The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion

Overview

There is arguably no more critical and pressing topic than the relation of science and religion in the modern world. Science has given us the methods for discovering truth, while religion remains the single greatest force for generating meaning. Yet the two are seen as mutually exclusive, with wrenching consequences for humanity. In The Marriage of Sense and Soul, one of today's most important philosophers brilliantly articulates how we might begin to think about science and religion in ways that allow for their ...

See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$13.15
BN.com price
(Save 17%)$15.99 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (69) from $1.99   
  • New (6) from $4.25   
  • Used (63) from $1.99   
Sending request ...

Overview

There is arguably no more critical and pressing topic than the relation of science and religion in the modern world. Science has given us the methods for discovering truth, while religion remains the single greatest force for generating meaning. Yet the two are seen as mutually exclusive, with wrenching consequences for humanity. In The Marriage of Sense and Soul, one of today's most important philosophers brilliantly articulates how we might begin to think about science and religion in ways that allow for their reconciliation and union, on terms that will be acceptable to both camps.
        Ken Wilber is widely acclaimed as the foremost thinker in integrating Western psychology and the Eastern spiritual traditions. His many books have reached across disciplines and synthesized the teachings of religion, psychology, physics, mysticism, sociology, and anthropology, earning him a devoted international following. The Marriage of Sense and Soul is his most accessible work yet, aimed at guiding a general audience to the mutual accord between the spiritual, subjective world of ancient wisdom and the objective, empirical world of modern knowledge.
        Wilber clearly and succinctly explores the schism between science and religion, and the impact of this "philosophical Cold War" on the fate of humanity. He systematically reviews previous attempts at integration, explaining why romantic, idealistic, and postmodern theories failed. And he demonstrates how science is compatible with certain deep features common to all of the world's major religious traditions. In pointing the way to a union between truth and meaning, Ken Wilber has created an elegant and accessible book that is breathtaking in its scope.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
The Barnes & Noble Review
April 1998

Ken Wilber is the author of more than a dozen books and is considered by many to be one of the most important philosophers of our time. In his latest book, The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion, Wilber writes about a critical dilemma of our day — the battle between the warring camps of religion and science. Science has given us methods for discovering truth, while religion remains the single greatest force for generating meaning.

Wilber addresses the ultimate millennial questions: How, in a postmodern era that acknowledges the failure of science to answer questions about the meaning of life, can we reconcile the answers offered by premodern religions that billions of people continue to practice today? Is mutual accord possible between the subjective spiritual world and the objective scientific world? Indeed it is, according to Wilber.

The author traces the development of Western ideology from a time when the spirit and soul were not considered at odds with empirical data. This is generally considered to have changed during the 18th-century Enlightenment, when religious and scientific thought became antagonistic toward each other. Western civilization's development thereafter consisted of a materialistic science, based solely on hard data, which left no room for spirituality.

The Marriage of Sense and Soul explores the schism between science and religion and the impact the rupture will have on the fate of humanity. Wilber reviews failed attempts at integration and suggests a path for the marriageofancient religious wisdom and modern knowledge as it is manifested in science.

