Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA [With Headphones]

( 64 )
This Audiobook (Other) is Not Available through BN.com
Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
BN.com price
This digital version does not exactly match the physical book displayed here.

All Available Formats & Editions

More About This Book

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781605147765
  • Publisher: Findaway World
  • Publication date: 9/28/2008
  • Format: Other
  • Product dimensions: 4.60 (w) x 7.70 (h) x 1.20 (d)

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 64 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 66 Customer Reviews
  • Posted June 29, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Biased--failure-focused on covert activities, ignores intelligence analysis

    Weiner sets out to demonize the CIA, and by use of selective incidents and cherry-picking of history, "succeeds."

    Not a balanced account of an agency that, like all government agencies, is made up of flesh-and-blood humans capable of ingenuity and bravery and, capable, too, of short-sightedness and cowardice.

    But what do I know? I only spent 5 years in CIA.

    6 out of 9 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 21, 2008

    A reviewer

    If this book had been written by Jimmy Breslin, it would be, ¿The Gang that Couldn¿t Shoot Straight Part Deux.¿ Only this book was not written by Jimmy Breslin and the consequences to our prestige as a nation, respect in the world and national security are much more serious. However it is a very interesting read, at many times incredible in the audacity of some missions sometimes just shocking in the stupidity displayed by what are supposed to be our nation¿s best. Mr. Weiner lays out the history of the CIA from the very beginning until our very recent history. In the process through extensive interviews and research of declassified documents, he tells a very unnerving story of what our CIA is, what it was meant to be and what it thinks it is. It is a damning indictment of the agency, the various directors and many of the presidents in power during its existence. Towards the end of the book, he pretty clearly sums up what the book is about, ¿Nineteen men had served as director of central intelligence. Not one met the high Standards Eisenhower had set. The agency¿s founders had been defeated by their ignorance in Korea and Vietnam and undone by their arrogance in Washington. Their successors were set adrift when the Soviet Union died and caught unaware when terror struck at the heart of American power. Their attempts to make sense of the world had generated heat but little light. As it was in the beginning, the warriors of the pentagon and diplomats at State held them in disdain. For more than half a century, presidents had been frustrated or furious when they turned to the directors for insight and knowledge.¿ Well that is what the book is about but before you get to that point, there is history, poignant stories, incredible blunders, and one of the best actual spy stories ever written. A true opus. Politically, the book is straight down the middle. You will find out that neo-cons were attracted to the agency from the beginning are were wrong from the beginning. I guess we could have seen it coming. They claimed 500 Soviet Missiles aimed at the US when there were only 4 and that is just the beginning. A featured character is Mr. Paul Wolfowitz who has managed to fail upwards for many years now. On the other side of the spectrum, the book paints President Eisenhower as perhaps our sharpest president in this entire era. However the idea of some guy putting on his underwear in the morning is a little disturbing. In today¿s times it¿s hard to remember the red menace and how that colored their thinking of the time, but it is shocking to learn how right wing and secretive Robert Kennedy was. An icon of liberalism definitely not portrayed that way in this book. The entire account of the Bay of Pigs invasion very much syncs with other accounts I have read so I have no reason to doubt the Robert Kennedy reporting. Other presidents: LBJ is an insecure mess. RMN is a drunken hawk. GRF, though having served in the Senate Intelligence committee for many years was surprised to find out he knew nothing of what the CIA was doing. JEC is a nice man, but not entirely as innocent as most people thought. RWR is out of the loop entirely, with a dark side and a cast of incredible characters to carry out some of the most disastrous missions in the entire agency history. Bill Casey definitely is not portrayed in gushing terms as Valerie Plame described him in her book. WJC was not a hands-on manager when it came to intelligence and was distrusted by the CIA and all the military. GWB, the worst period, as much of a nightmare to the agency as the rest of the United States. He would be the one to eventually undo the CIA and turn into ashes. Nobody comes off unscathed. A fair, fascinating look into the annals of the CIA and our presidents policies and relationship with the agency. A must read.

