The Leadership Mystique: A User's Manual for the Human Enterprise / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 95%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (15) from $1.99   
  • New (5) from $7.30   
  • Used (10) from $1.99   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$7.30
Seller since 2010

Feedback rating:

(160)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
Ships same day.Very slight shelf wear.

Ships from: Hudsonville, MI

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$7.95
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(19)

Condition: New
Excellent Buy!!!

Ships from: Pleasant View, TN

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$28.78
Seller since 2009

Feedback rating:

(10080)

Condition: New
New Book. Shipped from US within 4 to 14 business days. Established seller since 2000

Ships from: Secaucus, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$31.58
Seller since 2007

Feedback rating:

(23309)

Condition: New
BRAND NEW

Ships from: Avenel, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$56.56
Seller since 2013

Feedback rating:

(2)

Condition: New
New

Ships from: San Diego, CA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by

Overview

"Your business can have all the advantages in the world; strong financial resources, enviable market position, and state-of-the-art technology, but if leadership fails, all of these advantages melt away." - Manfred Kets de Vries Organizations are like automobiles. They don't run themselves, except downhill. Leadership now, requires very different behavior from the leadership tradition we are used to. It requires leaders who speak to the collective imagination of their people, co-opting them to join in the business journey; leaders who are able to motivate people to full commitment and have them make that extra effort. It's all about human behavior. It's about understanding the way people and organizations behave, about creating relationships, about building commitment, and about adapting your behavior to lead in a creative and motivating way. So, ask yourself what you're doing about the leadership factor. How do you execute your own leadership style? Whether you work on the shop floor or have a corner office on the top floor of a shimmering skyscraper, what have you done today to be more effective as a leader? There are no quick answers to leadership questions, and there are no easy solutions. In fact, the more we learn the more it seems there is to learn. InThe Leadership Mystique, management and psychology guru Manfred Kets de Vries unpicks the many layers of complexity that underlie effective leadership, and gets to the heart of the day-to-day behavior of leading people in the human enterprise.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780273656203
  • Publisher: FT Press
  • Publication date: 8/28/2001
  • Edition description: Older Edition
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 352
  • Product dimensions: 6.29 (w) x 9.14 (h) x 0.73 (d)

Meet the Author

Manfred Kets de Vries is one of Europe's leading management thinkers and an experienced author, co-author, or editor of 17 books. He holds chair and Directorship positions at INSEAD. He also holds professorships at McGill University, the École des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Montreal, and the Harvard Business School and has lectured at management institutions around the world.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Preface

The most difficult thing in life is to know yourself.

-Thales

I've learned one thing - people who know the least anyways seem to know it the loudest.

-Andy Capp

You can observe a lot by just watching.

-Yogi Berra

I would like to begin this book on leadership with an anecdote, one that's most likely apocryphal. It's about Wilfred Bion, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who has greatly influenced my thinking. During World War I, Bion was a tank commander. For those of you who have never been in a tank, it's a very small "working environment" indeed. Bion learned a considerable amount about small-group behavior while serving in such a machine. One world war later, when he was the director of a mental hospital dealing with people suffering from war neuroses, Bion was able to apply some of the concepts he had learned in his military career.

Although Bion had acquired considerable insight into the dynamics of war neuroses by this time, many questions remained. What factors contributed to the problems that the patients in his mental hospital faced, for example? What led to their neurotic symptoms? Why did they suffer from combat fatigue? More important at that moment, what could he do to help them? Bion worked with his patients in small-group settings and wrote about the psychological processes he observed. His work intrigued many people, but his writing style was dense and his conceptualizations complex.

Many years ago - he's been dead quite some time now - there was a conference in London at which Bion was to be a featured speaker. There was a lot of excitement about his presenting; people were interested to hear what he had to say, expecting him to clarify some of his complicated ideas. According to the story, when Bion walked onto the podium, he looked out at the packed auditorium and said, "Here we are!" And having uttered these words, he walked away. That was it.

