| Preface | iii |
| Figures | xi |
| Tables | xv |
| Summary | xvii |
| Acknowledgments | xxiii |
Chapter 1 | A Brief History of New American Schools and Rand's Role in Monitoring the Effort | 1 |
| History of NAS and RAND's Role | 3 |
| Research Questions Underlying RAND'S Overall Evaluation | 7 |
| Significant Features of RAND Research | 8 |
| Purpose of Current Report | 9 |
| Organization of the Report | 10 |
Chapter 2 | Analyzing Implementation and Performance in Nas Schools: A Conceptual Framework | 11 |
| Core Elements of Designs | 11 |
| Factors Affecting Implementation | 15 |
| External Assistance by Design Teams | 16 |
| Teacher Background | 18 |
| School Characteristics | 19 |
| District Factors | 20 |
| Other Factors | 22 |
| Implementation and Performance | 23 |
Chapter 3 | Rand's Sample of New American Schools | 25 |
| A Sample of New American Schools | 25 |
| Historical Context of Sample | 26 |
| Toward the Final Analysis Sample | 27 |
| Teacher Sample | 32 |
| Overview of NAS Schools in Analysis Sample | 33 |
Chapter 4 | Status of Implementation | 37 |
| Research Questions | 37 |
| Measuring Implementation Within and Across Designs | 38 |
| Implementation Indices | 41 |
| Core Implementation Index | 42 |
| Change in Implementation over Time and by Number of Years of Implementation | 45 |
| Design Team-Specific Implementation Index | 49 |
| Changes in Implementation Between 1997 and 1998 | 52 |
| Summary | 54 |
| Differences Across Jurisdictions | 54 |
| Differences Across Design Teams | 55 |
| Differences by Years Implementing | 58 |
Chapter 5 | Factors Affecting Implementation | 59 |
| Operationalizing the Variables Affecting Implementation | 60 |
| Teacher Background Characteristics | 60 |
| School Characteristics | 61 |
| Designs and Design Team Assistance | 62 |
| District Support | 64 |
| Variation in Implementation: MultiLevel Analysis | 64 |
| The Analysis Sample | 66 |
| Variance Components of the Dependent Variable | 69 |
| Multivariate Results | 70 |
| Teacher-Level Effects | 71 |
| School-Level Effects | 74 |
| Goodness of Fit | 76 |
| Summary | 77 |
Chapter 6 | Performance Trends in Nas Schools | 79 |
| Monitoring Academic Progress with School-Level Test Scores | 80 |
| Comparing NAS Schools to District Averages: Setting Expectations | 83 |
| Sample of NAS Schools for Performance Trend Analyses | 83 |
| Performance Trends in Cincinnati | 83 |
| Grades 3-5 Combined | 85 |
| Grade 7 | 87 |
| Summary for Cincinnati | 88 |
| Performance Trends in Dade | 90 |
| Grade 5 | 91 |
| Grade 8 | 92 |
| Grade 9 | 92 |
| Summary for Dade | 95 |
| Performance Trends in Kentucky | 96 |
| Grades 4-5 | 97 |
| Grades 7-8 | 100 |
| Grade 11 | 101 |
| Summary for Kentucky | 103 |
| Performance Trends in Memphis | 104 |
| Grades 3-5 | 105 |
| Grades 7-8 | 106 |
| Summary for Memphis | 109 |
| Performance Trends in Philadelphia | 110 |
| Grade 4 | 110 |
| Grade 8 | 111 |
| Grade 11 | 111 |
| Summary for Philadelphia | 113 |
| Performance Trends in San Antonio | 113 |
| Grades 4-5 | 115 |
| Grade 8 | 117 |
| Grade 10 | 117 |
| Summary for San Antonio | 120 |
| Performance Trends in Washington | 120 |
| Grade 4 | 121 |
| Grade 8 | 123 |
| Grade 11 | 125 |
| Summary for Washington | 125 |
| The Link Between Implementation and Performance | 127 |
| Summary | 129 |
| Differences in School Performance by Jurisdiction | 129 |
| Differences in School Performance by Design Team | 131 |
Chapter 7 | Qualitative Outcome Indicators | 133 |
| Teacher-Reported Effects on Professional Development, Teaching, and Student Achievement | 134 |
| Modeling Teacher-Reported Effects of Designs on Student Achievement | 138 |
| Teacher Level Effects | 138 |
| Design-Related Variables | 140 |
| School-Level Variables | 140 |
| Goodness of Fit | 140 |
| Summary | 141 |
Chapter 8 | Conclusions and Policy Implications | 143 |
| Implementation of NAS Designs Varies for Several Reasons | 143 |
| Teachers' Perceptions Matter | 144 |
| School Characteristics: Importance of Size, Level, and Leadership | 144 |
| Design Teams: Importance of Clear Communication and Teacher Support | 145 |
| District Support Is Critical | 146 |
| Appropriate Allocation of Critical Resources | 148 |
| "Schoolwide" Reform? | 149 |
| Early Performance Trends | 150 |
| Setting Expectations for Comprehensive School Reform | 151 |
| Appendix | |
A. | Key Studies in Rand's Evaluation of Nas School Reform | 155 |
B. | Description of Additional Implementation Indicators of the Designs, By Jurisdiction and Design Team, 1997 and 1998 | 161 |
C. | Models of Performance Expectations, Instructional Strategies, and Professional Development and Implementation Indices | 185 |
D. | Description of Standardized Tests Used By Various Jurisdictions | 189 |
E. | Graphs for Reading Scores for Nas Schools in Everett, Northshore, and Shoreline Districts in Washington | 197 |
F. | Rand Principal and Teacher Questionnaires | 203 |
| References | 245 |