Read an Excerpt
Journey to a Brave New WorldThe Startling Evidence That Humanity Is Being Manipulated Towards a Very Grim Future—but We Can Change Direction
By David Watts
iUniverse, Inc.Copyright © 2013 David Watts
All right reserved.
Chapter OneIt's a mad, mad, mad, mad World
There can be no denying that we are living in a seemingly crazy world, a world upside down and back to front. It seems like every day the mainstream news media is bombarding us with news stories that, if looked at logically just doesn't make sense, but for most people they have now turned off any logical thoughts of their own and are just accepting the facts that are presented to them by the experts in suits or skirts on our television screens, just as Zbigniew Brzezinski implied in his book 'Between Two Ages'and just as Lord Bertrand Russell said in his 1931 book, 'The Scientific Outlook',
"The society of experts will control propaganda and education".
Has the vast majority of our supposedly well educated population really lost the ability to discern when something is not quite right with the news and information they are being presented with? Have they been programmed to the point of no return? Let's take a look at a few news headlines from the last few months and years. If you, the reader, think all is well ... there is nothing to see here ... Then please move on, this book is not for you.
The Business Insider, September 13th 2012,—"The Fed Just Announced Unlimited QE"
This means that the Private, yes Private run for profit Central Bank of the United States called the Federal Reserve can now create as much money as it likes and loan it to our Government at interest. In early September of 2012 the official U.S. National Debt climbed above $16 Trillion, or to put it another way $140,000 of debt per taxpayer. Unlimited Quantitative Easing will increase the money supply leading to hyperinflation just as it did in the Weimar Republic during the 1920's and will leave the U.S. taxpayers with a debt that can never be paid off. We will explore more about the banking system in the next chapter.
The Daily Mail (UK), November 27th 2012—"A human Will Always Decide When a Robot Kills You: Pentagon's reassurance over fears of machine apocalypse."
In this article it explains that the Department of Defense issued a new policy directive saying that any semi-autonomous weapons systems will be designed so they need human authorization to open fire. The article details concerns from Human Rights Watch who are calling for a ban on killer robots.
We've already seen what semi-autonomous weapons systems can do with humans at the trigger. Just perform an internet search on the term 'Drone kills civilian'and you'll found literally millions of articles detailing how a drone was used in an attempt to kill a 'target', but that civilians were accidently killed or caught in the line of fire. So the Pentagon's re-assurance that some young man, or woman, who has spent most of their young life trained on XBOX and PLAYSTATION to shoot and kill anything on-site is hardly comforting. It might also concern you to know that in an unclassified document issued in July 2011 by Robotics System Joint Project Office titled 'Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap', says under the heading 'Future Trends'—
"As UGV missions continue to expand, the requirements placed on UGV's will constantly rise. There is an ongoing push to increase UGV autonomy, with a current goal of 'supervised autonomy', but with an ultimate goal of full autonomy."
So who is telling us the truth? The Pentagon via our mainstream media is telling us they will never allow fully autonomous systems to kill, yet military documents say they will.
Examiner and Daily Mail, October 1st 2012—"Former Priest hired by TSA to pat down passengers, three months after church kicked him out for 'molesting young girls'".
This news headline took 10 years to surface. Thomas Harkin was 'released' from the Diocese of Camden in 2002 after a second allegation of molesting a young girl. He was hired by the TSA three months later.
The TSA attempted to defend themselves by stating:
"in the wake of the September 11th 2001 terrorist attacks there was an urgent need for agents and that meant that staff were being hired without being put under sufficient scrutiny.... 50,000 workers were employed at the same time as Harkins, an unnamed TSA official said, many of whom went through without checks."
The article goes on to state that the church did notify the TSA in writing in 2003, but that no action was taken.
Apart from the fact that no action was taken despite this knowledge, what I find most disturbing is that these TSA agents were employed without background checks and yet they are supposed to be part of the front line in the so called war against terror. In fact on the TSA's own website http://www.tsa.gov/careers it states "Security is the TSA's highest priority". What could be the repercussions if they employed a suspected terrorist rather than a pervert? I guess in a way it's a good job that these agents don't perform at the same careless levels as their bosses do. You have to admit they are very thorough, especially if you fit into their 'perversion preference' or if they just don't like the look of you. Just take a look at these two headlines:
Dallas news channel (PIX 11), April 28, 2011—"Former Miss USA says TSA agent 'touched my vagina'".
