Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Mathematics Minus Fear: How to Make Math Fun and Beneficial to Your Everyday Life

Mathematics Minus Fear: How to Make Math Fun and Beneficial to Your Everyday Life

by Lawrence Potter

See All Formats & Editions

How can math help you bet on horses or win in Vegas? What’s the foolproof way to solve Sudoku? How can probability teach you to calculate your chances of survival in Russian roulette?

In this irreverent and entertaining guide to mathematics, Lawrence Potter takes the fear out of everything from long division to percentages. Using fascinating puzzles and


How can math help you bet on horses or win in Vegas? What’s the foolproof way to solve Sudoku? How can probability teach you to calculate your chances of survival in Russian roulette?

In this irreverent and entertaining guide to mathematics, Lawrence Potter takes the fear out of everything from long division to percentages. Using fascinating puzzles and surprising examples, from M.C. Escher to Pascal, he shows us how math is connected with the world we encounter every day, from how the VAT works to why weather forecasts are wrong, from winning at Monopoly to improving your mental arithmetic. Along the way you’ll also discover who invented numbers, whether animals can count, and what nuns have to do with multiplication.

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Anyone whose memories of math class leave “the bitterest taste” will find comfort as well as insight and plenty of laughs in this informal, irreverent look at math. The first thing readers need to know is that Potter is very serious about one thing: each topic here is based on a situation one could encounter in everyday life, from doing quick mental sums while figuring out a bar tab, to calculating bank interest rates or working out the odds of winning during a Vegas vacation. His brief vignettes star everyman-student Charlie, archetypically “tyrannical” math teacher Mr. Barton, and his star pupil, “know-it-all” Bernadette. Wacky word problems (the answers are in the back) keep the flood of information in context. Potter provides historical anecdotes that reveal the origins of fractions (thank the Egyptians) and how religious edicts have affected interest and banking rules. He even offers sympathy for those wounded by algebra, whose etymology stems from the Arabic word for both the process of setting a broken bone and the moving of a term from one side of an equation to the other. For anyone who has ever felt defeated by “the dark forces of mathematics,” Potter’s constructive guide offers enlightenment and hope. (Nov.)
Library Journal
Math teacher Potter (This May Help You Understand the World) aims this book at readers looking to improve their understanding of basic mathematics. It is divided into three parts: arithmetic, algebra, and probability. Potter introduces the concepts with clever humor and augments the text with interesting problems and puzzles scattered throughout. Illustrative examples come from the author's time teaching math in Rwanda, which lends an international flavor to the discussion. VERDICT Parts 1 and 3 are excellent, but the algebra section is a little too cursory to be of much use to anyone not already familiar with the material. This book may prove helpful for parents home-schooling their children, especially those who want to beef up on basic mathematics beforehand. An enjoyable book, but not an essential purchase.—Harold D. Shane, Baruch Coll., CUNY
Kirkus Reviews
Potter (This May Help You Understand the World, 2008) accessibly deconstructs simple math. This Oxford graduate in classics, who has taught math in Rwanda and Romania, confesses that he had a problem doing sums in his head. That started him on his pursuit of an explanation of why so many people fear math or despair of doing even simple arithmetic. The result is a patient and gentle dissection of the rules: how and why they work; carefully worked-out examples; simple tricks to make mental calculations easier; and ample do-it-yourself problems, helpfully explicated in an appendix. True, most readers could do without the corny stereotypes: the classroom with the obnoxiously bright Bernadette versus the hopelessly disorganized Charlie (who never does get the message). But Potter rationalizes the rules with his artful use of visuals, numerical tables, squares or rectangles with grid lines to depict fractions and ways to cope with them. While most of the book deals with arithmetic, later chapters explore elementary algebra and probability theory, again demonstrating the logic of the rules. Throughout, Potter takes time to digress into math history, including brief sketches of principal thinkers, and he offers plenty of practical advice: He explains why your best bet at the roulette table is to lay down your chips on the first round and then leave the table, whether you've won or lost. Harried schoolteacher? Worried parent? Self-defined math klutz? All could profit from the text, but there is enough sophistication and wry humor in Potter's approach to appeal to more savvy readers of any age.
The Times Educational Supplement
“Does for numbers whatEats, Shoots & Leavesdid for punctuation.”
The Daily Telegraph
“If you follow this eloquently written book you will be equipped to cope with all manner of challenges.”