At lunchtime that day, one of the organizers of the conference went to Bion and said diplomatically, "Dr. Bion, many people have commented on your speech and told me how fascinated they were with your ideas. But they found the presentation somewhat short. Would it be possible for you to elaborate? Could you say something more? Would you mind if we organized a special session this afternoon?" Bion agreed, so a special afternoon session was scheduled. Again, the auditorium was packed. Bion walked to the podium, looked around, and said (or so the story goes), "Here we are again!" And off he marched.

When I'm scheduled to give a presentation, I'm often tempted to act in a similar manner. As must have been the case with Bion, many thoughts cross my mind just before I step up to the podium. I ask myself: Can I articulate my ideas clearly? Will I remember everything that I want to say? Can I meet the audience's expectations? And I'm realistic enough to realize that in each case the answer is probably no, given my own human failings and the audience's range of personal agendas. No wonder that every time I make a presentation I'm very curious to hear what I have to say!

I teach at the most global business school in the world - an institute called INSEAD, which is located in France and Singapore. The main campus is situated in the forest of Fontainebleau, not far from Paris. What once used to be the hunting grounds of the French kings now is the gathering place of probably the most geographically diverse student group in the world. Most of these students - as I tend to say facetiously - walk around with their head tilted slightly to the left (a behavior that they share with the faculty, for the most part). And that tendency inclines them to walk in circles.

Most of my students are "rational" engineers and economists, "logical" thinkers whose left brain appears to be overdeveloped. Preoccupied with rationality and objectivity, they seem to be interested only in "hard" data to analyze complex business situations. They tend to perceive intuition, emotion, and subjectivity as being somewhere on the continuum between rather wishy-washy and dangerously soft, not realizing that "soft" matters can actually be very "hard." Because soft matters can kill a career, I frequently give my students (and colleagues) a slight knock on the head to get the brain back into equilibrium, to help them deal with both sides of that vital organ. But my efforts last only briefly. After a short time, most left-brainers go back to "normal," walking once more in circles.

In my academic work, I make an effort to merge two major disciplines. As I sometimes like to say, I try to combine what John Maynard Keynes called "the dismal science" (once upon a time I was an economist) with what Sigmund Freud called "the impossible profession" (I'm also trained as a psychoanalyst). Thus my interest lies in the interface between management and clinical psychology.

In this book, I'll address a number of themes that touch upon leadership, using the clinical paradigm as my microscope for looking at the world. (By clinical paradigm I mean the particular perspective that underlies psychoanalysis and related fields - but more on that later.) Unlike many of my organizational colleagues, I'm not interested just in organizational structures and systems. Although I certainly put these variables into the equation when I look at an organization, I'm more interested in the people who make up that organization.

My main objective in studying leadership is to bring the person back into the organization. Obvious as the need for the human factor may seem, a considerable body of research in organizations stands out for its conspicuous neglect of the people who are the principal actors in these organizations. Far too many organizational specialists give structures and systems precedence over people. In general, positivism and objectivity prevail in the world of organizations. The credo is that what you can't see doesn't exist. One of the explanations for this outlook is that it's much easier to deal with structures and systems than with people. People are much more complex. Furthermore, people are much harder to change. (As I sometimes like to say, it's easier to change people than to change people.)

My clinical orientation to management comes at a price. While my interest in the stories people have to tell makes my observations richer, it also make my life more complicated. After all, structures and procedures are so much more tangible than personality and biography. Furthermore, my focus on the human factor has caused some students of organizations to denigrate my work. For a large number of organizational researchers, storytelling isn't serious business. They see real life as consisting of "rats and stats"; according to their view, only controlled experiments that center around subjects evoking no empathic reactions and that generate unambiguous statistics make phenomena real. Granted, this outlook makes both business and life simpler. The internal, subjective world of the individual - indeed, the whole process of inter-subjectivity (that is, the constellation of effects of one person on the other) - is much harder to control.

