In Search of the INDO-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth

Overview

With the skill of a forensic scientist, Dr. Mallory traces the immediate origins of each of the Indo-European peoples of Europe and Asia. By comparing their languages he demonstrates their common cultural heritage, and through the technique of comparative mythology he examines their earliest beliefs.
Read More Show Less
... See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$28.95
BN.com price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (33) from $4.04   
  • New (6) from $11.04   
  • Used (27) from $4.04   
Sending request ...

More About This Book

Overview

With the skill of a forensic scientist, Dr. Mallory traces the immediate origins of each of the Indo-European peoples of Europe and Asia. By comparing their languages he demonstrates their common cultural heritage, and through the technique of comparative mythology he examines their earliest beliefs.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780500276167
  • Publisher: Thames & Hudson
  • Publication date: 4/28/1991
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 1
  • Sales rank: 729,390
  • Product dimensions: 7.00 (w) x 9.90 (h) x 0.80 (d)

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 7, 2004

    ACADEMICALLY QUALIFIED REVIEWER

    As a minimal qualification for understanding the relationship of the Indo-European languages and being able to write about it, what is required? It is my opinion as well as that of many others qualified in the field, that one must possess, at a very minimum, complete fluency in and a thorough knowledge of the grammar of: 1) Sanskrit. 2) The older (Homeric) Greek. 3) Latin. 4) One or two of the Germanic languages, preferably today¿s German and English (or more preferably, Anglo-Saxon (Old English)). 5) One of the Slavic languages. 6) One of the Baltic languages (Latvian or Lithuanian). 7) One of the Indo-European-base languages of India (preferably Hindi). That¿s the equivalent of taking a course in Indo-European 101, without which one is simply not qualified to write on the subject. And it is quite evident from a reading of this book that the author does not possess this minimum qualification. (Needless to say, this reviewer does possess this qualification, and more.) And if one does have this minimal qualification, one cannot but come to the conclusion, upon a review of the above languages, that one of the languages in the above list (Sanskrit) is the parent of all the others. And not just a parent, but a parent which is much more complex and highly structured than any of its descendants. The proof is as irrefutable as mathematical equations (in fact, some of the grammatical relations are very much like mathematical equations). That is the inescapable conclusion the very first European reviewers of these languages came to in the 18th and 19th centuries in their dispassionate analysis (they weren¿t fools, and, needless to say, they possessed much better scholarship than today¿s linguists). Their views held sway until, suddenly, around 1950, their views became ¿politically incorrect¿. Among other inescapable conclusions one would come to, e.g. from the overwhelming presence of the dual number in the root language and in no other language, and its extreme inflectional character, is that the people who spoke this root language were linguistically isolated for thousands of years, before abruptly being made to end their isolation and move. Without taking into consideration this fundamental fact, one cannot write about the presumed geographic or other origins of the root Indo-Europeans. And if one does take this fact into consideration, one must then account for the several clear celestial events (e.g. congruence of planets) cited in the RgVeda, the oldest written work in the root language, which can all be dated to about 5300 B.C., and the older descriptions in this text, which point to a homeland somewhere either in the region of modern-day Uzbekistan or the southern steppes of Central Asia (the latter substantiating the ¿Kurgian horsemen¿ hypothesis somewhat). Today, truth has been turned on its head in virtually all publications on this subject, and the authors of all and sundry works thereon are confident in the knowledge that they are safe because nearly all their readers are even more ignorant and unqualified than they. And the very few qualified readers shake their heads in dismay. Today, one dare not use the words ¿Aryan¿ or ¿root language¿ without immediately being branded a racist, even if one emphasizes that ¿Aryan¿ today has about as much relevance as ¿Tyrannosaurus rex¿, both being long extinct. An example of a recent publication by authors completely unqualified to write about Indo-European languages is the recent (2003) article in a prominent scientific journal hypothecating on Anatolian origins of the Indo-Europeans by using a statistical analysis of cognates employing the techniques of evolutionary biology, without at all considering the linguistic relationships of these cognates! Though I can write reams more on the subject, I¿ll conclude here. Basically, what I¿m saying is that the basis and thesis of the book is fundamentally unsound, not unlike many other books on the subje

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 8, 2001

    Good Overview

    This is a good introductory overview which synthesizes in a readable manner much scholarship which has been done in Indo-European studies. Some particularly interesting discussions include possible early homelands of Indo-European speakers, and cultural backgrounds of Indo-European groups. Some information has been superseded by more recent archaeological and linguistic findings, but the book still is a good introduction and based on sound scholarship. Contrary to the views of some politically-motivated critics, the author is fair, balanced and presents much factual information. The illustrations are also helpful and well-chosen.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 3, 2000

    Not well argued and dated!

    Mallory uses evidence selectively for his synthesis. Furthermore, his work is based on the discredited paradigm that languages are derived from a single ancestral language, a belief based ultimately on the Biblical view of descent of man from the Garden of Eden. Mr Mallory belongs to the Orientalist school of anthropology!

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 30, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)