    6 out of 8 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 14, 2009


    I liked this book from cover to cover, really liked it, and unfortunately believed every word. I found myself jumping right on the bandwagon guided by this author, a successful journalist, and my animosity for our government from the top spot down continued to grow as the author spun his web.<BR/><BR/>The fact of the matter is that this is an extremely biased novel, starting with the Title and continuing throughout the book. The author mis-quotes, misrepresents, and in my opinion manages to do all the things he accuses our leaders of between the covers of this long work of fiction...lie, manipulate, cover-up, and use information to suite his own purposes and biases.<BR/><BR/>I am not in any way giving a free pass to some of the decisions that were made by our leaders over the past 200+ years...but my fear is that this book takes it too far and has to use sleight of hand and take advantage of his readers and a national sentiment that wants to believe our government is full of idiots and scoundrels...<BR/><BR/>Personally I think the author owes everyone an apology, if you have read this, or haven't, Tim Weiner thinks you are an idiot and has completely wasted his considerable writing talent with a bias that is only to easily uncovered. I feel very bad for the large number of readers who have taken this man on his word.<BR/><BR/>For those of you interested the following link explains Tim's negligence and gives references to reality (the good and the bad).<BR/><BR/>https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol51no3/legacy-of-ashes-the-history-of-cia.html <BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/><BR/>Jesse H Grindeland<BR/>grindeland@gmail.com

    5 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 10, 2008

    Useful study of a criminal organisation

    Tim Weiner, an American journalist, has written a useful history of the US state¿s Central Intelligence Agency. It has been the president¿s private, secret and illegal army, it does what the president wants, so it is not `a rogue elephant¿, as the Church Committee called it. He shows that from its origin in 1947, the CIA has always been incompetent and incapable. In 1948 the CIA launched a scare about the Russians invading Berlin the next day Congress approved the Marshall Plan. A secret clause let the CIA skim $685 million from Plan funds, what Weiner calls `a global money-laundering scheme¿. In 1948 the CIA set up secret prisons in Germany, Japan and Panama, using torture and drugs on its captives. It carried out 81 major anti-democratic covert operations in Truman¿s second term, 170 in 48 countries under Eisenhower, and 163 in just three years under the liberals¿ hero Kennedy. Its efforts at gathering intelligence from 1948 (`World War Three starting in Berlin¿) to Iraq (`Weapons of Mass Destruction¿) have been consistently wrong. It always said that the Soviet Union was impervious to reason, impossible to reform and understood only force ¿ but this is projection, mirroring the CIA itself. It ran coups overthrowing elected governments and installing tyrants, for example in Iran, Guatemala, Congo, where Eisenhower ordered that Lumumba be `eliminated¿, Chile and Greece. Against Cuba it used biological and chemical weapons, assassination attempts hiring Mafia hit men and a botched invasion. The CIA funded Italy¿s neo-fascist terrorists in the 1970s. It illegally spied on the American people. The CIA lied to Congress, the people and presidents, for example, Weiner notes its director Allen Dulles¿ `practice of deceiving the president¿. To cover for the CIA, presidents lied to Congress and the people. Weiner remarks that the CIA¿s testimony to Congress ¿left the impression that the United States had hired a gang of conmen and thieves to run its foreign affairs.¿ It organised death squads in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras and in Afghanistan and Iraq today. It carries out illegal renditions of innocent suspects to its secret prisons in Thailand, Poland, Afghanistan and Iraq. Could a democratic country use such a vicious tool?

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 13, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    If the book is correct, CIA is truly a sorry outfit.

    The book is a bird's eye view of the CIA's history, based on the documents declassified in the last decade. It is a very critical view - but not at all in line with Agency's Hollywood's image ( evil devious all-powerful ruthless world conspiracy). The Agency is criticised for it's mediocre performance, inefficiency, poor planning, carrierist mindset, neglect of reliable intelligence in favor of poorly conceived covert projects and , frankly, for bringing more harm than good to US interests ever since Pearl Harbor. If you ( like me) can't really name a single major CIA success during your lifetime, the book is an explanation. Of course, the author could be biased ( I wouldn't know), but even if only half of his facts are only correct, CIA is a hardly a spy service one would expect a mighty superpower to have. I grade the books as Buy and Keep (BK), Read Library book and Return ( RLR) and Once I Put it Down I Couldn't Pick it Up ( OIPD-ICPU). This one is BK .

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 17, 2008

    Brilliant Overview

    Wiener's overview of the CIA, at its best and worst, is amazing. A paramilitary organization enthralled by the sophisticated nature of the British spies, Dulles, Donovan, and others went on to find the Agency that has changed the world for better and for ill. At a time when intelligence is at a premium compared to what Rumsfeld says, the history highlights the Agency's brilliant successes--the defection of KGB agents, dismantaling of the AQ Khan network, overthrow of the Chile government and their spectacular failures--overestimating the Soviet's military strength, the numerous attempts on Castro's life, operations in Soviet Russia and Maoist China, and domestic spying. However, the Agency is still facing its own demise.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 7, 2008

    best on cia

    The best book I have ever read on the CIA, if sometimes a little too hard on the agency. To say that every director has been a failure is difficult to believe. And the Kennedy brothers were not quite the liberal icons that martrydom has made them out to be. This book couldn't come at a better time when good intelligence is so important.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 22, 2007

    Excellent book

    Pulitzer Prize¿winning author Tim Weiner does a marvelous job of laying out how the CIA's mission and focus were somewhat hampered from Day One. It's a great read!

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 15, 2014

    Cloudbeauty's kin

    Frostedwolf(Grandmother[mom's mom], dead)
    Bravecloud(Grandfather[mom's dad], dead)
    Sunshine(Aunt[mom's sister], dead)
    Dragon(Uncle[mom's brother], dead)
    Jayfeather(Aunt[mom's sister-in-law], inactive)
    Courageheart/star(Cousin[jayfeather+dragon's], &female , inactive)
    Nightshadow(Cousin[jayfeather+dragon's], mate, &male , inactive)
    Cinderweed(Cousin-In-Law[Courageheart's 1st mate], inactive)
    Spotstar(Cousin-I-Law[Courageheart's 2nd mate], left)
    Ashwarrior(2nd Cousin[courageheart+cinderweed], inactive)
    Stormlilac(2nd Cousin[courageheart+cinderweed], inactive)
    Toppershat(2nd Cousin[courageheart+cinderweed], inactive)
    Smudgedot(2nd Cousin[courageheart+cinderweed], inactive)
    Softflame(2nd Cousin[courageheart+spotstar], Daughter-In-Law[Foxpower's former mate], inactive)
    Grassclaw(Uncle[dad's brother], dead)
    Mysteryflower(Aunt[dad's sister-in-law], dead)
    Littlepaw(Grandchild[foxpower+softflame], dead)
    Rubblepaw(Grandchild[foxpower+softflame], inactive)
    Sedgepaw(Grandchild[foxpower, adoted])

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 15, 2013


    As you enter the badger set, you feel safe and warm. The softest of moss, bracken, down, feather's, and cotten are layed down for the queen's and kits.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 6, 2011

    A smattering of real events mixed with a biased agenda

    There are a few takeaways from this book and despite a lower than perfect score, I would still recommend this book. Here are the reasons why- 1) Tim Weiner does have sources to back up his wildly biased take on the CIA. Some of these were from the very top, others from archives, still others from some lower level CIA employees. This has to be taken into account and much of what he says, despite being delivered with a slant, actually took place. 2) He gets opinions from the top as well. Some of the former directors are not at all shy about being upfront with failures, though I think Weiner does a disservice to them when he doesn't include some other viewpoints than "we messed up" or "we didn't have a clue." 3) His mistakes are easier to spot and his bias clearly shows so it becomes a little bit easier to pull out the good stuff from the book (and there is some good stuff.) Overall, the book was an enthralling read, if not biased as mentioned many times before. His title alone (though sure to be an attention grabber) smacks of a viewpoint that doesn't allow for much good to be shown. Only occasionally does he mention a victory for the CIA. I agree with other readers that the CIA's responsibility is huge and by relying on agents (as is necessary) that mistakes are gonna be made. You can't win all the battles in the intelligence war. Weiner here does a disservice to all the capable and patriotic men and women that we have (and had) in the CIA by not bringing more light to their accomplishments (though a few are present.) It's a well known fact in the intel world that your failures are known 10 times over your accomplishments. Some accomplishments are sometimes never gonna be known (maybe a guy that they took off the streets was gonna be the lead of a next terrorist attack, who knows.) Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, this book might not be valued for its narrow view of the past but moreover for its telling of the future. It is not so important as to what the CIA did but HOW it came to do it. If we look at how the CIA was managed and how it was a reflection of not only the current time period and threats but also of the president and directors themselves, we can see how better to manage such a huge force for better in the future. Leadership that was too strong and one-armed as during the early Bush years yields certain unintended and unfortunate results but also the lack of caring for the organization under the early Clinton era maligned it as well. A certain balance is needed as well as a certain level of oversight. Along with that, a core mission is most certainly needed as evidenced by the fleeting raison d'etre that vanished when the Cold War ended and left the CIA spinning its rudders without going anywhere. When the CIA is given too much rope, it can easily hang itself as evidenced by too many failed covert ops in the early days (and the deaths of many agents as well.) When it is not given enough, it cannot fully do its job. That balance will remain elusive and hard to grasp. We can only hope to learn from our mistakes and continue to improve. Overall, a very gripping novel-like read and a book that can shine some light on an organization that was, and continues to be, misunderstood and maligned, sometimes not only by its leaders but also by authors like Mr. Weiner himself.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 1, 2011