In my work, I pay considerable attention to the internal world of people, one person at a time. I ask myself questions such as, What are the focal problems that preoccupy this individual? What has emotional resonance for him or her? What are the script and setting of this persons's internal theater? But it's not only the internal world of the individual that's important. A person is also part of a social setting. We can talk meaning fully about a person only in the context of others. Nobody is an island unto him- or herself (much as some people would like to think so); people function in relationship to others. Thus I also pay attention to the interpersonal dimension. I'm interested in the chemistry of one person with another, especially in the ways that leaders affect the lives of those working (and living) with them.

As I try to get to know individuals in the workplace, looking to both personal and social issues as I deal with people within the context of their organization, I always keep a basic rule of journalists in mind: I focus on the five W's. When interacting with people, I ask the following questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why?

This book on leadership is based on a series of lectures I've been giving on the topic to many different audiences in more countries than I care to recall over a period of many years. Although the comments and conclusions contained herein are based on a large body of research on leadership, it's not my intention to write a highly theoretical book. This is meant to be a workbook, a volume that uses practical exercises to actively engage practicing executives who want to learn more about leadership and its vicissitudes - individuals who want to increase their leadership effectiveness.

In spite of the practical slant of this book, however, it's not a simple "how to" presentation. It's also an attempt to reflect on what leadership is all about. Many of the observations to be found in this book are based on research contributions I've made over many years in the study of organizations and their leadership. Readers who are interested in further developing their understanding of the clinical approach to organizational analysis may want to read some of the original source material. (I've included at the end of the book a list of some of my own research contributions and that of others on which this book is based.)

I'd like to caution readers that many of the things I say in this book aren't new; some of the ideas I present have been around for a long time. Furthermore, many of those ideas may seem quite obvious. But ideas that lack the sheen of novelty shouldn't be ignored on that ground alone. Ideas that have a long history aren't necessarily worse than a trendy set of new ideas. (Neither, I should add, are they necessarily better.) What matters is how these ideas play out in the workplace, in the lives of real leaders and followers. So I encourage you to look at my observations in light of your own experience, and to evaluate that experience critically. Ask yourself what you're doing about the leadership factor. How do you execute your own leadership style? Whether you work on the shop floor or have a corner office on the top floor of a shimmering skyscraper, what have you done today to be more effective as a leader? Do you walk the talk? Are you making an effort to be as effective as you can be?

There's a story of a frog that was lying on a log in a river. Because the log was surrounded by alligators, the frog was at a loss as to how he could cross the river unharmed. At one point, he looked up at a tree and saw an owl sitting on a nearby branch. He said, "Wise owl, please help me. How can I cross this river without being eaten by the alligators?" The owl said, "That's very simple. Just flap your legs as much as you can. That should do it. That will make you fly, help you cross the river, and keep you out of reach of the alligators." The frog did as suggested, and just before he fell into the water, to be snapped up by one of the alligators, he asked the owl, "Why, why did you give me this advice? I'm going to be eaten." To which the owl responded, "My apologies. I'm only into concepts. Implementation of the concepts is not my cup of tea."

As the story suggests, only a fraction of the strategies that are formulated in organizations are effectively executed. Most people aren't very good at synchronizing vision and action, at aligning ideas and execution. Anyone dealing in ideas needs to take into consideration people's abilities to implement those ideas. Navel gazing alone doesn't take visionaries past the drawing board. Leaders, to be successful, must understand action as well as theory.

This book hopes to help leaders shape their action effectively. It does so by addressing the following leadership themes:

