Let It Be... Naked

( 35 )

Editorial Reviews

Barnes & Noble - David Sprague
Long a contentious album among Beatlemaniacs -- and among the Beatles themselves -- Let It Be took a long and winding road to its ultimate release. The recording's original sessions -- for an album to be titled Get Back -- were made as a counterpart to an in-the-studio film in 1969, before Abbey Road. The album wasn't released, however, until 1970, after Phil Spector was brought in as producer and after the Beatles had broken up. This rethought rendition is less of an original version than it is 20/20 hindsight in action, and it stirred controversy even before its release. Naked removes much of Spector's studio frippery and lush orchestration, along with all of the ...
See more details below
Vinyl LP
$44.64
BN.com price
(Save 5%)$46.99 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Vinyl LP)
  • All (6) from $25.23   
  • New (6) from $25.23   

Editorial Reviews

Barnes & Noble - David Sprague
Long a contentious album among Beatlemaniacs -- and among the Beatles themselves -- Let It Be took a long and winding road to its ultimate release. The recording's original sessions -- for an album to be titled Get Back -- were made as a counterpart to an in-the-studio film in 1969, before Abbey Road. The album wasn't released, however, until 1970, after Phil Spector was brought in as producer and after the Beatles had broken up. This rethought rendition is less of an original version than it is 20/20 hindsight in action, and it stirred controversy even before its release. Naked removes much of Spector's studio frippery and lush orchestration, along with all of the between-songs quips and introductions, leaving many of the songs in comparatively stark relief. The difference is most notable on "The Long and Winding Road," where Paul McCartney's earthy vocal sounds clear as a bell atop a string-free arrangement guided by piano and organ. The bulk of the tinkering is subtler, with slightly less spaciness exuding from "Across the Universe," a fair amount of looseness from "One After 909," and an enhanced gospel tone to the haunting title song, which now closes the album. Other changes are more rudimentary: A pair of tunes -- "Maggie Mae" and "Dig It" -- were dropped altogether, and in their place, a new set of producers deigned to deposit "Don't Let Me Down," which long ago outgrew its hidden status as the B-side of "Get Back." Naked may pose more questions surrounding the original release of Let It Be than it answers, but its status as an essential release by rock's most formidable and creative group is indisputable.
All Music Guide
In its original form, Let It Be signaled the end of an era, closing the book on the Beatles, as well as literally and figuratively marking the end of the '60s. The 1970 release evolved from friction-filled sessions the band intended to be an organic, bare-bones return to their roots. Instead, the endless hours of tapes were eventually handed over to Phil Spector, since neither the quickly splintering Beatles nor their longtime producer George Martin wanted to sift through the voluminous results. Let It Be... Naked sets the record straight, revisiting the contentious sessions, stripping away the Spectorian orchestrations, reworking the running order, and losing all extemporaneous in-studio banter. On this version of the album, filler tracks "Dig It," "Maggie Mae" are dropped, while the juicy B-side "Don't Let Me Down" is added. The most obvious revamping is on the songs handled heavily by Spector. Removing the orchestrations from "The Long and Winding Road" and "Across the Universe" gives Paul McCartney's vocals considerably more resonance on the former, doing the same for John Lennon's voice and guitar on the latter. This alternate take on Let It Be enhances the album's power, reclaiming the raw, unadorned quality that was meant to be its calling card from the beginning.
New York Times - Allan Kozinn
"Let It Be . . . Naked" is a real treat. Remixed from the original multitrack session tapes, these performances have a warmth and fullness that makes the sound on the original album seem flat and squashed.
Blender - Paul Du Noyer
Whatever your reservations, let's celebrate the transformation of a second-rate Beatles album into one more worthy of their legend.