Product Details

Publication date:
Product dimensions:
8.20(w) x 5.80(h) x 1.10(d)

Read an Excerpt

Mathematics Minus Fear

How to Make Math Fun and Benieficial to Your Everyday Life

By Lawerence Potter


Copyright © 2012 Lawrence Potter
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-4532-7144-5


Small Steps

It is the start of the school day. Most children are barely awake, but shuffle through the school corridors in a sleep-drugged state. In marked contrast to them, Bernadette is bright-eyed and straight-backed as she stands waiting for the beginning of the day's dose of education at the front of a disorderly line outside the mathematics classroom. Charlie, too, is beginning to show signs of life. He has already managed to get his football confiscated by accidentally kicking it into the windscreen of the headmistress's oncoming car. Now he is concentrating on navigating around the school building according to his own strict rules of motion.

Strangely enough, although one of the underlying principles of these rules is to minimize the distance that he travels, they often result in making him late for lessons, because he regularly has to stop and wait for a particular obstruction to clear. It is fine to push through a group of smaller children, but experience has taught him that the same tactic is less suitable for larger children or teachers. He has tried to explain this problem in the past when accused of 'wilful tardiness', but, in general, his teachers struggle to understand that it is part of his religion to always walk in straight lines.

He arrives just as the last of his classmates are entering the classroom for the first lesson of the day, and slips quietly to his place in the back corner, placing his backpack on the floor under the desk. Mr Barton is writing the day's date and a title on the board in spidery handwriting. Bernadette has arranged her pens and coloured pencils on the desk in front of her. They form a neat geometrical pattern around her eraser, which smells sweetly of strawberries. Charlie has forgotten his homework.

I know that you are probably a little defensive about your ability to 'do' numbers. However, first of all, I want to get your achievements into context. Forget about the pressure of the school mathematics test. Wipe from your mind that little destructive silence that your teacher left just after you announced that you had only scored 'five out of ten'. If you are able to do any sum – either in your head or on paper – that is a little miracle in itself. It means that you have already come a long way.

Let's see just how far. When you were born, you knew nothing. This is not an insult. No one knows much just after they have been born, except that it is a blessed relief to get out in the fresh air. As a result of interacting with the world, you gradually began to figure some things out. You knew that there is a difference between one aunt, two aunts, three aunts and four aunts, even if they were trying to distract you from figuring this out by making funny noises and invading your personal space. But any more than this number of aunts, and it was all too much. There could have been ten of them or fifteen of them – you wouldn't have known the difference.

And without any further help, that is as far as the human mind will get in Arithmetic. Occasionally, a child grows up without contact with other humans. Such a person is called a 'wild child'. If they are not discovered early in their life, this is the limit of their understanding of number. Once they have hit puberty, they are rarely capable of improving on this vague sense of the difference between one, two, three and four objects.

This is exactly the same stage as the wiliest of animals can reach. Some of the best natural mathematicians are certain species of birds, like the crow and the magpie. If you were one of those people who used to collect birds' eggs (now illegal) and put them in glass cases with neat labels, then please bear in mind this fact to avoid unnecessary cruelty to the poor mother. Don't raid a nest where there are four or less eggs, because the lady magpie will know that one of her future children has gone missing.

Leaving behind the animal kingdom, there have existed whole human civilizations that have not got further than this. Unlike the wild child, they all developed speech, but, in general, they only had numbers for 'one' and 'two'. They could deal with 'three' and 'four' by talking about 'two-one' and 'two-two', but beyond that the average Botocudan from the Brazilian rain forest would just point at his head, and look a bit sorry for himself. This is no comment on the intelligence of Botocudans. They were perfectly capable individuals. It's just that they had no need for numbers greater than this.

There is evidence of our inability to get beyond a concept of 'four' all over the place. For example, the Romans only gave normal names to the first four of their sons. Then the fifth son was always called Quintus ('the fifth'), the sixth son Sextus ('the sixth'), the seventh Septimus ('the seventh') and so on. Similarly, in the original Roman calendar (which only had ten months), the first four months had names unconnected to their position (Martius, Aprilis, Maius, Junius), but the rest of them were named from their order: Quintilis, Sextilis, September, October, November and December. Later, January and February were included, when it was realized that the months were falling out of step with the seasons, and Quintilis and Sextilis were renamed July and August after the emperors Julius Caesar and Augustus.

