The Influence Of Evaluators' Principles On Evaluation Resource Decisions.

Paperback (Print)
Not Available on

More About This Textbook


This study examines ways in which evaluators' principles influence decisions about evaluation resources. Evaluators must seek-out and allocate (often scarce) resources (e.g., money, time, data, people, places) in a way that allows them to conduct the best possible evaluation given clients' and evaluation participants' constraints. Working within constraints implies a need to make trade-offs; to choose which aspects of the evaluation are most and least important. In designing an evaluation, evaluators consider many factors, including evaluation questions, context, stakeholder interests, and appropriate methods. Evaluators bring to their practice a set of principles (some "core," non-negotiable; some "peripheral," negotiable) about how evaluation should be conducted. This study builds on previous work by Alkin and Christie (2005) who asked four evaluators with different theoretical perspectives to design an evaluation of a mock program (2005). Three of these evaluators participated in the current study, this time considering (1) resources needed for their designs and (2) how design and resource priorities would change given more or less available resources. Semi-structured interviews with the evaluators provided the primary source of data from which categorized and prioritized lists were generated of resources, principles, and resource relationships influenced by principles. Each evaluator provided an evaluation report and literature about a real evaluation that best exemplified their approach in practice. These documents were used to validate and refine analyses of the Bunche-Da Vinci proposals. The evaluators reviewed analyses of their work, providing corrections and further insights. Findings documented key resource relationships influenced by evaluator principles, weighing social capital as an important, related influence. Particular attention was paid to the evaluation team-stakeholder relationships. In comparing the case studies, several important common themes emerged. Each addressed the themes differently, showing how their principles partly led to distinct resource relationships. Findings from this study may help evaluation practitioners to explore how their own principles drive their practice and to weigh alternatives likely dismissed due to prioritizing certain principles and resources over others. Further research could study how these findings translate to the larger evaluation community.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781243688392
  • Publisher: BiblioLabsII
  • Publication date: 9/8/2011
  • Pages: 428
  • Product dimensions: 7.44 (w) x 9.69 (h) x 0.87 (d)

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)