Daily Mail, December 2nd 2012—"TSA agent pulls down dress to expose the breasts of 17-year-old niece of Congressman during airport pat-down as he demands federal investigation"
Again, search on the Internet for 'TSA agent accused' and you'll find millions about articles of TSA agents touching, groping, molesting or stealing from passengers. But perhaps I'm in the minority in thinking that something is wrong here. You certainly have to wonder when results in a recent Harris poll showed that 35% of Americans said they would wear 'electric shock bracelet' in order to fly.
Let's take a look at a headline from October 9th 2009.
"Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize"
According to many news outlets including the Huffington Post, October, 9, 2009
"The announcement drew gasps of surprise and cries of too much, too soon. Yet President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday because the judges found his promise of disarmament and diplomacy too good to ignore."
So our President is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on a 'promise'. Well I promise to bring world peace as soon as I'm elected—is that enough to get me nominated this year? Still, President Obama has to be congratulated because other great world leaders like Benito Mussolini (1935), Adolf Hitler (1939) and Joseph Stalin (1945 and 1948) were nominated but just missed out on winning it themselves. Just as well because they went on to being responsible for the deaths of over 30 million people—how embarrassing would that have been for the Nobel Peace Prize Panel? Although it makes you wonder how many millions will die under Obama's rule? This is a serious question, especially when in May 2012 the NY Times reports that:
"Secret 'Kill List' proves a test of Obama's Principles and Will"
The article explains that—
"This was the enemy, served up in the latest chart from the intelligence agencies: ... The mug shots and brief biographies resembled a high school yearbook layout. Several were Americans ... including a girl who looked even younger than her 17 years."
Now when I took my civics test to become an American citizen I don't recall anything about the Executive Branch of Government having the Right to kill a U.S. Citizen without a proper trial. Interestingly we find another link with Obama to Hitler and Stalin since they both had 'Kill Lists' too. Stalin's kill list was rather long and included about 20 million Ukrainians, whereas Hitler's Kill list included several million Jews and Charlie Chaplin—because he thought he was Jewish. (Source: Mail Online: February 27, 2008)
Everyone should have the right to plead their case to a jury of their peers. Secret 'Kill Lists'are not indicative of a truly free nation.
You don't have to be a Christian to know that something is very wrong when headlines such as:
USA Today, November 25th 2012—"Palm Scanner get thumbs up is schools, hospitals"
The article explains that:
"At schools in Pinellas County, Fla., students aren't paying for lunch with cash or a card, but with a wave of their hand over a palm scanner."
Mark of the Beast do I hear you cry? Whether you are religious or not this should give you a major cause for concern. When Aaron Russo, a film producer and director blew the whistle on a meeting he had with Nick Rockefeller where he was being offered to join 'them', he explained that Rockefeller had told him that 'their' ultimate goal is to implant everyone with an RFID chip.(Source: video interview with Alex Jones) Slowly we are being trained to take what seems to be small and inconsequential steps. You'll hear of hospital patients accepting a tiny 'insert' to help doctors identify patients and the medications they are taking. You will also start hearing more about a 'cashless society' and instead of Dollars we will be able to purchase goods and service using a system of 'Credits'. Step by step by step and before you know it people will look back and ask "how on earth did we get here?" I will cover this in more details further in this book.
Another headline that may not surprise you but should still cause concern is:
Hattiesburg America.com, November 26th 2012—"Black Friday Gun Sale Checks Hit Record"
'Washington for the second consecutive year, prospective gun buyers joined Black Friday shoppers in record numbers as firearms dealers swamped FBI with required buyer background check requests'
Barack Obama can confidently claim that he has done more for the firearms industry than any other President. The second Amendment to our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were specifically written to counter the threat of a tyrannical government taking over. And it's not just the citizens getting ready either. There are hundreds of articles detailing unusually large purchases, or contracts to purchase, made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Research by 'INFOWARS.COM' into known contracts between DHS and firearms manufactures showed that between November 2011 and November 2012 various departments within DHS and including Social Security Administration and NOAA contracted for at least 1.6 Billion rounds of ammo. That's enough to put more than four bullets into every U.S. citizen, regardless of age. The ammo is not just regular target shooting ammo either. In one Government solicitation detailed on the FedBizOpps.gov website the DHS required 176,000 rounds of .308 which is a deadly bullet used in sniper rifles. The largest percentage of total ammunition purchased by the DHS are for Hollow Points rounds. Evidence suggest that Hollow Points are banned for use in the regular army during times of conflict because of the devastating damage they do to the victim. Hollow Points are also much more expensive compared to normal practice rounds, so the question is: Why does the DHS need such a quantity of highly lethal ammo and who are they expecting to kill?