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Ever since the Copernican revolution, the battle lines between science and religion have been drawn. In succeeding generations, science and religion have been depicted as two cultural juggernauts slugging it out to establish their ideas as the dominant worldview. In his new book, Wilber A Brief History of Everything contends that attempts to reconcile science sense and religion soul have failed because scholars have not taken into account the fundamental differences between the two. Science, he argues, is a product of modernity characterized by differentiationa spiritless materialism. Religion, on the other hand, is a product of a premodern worldview less enamored of a portrait of reality viewed as so much soulless matter and characterized by an emphasis on humanity's connection to a spiritual dimension. Using A.O. Lovejoy's idea of the Great Chain of Being, Wilber fashions what he calls "the Great Nest of Being" in which soul, body, matter, mind and spirit intersect and coalesce. Imitating Plato's scheme of realms of truth, knowledge and reality, Wilber divides his Great Nest into four quadrants, each of which has a subjective, objective, intersubjective and interobjective dimension. Wilber contends that this scheme of unity-in-diversity provides the key to integrating science and religion. As ambitious as it is, Wilber's study is filled with simplistic generalizations "Modern science and premodern religion aggressively inhabit the same globe, each vying, in its own way, for world domination" and mushy quasi-romantic pronouncements "Art is the Beauty of Spirit/ Art is in the eye of the beholder, in the I of the beholder: Art is the I of the Spirit.". Moreover, in order to marry sense and soul, Wilber does violence to science by representing it in terms of spirit rather than on its own terms. Wilber's attempt to integrate science and religion is far surpassed by physicist Ian Barbour's trenchant Religion and Science. Apr.
Library Journal
This book is an intriguing attempt at finding common foundations or agreements between scientific and religious world views. Wilber The Eye of Spirit, LJ 2/15/97 relies heavily on traditional philosophers to support his argument for multiple layers of knowing and the potential of empirical science to accept it. At the same time, he suggests that the religious world needs to be open to new ways of spiritual knowledge and validation. Wilber is writing for a popular audience, and his easy-to-read work will likely be compared to Paul Davies's The Mind of God S. & S., 1992 and Connie Barlow's Green Space, Green Time LJ 11/1/97. While he has not given us the ultimate answer to the division between science and religion, his book is worth reading. For large public and academic libraries.Eric D. Albright, Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. Lib., Durham, N.C.
Huston Smith
No one has done as much as Ken Wilber to open Western psychology to the insights of the world's wisdom traditions. -- Huston Smith, The New York Times Book Review
Deepak Chopra
"Ken Wilber is one of the most important pioneers in the field of consciousness in this century. I regard him as a mentor. He is a source of inspiration and insight to all of us. Read everything he writes. It will change your life." --Deepak Chopra
Kirkus Reviews
Yet another unsuccessful attempt to integrate all of science and all of religion in one Grand Unified Theory. Wilber has attempted before to wed the warring camps of science and religion (A Brief History of Everything; not reviewed; Up From Eden: A Transpersonal View of Human Evolution, 1981; etc.). Here he claims that science is one of the "major differentiations of modernity" that have shattered a previously unified worldview in which all disciplines worked together in the same search for meaning. Today, he says, truth and meaning are distinct; science can provide the former, but religion is necessary to confer the latter. Wilber writes that we need to "integrate the Great Chain [of being] with the major differentiations of modernity," including science. Fair enough, but he never really explains how this is supposed to occur. Blithely brushing aside centuries-old epistemological dilemmas about how we can know the world, Wilber claims that the empirical methods of science can be applied to mental and spiritual experience. The words þexperience,þ þknowledge,þ and þempiricalþ seem to be equated in Wilberþs loose arguments. As for religion, he considers it in terms of þfunction,þ devoid of specific contents, such as the belief that the Red Sea parted for the Israelites or in the virgin birth of Jesus. He never truly defines what he means by religion, which he inexplicably, continually refers to as "premodern." So, too, scientists may quibble with Wilber's vague generalizations about "the scientific method." What kind of science? What types of religion? Wilber's lack of specificity makes this book an exercise in theoretical, purelyacademic navel-gazing. This fusion of science and religion fails to take either discipline seriously as multifaceted, complex sets of meaning. (Author tour)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780767903431
  • Publisher: Potter/TenSpeed/Harmony
  • Publication date: 4/28/1999
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 240
  • Sales rank: 414,445
  • Product dimensions: 5.26 (w) x 7.98 (h) x 0.52 (d)

Meet the Author

Ken Wilber's first book, The Spectrum of Con-sciousness, written when he was only twenty-three, was hailed as "the most sensible, comprehensive book about consciousness since William James.  He is the author of more than a dozen books, including Grace and Grit; Sex, Ecology, Spirituality; A Brief History of Everything; and The Eye of Spirit; and his large readership has kept all of his books in print. He lives in Boulder, Colorado.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Challenge of Our Times: The Integration of Science and Religion

There is arguably no more important and pressing topic than the relation of science and religion in the modern world. Science is clearly one of the most profound methods that humans have yet devised for discovering truth, while religion remains the single greatest force for generating meaning. Truth and meaning, science and religion; but we still cannot figure out how to get the two of them together in a fashion that both find acceptable.

The reconciliation of science and religion is not merely a passing academic curiosity. These two enormous forces -- truth and meaning -- are at war in today's world. Modern science and premodern religion aggressively inhabit the same globe, each vying, in its own way, for world domination. And something, sooner or later, has to give.

