Junk English

( 1 )

Overview

Updating his survey of language atrocities, Ken Smith has again subjected himself to the continuing barrage of mindless jargon, hackneyed expressions, and war euphemisms. With hundreds of new examples pulled from everyday life, Junk English 2 shows how our language has become so pliable and flabby that the more we read and hear, the less we know.
Read More Show Less
... See more details below
Paperback
$11.00
BN.com price
(Save 15%)$12.95 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (77) from $1.99   
  • New (6) from $3.95   
  • Used (71) from $1.99   
Sending request ...

Overview

Updating his survey of language atrocities, Ken Smith has again subjected himself to the continuing barrage of mindless jargon, hackneyed expressions, and war euphemisms. With hundreds of new examples pulled from everyday life, Junk English 2 shows how our language has become so pliable and flabby that the more we read and hear, the less we know.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
If George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" were updated and expanded to address today's lexical and syntactic problems the tendency to make verbs out of nouns and nouns out of verbs, a general fondness for business-speak and verbal inflation, just to name a few it might look like Junk English. Ken Smith's (Mental Hygiene; Ken's Guide to the Bible) slim volume is a quirky, pleasingly judgmental dictionary of language crimes. From "invisible diminishers" ("virtually flawless") to technology jargon ("It is simply not natural to use feedback for opinion, [or] synthesis for combination"), Smith will delight language purists with his wit while confirming their grave assessments of contemporary speech. Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
As Smith (Mental Hygiene) here argues, our language has become pliable and flabby, filled with sloppy grammar, pretentious phrases, and, above all, loudness. "Junk English" is most often a trick we play on ourselves to make the unremarkable seem important. The result is "Edmund Burke's tyranny of the multitude merged with George Orwell's Newspeak, a world of humbug in which the more we read and hear, the less we know." This point is well made in an abundance of succinct examples, alphabetically arranged, which reveal the misuse of words, the overemphasis on euphemisms, the "verbalizing of perfectly good nouns," and other grammatical errors. Smith readily admits that what results is his own judgmental collection of observations, not a text of grammar or style. The errors are blatant and familiar, representing Smith's heightened sensitivity to poor English as found in newspapers and magazines, radio and TV, advertisements and editorials, as well as everyday life. Compact in size, reasonably priced, and nicely updating Richard P. Lederer's Fractured English (Pocket, 1996), this is highly recommended for all libraries and could be considered essential reading in English classes. Dale Farris, Groves, TX Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
Forbes FYI
An admirably cranky little book...refreshingly judgmental...will make you laugh, and you'll never use effort as a verb again.
Library Journal
As Smith here argues, our language has become pliable and flappy, filled with sloppy grammar, pretentious phrases, and, above all, loudness. Junk English is most often a trick we play on ourselves to make the unremarkable seem important. The result is "Edmund Burke's tyranny of the multitude merged with George Orwell's Newspeak, a world of humbug in which the more we read and hear, the less we know." This point is well made in an abundance of succinct examples, alphabetically arranged, which reveal the misuse of words, the overemphasis on euphemisms, the "verbalizing of perfectly good nouns," and other grammatical errors. Smith readily admits that what results is his own judgmental collection of observations, not a text of grammar or style. The errors are blatant and familiar, representing Smith's heightened sensitivity to poor English as found in newspapers and magazines, radio and TV, advertisements and editorials, as well as everyday life. Compact in size, reasonably priced, and nicely updating Richard P. Lederer's Fractured English (Pocket, 1996), this is highly recommended for all libraries and could be considered essential reading in English classes.
Minneapolis Star & Tribune
Small and streamlined, almost a thesaurus of sloppy usage...deserves a place on the desk of any writer or editor.
NYPress
A new Strunk & White...written in such a humorous, nonthreatening way that it might actually be of some use.
Publisher's Weekly
If George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" were updated and expanded to address today's lexical and syntactic problems -- the tendency to make verbs out of nouns and nouns out of verbs, a general fondness for business-speak and verbal inflation, just to name a few -- it might look like Junk English. Ken Smith's slim volume is a quirky, pleasingly judgmental dictionary of language crimes. From "invisible diminishers" ("virtually flawless") to technology jargon ("It is simply not natural to use feedback for opinion, [or] synthesis for combination"), Smith will delight language purists with his wit while confirming their grave assessments of contemporary speech.
Washington Post
Junk English is terrific...lively, funny, and impeccably right-minded...takes mighty whacks in all the right places.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780922233236
  • Publisher: Blast Books
  • Publication date: 10/28/2001
  • Pages: 144
  • Sales rank: 740,700
  • Product dimensions: 4.99 (w) x 7.26 (h) x 0.39 (d)

Read an Excerpt

Junk English excerpts


All of the examples in Junk English (quoted without correction of typographical or grammatical error) were taken from life: newspaper and magazine articles; radio and television commentators; advertisements and editorials; minimum-wage workers and millionaire executives; the underclass and the ruling elite. None came from internal business or political memoranda; all were intended to be understood by ordinary people.

Abstract Adjectives. Adjectives are not frivolous. Their job is to describe the noun to which they are attached more fully and definitely: desperate author, crazy decision, unread book. Adjectives that are not definite are detrimental; if they do not make nouns clearer, they do not help others to understand what is being expressed.

