Letters to a Young Conservative

Letters to a Young Conservative

4.3 18
by Dinesh D'Souza
     
 

View All Available Formats & Editions

In Letters To A Young Conservative, he stakes out the conservative philosophy that made him the enfant terrible of the Reagan revolution and a best-selling author. With rigor, wit and clarity, D'Souza shows that it is conservatives who uphold the classical "liberal" principles of the American Revolution: economic freedom, political freedom, and freedom of speech and

Overview

In Letters To A Young Conservative, he stakes out the conservative philosophy that made him the enfant terrible of the Reagan revolution and a best-selling author. With rigor, wit and clarity, D'Souza shows that it is conservatives who uphold the classical "liberal" principles of the American Revolution: economic freedom, political freedom, and freedom of speech and religion. These freedoms, combined with a commitment to civic and social virtue, distinguish the conservative vision of what it means to lead a good and happy life.

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
A young foot soldier of the "Reagan Revolution," bestselling author D'Souza (What's So Great About America, etc.) came to prominence during his years at Dartmouth, as one of the founders of the controversial Dartmouth Review. In his latest book, the newest installment in the Art of Mentoring series, D'Souza provides students of the next generation with a basic understanding of modern conservatism and its fundamental precepts. Addressing a fictional student by the name of "Chris," D'Souza outlines the major distinctions between the three main political positions in the U.S.: liberalism, conservatism and libertarianism. He goes on to explain how conservatism debunks an array of issues, such as affirmative action (it strengthens the "widespread suspicion that [blacks] might be intellectually inferior"), feminism ("the feminist error was to embrace the value of the workplace as greater than the value of the home"), postmodernism ("pompous, verbose, and incoherent") and some lesser known sins such as the "self-esteem hoax" (self-esteem doesn't promote better performance). In these chapters, the author is witty, even irreverent at times. He punctures the stereotype of conservatism as the dry and stodgy movement that liberals love to hate. Rather he says, conservatives are "radicals," resisting the morally deficient tide of modern liberalism, fighting for a common code of virtues. D'Souza will no doubt succeed in inspiring young conservatives to go out into the world and fight for what they believe in. (Oct. 1) Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
A recruiting brochure for the conservative cause, padded with the usual slams against Hilary Clinton, feminists, and anyone who questions the intellectual might and political accomplishments of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. This volume in the Art of Mentoring series finds Reagan administration alumnus D'Souza (The Virtue of Prosperity, 2000, etc.) piloting a young college student between the treacherous shoals of liberalism on one hand and libertarianism on the other. Avuncular and arch, D'Souza peppers his letters of instruction with homespun homilies about right-wing virtues: if I give a hungry man a sandwich, he writes, "then I have done a good deed, and I feel good about it. . . . But then see what happens when the government gets involved. The government takes my sandwich from me by force. . . . Instead of showing me gratitude . . . the man feels entitled to this benefit." Humans are inherently driven by self-interest, he goes on to explain, and conservatives, unlike liberals, have no illusions about their perfectibility; hence, conservatives have a more realistic view of humankind, which is why they're so much better at government and better people to boot. In all of this, D'Souza avoids the empty windbaggishness of Rush Limbaugh and the nastiness of Ann Coulter, but his arguments for the superiority of conservatism (or, really, neoconservatism) turn on a similar glibness: he falls easily into us good-them bad rhetoric and half-baked formulas (conservatives care about money, whereas liberals care about power, which is so much dirtier than money). Some of his attacks are well placed, if of the fish-in-a-barrel variety, as when he takes on proponents of academic "politicalcorrectness" (a term he popularized with his 1991 book Illiberal Education) and twits elite radicals who "communicate their anger in very nice lounges over expensive meals and fancy cocktails." Few, however, are completely thought through, suggesting that D'Souza wrote his Letters in a hurry-for money, of course, and not for power. Add water and stir: a political philosophy in 30 easy lessons, just right for college students too busy or ill-educated to read Edmund Burke or William Buckley. Author tour

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780465017331
Publisher:
Basic Books
Publication date:
09/01/1902
Series:
Art of Mentoring Series
Edition description:
REV
Pages:
240
Product dimensions:
5.30(w) x 8.30(h) x 0.84(d)

Meet the Author


Dinesh D'Souza, the Rishwain Research Scholar at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, served as senior domestic policy analyst in the White House in 1987-88. He is the best-selling author of Illiberal Education, The End of Racism, Ronald Reagan, and The Virtue of Prosperity. He divides his time between Washington, D.C, and San Diego, California.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