Now, this is not strictly relevant, but you are probably wondering how a member of the Botocudan tribe managed to keep track of things if she had no concept of a number greater than four. What happened if she found nine identical eggs in the nest of a macaw, and decided to carry them off home for breakfast? How would she know that she hadn't dropped one on the way back, if she didn't know the difference between nine and eight?

Well, the truth is that the Botocudans were perfectly capable of dealing with this sort of thing. They would take a tally. One way of doing this was that for each egg, they would pick up a pebble, or tie a knot in a piece of string, or cut a notch on a stick. And when they got home, as they took out each egg, they would throw away a pebble, or untie a knot, or cross out a notch. This way they could keep track of their belongings, and only ever really deal with the number 'one'. Each egg was a 'one' that they would record in whatever way was most handy.

In fact, one of the most common ways of keeping a tally was to use their own body. Each tribe would come up with a particular order for the different parts of the body. So the Botocudan woman would touch the little finger on her left hand when she put the first egg into her pouch, the second finger on her left hand for the second egg, and so on until she had used all her fingers for the first five eggs. For the sixth egg, she would touch her left wrist, for the seventh egg, her left elbow, for the eighth egg her left shoulder, and for the ninth egg her left breast. When she got home, she just had to go through this sequence again as she took out her eggs. If she ended up pointing at her left breast, then she hadn't dropped any.

This might all sound very primitive, but just to stop you from feeling smug, different methods of tallying have stuck with us through the ages. Up until 1828, the British exchequer sent out tax demands on tally sticks, and kept them as receipts in the basement of the Houses of Parliament. When the system was abolished in 1834, the politicians decided to burn all the sticks. Unfortunately, they lost control of the fire, and burnt down the Houses of Parliament by mistake.

So there you go. At the age of eighteen months, you are already at the same level as many civilizations ever reached altogether. As soon as your parents encourage you to count with your fingers (just like the Botocudans), and to give each new number a name (unlike the Botocudans), you have moved into a place that many inhabitants of this planet have never been. You are a little genius. And it won't be long before you can tell all nine of your irritating aunts to kindly leave you alone.


How Many Fingers?

Getting beyond the number four is only the beginning. As soon as you start counting, you bring into existence an infinite amount of numbers. And it is all very well to start giving special names to the first few of them, but you can't come up with new names forever, and even if you did, you wouldn't be able to remember them all. It's a bit like the Romans with their sons – after a while you give up trying to be original.

So the next challenge that you have to deal with is to understand the system that we use to cope with all these numbers. And the system that most people use is called the decimal, or base ten system. The best people to talk to about this are the Tibetans, because they stick to it the most completely. The Tibetans have come up with words for the numbers zero to nine (as we call them). They have also come up with words for every power of ten (as have we for the most part: ten, hundred, thousand and million). Then they can express in words any number they like by combining their words for zero to nine, with their words for the powers of ten. So, they would call the number 324: 'three-hundreds two-tens and four', or actually 'gsum-bryga gnyis-bcu rtsa bzhi'.

Now you might be thinking, with a nationalist rush of anger, that the English language is every bit as logical as the Tibetan. But it isn't quite. For starters, in English, names for numbers get shortened to make them easier to say. 'Two-tens' becomes twenty. 'Five and ten' becomes 'fifteen'. Also, there is the mystery of 'eleven' and 'twelve'. They don't appear to have anything to do with 'two-and-ten' or 'one-and-ten', although one theory is that they are different – that is, don't contain any reference to ten – because they are so near to it in sequence. So 'eleven' derives from 'one left' (after ten) and 'twelve' from 'two left' (after ten). When we get to thirteen apparently we are getting too far away from ten to cope without being reminded of where we are.

And then there is the fact that we just got lazy when it came to making up names for powers of ten. While the words 'ten', 'hundred', 'thousand', 'million', 'billion' and even 'trillion' are all commonly used in English, the Tibetans went further. They also have a special name for 'ten thousand' and 'one hundred thousand'. We couldn't be bothered, which is a shame, because it would make writing cheques much easier. So we can't claim to be as logical as the Tibetans, but we can claim to be a lot more sensible than the Welsh. They came up with 'two-nines' instead of 'ten and eight'. Where is the sense in that?

