- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
As Americans continue to worship at the altar of cultural diversity and endorse religious tolerance for tolerance sake, Muslims masquerading as "moderates" have insinuated themselves into the very fabric of American society, taking advantage of our blind trust and gaining footholds in our education system, government, workplace, law enforcement, and military. In this startling book, investigative journalist Paul Sperry uses revealing new interviews and classified documents to courageously explain how, for the ...
As Americans continue to worship at the altar of cultural diversity and endorse religious tolerance for tolerance sake, Muslims masquerading as "moderates" have insinuated themselves into the very fabric of American society, taking advantage of our blind trust and gaining footholds in our education system, government, workplace, law enforcement, and military. In this startling book, investigative journalist Paul Sperry uses revealing new interviews and classified documents to courageously explain how, for the past thirty years, these Islamist extremists have been covertly working to destroy our constitutional government and the Judeo-Christian ethics on which our nation was built. Their goal, according to Sperry, is to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran and turn America into an Islamic state. And, as Sperry details point-by-point, they have been unwittingly aided in their sinister aims by the politically correct media, government, and citizens, who don't fully understand the dangers of the Muslim faith.
Infiltration explodes the facade of moderation and patriotism that Muslim scholars, imams, clerics, businessmen, and other leaders in the burgeoning Muslim community in America have conveyed in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In reality, the Muslim establishment that publicly decries the radical fringe-represented by al-Qaida's brand of Islam known as Wahhabism, the official religion of Saudi Arabia-is actually a part of it. The only difference is that they use words and money instead of bombs to accomplish their goals.
Now, thanks to Sperry's peerless research, piquant prose, and forthright presentation, their cover is blown. He will not only make readers forget nearly everything they've been told about these "moderate" and "mainstream" leaders, he will expose the true agenda of these "moderate" and "mainstream" leaders, and he will explain the full scope of the dangerous threat of Islam in America.
With everyone still on edge after 9/11, this book will garner wide interest, appealing specifically to people interested in current events and/or religion. Additionally, the book will appeal strongly to women whose roles, values, and rights are greatly threatened by fundamentalist Islam.
Sensitivity Training for FBI Agents
"The bureau is against-has been and will be against-any form of profiling [of Arabs or Muslims]." -FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
A year after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the FBI invited the head of an influential Arab-rights group to speak about Islam to about four hundred new agents in the auditorium of the FBI Academy, the bureau's high-security training campus hidden in the woods of Quantico, Virginia, about an hour south of Washington. The lecture by Dr. Ziad Asali, then-president of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, was mandatory and lasted about one hour. Asali, a Palestinian refugee, "talked about how peaceful their religion is, and how not to offend Muslims ... showing respect for their culture, things like that," says FBI Academy spokesman Kirk Crawford.
And at least four times the following year, the FBI's New York field office held all-day sensitivity training sessions, not far from Ground Zero, featuring Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the Masjid al-Farah mosque. Speaking for about two hours each session, "he gave an overview of Islamic culture and some of the differences between what fundamentalist terrorist groups say are the teachings of the Quran and what he believes, as a student of religion, the Quran actually says," says special agent James Margolin, spokesman for the FBI New York office.
For example, Rauf asserted that the Quran, the sacred book of Muslims, "certainly doesn't counsel terrorism, murder, or mayhem," Margolin says. And he said terrorists have misinterpreted the Quranic term jihad to mean violent, or armed, struggle against nonbelievers. Rauf claims it means internal struggle.
The rest of the training sessions were conducted by a Muslim FBI agent born in Pakistan. Foria Younis, who works for the Joint Terrorism Task Force, advised fellow agents to respect Muslims by honoring their religious and cultural customs. For instance, she said they should refrain from showing a Muslim the soles of their shoes, which is a sign of disrespect.
The Muslim-sensitivity training program, denounced by some active and former agents, was mandated by FBI Director Robert S. Mueller after the 9/11 attacks and is still in effect. Officially known within the bureau as "Enrichment Training Sessions," the program invites Muslim clerics and scholars to preach to agents about the allegedly peaceful attributes of Islam.
But critics say the Muslim leaders who have lectured to agents have an agenda of soft-peddling the violent aspects of the religion and shielding Muslims from FBI questioning.
"The Muslim and Arab leaders Mueller brought in to train us about Islam weren't interested in helping us investigate terrorism. They all have an agenda of making sure FBI agents don't discriminate against Muslims and Arabs," says recently retired FBI special agent John B. Vincent. "They even came to Quantico to lecture new agents on how not to pick on them."
