Hinsch's new book, Masculinities in Chinese History, is...written in a straightforward, accessible style. It seems intended for undergraduate teaching and will probably be most useful in that context. . . .Hinsch...[is] to be congratulated for [his] useful contributions to the rapidly growing body of scholarship on Chinese masculinities. . . .[His] book should be required reading for anyone interested in this field.
Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review
Hinsch's new book, Masculinities in Chinese History, is...written in a straightforward, accessible style. It seems intended for undergraduate teaching and will probably be most useful in that context.. . .Hinsch...[is] to be congratulated for [his] useful contributions to the rapidly growing body of scholarship on Chinese masculinities.. . .[His] book should be required reading for anyone interested in this field.
Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review
Historian Hinsch (Foguang Univ., Taiwan) chronicles changing ideals of manhood in China from the 11th century BCE to the present, viewing the evolution of Chinese masculinities as a continuous historical process sustained and characterized by men's relationships with familial ideologies, the state, economic conditions, and cultural others. Hinsch employs the concept 'hegemonic masculinity' to come to terms with masculine paragons invented by both mainstream society and marginal men. He argues that hegemonic masculine values in Chinese history were not fixed values or behaviors of certain groups of men, but rather discursive positions open for tapping by men of different social standings. Hinsch develops the bipartite model of wen (civil) and wu (martial) into a complex and mutable system encompassing educated and refined scholar-officials, the male honor culture encouraging vengeance and violence, and variants. The author draws on hagiographical and popular representations to document the development of manhood over the centuries. The nature of the sources restricts his analysis largely to Han Chinese visions. Comparable to Susan Mann's Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History (CH, Nov'12, 50-1627), Hinsch's book is indispensable for teaching gender and manhood in China. Summing Up: Essential. All levels/libraries.
While writing about China has grown exponentially in recent decades, scholarly discussions of Chinese men as gendered objects have only just begun. Bret Hinsch’s comprehensive history of Chinese masculinity is part of that beginning. It reveals how Chinese men thought and behaved from the distant past to current times, and it is an excellent introduction to anyone interested in understanding Chinese men and women. The book shows how some masculine values that are instantly recognizable in the West (such as honor) as well as some particularly Chinese ones (such as wen-wu) have persisted throughout the centuries. It is highly readable, and passages such as Chinese men’s obsession with flowers in the Song Dynasty will entertain and enlighten modern readers.
The first historical survey of changing Chinese male identities, covering the entire chronology from the Zhou dynasty to the present day.. .. It is an important and welcome contribution to a growing interest in Chinese masculinity studies. .. [and] fills a significant void in Chinese gender studies.. .. One cannot help but admire Hinsch’s finesse and the extraordinary knowledge he possesses to create this analysis of changing male attributes.. .. The strengths of this well-written and well-illustrated volume. .. make this rich study an excellent source for teaching and research on Chinese gender relations.
Women and Gender in Chinese Studies Review
Hinsch's new book, Masculinities in Chinese History, is...written in a straightforward, accessible style. It seems intended for undergraduate teaching and will probably be most useful in that context. . . .Hinsch...[is] to be congratulated for [his] useful contributions to the rapidly growing body of scholarship on Chinese masculinities. . . .[His] book should be required reading for anyone interested in this field.-- "Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review"
Historian Hinsch (Foguang Univ., Taiwan) chronicles changing ideals of manhood in China from the 11th century BCE to the present, viewing the evolution of Chinese masculinities as a continuous historical process sustained and characterized by men's relationships with familial ideologies, the state, economic conditions, and cultural others. Hinsch employs the concept 'hegemonic masculinity' to come to terms with masculine paragons invented by both mainstream society and marginal men. He argues that hegemonic masculine values in Chinese history were not fixed values or behaviors of certain groups of men, but rather discursive positions open for tapping by men of different social standings. Hinsch develops the bipartite model of wen (civil) and wu (martial) into a complex and mutable system encompassing educated and refined scholar-officials, the male honor culture encouraging vengeance and violence, and variants. The author draws on hagiographical and popular representations to document the development of manhood over the centuries. The nature of the sources restricts his analysis largely to Han Chinese visions. Comparable to Susan Mann's Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History (CH, Nov'12, 50-1627), Hinsch's book is indispensable for teaching gender and manhood in China. Summing Up: Essential. All levels/libraries.
Historian Hinsch (Foguang Univ., Taiwan) chronicles changing ideals of manhood in China from the 11th century BCE to the present, viewing the evolution of Chinese masculinities as a continuous historical process sustained and characterized by men's relationships with familial ideologies, the state, economic conditions, and cultural others. Hinsch employs the concept 'hegemonic masculinity' to come to terms with masculine paragons invented by both mainstream society and marginal men. He argues that hegemonic masculine values in Chinese history were not fixed values or behaviors of certain groups of men, but rather discursive positions open for tapping by men of different social standings. Hinsch develops the bipartite model of wen (civil) and wu (martial) into a complex and mutable system encompassing educated and refined scholar-officials, the male honor culture encouraging vengeance and violence, and variants. The author draws on hagiographical and popular representations to document the development of manhood over the centuries. The nature of the sources restricts his analysis largely to Han Chinese visions. Comparable to Susan Mann's Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History (CH, Nov'12, 50-1627), Hinsch's book is indispensable for teaching gender and manhood in China. Summing Up: Essential. All levels/libraries.