  • Chapter 1, "Leadership in a dissonant voice," first looks at what leadership is and does and then introduces the clinical paradigm (which, as I noted earlier, governs my approach to organizational theory and action).
  • Chapter 2, "Emotional intelligence in the world of work," focuses on emotional intelligence, identifying ways that it can enrich both a leader's self-understanding and his or her ability to understand, motivate, and support followers.
  • Chapter 3, "The mussel syndrome," looks at the natural human tendency to resist change - a tendency that can bring down leaders and organizations alike. It also takes stock of the changes occurring in the world of organizations.
  • Chapter 4, "The failure factor in leadership," dissects the interplay of rational and irrational forces behind executive behaviour, examining how such issues as transference and narcissism affect leadership and offering ways to offset their power.
  • Chapter 5, "The dynamics of succession," presents the life-cycle of the CEO and reviews some of the dilemmas that make planning for leadership succession so difficult.
  • Chapter 6, "The Dilbert phenomenon," looks at how organizations suck the life out of their people and offers ways to resuscitate lifeless employees.
  • Chapter 7, "The rot at the top," introduces specific "neurotic" leadership styles - styles that originate with the leader but eventually have a "toxic" effect on the entire organization - and then offers suggestions for rebalancing these neurotic styles.
  • Chapter 8, "Achieving personal and organizational change," probes the dynamics of the change process as it applies to individuals and the organizations they inhabit.
  • Chapter 9, "Characteristics of effective leadership," looks at what leadership demands and outlines some of the competencies that distinguish effective leaders from those who are ineffective.
  • Chapter 10, "Leadership in a global context," looks at cultural differences and their impact on business, reviews the special demands of global leadership, and highlights ways that organizations can select and develop leaders who work well in the global context.
  • Chapter 11, "Roles leaders play," focuses on two dichotomies - leadership versus management and charismatic leadership versus architectural leadership - and suggests how leaders can balance these contrasting but necessary strengths.
  • Chapter 12, "Leadership development," deals with how organizations can assess leadership ability in potential candidates and develop leadership skills in those already within the fold.
  • Chapter 13, "Authentizotic organizations," defines a new sort of workplace and challenges organizations to adopt that new model.
  • Chapter 14, "Concluding comments," makes a case for the "fool" in organizations and presents some final thoughts on the subject of leadership.

As I indicated earlier, this book is intended to be somewhat interactive. To that end, it contains a large number of quizzes, self-assessment exercises, and questions. It's my hope that these exercises will facilitate the process of self-reflection in readers. Please note, however, that although many of these exercises are based on a robust body of research, neither the questions nor the measurement of responses have been validated. For that reason, the results of these exercises should never be the sole basis for making a decision. Rather, they should be looked at as guidelines to help readers reflect on and improve their leadership capabilities. These results need to be seen as part of a total package that includes the individual's past experience, present life circumstances, and other factors. Our behaviour is far too complex to be reduced to a set of simple questions in a self-assessment exercise. Exercises are valuable, but they're only a piece of the puzzle. The results should be seen as indicators, not as absolutes.

To simplify the reading, I've abstained from including source notes and references in this book. If you're interested in pursuing my research findings, or the research findings of others, please see the Suggested further reading at the end of the book.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
Preface
1. Leadership in a Dissonant Voice
2. Emotional Intelligence in the World of Work
3. The Mussel Syndrome
4. The Failure Factor in Leadership
5. The Dynamics of Succession
6. The Dilbert Phenomenon
7. The Rot at the Top
8. Achieving Personal and Organizational Change
9. Characteristics of Effective Leadership
10. Leadership in a Global Context
11. Roles Leaders Play
12. Leadership Development
13. Authentizotic Organizations
14. Concluding Comments
About the Author
Suggested Further Reading

Read More Show Less

Preface

Preface

The most difficult thing in life is to know yourself.

-Thales

I've learned one thing - people who know the least anyways seem to know it the loudest.

-Andy Capp

You can observe a lot by just watching.

-Yogi Berra

I would like to begin this book on leadership with an anecdote, one that's most likely apocryphal. It's about Wilfred Bion, a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who has greatly influenced my thinking. During World War I, Bion was a tank commander. For those of you who have never been in a tank, it's a very small "working environment" indeed. Bion learned a considerable amount about small-group behavior while serving in such a machine. One world war later, when he was the director of a mental hospital dealing with people suffering from war neuroses, Bion was able to apply some of the concepts he had learned in his military career.

