Lobotomist: A Maverick Medical Genius and His Tragic Quest to Rid the World of Mental Illness / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $2.20
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 93%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (26) from $2.20   
  • New (8) from $10.96   
  • Used (18) from $2.20   


Dr. Walter J. Freeman ranks as one of the most scorned physicians of the twentieth century, a man widely remembered as a loose cannon who worked beyond the boundaries of accepted medical practice to appease his own personal demons. The myths surrounding Freeman and the operation that made him famous—lobotomy—still persist today. Lobotomies turn people into human vegetables . . . Freeman lobotomized actress Frances Farmer . . . he carried a set of gold-plated ice picks . . . he lost his license to practice medicine . . . the list goes on.

Yet, many of the most important medical figures during Freeman's time lent their support to his work, effectively pulling lobotomy into the mainstream of medical practice. Many of Freeman's patients, some of them writing and speaking with astonishing clarity, observed how their lobotomies had changed them for the better. So how is it that both physicians and patients supported a procedure that today seems outrageous, even barbaric? And why did Freeman remain a forceful proponent of lobotomy even after most other physicians abandoned it in favor of newer forms of psychiatric treatment?

In The Lobotomist, Jack El-Hai examines these puzzling questions, taking a penetrating look into the life of a complex scientific genius who defies easy description. Drawing on the mountain of documents Freeman left in the wake of his half-century-long career—a treasure trove of books, articles, letters, journals, and memoirs—as well as interviews with Freeman's family, El-Hai presents a controversial view of this physician as a brilliant but flawed figure who, along with his partner, neurosurgeon James Watts, tried to rescue people once deemed incurable from permanent institutionalization.

Following Freeman during his childhood, his college years, and his growing fascination with the brain, El-Hai explores how the doctor became a rising star in neurology. He traces Freeman's wild journey as he refined and promoted lobotomy, which placed him in the middle of the long-running conflict between the biological and behavioral camps of psychiatry. El-Hai also provides a fascinating look at the evolution of psychiatric medicine through the eras of shock therapy, psychoanalysis, and pharmaceuticals. He reveals how Freeman's shadow looms over a new generation of physicians who practice today's psychiatric surgery—with better technology, a better understanding of the brain, and better ethical guidelines.

Intriguing, provoking, and at times unsettling, The Lobotomist is a unique take on the legacy of Dr. Freeman and his work, presenting a side of the story many have yet to hear.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
"Written with such clarity and engaging detail that a reader has difficulty in putting it down." (The New York Review of Books, August 11, 2005)

“Jack El-Hai has written an absorbing, unsettling and cautionary story of the man who sold the lowly ice pick as the surgical solution to the mental illness of tens of thousands of people…. The author, a respected science journalist, started his research assuming that Freeman was akin to Josef Mengele. He ends this book with a nuanced, haunted view of his subject… With The Lobotomist, El-Hai gives his readers a first-class biography and, without saying so, a tutorial in the sober need for professional humility.” (Karen R. Long, Cleveland Plain Dealer)

“One of the many virtues of El-Hai's text is the rich detail he provides about Freeman's life and ideas. His readers will thus be able to judge Walter Freeman for themselves and decide whether he is, as El-Hai would have it, "a maverick medical genius" or, as others have concluded, a moral monster.” (Andrew Scull, The Los Angeles Times, April 24, 2005)

“Parts of The Lobotomist can best be read curled in a fetal position, but the reader would be well-advised to make the effort to wade through the relievedly short gruesome passages. That’s because Walter Jackson Freeman is a man worth getting to know, a classic American archetype of genius whose one crucial idea is wielded over and over again.” (Sam Stowe, California Literary Review , April 3, 2005)

“For anyone interested in the science of mind and body, The Lobotomist is surely a reading must.” (Louis C. Martin, Science and Theology News)

“a lively biography of a much maligned and misunderstood practitioner…” (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, August 2005)

“…a well researched account of psychosurgery in the mid 20th century…” (The Guardian, June 11, 2005)

“…fascinating book…an important and disturbing contribution to the history of psychiatry…” (New Statesman, June 17, 2005)

