- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
From the Publisher
"This remarkable book is the fruit of a two-decades-old project pioneered by Paul Robinson and his collaborators into the moral intuitions behind our criminal law. It reveals that our intuitions about who and what deserves to be punished, and how much, are remarkably precise and universally shared. He offers intriguing speculations as to why that might be so and shows that legislators who try to make up laws that go against those intuitions-as they habitually do in the name of populist or pragmatic considerations-wreak great havoc with our system."
--Leo Katz, Frank Carano Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
"A defining work on the ideal distributive principles for punishment. It is undoubtedly one of the best books I have recently read. Its highly rational approach, with radical new thinking, is important for both legislators and criminal law researchers. This book will provide important insights to the changing landscape of modern criminal theory."
--Zhao Bingzhi, President and Professor, Chinese Criminal Law Society
"No criminal law theorist has done more than Paul Robinson to employ sophisticated techniques of social science to discover what laypersons think about the fairness of various rules and doctrines in the substantive criminal law. In extraordinarily readable prose, Robinson argues that efforts to ensure that our penal law conforms to the judgments of laypersons will help to produce a criminal law that is beneficial to us all."
--Doug Husak, Professor II, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University
"The book draws upon several empirical studies, undertaken by Robinson and collaborators, into aspects of lay understanding, law intuitions and lay opinions. The result is a volume that raises challenging questions about the role of the public in criminal law doctrine and in sentencing principles, written with Robinson's characteristic clarity and persuasiveness."
--Andrew Ashworth, Vinerian Professor of English Law, University of Oxford
Overview
Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. The core of those judgments is often intuition rather than reason. Should the criminal law heed what principles are embodied in those deep seated judgments?
In Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert, Paul H. Robinson demonstrates that criminal law rules that deviate from public conceptions of justice and desert can seriously undermine the American criminal justice ...