Although Bion had acquired considerable insight into the dynamics of war neuroses by this time, many questions remained. What factors contributed to the problems that the patients in his mental hospital faced, for example? What led to their neurotic symptoms? Why did they suffer from combat fatigue? More important at that moment, what could he do to help them? Bion worked with his patients in small-group settings and wrote about the psychological processes he observed. His work intrigued many people, but his writing style was dense and his conceptualizations complex.

Many years ago - he's been dead quite some time now - there was a conference in London at which Bion was to be a featured speaker. There was a lot of excitement about his presenting; people were interested to hear what he had to say, expecting him to clarify some of his complicated ideas. According to the story, when Bion walked onto the podium, he looked out at the packed auditorium and said, "Here we are!" And having uttered these words, he walked away. That was it.

At lunchtime that day, one of the organizers of the conference went to Bion and said diplomatically, "Dr. Bion, many people have commented on your speech and told me how fascinated they were with your ideas. But they found the presentation somewhat short. Would it be possible for you to elaborate? Could you say something more? Would you mind if we organized a special session this afternoon?" Bion agreed, so a special afternoon session was scheduled. Again, the auditorium was packed. Bion walked to the podium, looked around, and said (or so the story goes), "Here we are again!" And off he marched.

When I'm scheduled to give a presentation, I'm often tempted to act in a similar manner. As must have been the case with Bion, many thoughts cross my mind just before I step up to the podium. I ask myself: Can I articulate my ideas clearly? Will I remember everything that I want to say? Can I meet the audience's expectations? And I'm realistic enough to realize that in each case the answer is probably no, given my own human failings and the audience's range of personal agendas. No wonder that every time I make a presentation I'm very curious to hear what I have to say!

I teach at the most global business school in the world - an institute called INSEAD, which is located in France and Singapore. The main campus is situated in the forest of Fontainebleau, not far from Paris. What once used to be the hunting grounds of the French kings now is the gathering place of probably the most geographically diverse student group in the world. Most of these students - as I tend to say facetiously - walk around with their head tilted slightly to the left (a behavior that they share with the faculty, for the most part). And that tendency inclines them to walk in circles.

Most of my students are "rational" engineers and economists, "logical" thinkers whose left brain appears to be overdeveloped. Preoccupied with rationality and objectivity, they seem to be interested only in "hard" data to analyze complex business situations. They tend to perceive intuition, emotion, and subjectivity as being somewhere on the continuum between rather wishy-washy and dangerously soft, not realizing that "soft" matters can actually be very "hard." Because soft matters can kill a career, I frequently give my students (and colleagues) a slight knock on the head to get the brain back into equilibrium, to help them deal with both sides of that vital organ. But my efforts last only briefly. After a short time, most left-brainers go back to "normal," walking once more in circles.

In my academic work, I make an effort to merge two major disciplines. As I sometimes like to say, I try to combine what John Maynard Keynes called "the dismal science" (once upon a time I was an economist) with what Sigmund Freud called "the impossible profession" (I'm also trained as a psychoanalyst). Thus my interest lies in the interface between management and clinical psychology.

In this book, I'll address a number of themes that touch upon leadership, using the clinical paradigm as my microscope for looking at the world. (By clinical paradigm I mean the particular perspective that underlies psychoanalysis and related fields - but more on that later.) Unlike many of my organizational colleagues, I'm not interested just in organizational structures and systems. Although I certainly put these variables into the equation when I look at an organization, I'm more interested in the people who make up that organization.

My main objective in studying leadership is to bring the person back into the organization. Obvious as the need for the human factor may seem, a considerable body of research in organizations stands out for its conspicuous neglect of the people who are the principal actors in these organizations. Far too many organizational specialists give structures and systems precedence over people. In general, positivism and objectivity prevail in the world of organizations. The credo is that what you can't see doesn't exist. One of the explanations for this outlook is that it's much easier to deal with structures and systems than with people. People are much more complex. Furthermore, people are much harder to change. (As I sometimes like to say, it's easier to change people than to change people.)