Mueller has met several times with Arab and Muslim groups since the 9/11 attacks. He even agreed to be the keynote speaker at an American Muslim Council luncheon in Washington-a move that drew fire from AMC critics who warned the director he was legitimizing a group that has sung the praises of Hamas and Hezbollah, officially designated terrorist groups with American, as well as Israeli, blood on their hands. The annual conference also featured speakers from the PLO and government of Syria, a terrorist-sponsoring state. A Mueller spokesman at the time dismissed the concerns, calling the AMC "the most mainstream Muslim group in the United States." Last year, its founder, Abdurahman M. Alamoudi, confessed to plotting acts of terrorism and is now behind bars.
"Mueller should lead the FBI in this war and leave the sensitivity sessions to the human resources department or CNN," complains retired FBI special agent Donald Lavey, who served twenty years in the bureau's counterterrorism section. "Let's just hope the director is leading the charge in this war against terrorism with an equal amount of zeal that he shows for cultural sensitivities," adds Lavey, who points out that Mueller is so politically correct he refuses to use "Islamic" and "terrorism" in the same sentence.
FBI headquarters defends the Muslim-sensitivity program as a way to reach out to the Muslim community in America.
"I hate the word 'sensitivity' training," says FBI spokesman Ed Cogswell. "I would call it an awareness training relative to cultural issues."
Some former colleagues of the late FBI agent John O'Neill say the legendary al-Qaida hunter would probably roll over in his grave if he knew about the Muslim sensitivity program required at his old New York office, where he headed counterterrorism operations last decade.
"This would not have been an issue high on his priority list," says Ivian C. Smith, a retired FBI manager who worked in counterintelligence at bureau headquarters.
"He would not have been interested in improving the cultural awareness of a bunch of FBI agents. He would have considered it a waste of time," Smith says. "And knowing John, he would have probably figured out a way to avoid going to the meetings."
"He was no-nonsense," Smith adds, "brutally focused on al-Qaida."
Still, Smith allows that the cultural training could be beneficial to investigators if designed to help agents improve their field interviewing and interrogation techniques to gain the cooperation of Muslim witnesses and suspects.
HOLD THE BACON
Margolin says this is certainly one of the goals of the program. For example, he notes, agents also are taught to respect the dietary restrictions of devout Muslims. So-called halal dietary laws require their meat be butchered in a certain way. Also, they cannot eat pork or pork byproducts.
"So if you're attempting to be accommodating to a religious Muslim you're interviewing or someone you may have arrested, and you say, 'Gee, I'll run across the street and get you something to eat; you know, you haven't eaten in six hours,' you don't get them a cheeseburger-and you definitely don't get them a bacon cheeseburger," Margolin says. "That would be taken as an offense, when in fact what you're trying to do is maybe open some channels of communication," he adds. The same concerns apply to showing a Muslim witness or suspect the sole of your shoe, he says.
But Lavey insists the program's main objective is political: mollifying vocal Arab-American and Muslim interest groups. He argues that Mueller is so worried about offending American Muslims that he's loath to even describe the most serious terrorist threat against America as "Islamic."
"There's a continued reluctance on the part of the entire FBI to ever use Islamic and terrorism in the same sentence," he says.
Indeed, a search of transcripts of Mueller's congressional testimonies, press conferences, and public speeches turns up no examples of him using the phrase "Islamic terrorism," although he has used the phrase "militant Islamic groups." He typically describes terrorism in generic terms, such as "international terrorism."
It is worth noting that Margolin of the New York office also avoided using the term "Islamic terrorists" during my lengthy interview with him, opting instead for "fundamentalist terrorist groups."
Though bureau spokesman Cogswell admits political correctness "can get out of hand" in Washington, he insists there is no bureau-wide "edict" against describing terrorism or terrorists as "Islamic."
However, President Bush personally made a deal with the Muslim community to never make such a description in public, according to one Muslim activist group. "President Bush told us in a meeting with him that he will make it a point to detach the Islamic label from the word terrorism," says Salam al-Marayati, executive director of the Los Angeles-based Muslim Public Affairs Council. "So you will never see President Bush saying, 'Islamic terrorism.'"
"And in fact, this will help all of us in focusing and concentrating on the problem, and not spreading the whole issue to the religion of Islam," he says.
Actually, it will only worsen the problem, Lavey argues, by distracting from the core issue in the war on terrorism, which is Islamic fundamentalism. He says it is impossible to separate religion from terrorism carried out in the name of Islam, and Washington cannot be shy about calling things by their proper name in a time of war. If it is too "culturally sensitive" to even define the enemy, he argues, it cannot effectively protect the country from it.
