreover, the presence of

Overview


In Imperfect Equality, Richard Fuke has explores the immediate aftermath of slavery in Maryland, which differed in important ways from the slaveholding states of the South: it never left the Union; white radicals had a period of access to power; and even prior to legal emancipation, a large free black population resided there. Moreover, the presence of Baltimore, a major city and port, provided abundant evidence with which to compare the rural and the urban experience of black Marylanders. This state study is therefore uniquely revealing of the successes and failures of the post-emancipation period. The transition in Maryland from a slave to a free society, Fuke argues, presented to black Marylanders opportunities to achieve previously inaccessible goals. Blacks were able to realize some goals, such as greater land ownership, control over the labor of their children, education, and the formation of independent cultural and social organizations, through their own intrepidity combined with the support of white radicals as well as with the assistance of the Freedmen's Bureau, the United States Army, and some state-controlled agencies. Other goals-such as social equality, economic opportunity and advancement, and suffrage-remained beyond the reach of blacks, not only because of conservative white opposition, but also, Fuke argues, because of the attitudinal limitations of white radicals unable to confront the full range of post-emancipation possibilities. Calling upon a very broad range of sources, Fuke demonstrates that after emancipation, Black Marylanders neither enjoyed total freedom nor suffered absolute coercion, but their struggle made two things clear: much of whatever they might accomplish, they would have to do by themselves; and such efforts would remain confined by white attitudes determined to regulate them.

Editorial Reviews

Booknews
Finding in Maryland a postwar situation both unlike that in the South (the state never left the Union) and rich in records and contrasts, Fuke (history, Wilfrid Laurier U., Waterloo, Ontario) assesses the extent to which freedom followed emancipation for African Americans there. He finds that many gains were achieved, and the failure to achieve others was due not only to the opposition of conservative whites, but also to the failure of radical whites to comprehend the full range of possibilities. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780823219636
Publisher:
Fordham University Press
Publication date:
01/01/1999
Series:
Reconstructing America Series
Edition description:
2
Pages:
307
Product dimensions:
8.90(w) x 5.80(h) x 0.80(d)

Meet the Author

Richard Paul Fuke is Associate Professor of History at Wilfrid Laurier College in Ontario, Canada.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews