It is not the purpose of this book to offend or throw bombs. I wasn’t seeking a flashy title when the title presented itself to me. I chose the title after my research because it perfectly epitomized the movement of liberalism or LSPism through the years in their own words. I don’t think that the average person would have a clue where the title from this book comes from and might even get the wrong opinion entirely. Most would think from the title that it’s about a biased one sided assault on liberalism. The ...
It is not the purpose of this book to offend or throw bombs. I wasn’t seeking a flashy title when the title presented itself to me. I chose the title after my research because it perfectly epitomized the movement of liberalism or LSPism through the years in their own words. I don’t think that the average person would have a clue where the title from this book comes from and might even get the wrong opinion entirely. Most would think from the title that it’s about a biased one sided assault on liberalism. The reader might expect to be inundated with right wing rhetoric and a conservative ideological attack against liberalism in reading this.
Depending on your perspective, you might be right if you regard this book as purely an attack on Liberalism (or as I prefer to identify it, LSPism). You might regard it as that if the stating the truth and exposing dishonest, hypocritical and false actions and purposes by the leaders and authors of liberalism and LSPism as an attack. This book is not an attack, but rather a defense of the truth and the exposing of the lie of LSPism with their own words. Moreover it is an expose on their deceitful, beguiling methods that engender slavery of the masses, again in their own words (well they don’t admit to enslaving the masses, quite the contrary, what we see around us today is ostensibly their effort to set them ‘free’).
The title of the book is not taken from a tirade of mine, but from the words of a quote from the works of George Raymond Geiger, a devotee of one of the founders of the LSP movement in America. In his work, he synopsized the work of John Dewey as such: "His plea is that `liberalism must again become the truly radical, the subversive, reform that once upon a time evoked energies directed to fundamental social change'". So then would be uncharitable or unfair to regard LSPism as radical, or subversive?
What is critical for the unbiased trier of fact to know is that the sentiments expressed in italics portray the very methods that the ‘movement’ used to take over our country. If you don’t believe me, perhaps you will believe them. For the most part this book simply uses their own words in the context that they used them to expose their takeover for what it was and is. It is not necessary to misquote them, or take what they say out of context. It is certainly not necessary to make false statements, nor even to engage in the use of hyperbole to prove one’s point about them or their ideology. The proponents of LSPism (Liberal Socialist Progressivism) are all too willing, in fact braggadocios about their methods and their ‘successes’ in ‘making a revolution without having a revolution’. Again their words, not mine, as you shall see herein.
If in the end you are cool with having yourself and your children be taught revisionist history that bears no resemblance to the actual facts and truth as they occurred, then that will be your choice and you can drink that tea if you want. If you don’t care that what we once had entrusted to us has been stolen from us in a deceitful manner that is your choice also. My purpose in writing this book is that you should know what actually has happened. What happened was back behind the curtain to most Americans because of revisionist history and compliant journalism.
I have written strong words to begin with. You will see why as you read. Reserve your full opinion on the actions of the LSPers and on this book until you have fully finished it. Especially reserve any anger that might start to arise as you read. What is contained herein is simply facts, not my facts, not LSP facts, simply historical facts.
Whether it is LSP advances taken as a whole or each of the vehicle issues that liberal socialists have used to advance their agenda, their methods and hopes are the same: what ever they call themselves at the moment: Get the advance by any means necessary, then proclaim its legitimacy later.
Charles N. Clark holds an undergraduate degree (BA) in Liberal Arts from Langston University (1994) and a MA degree from the University of Oklahoma in Public Administration (with honors standing, 1996).He is a 1978 graduate of Rhema Bible Training Center in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. He is a former construction manager (for over twenty years in construction) and a former classroom teacher and coach.
He has been a public administrator in local government positions in Oklahoma and Missouri for over 15 years. He is married to his wife of 30 plus years and counting and has four children. He has been active in church, civic groups and boards for many years. He has always been active in and has dedicated his life to helping people. He is not a democrat or a republican, libertarian or independent, he is simply a Christian. He is not a liberal or a conservative. He seeks ‘the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.’
Charles N. Clark has written numerous books for the purpose of sharing his practical and pragmatic understanding of truth and self-help for any individual interested in fulfilling their responsibilities and in developing themselves into what nature and nature’s God intended.