For the last couple of decades we have been inundated with claims of 'Global Warming' and 'Climate Change'. We are given images of Polar Bears clinging to small pieces of ice. We have seen advertisements on our Televisions showing children's heads being blown up because they didn't go along with the global warming story. Okay, now that's it, I hear you say. You don't believe that I bet. Well put the book down, and do an internet search using "global warming advert blowing up"—no pressure ...
Man Made Global Warming is a HOAX! How do I know this? Well apart from researching real science, not junk science paid for by the Central Bankers, you can also read a document by a United Nation 'Think Tank' called the Club of Rome titled "The First Global Revolution". In that document it reads:
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
I also encourage you to research the cycles of warming and cooling that the earth naturally goes through. (Source: longrangeweather.com) Take for example Britain around 1200 A.D. where living structures were built without an inside fireplace. This was because the earth was going through a 'warm cycle' and therefore they did not need it. However from the late 1600's to the mid 1800's the River Thames regularly froze during the winter, something you don't see now.
Surprisingly the UK's Daily Mail online news service published an article on January 29, 2012 with the following title:
"Forget Global Warming—it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)—Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years."
The article explains that "Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997."
Finally the last argument that I shall deal with on this matter is based on a National Geographic article from February 2007 titled "Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human Cause For Warming, Scientists Say"
Scientists have discovered that at the same time earth appears to warming so too are other planets in our Solar System including Mars. Just how many cars and CFC filled refrigerators do they have on Mars? Perhaps that big bright yellow circle that appears in the sky everyday just might have something to do with it.
Now we're going to take a look at another article and document that will have you reaching for your computer (and quite possibly the toilet bowl as it certainly made me feel sick when I first read it) because I'm sure you will find this hard to believe too.
In March 2012 Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva co-authored a paper that was published in the Medical Ethics Journal, a subset of the British Medical Journal and British Medical Association titled:
"After-Birth Abortion: Why should the baby live?
The authors of this paper argue that newborns are still only "potential persons" and no different to a fetus and therefore since we legally allow for fetuses to be aborted it should be no different for the newborn to be aborted" including cases where the newborn is not disabled".
The paper describes how they prefer to call the procedure After Birth Abortion rather than infanticide to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus.
"If the death of a newborn is not wrongful to her on the grounds that she cannot have formed any aim that she is prevented from accomplishing, then it should also be permissible to practice an after-birth abortion on a healthy newborn too, given that she has not formed any aim yet."
The paper concludes by stating that they do not suggest any age thresholds as it depends on the neurological development of the newborn and that neurologist and psychologists would be best able to determine at what age the newborn has aims and therefore would not meet the criteria.
The Internet search term (if you can stomach reading the paper) is: AFTER BIRTH ABORTION PDF
For me I can only describe this as one of the most disgusting documents I've had the displeasure of reading. I find their argument that because a baby, (with no stated age limits), does not have any 'aims' in life makes it perfectly okay to murder that baby, totally and absolutely abhorrent.
I'm sure many readers will argue that this could never be passed into law or practiced in the real world—a good argument, or so you'd think, but let's now look at a practice that was carried out 'legally' at least 40,000 times in the U.S. from 1995 to 2003 called Partial Birth Abortion. In September 1992 Martin Haskell presented a technique at the National Abortion Federation Seminar called 'Partial Birth Abortion'. It describes how the cervix is dilated (using drugs) such that the abortionist (I really struggle here to call the people that would do this 'Doctors') is able to pull the baby out by the legs leaving just its head inside. The abortionist then takes a special pair of scissors and while keeping the baby still inserts the sharp scissors into the back of the baby's skull piercing the brain. They then open up the scissors to make sure they finish the job. They clean up by suctioning the brain out.
Excerpted from Journey to a Brave New World by David Watts Copyright © 2013 by David Watts. Excerpted by permission of iUniverse, Inc.. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.