    more from this reviewer

    Unflattering for the CIA

    After reading Weiner's work on the CIA you wonder how they haven't been disbanded by Congress; educate yourself on power and corruption from the start infected America's intelligence agency with irreparable ignorance.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 20, 2011

    must read for policy makers

    and for citizens who want to be in the know. Previous reviewer must either be ex CIA or been reading too many Clancy novel; this is reality.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 28, 2011

    so biased = useless

    This book is so jaded and biased that it renders itself useless.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 6, 2010

    Very Enlightening

    Having worked for the CIA and knowing the people he wrote aboout, I found this book to be quite good. Enjoyed it immensely.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 23, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Billed as "Required Reading" ... It Was

    The book was definitely required reading. And at times it felt like it. It was comprehensive and thorough and scholarly. A bit dry and a chore to get through at times.

    Overall it was discouraging...The CIA promising so many overhauls through its history and all of these overhauls ending in failure (if you believe the author).

    I thought the description of how each of the various presidents used the CIA was very revealing.

    I could have used a bit more on the glamour points "Bay of Pigs", "Kennedy Assassination", etc. It would have spiced the book up a bit.

    Overall, I am glad to have read it. It was a bit like taking geometry in High School. You are glad to have taken it, but not so excited about sitting though every class.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 9, 2009

    Legacy of Ashes should be read by all tax payers.

    This work is extraordinary in its breadth and scope. Weiner chronicles the CIA's history from its beginnings with Truman to present day. I was very surprised at some of the revelations about Eisenhower and the Kennedys. It is an image destroyer. No one is sacrosanct. The Agency's incompetence is clearly displayed, especially currently. You won't want to put it down although it will make you so angry you may want to throw it at a wall, occasionally. A must read.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 9, 2009

    Bringing History of the CIA into a Bright Shining Light

    Tim Weiner's history of the CIA is truly enlightening. Movies, magazines, and the simpleton accounts on network news shows could not come close to providing such riveting information. This is a well balanced narrative of our countries Central Intelligence Agency, telling of the few successes and many disappointments. Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, unfortunately made decisions based on less than accurate and, at times, completely false data. What is also very interesting is how often members of the President's inner circle were involved in the clandestine operations of the CIA. The media would not then, or now, report it, the fact that Robert Kennedy was deeply involved in plots to assassinate Fidel Castro and other nations leaders. It is assuring to know that some authors still have integrity to report the truth. Maybe it should go into the libraries of our public schools! This would be a more valuable history text than the book of politically corrects piles of rubbish many are currently using. I certainly would recommend this book to anyone wishing to learn the truth about the CIA. Enjoy!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 30, 2008

    One of the Best Histories of the Agency

    This is an outstanding history. It does point out the serious errors, even downright incompetence of the Agency, but also their few successes. Unlike some other reviewers, I feel this book gives a great balance of what actually happened, not conspiracy theorist gobble-dee-gook like the Agency killing Kennedy or other nonesense. This is a straightforward facts based history.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 28, 2007

    CIA disinformation disguised as revelations.

    The author's premise of the Presidents are to blame and not us (CIA) won't fly. I've read the Church Committee documents so I know the truth. The author's fawning over Richard Helms sickened me. No mention of Helm's assassination of President Kennedy nor one word of RFK's murder by Manchurian Candidate courtesy of Helms and his MKULTRA program. How come? The book is CIA disinformation disguised as revelations. The author is either ill informed or purposely misleading the reader. Why? Well written though and worth a read.

    0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 66 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)