Letters to a Young Conservative 4.3 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 18 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
There are not enough words in the dictionary to describe how amazing this book is. D'Souza addresses just about every idea that has been destroyed by liberals. He gives plenty of examples for maintaining good conservative values in school and work. He is a true hero and I really believe and value every thing he wrote. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful book--HIGHLY RECOMMENDED for all young conservatives!!!
Guest More than 1 year ago
What an eye opener! This is probably the only book that I will remember for the rest of my life. I encourage any young person interested in conservatism to read this book! You won't regret it.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed this book. It was easy to read and had straight forward answers to good questions.Perfect for a college kid wondering about politics and searching for clear insights. After reading, most will have a better basis upon which to base their own opinions and decisions.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I absolutely loved this book. It is relatively short, and succinct. In it D'Souza explains what conservatism is, and what it is not [libertarian], and what American liberals think and how they act. This book explains the underpinnings of conservatism (belief in the individual, free market economics, a set moral order in the universe, pride in country, a strong military, free speech, freedom of thought), basically, the ideals of the American Revolution. He then contrasts them with what liberals think: belief in the "inner Self" [Rousseau], belief in groups, belief in oppression, dislike of one's own nation, an idealized view of the Third World, "bogus multiculturalism" [looking at other cultures not as they are, but as the Left in America would like them to be], belief in "equality of outcome". The book is peppered with many anecdotes from Dinesh's time at Dartmouth, and the attempts of many parties at Dartmouth to silence him and his conservative friends. Dinesh invented the term "political correctness", after reading that the Russian communists used it to refer to anyone not towing a strict Bolshevik line. Dinesh points out that American universities are more open to free speech in 2002 than they were in 1990, mostly due to the efforts of a few brave conservative editors at Ivy League schools, like him. I believe it. I remember being a conservative at a small liberal arts college in the 1980s. It took a bit of courage, but it was damn fun debating the liberals. Reading the book also brought back a lot of those memories, and how great it was to open a sophmore's mind to a new reality, when all he or she had been hearing was "the Party Line".
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Moo
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Graceson Brotzman More than 1 year ago
Excellent way of pproceding to write a book which I have seen the same stlye used in history books. Every topic covered in the book to explain conservatism to liberals and their blockheaded rejections towards conservatism. A great read especially to those liberals whom portray to be patriots but do not fit te mold. Just read the book. Graceson Brotzman, retired USA, disabled Vet
Reader1066 More than 1 year ago
This is a wise and knowing book on many levels, mostly because it is directed at someone around 20 years of age. And yet, although I haven't been that age in quite a while, it reminds me in great detail of an earlier generation's (mine) professors' cover up of classic values and their caving into trendiness. Even if someone has never been to college, be they 18 or 50 years old, this book will show them where government officials and petty bureaucrats - and their neighbors - got their failing ideas about how life and society should be organized. And it is also funny, making it witty and wise. I wish I had such a book when I was an undergrad many years ago.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
In today's world of liberal, ivy-league colleges it was refreshing to finally find a book that wanted to help kids understand conservative politics. Universities these days don't teach these principles. I am not even close to going to college yet, but I found it was very interesting and I enjoyed it. I would recommend it to any conservative, old or young. (And hopefully a couple liberals here and there!) )
Guest More than 1 year ago
Letters to a Young Conservative is an entertaining and highly important book for anyone interested in standing up to liberal extremism. D'Souza's ability to clearly point out the difference between liberal and illiberal is espically inciteful. I went right out and bought a copy for my daughter in college.
Guest More than 1 year ago
If you are a conservative or just like politics in general then you will enjoy this book which is a coherent argumentative summary of the modern conservative movement. D'Souza's strength is his unique style of clarity which serves the reader well because it has a conversational tone. He writes as if he is talking to a jury that he has to convince in a point-to-point way and he is quite effective. You feel when you are reading as if he is saying " I know what your initial question may be after I say this so let me go ahead and answer it." If you love America, know that modern liberalism is defunct, and intellectually and factually void but do not know how to put your thoughts into a unified argument in your everyday life this is the book to help you!! In letter format D'Souza addresses not just modern day issues but also the philosphies of human nature and thought that underlie the conservative movement. In this short book, D'Souza vindicates all of the leading symbols of hate on the modern left: Ronald Reagan, the Founding Fathers, pro-lifers, Abraham Lincoln, and best of all The United States of America. Read it and enjoy!!! Warning: If you are a liberal you may have a bit of a wakeup call.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The first two chapters are interesting in that the author cites the differences between Conservatism, Liberalism and Libertarianism -- the basics. The author's bias is evident in virtually every sentence in this book. Makes it kinda hard for someone on the middle or a little left of the middle to have full faith in the author -- not to mention, makes it impossible for the real Leftists. The arguments for Conservatism are very biased, and the examples are very selective, and the choice of words are very pro-conservative. Author, many times, becomes involuntarily tangled in the Conservative hypocrisy of self-righteousness and patriotism. Like most conservatives, especially opinionated with 'capitalism,' author displays an alarming lack of knowledge in economics (albeit authors went to Dartmouth to study Economics). A very good handbook for the conservatives, but shamelessly falls short of proselytizing the liberals. As a conservative, I wouldn't use this book to convert my liberal fiends.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
It is shallow, empty, ignorant, puerile, and completely devoid of truth and meaning. What a waste of pqper.