Science and technology have created a global and transnational framework of industrial, economic, medical, scientific, and informational systems. Yet however beneficial those systems may be, they are all, in themselves, devoid of meaning and value. As its own proponents constantly point out, science tells us what is, not what should be. Science tells us about electrons, atoms, molecules, galaxies, digital data bits, network systems: it tells us what a thing is, not whether it is good or bad, or what it should be or could be or ought to be. Thus this enormous global scientific infrastructure is, in itself, a valueless skeleton, however functionally efficient it might be.

Into this colossal value vacuum, religion has happily rushed. Science has created this extraordinary worldwide and global framework -- itself utterly devoid of meaning -- but within that ubiquitous framework, subglobal pockets of premodern religions have created value and meaning for billions of people in every part of the world. And these same premodern religions often deny validity to the scientific framework within which they live, a framework that provides most of their medicine, economics, banking, information networks, transportation, and communications. Within the scientific skeleton of truth, religious meaning attempts to flourish, often by denying the scientific framework itself -- rather like sawing off the branch on which you cheerily perch.

The disgust is mutual, because modern science gleefully denies virtually all of the basic tenets of religion in general. According to the typical view of modern science, religion is not much more than a holdover from the childhood of humanity, with about as much reality as, say, Santa Claus. Whether the religious claims are more literal (Moses parted the Red Sea) or more mystical (religion involves direct spiritual experience), modern science denies them all, simply because there is no credible empirical evidence for any of them.

So here is the utterly bizarre structure of today's world: a scientific framework that is global in its reach and omnipresent in its information and communication networks, forms a meaningless skeleton within which hundreds of subglobal, premodern religions create value and meaning for billions; and they each -- science and religion each -- tends to deny significance, even reality, to the other. This is a massive and violent schism and rupture in the internal organs of today's global culture, and this is exactly why many social analysts believe that if some sort of reconciliation between science and religion is not forthcoming, the future of humanity is, at best, precarious.

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "RELIGION"?

The aim of this book is to suggest how we might begin to think about both science and religion in ways that allow their reconciliation and eventual integration, on terms acceptable to both parties.

Of course, this reconciliation of science and religion depends, in part, on exactly what we mean by "science" and "religion." We will actually devote several chapters to just this topic (Chapters 11, 12, and 13). In the meantime, a few crucial points should be noted.

Defining "religion" is itself an almost impossible task, largely because there are so many different forms of the beast that it becomes hard to spot what, if anything, they have in common. But one thing is immediately obvious: many of the specific and central claims of the world's great religions contradict each other, but if we cannot find a common core of the world's great religions, then we will never find an integration of science and religion.

Indeed, if we cannot find a common core that is generally acceptable to most religions, we would be forced to choose one religion and deny importance to the others; or we would have to "pick and choose" tenets from among various religions, thus alienating the great religious traditions themselves. We would never arrive at an integration of science and religion that both parties would find acceptable, because most religions would reject what was done to their beliefs in order to force this "reconciliation."

It will do no good, for example, to claim, as many Christian creationists have, that the Big Bang suggests that the world is the product of a personal creator God, when one of the most profound and influential religions in the world, Buddhism, does not believe in a personal God to begin with. Thus, we cannot use the Big Bang in order to "integrate" science and religion unless we can first find a way to reconcile Christianity and Buddhism (and the world's wisdom traditions in general). Otherwise, we are not integrating science and religion; we are simply "integrating" one narrow version of Christianity with one version of science. This is not worthy of the term "integration," and it is certainly not an integration that other religions would find acceptable.

Thus, those who wish to advocate one particular form of religion -- whether it be a patriarchal God the Father, a matriarchal Great Goddess, a fundamentalist Christianity, a mythological Shintoism, a Gaia ecoreligion, a fundamentalist Islam -- have often taken various modern developments in science and attempted to show that these developments just happen to fit with a (very generous) interpretation of their particular religion. This will not be our approach. Because the fact is, unless science can be shown to be compatible with certain deep features common to all of the world's major wisdom traditions, the long-sought reconciliation will remain as elusive as ever.

So before we can even attempt to integrate science and religion, we need to see if we can find a common core of the world's great wisdom traditions. This common core would have to be a general frame that, shorn of specific details and concrete contents, would nonetheless be acceptable to most religious traditions, at least in the abstract. Is there such a common core?