My clinical orientation to management comes at a price. While my interest in the stories people have to tell makes my observations richer, it also make my life more complicated. After all, structures and procedures are so much more tangible than personality and biography. Furthermore, my focus on the human factor has caused some students of organizations to denigrate my work. For a large number of organizational researchers, storytelling isn't serious business. They see real life as consisting of "rats and stats"; according to their view, only controlled experiments that center around subjects evoking no empathic reactions and that generate unambiguous statistics make phenomena real. Granted, this outlook makes both business and life simpler. The internal, subjective world of the individual - indeed, the whole process of inter-subjectivity (that is, the constellation of effects of one person on the other) - is much harder to control.

In my work, I pay considerable attention to the internal world of people, one person at a time. I ask myself questions such as, What are the focal problems that preoccupy this individual? What has emotional resonance for him or her? What are the script and setting of this persons's internal theater? But it's not only the internal world of the individual that's important. A person is also part of a social setting. We can talk meaning fully about a person only in the context of others. Nobody is an island unto him- or herself (much as some people would like to think so); people function in relationship to others. Thus I also pay attention to the interpersonal dimension. I'm interested in the chemistry of one person with another, especially in the ways that leaders affect the lives of those working (and living) with them.

As I try to get to know individuals in the workplace, looking to both personal and social issues as I deal with people within the context of their organization, I always keep a basic rule of journalists in mind: I focus on the five W's. When interacting with people, I ask the following questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why?

This book on leadership is based on a series of lectures I've been giving on the topic to many different audiences in more countries than I care to recall over a period of many years. Although the comments and conclusions contained herein are based on a large body of research on leadership, it's not my intention to write a highly theoretical book. This is meant to be a workbook, a volume that uses practical exercises to actively engage practicing executives who want to learn more about leadership and its vicissitudes - individuals who want to increase their leadership effectiveness.

In spite of the practical slant of this book, however, it's not a simple "how to" presentation. It's also an attempt to reflect on what leadership is all about. Many of the observations to be found in this book are based on research contributions I've made over many years in the study of organizations and their leadership. Readers who are interested in further developing their understanding of the clinical approach to organizational analysis may want to read some of the original source material. (I've included at the end of the book a list of some of my own research contributions and that of others on which this book is based.)

I'd like to caution readers that many of the things I say in this book aren't new; some of the ideas I present have been around for a long time. Furthermore, many of those ideas may seem quite obvious. But ideas that lack the sheen of novelty shouldn't be ignored on that ground alone. Ideas that have a long history aren't necessarily worse than a trendy set of new ideas. (Neither, I should add, are they necessarily better.) What matters is how these ideas play out in the workplace, in the lives of real leaders and followers. So I encourage you to look at my observations in light of your own experience, and to evaluate that experience critically. Ask yourself what you're doing about the leadership factor. How do you execute your own leadership style? Whether you work on the shop floor or have a corner office on the top floor of a shimmering skyscraper, what have you done today to be more effective as a leader? Do you walk the talk? Are you making an effort to be as effective as you can be?

There's a story of a frog that was lying on a log in a river. Because the log was surrounded by alligators, the frog was at a loss as to how he could cross the river unharmed. At one point, he looked up at a tree and saw an owl sitting on a nearby branch. He said, "Wise owl, please help me. How can I cross this river without being eaten by the alligators?" The owl said, "That's very simple. Just flap your legs as much as you can. That should do it. That will make you fly, help you cross the river, and keep you out of reach of the alligators." The frog did as suggested, and just before he fell into the water, to be snapped up by one of the alligators, he asked the owl, "Why, why did you give me this advice? I'm going to be eaten." To which the owl responded, "My apologies. I'm only into concepts. Implementation of the concepts is not my cup of tea."

As the story suggests, only a fraction of the strategies that are formulated in organizations are effectively executed. Most people aren't very good at synchronizing vision and action, at aligning ideas and execution. Anyone dealing in ideas needs to take into consideration people's abilities to implement those ideas. Navel gazing alone doesn't take visionaries past the drawing board. Leaders, to be successful, must understand action as well as theory.