"Let It Be . . . Naked" is a real treat. Remixed from the original multitrack session tapes, these performances have a warmth and fullness that makes the sound on the original album seem flat and squashed.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • Release Date: 7/15/2008
  • Label: Emd Int'l
  • UPC: 724359543802
  • Catalog Number: 5954380
  • Sales rank: 17,908

Tracks

Disc 1
  1. 1 Get Back
  2. 2 Dig a Pony
  3. 3 For You Blue
  4. 4 The Long and Winding Road
  5. 5 Two of Us
  6. 6 I've Got a Feeling
  7. 7 One After 909
  8. 8 Don't Let Me Down
  9. 9 I Me Mine
  10. 10 Across the Universe
  11. 11 Let It Be
Disc 2
  1. 1 A Fly on the Wall
Read More Show Less

Album Credits

Performance Credits
The Beatles Primary Artist, Group
Billy Preston Keyboards
Technical Credits
The Beatles Producer
George Harrison Composer
John Lennon Composer
Paul McCartney Composer
Ringo Starr Composer
George Martin Producer
Glyn Johns Engineer
Alan Rouse Producer
Kevin Howlett Liner Notes
Paul Hicks Producer
Steve Rooke Mastering
Guy Massey Producer
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 35 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(20)

4 Star

(4)

3 Star

(4)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(6)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 35 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Paul's Revenge!

    Let us be clear about one thing: this is not the Let it Be album the way it was meant to be heard. It is simply one person's (Paul McCartney's) interpretation of the album. This version of Let it Be represents Paul's attempt to correct the many "mistakes" he perceived were prevalent on the original release, most notably Phil Spector's lush orchestrations which Paul believed "ruined" his compositions, most notably, "The Long & Winding Road." Like many Beatle fans, I long to hear the original "Get Back" project the way the Beatles meant for it to be heard. But, we will have to wait a little longer, since this is not that. I have to admit I prefer the original "Let it Be" release. The stripped down feel of many of the songs, the short bits of humour, and, yes, even the lush orchestrations lent a bit of humanity to the project that is missing on this overproduced, sterile "remake." "The Long & Winding Road" sounds naked and bare without Phil Spector's touch. The orchestration and choral vocals lent an air of poignancy and beauty to the song that underscored what was happening in the Beatles's lives at that time. A stripped down version of "The Long & Winding Road" is already available on The Beatles Anthology 3 if you really have to hear it. "Get Back" sounds rough and incomplete on this version. The humour at the end of the version on the original Let it Be released added to the charm of the song. The version on Let it Be. . .Naked does not even include the extended bridge at the end of the single version which may have helped, especially since it was chosen to lead off this project. While it is nice to have "Don't Let Me Down" included on this version, it works better as a B-side and it is not one of the Beatles's best songs anyway. "Old Brown Shoe" would have probably fit this project better. The extra disc is like a mini-edition of the Anthology project but would probably not appeal to non-Beatle fans. Overall, this project has limited historical value, but for my money, the original edition of Let it Be is still the best.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Its OK

    I must admit the songs do sound better than the original release but I dont think its worth the amount of money wanted for it. Unless you really want it of course. The excellent song "Dont let me down" isnt available on many other CD's so thats one good thing. Its about time that Capitol records comes out with a collection of Beatles singles on a few discs so all the single that are harder to get on the albums would be in one place.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Better than the original I think

    I really liked this album because the songs seemed a lot clearer than one the original album. I really like this album's "I Me Mine" and "The Long and Winding Road." I also like the song arrangement on this album better than the other one. One bad thing, though, is that they cut some of the actual song on a few of them like on "Get Back." Overall, though most people don't agree with me, the album is very good and better than the original.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Not the 'Get Back' album, but good for what it is