“…meticulously researched account…” (British Medical Journal, 28 May 2005)

According to freelance journalist El-Hai, Walter Freeman (1895-1972) was "the most scorned physician of the twentieth century" except for Nazi Joseph Mengele. In this first biography, he deftly chronicles the rise and fall of Freeman and the procedure he championed. Nearly 70 years ago, Freeman began refining lobotomy, in which a sharp instrument is inserted under the patient's eyelid and into the frontal lobes of the brain; this resulted in nerve damage that seemed to offer remarkable cures in many psychiatric patients. Over time, the operation became widely adopted by the medical community and supported by mental health professionals, families, and many patients themselves. Yet there were always dissenters who attacked lobotomy as useless, cruel, or indeed criminal. Freeman, in turn, spent his entire career performing, promoting, and justifying the operation-even after the development of drugs like chlorpormazine that offered the promise of "chemical" lobotomies. By the time of his death, lobotomy had been gone for more than a decade.  A worthy purchase for any library, especially for medical and large public libraries. —A.J. Wright, Univ. of Alabama Lib., Birmingham (Library Journal, January 15, 2005)

"In The Lobotomist, Jack El-Hai's lively biography, Freeman comes across as a classic American type, a do-gooder and a go-getter with a bit of the huckster thrown in." —William Grimes, The New York Times

"Driven, egotistical, brilliant, and focused, Freeman is as fascinating as the chronicle of twentieth-century psychiatry in which El-Hai sets his story." —Donna Chavez, Booklist

"There are more curious characters than Freeman in the annals of medical history, but few are so curiously American."—Verlyn Klinkenborg, Discover Magazine

"In this first biography, El-Hai deftly chronicles the rise and fall of Freeman and the procedure he championed." —Library Journal

"Good biographers must keep an open mind, to avoid stereotyping and reductionism. Fortunately, El-Hai turns out to be a good biographer."—Steve Weinberg, The Philadelphia Inquirer

Library Journal
According to freelance journalist El-Hai, Walter Freeman (1895-1972) was "the most scorned physician of the twentieth century" except for Nazi Joseph Mengele. In this first biography, he deftly chronicles the rise and fall of Freeman and the procedure he championed. Nearly 70 years ago, Freeman began refining lobotomy, in which a sharp instrument is inserted under the patient's eyelid and into the frontal lobes of the brain; this resulted in nerve damage that seemed to offer remarkable cures in many psychiatric patients. Over time, the operation became widely adopted by the medical community and supported by mental health professionals, families, and many patients themselves. Yet there were always dissenters who attacked lobotomy as useless, cruel, or indeed criminal. Freeman, in turn, spent his entire career performing, promoting, and justifying the operation-even after the development of drugs like chlorpormazine that offered the promise of "chemical" lobotomies. By the time of his death, lobotomy had been gone for more than a decade. A worthy purchase for any library, especially for medical and large public libraries.-A.J. Wright, Univ. of Alabama Lib., Birmingham Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780471232926
  • Publisher: Wiley
  • Publication date: 1/14/2005
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 368
  • Sales rank: 864,554
  • Product dimensions: 6.14 (w) x 9.21 (h) x 0.88 (d)

Meet the Author

JACK EL-HAI is the Executive Vice President of the American Society of Journalists and Authors and a winner of the June Roth Memorial Award for Medical Journalism. A contributor to the Atlantic Monthly, the Washington Post Magazine, American Heritage, and numerous other publications, he lives in Minneapolis with his wife and two daughters.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


1. September 1936.

2. Rittenhouse Square.

3. The Education of a Lobotomist.

4. In the Hospital Wards.

5. A Perfect Partner.

6 Refining Lobotomy.

7. The Lines of Battle.

8. Advance and Retreat.

9. Waterfall.

10. Fame.

11. Road Warrior.

12. Leaving Home.

13. Decline.

14. Ghost.





Read More Show Less

First Chapter

The Lobotomist

By Jack El-Hai

John Wiley & Sons

ISBN: 0-471-23292-0

Chapter One

September 1936

The unconscious patient was wheeled from an operating room at the George Washington University Hospital in Washington, D.C., to her bed. Nurses elevated her head to reduce bleeding in her brain. They monitored her temperature, blood pressure, and pulse; they noted that the patient had vomited after surgery and could not control her bladder.

