- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
David Haberman[Readers] with a tolerance for scandal will be rewarded with a disturbingly delightful celebration of a complex mystic and his particular brand of religion.
— Journal of Asian Studies
In a substantial new preface to this second edition, Kripal answers his critics, addresses the controversy the book has generated in India, and traces the genealogy of his work in the history of psychoanalytic discourse on mysticism, Hinduism, and Ramakrishna himself. Kali's Child has already proven to be provocative, groundbreaking, and immensely enjoyable.
"Only a few books make such a major contribution to their field that from the moment of publication things are never quite the same again. Kali's Child is such a book."--John Stratton Hawley, History of Religions
Winner of the American Academy of Religion's History of Religions Prize for the Best First Book of 1995
|A Note on Transliteration|
|List of Abbreviations|
|Introduction: Approaching the Secret||1|
|Defining the Study: Recovering the Text and Revealing the Secret||1|
|The Mystical and the Erotic||14|
|Ramakrishna's Tantric World||24|
|The Study's Symbolic Structure: Kali's Child||33|
|The Hindu Unconscious||37|
|Ch. 1||Kali's Sword: Anxious Desire and the First Vision||47|
|From the Village to the Temple, 1836-1856||53|
|A Textual Study of Ramakrishna's "Anxious Desire": Discerning a Vocabulary of Desire||63|
|Ramakrishna's "Anxious Desire" in the Eyes of His Contemporaries||77|
|"Her Sword as His Flute"||83|
|Ch. 2||Kali as Mother and Lover: Interpreting Ramakrishna's Tantric Practices||85|
|Kali as Mother and Lover||87|
|The Secret Years: Textual Considerations||90|
|The Secret Years: The Practices according to the Puranas, 1856-1861||101|
|The Secret Years: The Practices according to the Tantras, 1861-1865||112|
|The Hero and the Child||130|
|Cleaving the Bitch in Two||142|
|Ch. 3||Kali on Top of Siva: Tantra and Vedanta in Ramakrishna's Teachings and Mystical Experiences||145|
|Why Is Kali on Top of Siva?||147|
|The Secret Years: From the Practices according to the Vedas to the Jesus State, 1865-1868||150|
|The Mansion of Fun and Its Tantric Form||170|
|The Love-Body of the Goddess||185|
|Ch. 4||Kali's Feet: Ramakrishna's Descent into the Forms of Man||199|
|The Coming of the Disciples, 1868-1885||204|
|The Change and the Secret of the Dislocated Hand||219|
|Phallic Love and the Incarnation's Erotic Community||230|
|Ramakrishna's Foot: The Sinful Touch of God||238|
|Ch. 5||Kali's Tongue: Shame, Disgust, and Fear in a Tantric World||243|
|The Last Days, 1885-1886: The Secret Revealed and Concealed||252|
|The Secret Door||287|
|"Bite Your Tongue!"||304|
|Epilogue: The Fog of Bliss||307|
|Conclusion: Analyzing the Secret||309|
|Emerging from the Fog of Bliss: Defining the Secret||310|
|Sexuality and Mysticism: Realizing the Erotic||317|
|Appendix: Some Historical and Textual Aspects of Ramakrishna's Secret Talk||329|
Posted August 8, 2013
The trouble with Kripal is that he does NOT understand Bengali and sees sex in everything. I am a bengali and have read the original kathamrita from where kripal supposedly sources most of his material. His translations of commonly used bengali words are horribly wrong. His conclusions are not what bothered me so much, what bothered me was that he has used serious mistranslations and non-bengali westerners have not been able to understand that and treats his sources as authentic. This is grossly inaccurate result. Furthermore, he claims that he has discovered secret writings. How can a hugely popular and widely read bengali book be secret at all? The fact that Kripal understands nothing of bengali culture is another hindrance. He keeps assuming things and drawing his own interpretations, yet claims that this is a serious scholarly book. Before promoting this book, the concerned editors, foreword writer, review writers acclaiming this book should bother to find out if the sources mentioned as references actually say what kripal claims they say. Considering his fake and shoddy scholarship, he should not have got a doctoral degree for his thesis on this work. I am a doctoral student in Physics and if use such dubious interpretations in my work, my guide will see to it that i never graduate! All in all, a trashy sensationalist book NOT based on factual evidence.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 11, 2002
Posted January 28, 2001
In many ancient cultures the homosexuals of the tribe were the spiritual leaders. In my opinion this makes Ramakrishna more holy than ever and raises his status beyond the mundane. I always felt homosexuals had more of a capacity for the spiritual anyway, and Jesus may well have been a homosexual, he probably was. Too think there's something wrong with being homosexual is just ignorance. Also in these cases that energy is transmuted anyway.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 28, 2000
The title of my review says it all. I am feel bad that I wasted my time to read this book. For the scholars on Sri Ramakrishna, this book should be listed as one that should not be read.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 10, 2000
Promoting deconstruction of any saint is well within the right of an author in the name of freedom. I am not sure if it is deconstruction or religious pre-occupation? Disappointed to see the poor choice by Britannica in promoting a controversial book as the primary source with no mention or link to much known, well acclaimed book,' Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna'. I did not expect EB to be so unscholarly. Deconstructionism is the way of the day but the readers should also have a chance to know what is being deconstructed. Britannica has failed to provide that!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 25, 2000
The author's imagination and wishful thinking permeate this book. His claims that Ramakrishna was homosexual are totally unfounded. This book was the author's thesis and was an attempt to gratify his thesis adviser, Wendy Donniger, whose jaundiced eye sees sex in every area of religion. It's like writing a book about the homosexuality of Jesus Christ, deducing this from the relationships that Jesus had with his Disciples...travelling together, sleeping together, and Jesus' incessant talk of love. There is no evidence, not even implied, for this premise. Ramakrishna is highly revered in India and by many of his Western followers. He was a teacher of the highest truths. The trend towards deeming notable people homosexual, e.g., Emily Dickinson, Jack Kerouac, Michelangelo, etc., is prevalent and popular today. But this is carrying it a bit too far. The BEST authority on Ramakrishna is, 'The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna', written by 'M', who recorded his every word and deed over a period of many years. In the interest of TRUTH/INTEGRITY I suggest this book be labeled for what it is...TRASH!!!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.