This book hopes to help leaders shape their action effectively. It does so by addressing the following leadership themes:

  • Chapter 1, "Leadership in a dissonant voice," first looks at what leadership is and does and then introduces the clinical paradigm (which, as I noted earlier, governs my approach to organizational theory and action).
  • Chapter 2, "Emotional intelligence in the world of work," focuses on emotional intelligence, identifying ways that it can enrich both a leader's self-understanding and his or her ability to understand, motivate, and support followers.
  • Chapter 3, "The mussel syndrome," looks at the natural human tendency to resist change - a tendency that can bring down leaders and organizations alike. It also takes stock of the changes occurring in the world of organizations.
  • Chapter 4, "The failure factor in leadership," dissects the interplay of rational and irrational forces behind executive behaviour, examining how such issues as transference and narcissism affect leadership and offering ways to offset their power.
  • Chapter 5, "The dynamics of succession," presents the life-cycle of the CEO and reviews some of the dilemmas that make planning for leadership succession so difficult.
  • Chapter 6, "The Dilbert phenomenon," looks at how organizations suck the life out of their people and offers ways to resuscitate lifeless employees.
  • Chapter 7, "The rot at the top," introduces specific "neurotic" leadership styles - styles that originate with the leader but eventually have a "toxic" effect on the entire organization - and then offers suggestions for rebalancing these neurotic styles.
  • Chapter 8, "Achieving personal and organizational change," probes the dynamics of the change process as it applies to individuals and the organizations they inhabit.
  • Chapter 9, "Characteristics of effective leadership," looks at what leadership demands and outlines some of the competencies that distinguish effective leaders from those who are ineffective.
  • Chapter 10, "Leadership in a global context," looks at cultural differences and their impact on business, reviews the special demands of global leadership, and highlights ways that organizations can select and develop leaders who work well in the global context.
  • Chapter 11, "Roles leaders play," focuses on two dichotomies - leadership versus management and charismatic leadership versus architectural leadership - and suggests how leaders can balance these contrasting but necessary strengths.
  • Chapter 12, "Leadership development," deals with how organizations can assess leadership ability in potential candidates and develop leadership skills in those already within the fold.
  • Chapter 13, "Authentizotic organizations," defines a new sort of workplace and challenges organizations to adopt that new model.
  • Chapter 14, "Concluding comments," makes a case for the "fool" in organizations and presents some final thoughts on the subject of leadership.

As I indicated earlier, this book is intended to be somewhat interactive. To that end, it contains a large number of quizzes, self-assessment exercises, and questions. It's my hope that these exercises will facilitate the process of self-reflection in readers. Please note, however, that although many of these exercises are based on a robust body of research, neither the questions nor the measurement of responses have been validated. For that reason, the results of these exercises should never be the sole basis for making a decision. Rather, they should be looked at as guidelines to help readers reflect on and improve their leadership capabilities. These results need to be seen as part of a total package that includes the individual's past experience, present life circumstances, and other factors. Our behaviour is far too complex to be reduced to a set of simple questions in a self-assessment exercise. Exercises are valuable, but they're only a piece of the puzzle. The results should be seen as indicators, not as absolutes.

To simplify the reading, I've abstained from including source notes and references in this book. If you're interested in pursuing my research findings, or the research findings of others, please see the Suggested further reading at the end of the book.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 16, 2005

    Highly Recommended !

    Business schools and shareholders focus so relentlessly on hard numbers and cold facts that it's no surprise that data reigns supreme in the corporate world. But executives who downplay the importance of emotion and intuition do so at their own peril, management expert Manfred Kets de Vries convincingly argues. He offers a wealth of useful tips for leaders who are ready to reintroduce the human side, the soft side, to their organizations and their own lives. The author occasionally drops in stories and quotes from his clients, but his argument would have been bolstered by even more examples. We recommend this easy-to-digest volume to leaders who want to improve their interpersonal skills.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)