Walter Jackson Freeman, a neurologist and a psychiatrist, stood by her at a critically important moment in his career. He leaned over the patient and began a neurological examination. The patient's pupils were responsive and of equal size. Her face showed no asymmetry or other signs of paralysis. Her knee reflex was normal, and she curled her toes inward when Freeman stroked the soles of her feet. So far, the patient appeared to be doing well.

Four hours later, her anesthesia wore off. Alice Hood Hammatt, sixty-three years old, opened her eyes and focused on Freeman. He was then forty, slightly over six feet tall, solidly built, with a receding hairline and a trim goatee that some of his psychiatric patients enjoyed pulling-and Freeman liked having it pulled. His eyeglasses were scratched from frequent contact with the eyepieces of microscopes. Hammatt offered her hand to him in greeting.

Freeman, speaking in a resonant and slightly nasal voice, asked Hammatt how she felt. Her expression placid, she replied that she felt much better. Sheappeared better, Freeman thought. That evening, Hammatt was able to name her husband, describe his line of work, recite her address, and identify objects in the room.

Freeman returned to Hammatt's bedside the next day and found her alert and sitting up. Again, she greeted him by offering her hand. Curious about her emotional state, he asked if she still felt her old fears. No, she replied. Was she sad or happy? Happy, she declared. Did she remember what exactly had caused her such anxiety in the past? "I seem to have forgotten," she said. "It doesn't seem important now." As she spoke, she "continually rolled a paper handkerchief about in her hands, rubbing it about her face and arms as though drying herself," Freeman observed.

Over several days, Freeman watched Hammatt steadily grow more alert and active. She read magazines and could discuss what she had read. Her appetite was good, and she slept well. Most strikingly, she suffered from little anxiety. This, Freeman believed, represented a substantial improvement over her previous condition. Weeks earlier, Hammatt had come to Freeman's examining room to seek help for insomnia, anxiety, and debilitating depression. Emotional problems and nervous breakdowns had plagued her for most of her life. Freeman diagnosed her with agitated depression and checked her into George Washington University Hospital for observation. Her condition deteriorated. She "showed uncontrollable apprehension, was unable to sleep, laughed and wept hysterically," Freeman noted. Under other circumstances, permanent institutionalization in a mental hospital would have been Alice Hammatt's fate. As a patient of Walter Freeman in September 1936, however, she could choose one other course of treatment.

Now the treatment was over. During his visits to Hammatt's bedside, Freeman closely watched her recovery. She did not care about the shaved areas of her scalp and even showed off her bare patches, when previously the thought of having her hair shorn for surgery drove her to distress. The appearance of her anesthetist, which had made her cry out in fear a few days earlier, produced no apprehension now. When her husband entered her hospital room, Hammatt welcomed him with calmness; when he left, she did not panic.

These responses were exactly what her doctors had hoped to see. Freeman and his partner in Hammatt's treatment, neurosurgeon James Winston Watts, "were congratulating ourselves upon a brilliant result," Freeman declared. What they had just accomplished was the first attempt in American medical history to treat a psychiatric disorder by means of surgery on the frontal lobes of the brain. At their hands, Alice Hammatt had received the first lobotomy in the United States.

In Freeman's eyes, Hammatt's case history had made her an ideal candidate for the experimental procedure. A native of Emporia, Kansas, she was the youngest daughter of pioneer settlers of that state. Her parents spoiled her, and she learned to make her needs known by crying and throwing tantrums. Anxiety and depression left her incapacitated with stomach ulcers and emotional breakdowns.