You might have wondered why we count like this. And in doing so at such a tender age, you once again proved your potential for genius. That is exactly the same question that a fully-grown Aristotle asked, and he ranks as one of the greatest philosophers of all time: 'Why do all men, whether barbarians or Greeks, count up to ten and not to some other number?'

The short answer to this question is: FINGERS. Your fingers are the most natural tool for counting that you have. At some point, people stopped using them as a tally (like the Botocudans), and started connecting them with numbers.

The long answer to the question is that in fact not everyone has counted like this. Although the vast majority of counting civilizations have used base ten, there are plenty of examples of people who used different bases. This may seem surprising. Our numbers and the way that we use them seem so natural that it is hard to believe that they do not just exist in the world that way. But the base ten system is just one of an infinite number of ways that we could have chosen to put numbers into a system. If you had eight fingers, rather than ten, for example, you would be using base eight, and be just as happy, except you would not be so good at playing the piano.

This is not just a hypothetical situation. Besides base ten, the most common number system used is the vigesimal system, or base twenty. Both the Maya and the Eskimos used base twenty, presumably because they were counting on their fingers and their toes – although what an Eskimo was doing without any shoes on, I don't know.

There are still elements of base twenty thinking around today. If you ask a mysterious stranger in the middle of a windswept English moor how far it is to the nearest pub, he might answer: 'Two score miles and ten'. He actually means 'Two lots of twenty miles and ten more' which to you and me is fifty. (The word 'score' for the number twenty has been used since Biblical times, when the average human lifespan was said to be 'three score years and ten' – i.e. seventy years. The word comes from the old method of keeping tally. When you got to the number twenty, you made an extra large cut, or score, in your counting stick.) Similarly if you ask a Frenchman for eighty onions, and in his surprise at the strength of your need for his national vegetable, he raises his eyebrows, and says: 'Quatre-vingt?', what he means is: 'Four twenties?' Both of these people are using a base twenty system.

Just as base ten developed from counting the fingers on both hands, and base twenty from fingers and toes, a base five system developed in several civilisations through people counting on just one hand. To give you an idea of what you are missing, this is how a member of the Fulah tribe in West Africa would have dealt with numbers. It is a perfectly sensible way of going about things.

Firstly, he had special names for the numbers from one to four. To make life easier, let's say that these names were, in fact, 'one', 'two', 'three', and 'four'. He also had special names for the powers of five (5, 25, 125 etc.). Let's say they were as follows: 'five' (5), 'high-five' (25) and 'jacks-on-five' (125). He could then use this system to name any number he liked.

For example, take the number we call 'three-hundred-and-thirty-nine'. We have given this number its name because we think of it as being made up of three hundreds, three tens, and nine units. But the Fulah tribesman did not think of it as being made up in this way at all. He looked at it, and saw it as being made up of two jackson-fives, three high-fives, two fives and four units, and so he named it precisely that. You can check his thinking. He hasn't made any mistakes. It all adds up to 339. It is just a different way of looking at the same number.

(I should add here that I shouldn't really talk about the number 339 as if that is the only way of representing this number in symbols. It isn't, and the Fulah tribesman, if he had got around to writing numbers using symbols, would not have written it like this. But that is something that I will come to later. For now, when I write 339, I simply mean the number that we are referring to when we write down these symbols.)

It is possible that your mathematics teacher never told you about all of this. It is possible that he kept it to himself, tucking away his knowledge in his tattered leather briefcase next to his Tupperware box containing corned beef sandwiches and an overripe tangerine. But it is all true. The way we count is the result of the design of our bodies. It is a system that we have made up to deal with the consequences of inventing number. And it is by no means an easy one to understand.


Excerpted from Mathematics Minus Fear by Lawerence Potter. Copyright © 2012 Lawrence Potter. Excerpted by permission of PEGASUS BOOKS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Meet the Author

Lawrence Potter attended Oxford University and graduated with a degree in classics before becoming an adventurous mathematics teacher in Romania and Rwanda. He is the author of This May Help You Understand the World and lives in London.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews