Conway's King of Heists. Determining what is true and what is not.
It's hard to decide what to make of J. North Conway's King of Heists. Is it a historical novel or is it historical fiction? Much in it is genuine history, but there is also much that is questionable or outright false. A first rate historical novel should not portray any person or event in a way that contradicts known facts.
The first time I questioned anything in the book was when I reached page 36 and read the statement, "In 1862, Linus Yale Jr. invented the modern combination lock." As a collector of antique locks and keys, I immediately knew this was an error. Yale is famous for his invention of the key-operated, pin tumbler cylinder lock. I checked a list of Yale's patents thinking that perhaps Conway had confused a combination lock improvement with being the first. No patents for Yale were listed for 1862. This was a "red flag". If Conway can just make-up a fact here, could there be other places where he also played loose with the facts?
I only had to read a little further to see more questionable material. Conway states that George Leslie, the main character, invented a little tin wheel he dubbed "the little joker." It's purpose was to reveal the combination of a safe or vault. To use it, he needed to first gain entrance into the bank prior to the burglary and place the device inside the dial of the combination lock. Later he would return to retrieve the contraption. With the combination revealed, he now could plan a robbery that would be quick, safe and not draw any attention.
I wondered how he could remove the combination dial, because it can't just be screwed off. It's attached from the inside of the armored door by a spindle. Later I found a description of the dial being pried off using a specially designed file. Conway added the detail that the surrounding area was covered with cheesecloth so no scratches would be left that would be a tip-off to the tampering. My question now was how could the severed dial be reattached so that it would not alert the bank authorities? A dab of glue? Tape?
I checked some of the books listed in Conway's bibliography to see if I could find any mention of "the little joker." None of the books mentioned this safecracking contraption. Considering the improbability that such a device could work, as well as the complete absence of any reference to it in earlier wortks, it's fair to conclude that George Leslie's invention was actually J. North Conway's invention.
Conway states in his Introduction, "I have made every attempt to not portray Leslie as heroic in any way." There are no known pictures of George Leslie, but the true and unembellished facts, according to Conway, are that the debonair and dashing Leslie was "tall, handsome...lean fit and muscular...clean shaven, with a cleft in his strong chin." Also, well educated, sophisticated with "impeccable manners," he never associated with the lower rungs of the criminal class except for strictly business. I can't see that there is too much more Conway could have said if he decided to portray Leslie as heroic.
Not everything in his book is fiction. Here is the problem. How can one be sure what is true and what is not? There is, however, enough false an questionable material to warrant caution. I don't wish to deter anyone from reading King of Heists. Conway is a good writer, but his book should be read for entertainment - not history.
4 out of 11 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.