The answer, it appears, is yes.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

A Note to the Reader
Pt. I The Problem 1
1 The Challenge of Our Times: Integrating Science and Religion 3
2 A Deadly Dance: The Relation of Science and Religion in Today's World 15
3 Paradigms: A Wrong Turn 26
4 Modernity: Dignity and Disaster 41
5 The Four Corners of the Known Universe 59
Pt. II Previous Attempts at Integration 77
6 The Reenchantment of the World 79
7 Romanticism: Return of the Origin 90
8 Idealism: The God That Is to Come 102
9 Postmodernism: To Deconstruct the World 116
Pt. III A Reconciliation 137
10 The Within: A View of the Deep 139
11 What Is Science? 150
12 What Is Religion? 162
13 The Stunning Display of Spirit 175
Pt. IV The Path Ahead 185
14 The Great Holarchy in the Postmodern World 187
15 The Integral Agenda 202
Further Reading 215
Index 217
Read More Show Less

Interviews & Essays

Before the live bn.com chat, Ken Wilber agreed to answer some of our questions.

Q:  In The Marriage of Sense and Soul you trace the varying relationship between science and religion through numerous previous attempts at integrating the two. As we approach the millennium, do you foresee some sort of fusion between the two?

A:  If you think about it, the real war that is going on in the world is not between various nations, tribes, companies, or states. There is a more basic war that cuts across all of those, and it is a war between science and religion. Most "hard-core" scientists distrust or even despise religion because its myths and dogmas are not open to scientific proof, and many religionists think that science ignores and thus brutalizes the soul. Humanity is being torn in half by this most basic of conflicts. So when you ask whether I foresee some sort of fusion or union of science and religion, all I can say is: There better be, yes? Surely there are profound and important truths that each of these noble endeavors, science and religion, can bring to the marriage. That, anyway, is the theme of the book.

Q:  You contend that science and religion must coexist in order for us to live truly integrated lives. Do you see the Internet factoring into this coexistence?

A:  Anything that helps increase communication can help integrate science and religion, and that would certainly include the Internet. But let's remember that all technological communication systems are still variations on "in garbage, out garbage." We can have global stupidity as well as global wisdom. There is nothing magic about "global." What is magic is what you and I bring to the Internet -- our insight, intelligence, wisdom, courage. Otherwise the Internet just acts to spread the crap more rapidly.

Q:  We're curious to get your opinion on the recent popular trend of people searching for spiritual life in cyberspace.

A:  There are an enormous number of endeavors that call themselves "spiritual" or "religious." And one of the first things that you have to do in this field is try to develop some standards as to which spiritual aspirations are genuine and which are warped, loopy, whacked, or whatnot. You can have good and bad science, good and bad art, good and bad anything, and spirituality is no different. Searching for Zen on the Internet is one thing; searching for Heaven's Gate and subsequently committing suicide so as to hitch a ride on a comet -- that's quite different. So again, the Internet helps with quantity, global reach, and massively increased access. But what we access -- wisdom or crap -- that is still up to us as conscious, deciding, willing human beings. So I think it's great that the Internet increases access. It does not, however, increase wisdom -- that is up to you and me. So surf the net for God all you want -- that's terrific! -- but it is still you who will have to decide whether what you are getting is Buddha or bullshit.

Q:  How do you enjoy living in Boulder, Colorado?

A:  Boulder is nice. It's a great place to work, because it's quiet, with few distractions. On balance, though, I'd probably rather be in a large city -- say, the Bay Area or Manhattan, Boston, places like that. But I have no complaints. Boulder is ideal for the work I do, which is writing, writing, writing.

Q:  Have you read anything lately that you would highly recommend?

A:  I think you have an upcoming chat with Robert Thurman. His book Inner Revolution is wonderful. And you might check out Lama Surya Das's Awakening the Buddha Within. Both are excellent guides to genuine spiritual realization.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 8, 2003

    Most Accessible Wilber book!

    Although Wilber is one of the most advanced thinkers of our time, most of his books are so diffucult to understand perhaps because it is too advanced for most of us. With this book, Wilber takes common knowledge and introduces his ideas in relation to these things by using something very similar to a scaffolding technique. I thought this was very effective and allows many more of us to thoroughly appreciate his theory. Although I think Toru Sato's theory takes it one step further in the exceptional book called 'The Ever-Transcending Spirit' he uses the same type of technique to deliver his message. I think this is an excellent way to present advanced material like this to a general audience. If you are interested in developing a good understanding of Wilber's theory, this may be the right book for you. If you want to understand more, read 'The Ever-Transcending Spirit' by Toru Sato.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)