- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Available on NOOK devices and apps
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Winner of the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction
| 1 | Pax Britannica | 1 |
| 2 | Britain's assault on Mau Mau | 31 |
| 3 | Screening | 62 |
| 4 | Rehabilitation | 91 |
| 5 | The birth of Britain's gulag | 121 |
| 6 | The world behind the wire | 154 |
| 7 | The hard core | 192 |
| 8 | Domestic terror | 233 |
| 9 | Outrage, suppression, and silence | 275 |
| 10 | Detention exposed | 311 |
| App | The operating pipeline circa January 1956 | 369 |
Anonymous
Posted May 25, 2010
As other reviewers have written (extensively), this book is a thorough and graphic account of the atrocities perpetrated by the British Colonial Government and their native accomplices against the substantially innocent Kikuyu people in response to the Mau Mau uprising. The research appears to be meticulous based on the extensive footnotes and the descriptions of the effort by the author herself. It is a very well written book although in some respects a little repetitive but quite well organized. As a avid reader of world history I found this book very enlightening giving a clear picture of the ugly dissolution of the Empire in Africa. One minor quibble would be the brevity with which the Mau Mau uprising itself was described. Although the actions of the British and their loyalists are impossible to justify, the picture would be clearer if more space in the book had been devoted to explaining the actions associated with the Mau Mau which the British used as a pretext for the mass imprisonment and harsh treatment of their victims. Finally I detected an undercurrent of anti-British sentiment throughout but this may be expected from someone who has spent so much time with the victims.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted May 4, 2005
Some claim that the British Empire was run well and handed over peacefully, unlike the Belgian Congo or French Algeria (both backed by the British state anyway). This outstanding book exposes those lies, showing how colonial government forces in Kenya killed between 200,000 and 300,000 people in the 1950s. Elkins details the government `campaign of terror, dehumanizing torture, and genocide¿ marked by detention without trial, forced labour, collective punishments, deprivation of medical care, systematic starvation and murders. The colonial government stole the Kenyan people¿s land, starved them and then blamed them for not feeding their children properly. Using the same tactics as in South Africa and Malaya, the imperial forces torched the homes of a million Kenyans then forcibly resettled them into compounds behind barbed wire. The people resisted and fought for their freedom. The judge at the nationalist leaders¿ trial, who got £20,000 for his verdict, admitted that it was a national liberation struggle when he denounced `this foul scheme of driving the Europeans from Kenya¿. The British government demonised all who opposed colonialism as `terrorists¿. It detained without trial up to 320,000 people in punishment camps, where the official policy was systematic brutality, using sexual violence and humiliation. Guards were indoctrinated into a fascist mentality, describing and treating Africans as animals. The assistant police commissioner said that camp conditions were worse than he had experienced in Japanese POW camps. Critics asked how many camps were run by British forces. How many people had been arrested and detained? On what charges? Were they made to work in the camps? If so, for how long and in what conditions? Was there any disease or malnutrition in the camps? Were there any deaths? The British government tried to maintain the absolute virtue of its rule by admitting nothing, lying systematically. `Incidents¿ of abuse were always `isolated¿, carried out by the lowest members of the colonial hierarchy. It set up powerless internal inquiries run by those responsible for the atrocities. It smeared nationalist leaders, witnesses and critics as `self-interested¿ and `prejudiced¿. The Empire was no civilising mission; it was a way to steal other people¿s land and labour power and murder them when they resisted.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.SharynR
Posted March 3, 2009
This is a must-read for history lovers! It is full of details about the treatment of Kikuyu people in Kenya starting 1952.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 19, 2005
Excellent research and presentation of the 'British' mentality that can be so terrible and self-rightous. Too bad the author did not find out more about who agreed to the parliamentary motion that precluded a more just outcome.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted April 6, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted July 4, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
A major work of history that for the first time reveals the violence and terror at the heart of Britain's civilizing mission in Kenya
As part of the Allied forces, thousands of Kenyans fought alongside the British in World War II. But just a few years after the defeat of Hitler, the British colonial government detained nearly the entire population of Kenya's largest ethnic minority, the Kikuyu-some one and a half million people.
The compelling story of the system of prisons and work camps where thousands met their deaths has remained largely ...