- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Ships from: Stroud, Glos, United Kingdom
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
This book studies the functions of Islamic courts within the framework of the late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century Ottoman provincial administration, and explores the processes of adjudication and dispute resolution through a detailed juxtaposition of court records from two Anatolian towns, ÇankÄ±rÄ± and Kastamonu.
In particular, it identifies the socio-economic backgrounds of the court clients, the kinds of issues that they brought to the courts, their strategies of litigation, and how disputes were resolved in the courts. This book also sheds light on the costs of court usage and reveals alternative sites for dispute resolution that existed independently of the courts.
This study is particularly useful for the students of legal anthropology as it pays a special attention to the practice of law and the process of dispute resolution.
|List of Tables|
|List of Figures|
|List of Maps|
|Ch. 2||Two-Sub-Provinces, Two Towns, Two Courts||9|
|Ch. 3||A Comparative Analysis of the Operations of Cankiri and Kastamonu Courts||32|
|Ch. 4||Litigants, Litigations, and Resolutions: A Statistical Analysis||57|
|Ch. 5||Costs of Court Usage||76|
|Ch. 6||The Court Process I: Alternative Approaches to Kadiship, Court, and Legal "Corruption"||99|
|Ch. 7||Intermission: Sicil as Text||125|
|Ch. 8||The Court Process II: Strategies of Litigation||142|
|Ch. 9||Alternative Sites for Dispute Resolution||170|
|Ch. 10||In Place of a Conclusion: Models and Taxonomies||189|
|App||Where Did the Court Clients Come from and Why?||213|