    Like the Beach Boys 'Smile' and Jimi Hendrix' 'First Rays of the New Rising Sun', the Beatles' 'Let it Be' will forever be discussed and debated in the category of albums that never really were, leaving much conjecture and guesswork up to the fans. To McCartney's credit (and whoever else had much to do with the making of 'LIB...Naked'), "Don't Let Me Down" is restored to where it belongs, associated with the Get Back/Let it Be sessions, not simply a track from the Hey Jude compilation, or just a b-side of a single (plus the 'Naked' version is worthy). Also the de-Spectorization of "The Long and Winding Road", "Across the Universe" and "I Me Mine" make for interesting tracks, in comparison to the original Let it Be versions. Some think the album sounds too slick, missing the in-between asides ("I dig a pygmy" etc) and the two short songs left off in favor of "Don't Let Me Down" - I found the overall sound more upfront and direct, as if I was there in the studio with JPG&R (close as I'm going to get anyway). I would've preferred, as many Beatles fans do, any Glyn Johns' versions of what would be a 'Get Back' album. It's likely that now, as then, the Beatles (today meaning Paul, Ringo & estates of John and George) still do not want fans to hear raw, underproduced and ragged recordings from their 'Get Back' sessions. Having hear bootlegs of projected GB albums, I think I can see why from their viewpoint. Some of the recordings are simply not that good or up to standards set by the White Album, never mind anything from 1967 or before. The Beatles have a reputation and image to uphold as the greatest pop music group of all time, and to release anything like what Glyn Johns had done might undermine that reputation, no matter what original intentions they had when they started the project. The original Phil Spector produced 'Let it Be' does in fact do what John Lennon once said - take recordings made during the worst period of their career, of substandard material, and made something out of it. So if you want to hear what Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr (for the most part - that sticker on the CD stating that this is as it was meant to be heard - one has to wonder if Lennon and/or Harrison would think so) think the 'Let it Be' album should sound like, then take a chance and get 'Naked' ... but not if you don't already have the original Let it Be first.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Like it or not

    Sir Paul McCartney flamboyantly said "If we had today's technology, it would sound like this." John Lennon and George Harrison are no longer around to give their 2 cents, but Ringo Starr seemed to agree. I'd have to agree with the last person in that I like this version a little better, too. Of course, John Lennon's wisecracks at the end of "Get Back" and at the beginning of "Two of Us" are missing, but that's just a minour complaint. This isn't my favourite Beatles album (and very few Beatles fans'). However, I personally prefer this version of "The Long and Winding Road" without the cheezy choir (I'm sure Sir Paul would gladly appreciate someone agreeing with him) and this version of "Across the Universe" and "I Me Mine," though the latter has one verse repeated like on the "original" release. The Fly on the Wall disk is fun to listen to but not something I'd listen to very often (for collectors only). We all know this isn't the "original" Get Back album many of us were expecting. Ok, that's my review. If you don't agree, send your non-helpful votes (oops, wrong website!).

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    I feel like I'm sitting in with the four (five) of them.

    Beautiful...and I loved the original. But now I can really hear them playing and with the strings and effects brought down I feel like they are playing live right in front of me. It has the same intimacy as Rubber Soul and Revolver.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL

    This version of Let It Be is sounds 100 times better than the original. The bass tones are bassier, the vocals cleaner and the jibberish between songs omitted. Capitol should remaster all the other Beatle titles like this one. The sound is simply superb.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    At Last

    Finally after more than thirty years, the wonderful songs of 'Let It Be' devoid of the overblown, fragmented, and congealed Phil Spector production. It's especially nice to hear what 'The Long and Winding Road' actually sounds like.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Don't Pass This One By

    The clarity of this refurbished album makes it hard to believe Let It Be was originally recorded over 30 years ago. While listening to this masterpiece, you'lde think you stepped (back in time) into the mixing studio at Abbey Road or were on the rooftop with John, Paul, George, and Ringo it's that crisp. In fact, at the end of the new "Across the Universe", John Lennon actually sounds like thats where he's singing from. Now that the Phil Spector post-production fluff has been stripped away, LIBN takes its place along side Rubber Soul, Revolver, Sgt.Pepper & Abbey Road as one of the Beatles best albums. Get Back to your local music store and buy this CD immediately!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Stop Start-Is it scratched recording

