Matisse and Picasso

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $9.60
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 72%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (17) from $9.60   
  • New (9) from $20.90   
  • Used (8) from $9.60   

Overview

Fiercely competitive, Matisse and Picasso engaged in one of the most formidable artistic dialogues of this century. The intense beginning of the relationship between the two artists - from the time they met in 1906 until 1917, when Matisse left for Nice - has already been amply studied, but their continuous exchange during the second part of their careers has never been examined in detail. In Matisse and Picasso, Yve-Alain Bois stages the intertwined evolution of the two giants of modern art as if it were an ongoing game of chess between two masters. As Joachim Pissarro points out in the foreword of this volume, Matisse and Picasso's dense plot and rich narrative make this work read more like a suspense novel than a traditional art history treatise. Bois' thoroughly researched historical demonstration is supported by striking visual juxtapositions of works by the two artists brought together here for the first time, making this long-awaited study a major contribution to the history of twentieth-century art.

Fiercely competitive, Matisse and Picasso engaged in one of the most formidable artistic dialogues of this century. The intense begining of the relationship between the two artists -- from the time they met in 1906 until 1917, when Matisse left for Nice -- has already been amply studied, but their continuous exchange during the second part of their careers has never been examined in detail. Matisse and Picasso, Yve-Alain Bois stages the intertwined evolution of the two giants of modern art as if it were an ongoing game of chess between two masters.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
This beautiful examination of two artistic giants compares the styles and personalities of two very different men and their collective impact on modern art and culture. A portrait of a time and place beloved in memory and rich in images.
Library Journal
Bois's (modern art, Harvard Univ.) well-argued thesis that Matisse, the sensual observer, and Picasso, the structuralist, had each other "in mind" when creating many paintings and sculptures redefines their complex relationship. With enormous appetite and "understanding," they worked similar ideas to dissimilar ends, challenging and influencing each other in great measure. By chronicling their mutual respect and referencing the historical documents of the time and what can now be deduced from the visual record, Bois has uncovered a wealth of evidence to support what was always implied. The many full-color illustrations encourage comparison and bolster the well-documented text. Ultimately, this is more than a book about Picasso and Matisse; through their examples, it is about the language of painting itself. Connoisseurs and students of modern art will derive much pleasure from this accomplishment, which accompanies a show currently at the Kimball Art Museum in Fort Worth, TX. Recommended for large public and academic libraries and any modern art collection.--Ellen Bates, MLS, New York
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9782080106186
  • Publisher: Rizzoli
  • Publication date: 10/28/2001
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Pages: 272
  • Sales rank: 1,076,509
  • Product dimensions: 8.95 (w) x 10.81 (h) x 0.76 (d)

Table of Contents

Foreword 7
Introduction: Four Angles 10
Ch. I Foreign Languages 24
Ch. II Late Twenties: The Stage 32
Ch. III First Act: Snap Shots (1930-32) 56
Ch. IV Second Act: Making Partners (1932-39) 76
Ch. V Third Act: Parallel Play (1940-44) 128
Ch. VI Fourth Act: Reunion (1944-54) 178
Coda: Picasso in Mourning 230
Notes
Chronology
Bibliography
Lenders to the exhibition
Index
Acknowledgements
Read More Show Less

First Chapter

An Excerpt from Matisse and Picasso: A Gentle Rivalry

"Matisse is always compared to Picasso," writes the Japanese artist Riichiro Kawashima in January 1933:

Quite a long time ago [1913], when Picasso was living in a fashionable studio overlooking the Montparnasse cemetery,...I asked him, "Do you like Matisse?" He widened his big, bright eyes and said, "Well, Matisse paints beautiful and elegant pictures. He is understanding."... When I visited Matisse in Nice four years ago [1929], I asked him, "What do you think of Picasso?" After a moment of silence he said: "He is capricious and unpredictable, but he understands things."


Each painter acknowledges a difference, and each offers laconic praise ("he is understanding...he understands things"). Consider the situation of two works that are far apart in time: in the late spring of 1916, Matisse paints Still Life with a Plaster Bust; in March of 1932, Picasso paints Still Life: Bust, Bowl, and Palette. Could there be a closer pairing? And how can the resemblance of the two works, executed almost sixteen years apart, be accounted for?

The standard explanation -- that Matisse "influenced" Picasso -- is highly unsatisfactory. The very notion of influence, with its implication of passivity, hardly squares with what we know about Picasso's omnivorous exploitation of styles, past or present. It would be just as unsatisfactory to say that Picasso was "influenced" by Ingres in the portraits drawn in the late teens, or by Delacroix in the Women of Algiers series of 1954-55: for the portraits engage in pastiche, and the series after the nineteenth-century artist is the expression of a desire to gather the past into an everlasting present. In March 1932, Picasso attends to Matisse just as he attends on other occasions to Ingres and to Delacroix: he does so with a purpose.

In 1932, Picasso was anxiously preparing his first major retrospective, scheduled to take place in June and July at the Galeries Georges Petit -- exactly a year after Matisse's own retrospective in the very same venue. To say that Picasso was thinking of Matisse would be an understatement. But why does he offer a response to Still Life with a Plaster Bust at this particular time? Did he have something to tell Matisse -- a score to settle, a corrective to offer?

Picasso knew very well that Matisse had painted the still life as a response to cubism, and that it constituted one of Matisse's few really accomplished blendings of his own compositional system with the cubist idiom. In 1916, it also marked the culmination of a particularly vivid exchange between the two painters.

The better to follow the exchange, we introduce a letter from the dealer Léonce Rosenberg to Picasso on November 25, 1915, in which Rosenberg discusses a recent visit to his gallery by Matisse, here called "the master of the 'goldfish'" (a reference to Matisse's Goldfish and Palette.) After showing two Picassos to Matisse -- specifically, Harlequin and Green Still Life -- Rosenberg writes the following report to Picasso:

Like me, the master of the "goldfish" was a bit nonplussed at first: for your Harlequin is such a revolution that even those who know your previous work were a little disconcerted.... After looking at your painting again and again, he honestly recognized that it was superior to anything you had done so far, and that it was the work he preferred to all others. Next to the Harlequin I placed your still life with a green background; you cannot imagine how this other work, while keeping all its splendid textural qualities, looked small in conception.... In your Harlequin, Matisse finds that the means contribute to the action, that they are equal to it, while in the still life there are only means, very beautiful but without object. Finally, he expresses the feeling that his own "goldfish" may have led you to your Harlequin.


Rosenberg, in agreement with Matisse, gently criticizes Picasso's Green Still Life of summer 1914 (in which scholars have often read an echo of the 1911 "Red Studio), adding that, in the eyes of Matisse himself, it was only upon painting his 1915 Harlequin that Picasso came to an understanding of Matisse's Goldfish and Palette of winter 1914-15. And we can propose the following hypothesis: that Matisse's 1916 Still Life with a Plaster Bust was a move in a sequence of sharp exchanges, in a game of "tit-for-tat" between the two painters.

Excerpted by permission of Abbeville Press. Copyright © 1998 Flammarion. Text copyright © 1998 Yve-Alain Bois. Illustrations copyright © Succession Picasso 1998 and Succession H. Matisse 1998.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)