In her mid-twenties, she married Theodore Dudley Hammatt, an even-keeled and patient man who worked in the Kansas State Department of Agriculture. Her first pregnancy was a nightmare of depression, agitation, and suicidal feelings. The child died at age two, but her next two pregnancies were more bearable, and the children survived. In time, the Hammatts moved to Washington, where her husband accepted a position in the Grain Futures Administration of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hammatt's emotional troubles grew worse. A perfectionist as a housekeeper, she distressed her husband and children with her fussiness. The murder-suicide of her sister- and brother-in-law in 1933 added to her stress. She developed a crush on another man, told her husband about it, and became miserable from revealing the infatuation to him. Sometimes she would grimace at herself before a mirror, urinate on the floor, and, standing nude at the windows, expose herself to the neighborhood. In addition, she was a "master at bitching and really led her husband a dog's life," Freeman noted. "She worried if he was a few minutes late in coming from the office and raised the roof when things did not suit her. She was a typical insecure, rigid, emotional, claustrophrenic individual throughout her mature existence." Freeman also found her to be vain, afraid of growing old, and overly concerned about her thinning hair. Alice Hammatt would soon show him how protective of her hair she could be.

For ten years, Hammatt had regularly used strong bromide sedatives to help her sleep. But her insomnia had worsened in 1935 after she and her husband lost their way while driving around New York City. Immediately afterward, "she was highly keyed up and unable to sleep and she had been troubled with sleeping ever since," Freeman noted. Hammatt continued to entertain thoughts of suicide.

In his initial examination of Hammatt, Freeman judged her "rather thin and flabby" but appearing younger than her actual age. She seemed scared and anxious; she wrung her hands and thrashed her limbs during the exam. In a loud and high-pitched voice, she demanded that Freeman explain the purpose of his questions about her general health. After registering her in the hospital for observation, Freeman reexamined a medical journal article written several months before by a physician in Portugal. The Portuguese doctor, Egas Moniz, described a new treatment he had used on psychiatric patients-and many of those patients had shown symptoms of agitated depression similar to Hammatt's.

The previous year, Moniz and Almeida Lima, a neurosurgeon, had started a series of operations on mentally ill patients in Lisbon. The procedure, which Moniz called leucotomy, involved cutting the neural connections in the prefrontal regions of the brain. Moniz hypothesized that in severing these connections, he was disrupting detrimental emotional responses that had grown habitual in the patients during the course of their disease. Leucotomy, he speculated, forced their brains to develop new neural pathways and more beneficial emotional responses. Freeman, who had read Moniz's descriptions of the procedure in medical journals and corresponded with him, believed that the validity of Moniz's hypothesis "hardly seems to matter since this procedure is reported by Moniz to have cured five out of six patients with agitated depression and to have relieved the sixth to some degree." The results, not the theory, were what counted. Freeman knew that patients with agitated depression-those with the same diagnosis as Alice Hammatt-had in Moniz's account responded better to leucotomy than had patients with other diagnoses.

Since the spring of 1936, when Moniz began publishing his results, Freeman and Watts had been preparing themselves to perform the first leucotomy in the United States. From Paris they had ordered several leucotomes, the surgical tool that Moniz and Lima had used to perform their operations. They had acquired preserved brains from the bodies of cadavers and used the leucotomes to practice cutting the nerve fibers of the prefrontal lobes. Finally, with the appearance of Alice Hammatt, they had a suitable candidate for the surgery. They asked Hammatt and her husband for their consent.

Before making a decision, the Hammatts sought an opinion from their son-in-law, Archibald J. Brier, a physician in Topeka. He, in turn, asked for advice from Karl A. Menninger, soon to become the most famous psychiatrist in the United States. Freeman had known Menninger-as well as his father and brother, psychiatrists who both practiced at the Menninger Clinic in Topeka-for years. "Of course," Menninger later wrote to Freeman, "I was glad to tell him how well we knew you and how highly we regarded you."

With this stamp of approval, the Hammatts agreed to proceed. On the evening before surgery, Alice Hammatt received a preparatory enema. At the last minute, however, she abruptly withdrew her consent to be operated on. It was her hair. She wanted to keep it and balked at having her scalp shaved. "We got around her objection by promising to spare the curls if we could," Freeman wrote. He knew that sparing her hair would be impossible. The next morning, September 14, an anesthetist arrived to give her a dose of Avertin, a common anesthetic that produced unconsciousness. Her anxiety spiked once again. "Who is that man?" she cried. "What does he want here? What's he going to do to me? Tell him to go away." She struggled in bed so wildly, Freeman reported, that the staff "was scarcely able to control her sufficiently to administer the Avertin by rectum." The anesthetist bolstered the Avertin with a dosage of nitrous oxide gas. Then her head was shaved back to the ears.