Abstract adjectives in vogue are major, positive, quality, and serious, with alternative, feasible, and impact not far behind in popularity. Some of these are actually abstract nouns, and when paired as adjectives with other abstract nouns, e.g., positive impact, serious alternative, they make a great show but say little.

Address, when not used to describe the location of a building, is often employed by those who wish to be evasive and yet sound as if they are not.

Our product was specifically developed as a safe alternative for men who prefer an all-natural approach to address [treat] impotence.

I will address [confront] these policy issues.

Let me address [answer] that question.

"Any worthy energy policy must address [stop] the price gouging of consumers by greedy energy suppliers," Davis said.

Affordable is a word often used by advertisers who want to persuade buyers that a car or washing machine or bedroom set is inexpensive when it is not. An affordable product, sometimes inflated to very affordable, is one that a customer can fit within his or her budget, usually on the installment plan, with interest. Strictly speaking, the product is thus affordable, but affordable is not a synonym for cheap.

Ambiguity. The temptation to use words out of novelty or because they are fashionable is strong. This sometimes leads unwitting writers to create puzzling ambiguities.

The results of the cancer screening test were positive.

Most Silicon Valley insiders agree that the offering price is outrageous.

Should the recipient of the test results feel relieved or heartbroken? Is the stock being sold for a pittance or a fortune?

Anonymous Acronyms. Organizations engaged in politically or socially controversial activities sometimes compress their names, or the names of things within their domain, into a series of letters, in an attempt to mask the nature of their work. Thus the Consolidated Mining and Smelting Company of Canada becomes COMINCO, the Conservative News Service becomes CNS News, and Multi-Level Marketing — itself a euphemism for pyramid scams — becomes MLM. Sometimes this deception works and sometimes it doesn't.

Acronyms are meant to be easy to recall, the intent being that no one will need to refer to the lengthier phrase they stand for. The Geheime Staatspolizei (secret state police), for instance, reduced its name to the acronym GESTAPO, which was perhaps easier to recall than this organization ultimately wanted.

Some modern acronym makers have learned to make their acronyms unpronounceable and innocuous. There is no chance that DWPF (Defense Waste Processing Facility) will ever roll lightly off the tongue or that MRM (Mechanically Recovered Meat) will ever call to mind a disagreeable image. Both are anonymous and easy to skip over, never even briefly tempting a reader to linger and think.

Apology words are special, earnest-sounding parasitic intensifiers, among them genuinely, honestly, 100%, really, seriously, sincerely, and truly. Their appearance tacitly concedes that the word or phrase that immediately follows has been stretched thin in current usage — really free, sincerely moved, genuinely shocked, 100% legal — but that this time, honestly, what we are about to read is the truth.

Would you seriously like to make $2,000 - $5,000 per week starting right away?

Take this opportunity to learn risk free the most effective way to truly meet that someone special.

If you request removal we really will remove you immediately.

This is honestly the most effective weight-reduction program I have ever tried.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(1)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 11, 2002

    The Strangling Fig

    Irrespective of its cultural foundation and legacy, English has been and continues to be the de facto international language. Its cross cultural dominance is near absolute. A case in point is that English is the lingua franca for all international air traffic from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. While scholars like Crystal, Phillipson, and Pennycook have put forth academic constructs on the politics of the English language and its influences on other cultures, Ken Smith's goal in writing 'Junk English' is more concrete, immediate, and urgent. Like Philip Howard and R.W. Holder who'd preceded him, Smith is the latest voice wandering the wilderness of newspeak and euphemisms, decrying: 'Junk English is much more than sloppy grammar. It is a hash of human frailties and cultural license: spurning the language of the educated yet spawning its own pretentious words and phrases, favoring appearance over substance, broadness over precision, and loudness above all. It is sometimes innocent, sometimes lazy, sometimes well intended, but most often it is a trick we play on ourselves to make the unremarkable seem important.' (p.15) Among the witty illustrious examples of 'Junk English' usage, Smith has many times alluded to a category of words known as 'parasitic intensifiers.' He has asseverated that these intensifiers are used by those who feel uneasy when words are left to pull their own weight. What were 'formerly strong words are being reduced to lightweights that need to be bulked up with intensifiers to regain their punch...The intensifier drains the vigor from its host.' (p.98). If one were 'to offer insight' or to 'oppose a position', he doesn't get much noticed if not entirely ignored in the these days unless his insight is 'valuable' and the opposition 'diametrical'. Parasitic words are insidiously putative. Smith himself is not immuned to them. He has spoken to gatherings of a blunder he'd made on page 16 of the book - after the book has been published. (As a teaser to prospective readers, this reviewer will keep the author's finding to himself. Hint: This parasitic word to which the author has confessed can be found on page 98. *grin*) Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Oscar Hijuelos has heaped praises on the English language. He sees English as a robust and efficient language upon which the brick-by-brick world is built. He and the Ken Smiths are in the minority, however. The brick foundation has already cracked. The task to contain the strangling fig* of the English language is Sisyphean. A final thought. This book should appeal to those who won't accept word-pairs like 'further' and 'farther', or 'who' and 'whom' as grammatical equivalents. For some others their reaction would probably be: ¿what¿s grandma got to do with junk English?¿ *Strangler fig is a common name for a number of tropical vines that grow on healthy trees, strangling them and eventually becoming trees themselves.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)