"As someone who worked Middle East terrorism for nearly twenty years, I am bothered by the fact that so many influential government leaders and religious leaders who represent Islam see only one side of the sensitivity coin," Lavey says.
"Director Mueller will ensure that all FBI personnel are culturally sensitive to the tenets of Islam," he explains. "But who will ensure that responsible Islamic leaders will be culturally sensitive to the citizens of the United Sates who saw and continue to see their country attacked and innocent countrymen murdered in the name of Islam?"
Lavey and others fear Muslim leaders are teaching FBI agents the PC, sanitized version of the Quran in the interest of mainstreaming Islam. The message agents are hearing is that Muslim terrorists like Osama bin Laden have misinterpreted the Quran, and that devout Muslims in America do not sympathize with them, even though the Quran is replete with instructions exhorting the Muslim faithful to fight, even slay, the "unbelievers" in the cause of Allah. Unbelievers include Christians and Jews.
They cite, for example, Muslim clerics' campaign to spin jihad as nonviolent and nonthreatening to people outside the faith. "They're sugarcoating jihad as an internal struggle by Muslims to improve themselves," Vincent says. "But there is also, without a doubt, a violent component to jihad as taught by the Quran, which is when they kill other people who don't subscribe to their religion-and not just non-Muslims, but also hypocrites," or Muslims who do not follow the Quran.
If agents go into investigations with the assumption that American Muslims do not believe what al-Qaida or Hamas terrorists believe and do not sympathize with their cause, agents argue they may be easily snowed by Muslim suspects, witnesses, and informants. They may also be less inclined to investigate Muslim clerics and scholars themselves, even though some who have preached in this country have been tied to Islamic terrorists.
For example, the nine-hundred-page report on 9/11 intelligence failures released by Congress took the FBI to task for failing to pursue leads back to a local imam involved with two of the al-Qaida hijackers who helped crash an American Airlines jumbo jet into the Pentagon. Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were close to the imam, Anwar Aulaqi. He and the hijackers moved from San Diego to Falls Church, Virginia, where they joined the Dar al-Hijrah mosque, which will be covered in-depth in another chapter. A phone number for the mosque was found in the German apartment of Ramzi Binalshibh, roommate of hijacking ringleader Mohamed Atta.
Margolin, for his part, says he is inclined to accept the New York imam's interpretation of the Quran, even though he admits he has not read any of it himself.
"I haven't read the text," he says. "But even in Judaism and Christianity, there are portions of the Old and New Testament that are open to interpretation, and people who are politically left or politically right use the Bible as the authority for their positions." And besides, he adds, the bureau's job is to investigate criminal acts of violence that have been committed, not instructions for violence that may or may not be directed by a religion against those who do not believe in that religion.
"While what the Quran actually says is not insignificant, what we're ultimately concerned with is criminality," Margolin says-which is exactly the kind of tunnel vision that critics say blinded the FBI to the 9/11 cells operating inside America. Before 9/11, supervisors and agents accustomed to solving bank robberies and other black-and-white crimes had little interest in collecting intelligence and analyzing it to prevent terrorism before it happens, a subject I will expand on in the section on law enforcement.
THE PHOENIX MEMO
But bureaucracy was only part of the reason the FBI missed the hijackers' plot. Minority politics also played a role. It turns out that the Phoenix memo-a pre-9/11 proposal by an FBI agent in Arizona to check Middle Eastern students in flight schools-was shelved at headquarters in part because it would have violated bureau guidelines against racial profiling.
Could it happen again? You bet.
"The bureau is against-has been and will be against-any form of profiling," Mueller has testified in response to questions about investigating terrorist leads based on ethnicity or religion. He even reassured the Muslim Public Affairs Council that he does not view the Muslim community as any more suspect than other communities in America. "None of our agents focus on the fact that somebody looks Muslim or not," he said in an April 24, 2003, interview with an MPAC official in his Washington office, while noting the bureau's efforts to train agents to be more sensitive to Muslims. The official, in turn, complimented him: "I think you have been very supportive of the Muslim community."
Career agents worry that Mueller is forcing counterterrorism squads to work at cross-purposes. On one hand, they are under pressure to aggressively flush out terrorist cells inside the Muslim community. But on the other hand, they are told to bend over backwards to avoid offending individuals in that clearly hard target group. They say headquarters' obsession with minority politics is handcuffing field agents trying to work the Muslim community for leads-particularly when they try to question worshippers at American mosques, a shocking number of which have been discovered to be sanctuaries for terrorist activities, as I will document in a coming chapter.
