- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
The anthology makes use of a range of classic translations, and includes new translations by Jane Chamberlain and Jonathan RUe, explanatory introductions, an index and a glossary.
Introduction: Becoming a Philosopher.
1. Journals and Notebooks:.
2. The Concept of Irony (1841):.
Irony after Fichte.
3. Either/Or (1843):.
4. Fear and Trembling (1843):.
5. Repetition (1843):.
A Report by Constantin Constantius.
6. Philosophical Fragments (1844):.
Is the Past More Necessary Than the Future? Or: Does thePossible Become More Necessary by Becoming Actual?.
. Coming into Existence.
-2. The Historical.
• 3. The Past.
• 4. The Apprehension of the Past.
7. The Concept of Anxiety (1844):.
Anxiety as the Consequence of That Sin Which is Absence of theConsciousness of Sin.
Anxiety as Saving Through Faith.
8. Prefaces (1844):.
9. Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846):.
Possible and Actual Theses by Lessing.
Actual Ethical Subjectivity.
Towards an Understanding with My Reader.
A First and Last Explanation.
10. My Work as an Author (1850, 1859):.
On my Work as an Author.
The Point of View for my Work as an Author.
A: The Ambiguity or Duplicity in the Whole Authorship.
B: The Explanation.
Part Two: The Whole Work of Authorship.
A: The Aesthetic Works.
B: Concluding Unscientific Postscript.
C: The Religious Works.
Chapter Two: The difference in My Personal Mode ofExistence.
A: In Relation to the Aesthetic Works.
B: In Relation to the Religious Works.
Chapter Three: The Share Divine Governance Had in MyAuthorship.
11. Johannes Climacus, or De Omnibus Dubitandum Est (1842,1869):.
Part One, In which Johannes Begins to Philosophise with the Helpof Traditional Ideas.
Chapter One: Modern Philosophy Begins with Doubt.
How Should the Third Thesis be Understood Literally.
-2 How Did it Come to Pass that Modern Philosophy Began withDoubt?.
(a) Was it by Accident That Modern Philosophy Began withDoubt?.
(b) Was it by Necessity that Modern Philosophy Began withDoubt?.
• 3. Intimations.
Chapter Two: Philosophy Begins with Doubt.
. Is the First Thesis Identical with Thesis Three?.
-2. How Does the Individual Relate to the First Thesis?.
(a) How Does an Individual who Affirms the First Thesis Relateto It?.
(b) How Does the Individual to Whom the First Thesis is ProposedRelate to the Individual who Propounds It?.
Chapter Three: In Order to Philosophise One Must HaveDoubted.
Part Two, In Which Johannes Tries to Think Propriis Auspiciis(On His Own Account) De Omnibus Dubitandum Est.
Chapter One: What Is It To Doubt?.
. How Must Existence be Constituted in Order for Doubt to bePossible?.
Kierkegaard's Works and their Authors.