    I am very disappointed. It's very nice to hear their young voices again. However, I'm not sure if it is just the CD I received- (there are no scratches on the CD) or the recording. It would sound much better if the songs didn't just CUT OFF, pause and start. It sounds like it was recorded from old scratched records.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    De-produced

    More than just sonically superior to its predecessor, "...naked" is a genuinely different album. A raw and honest sound which falls somehow in between the deconstructed feel of the White Album and the cleaned up outtakes of Anthology III. Almost like an "unproduced," anadorned final take. The excising of the inter-track banter is an improvement, giving the music the dignity of setting it deserves. Probably the closest thing to sitting in an intimate club and hearing this greatest of all quartets live.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    A masterpiece

    even if It is not released yet, I listen to this yesterday on the radio in LA, the sound now is so clear, it is a real treat to every beatlemaniac and even the new fans, I will still listen to the original Let it be album too, but this new version really captures my heart. The real sound, the way it was supposed to be originally, for sure one of the best albuns of this year.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 10, 2011

    "They've Become Naked"

    While nothing will ever make me throw the original "Let It Be" album away, "Let It Be...Naked" is a nice addition to The Beatles' catalog. Wikipedia has a detailed list of each track, explaining which recordings were used to create "LIBN". While very little of this is a revelation, I always welcome officially released outtakes from my favorite group.

    By the way, the version of "The Long And Winding Road" here is not simply the "Let It Be" version without Spector's overdubs(That one is on "Anthology 3"). The version here is the one seen in the "Let It Be" movie.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Not as good as the original.

    Stick to the original album. The Phil Spector version is far better than this reissue. Everything from the sound quality to the cover photos are better. I absolutely love the string arrangement on "The Long and Winding Road". Besides, if you have the "Beatles Antholgy Album Vol. 3" you already own the de-spectorized version of this song. Everything else sounds pretty much the same albeit in inferior sound. If you're looking for a GREAT new Beatles album, I highly recommend "Love" over this release.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Awesome!

    I love any Beatles Album and this one is becoming one of my favorites. I love, 'Across the Universe' and of course, 'I, Me, Mine'.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    All they need is cash

    One more milking of the Beatles' cash cow... The differences between this and the original (legit) Let It Be are so subtle it's meaningless (been a serious guitar hobbyist for 30+years)... Actually, I prefer the original over this. There's nothing particularly revealing in this new "official" version. Anyone looking for more "raw" performances of this material probably would do better with any of the bootleg versions!

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Naked....OH YEA

    Let It Be...Naked is a great album. I wouldnt say it is better than the original. I also wouldnt say that its worse. I would suggest that you listen to the original first so you can hear what they changed. All in all it is a great album and recomend it.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Naked.......Not worth it

    I heard the "Naked" album last weekend and all I could think of was here is just another attempt by the surviving Beatles to make some extra Christmas money. Don't get me wrong, I am, and will always be, one of their biggest fans. My God, the Beatles changed my life. I wouldn't be the musician I am today without their influence. But this to me is just another way to rip us Beatle lovers off. Sorry. I loved the original Let It Be album. Strings and all.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Make this Another Edition (With More Stuff and More Tracks)But unless is a good album

    When I heard this album I felt that they needed to put more tracks, more things, and more stuff to make this a good album, This album or the songs all the same, same lyrics but when I heard "Dont let me down" something change, assually all the songs. This album is a good one to have if you like the beatles or read the reviews of this CD. Hey make this a better Version with more things. But this sound better. Studio and With no live sound.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Who Needs Phil Spector?????

    IT IS GREAT!!!!! It is Beatles through and through. Their sound. Their magic. So much better than the original Phil Spector version. Thank you so much for bringing this to us after all these years. It is a wonderful surprise!!!!!!!!

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 35 Customer Reviews