Less than four months before Alamoudi was arrested, Mueller dispatched the head of his civil-rights shop to another AMC conference in Alexandria, Virginia, to tell some three hundred good and decent Muslim leaders and imams gathered there that protecting their civil rights was his "number one priority." FBI official Tom Reynolds assured them that the bureau does not target or even suspect Muslims. "The director has said from the beginning that Islam is good," he said. "The problem is not the [Muslim] community; the problem is a handful of terrorists." With that, an AMC board member stood up to say he has heard "horror stories of how people were investigated" as terrorists. Jamal Barzinji complained that charities to which American Muslims have donated have been raided and shut down. And Barzinji should know: he and a network of charities he and other Washington-area Muslims run are under investigation for funding terrorism. "You didn't shut down the United Way," he fumed at Reynolds, referring to embezzlement scandals brought on that giant charity by its former president.
Reynolds responded by saying the bureau would not tolerate any Muslim harassment: "When FBI agents overstate their grounds, call me." He noted that the bureau has an Office of Professional Responsibility that investigates agents' conduct, and that federal law enforcement officers have been held accountable in the past for religious harassment. For example, Reynolds reminded the audience of the Secret Service agent who was suspended for scrawling "ISLAM IS EVIL" on the prayer calendar of a Muslim accused of having connections to terrorism during a 2002 federal raid of his Detroit home. In addition, he said the bureau would continue its Muslim-sensitivity training of agents at Quantico.
CHOKING BACK TEARS
According to an AMC press release at the time, Reynolds reportedly "choked back tears while talking about the internment of the Japanese Americans during World War II. He promised that it would never happen again." The FBI official closed his talk by underscoring the fact the bureau views their mosques as partners in the war on terrorism, not targets of investigation. And he expressed his wish that more Muslims would themselves become FBI agents.
Excerpted from INFILTRATION by PAUL SPERRY Copyright © 2007 by PAUL SPERRY . Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Posted January 28, 2009
This book calls it like it is. It documents spacific examples of Muslim Spies in America. It is not discriminatory whatsoever. These people were Muslim (which in Islam comes before nationality. In other words we say, "Hi I am American" before we say, "Hi I am Christian." They say, "Hi I am a Muslim" before they say, "Hi I am Saudi."), were Spies, and were in America. This is fact by definition not discrimination. Read, research examples, and see for yourself. It forces the reader to explore the raw truth. I guarantee it will suprise you and take you off guard, possibly make you sleep less at night knowing this kind of thing is in your back yard. See the section on prisons, it is shocking! To those who are opposed to this book...would you invite bin Laden to your dinner table?
5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
This is an information source which should be required reading for every member of Congress and every member of our military command, including the Joint Chiefs.
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted August 27, 2005
This books shows the absolute breakdown of our intelligence and how since 9/11 the muslem community has been given a completely free pass out of political correctness
4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 16, 2006
the book 'Infiltration' is indeed the most falsely written book i have ever read. i m an Atheist but have diverse readings of almost all big religions of the world. The way author has labelled American Moselms and Islam as 'spies' , he has downgraded 20 million Moselms in America especially and 1 billion moselms in the world, generally. A highly falsified book with distorted facts and ideas.
1 out of 6 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted June 15, 2005
To anyone who reads this book as a concerned and patroitic citizen of the best country of the world the United States of America I would just like to say... Have we forgotten all about Senator McCarthy and his Red Scare? COMMUNISTS! COMMUNISTS! They have infiltrated the government and even the military! Have we forgotten Hitler's Nuremburg laws and his Mein Kampf that claimed that certain people could not be part of the 'Aryan' Race... This book is a blatant attack on American Muslims and Muslims in general I hope we remember that our founding fathers included in the constition the freedom of relegion and equality amoung us all... there are many great American Muslims like Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali ... i hope we remember what are grandfathers in WWII fought about and we remember that Jesus and the LORD himself loves us all. May God be with us all
1 out of 5 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 12, 2007
and its 'traditional values' propaganda. During the 1950s, this author would have seen the invisible 'enemy' as COMMUNISTS! (read: Liberals). During the 1960s, he would have seen the invisible 'enemy' as civil rights activists, especially those not white (read: Liberals). So today the same old hateful racism is packaged as an attack on other non-whites, this time Muslims (-- and 'multiculturalism' read: Liberals). Consistent with his view was that expressed in WW II Germany by its leader: his central target, and most bashed by him, was Liberals. By contrast, the Founders and Framers of the US were Liberals. And they, in part based upon existing tradition, and state constitutions and laws, established separation of church and state, which fact, appearing in two places in their Constitution, demolishes the 'Christian nation' lie.
0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 31, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Posted October 28, 2008
No text was provided for this review.