The only honest appraisal: A superb book
As a historian of the Civil War period, with a particular interest in the border states, I found this to be a superb work of scholarship and tremendous storytelling at the same time. To my knowledge, that is the universal opinion of every historian and professional book reviewer who has examined Mr. Stiles's work. Indeed, the only fair-minded appraisal one can make is that it is simply outstanding. Unfortunately, the deserved praise this book has received has also made it a target of abuse by a handful of patently dishonest customer reviewers. For example, Tom Spencer writes here on Barnes and Noble that this is simply a work of popular history, with no scholarship. This claim is so absurd it is apparently calculated to undercut this fine book, for reasons unknown. In my opinion, if an assistant professor of history made simply one of the many new interpretations Stiles offers, he or she would make tenure--such as the role of the border ruffians in polarizing politics within Missouri before the Civil War, the emergence of the Radical party in the state, the political nature of both bushwhacker and militia operations against civilian targets, the transition of the bushwhackers into bandits amid the turmoil of 1866, the political rather than economic nature of support for the James-Younger gang, and the definitive assessment Stiles offers of the historical theory of social banditry. Customer Spencer would have you believe that Stiles is creating a work of historical fiction. My knowledge of the period and sources, and my review of the endnotes of this book, allow me to state that it is an extraordinarily well-reasoned work of history. Stiles focuses on Jesse James over Frank (as the title indicates he will do from the beginning) because it was Jesse who was central to the outlaws' public, political role. He addresses all the things his critics claim he doesn't, including the role of bushwhacker victims Bond and Dagley in the hanging of Reuben Samuel (he simply puts a different light on it, saying, "they had long since left the militia, and had been tending their fields and livestock in peace," p. 104), and the possibility that the outlaws wanted to rob the Mankato bank in 1876 (Stiles shows why this is unlikely). As Larry McMurtry noted in a review in The New Republic, this is an extremely careful biography that never goes out on a limb--it is dishonest to accuse it of being fiction. As Stiles himself notes, the leading buff book on the subject, Ted Yeatman's "Frank and Jesse James," is a very useful resource, one that (again, as Stiles notes) covers things that Stiles simply doesn't cover in an already-sweeping account; but I have to say, as a historian, that Yeatman's book is far shallower in its research and its judgments. Stiles has written the definitive book, one that forces us to rethink both Jesse James and his times in a wonderfully fast-reading manner.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.