Meanwhile, Freeman and Watts grappled with the significance of the step they were about to take. "I realized when I did the first operation that I was taking a big risk," Watts recalled. "In other words, ... I'd been considered by people to be conservative. I knew as soon as I operated on a mental patient and cut into a physically normal brain, I'd be considered radical by some people." But a radical image appealed to his partner. The grandson of a famous surgical innovator, Freeman rushed toward controversy with the enthusiasm of a man determined to make his name as the slayer of a millennia-old scourge to humanity.

Freeman and Watts went to work on Hammatt. Behind their surgical masks, they made an unusual pair: Freeman, whose intent movements and unflagging energy revealed his determination to break new ground in medicine, and Watts, a baby-faced and laconic surgeon whose conservative orientation made him cautious of undertaking a radical operation. Taking turns performing the surgical duties, they closely followed the procedure that Moniz had described. They first cleaned the scalp. Using gentian violet, they daubed the scalp to show the location of the two holes they would cut in the skull. They made incisions 3 centimeters in length into the violet markings, stopped the bleeding with mastoid self-retaining retractors, and, using an auger, made holes in the skull over the left and right frontal lobes. They then inserted a leucotome 4 centimeters straight down through the hole on the left side into the exposed surface of the brain. The tissue had the consistency of warm butter. Pressing a stylet at the top of the instrument caused a wire loop to protrude from the other end. They rotated the loop a full circle and cut a round core of white neural fibers. Next they withdrew the loop back into the leucotome, pulled out the instrument a single centimeter, and cut another core. A third core was scooped at a depth of 2 centimeters.

After removing the leucotome from the brain, they reinserted it into the same hole but at a different angle and cut three more cores. They withdrew the leucotome and inserted the instrument into the hole over the right hemisphere, cutting three more cores, followed by another three at a different angle. The last cut, however, sliced a blood vessel that had been caught in the loop. A hose sucked away the surging blood as they untangled the vessel from the leucotome. After a total of twelve cores had been made, the operation was over. The patient's vital signs showed no indication of distress. The doctors washed the incisions with saline solution, used black silk sutures to seal them up, and bandaged the site. The operation had lasted about an hour.

Freeman felt confident in his diagnosis and selection of Hammatt as the first leucotomy patient. He had faith in their mastery of the technical aspects of the surgery and, most of all, in the outcome. As she lay in bed postsurgery, Alice Hammatt was calm, not obviously impaired mentally, and recovering rapidly. Word got back to Menninger in Topeka that "visitors have found her much improved immediately following the operation." He asked Freeman to fill him in on the details of this new treatment.

Six days after the operation, however, Freeman received an unpleasant jolt when Hammatt suddenly became disoriented and excited, and began stuttering. Although she seemed to understand what others said, words came to her with difficulty. Freeman's examinations showed "symptoms indicative of frontal lobe deficit but no paralysis or disturbance of sensibility." A few days later she was able to page through magazines and draw pictures-she misspelled words in her labels of her drawings-"but she cannot yet write legibly or carry on a conversation." Freeman was concerned that Hammatt seemed "almost too placid," and she resumed the odd "rubbing and rolling movements" she had shown soon after the surgery.

Freeman speculated that swelling or hemorrhage in the areas of the severed fibers were responsible for this setback, and with relief he noted that Hammatt gradually returned to normal with the passage of several more days. He believed it was too soon to determine whether she would show any permanent changes in her personality or brain function, "but the agitation and depression that the patient evinced previous to her operation are relieved," he declared. A quarter-century later, Alice Hammatt's operation still shone brightly in his memory. "The result was spectacular," he wrote.

She soon could speak normally and walk without difficulty. She said she looked forward to leaving the hospital.


Excerpted from The Lobotomist by Jack El-Hai Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4.5
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 17, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)