Mean Justice

Overview

In Mean Justice, journalist Edward Humes embarks on a chilling journey to the dark side of the justice system - the powerful true story of one man's battle to prove his innocence. It is a story both deeply personal and sweeping in scope, for Humes shows how the individual injustice done to one man is part of a disturbing national trend, in which innocence becomes the unintended casualty of the war on crime, and the immense new powers of prosecutors - from Main Street to Wall Street to Pennsylvania Avenue - are ...
See more details below
Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (29) from $1.99   
  • New (1) from $50.00   
  • Used (28) from $1.99   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$50.00
Seller since 2014

Feedback rating:

(162)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
Brand new.

Ships from: acton, MA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by
Sending request ...

Overview

In Mean Justice, journalist Edward Humes embarks on a chilling journey to the dark side of the justice system - the powerful true story of one man's battle to prove his innocence. It is a story both deeply personal and sweeping in scope, for Humes shows how the individual injustice done to one man is part of a disturbing national trend, in which innocence becomes the unintended casualty of the war on crime, and the immense new powers of prosecutors - from Main Street to Wall Street to Pennsylvania Avenue - are dangerously unchecked. Humes tells how retired high-school principal Pat Dunn was prosecuted for killing his wife to inherit her millions. Mean Justice reveals how Dunn's case was tainted by hidden witnesses, concealed evidence and behind-the-scenes lobbying by powerful politicians. More horrifying still, there were many such cases in this All-American town, where a well-meaning desire for public safety led to something dark and terrible and unjust. Finally, Humes asks whether the mean justice dispensed in Bakersfield, California, may be fast becoming the norm for the rest of the country, where, in our zeal for order, we are increasingly forgiving prosecutorial misconduct.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Humes (No Matter How Loud I Shout, etc.), a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, builds his condemnation of police corruption, prosecutorial misconduct and political pandering around an account of the successful prosecution of an apparently innocent man, Patrick Dunn, for murdering his wife in Kern County, Calif. It's a compelling narrative of a horrifying story. In describing the events surrounding the Dunn prosecution, Humes delves into the sordid history of Kern County, exposing a ruthless D.A.'s office, which conducted the equivalent of a modern-day witch hunt. Kern County, the site of many spurious child-molestation and Satanic ritual-abuse cases, emerges as a crossroads where the worst abuses of psychotherapy meet the worst excesses of rabid law-and-order conservatism. Humes recounts how literally dozens of people in Kern County have had their convictions overturned on appeal based on shocking prosecutorial abuses. The evidence assembled strongly suggests that prosecutors frequently knew of the defendants' innocence. As a result, Humes's exhaustive account of the unscrupulous Dunn prosecution makes it difficult to avoid the conclusion that Dunn was innocent. Humes successfully weaves this story into an overall indictment of the criminal justice system by demonstrating the ease with which police, prosecutors and judges can manipulate the process to convict even the innocent. (Feb.)
Library Journal
A book about an innocent person convicted because of manufactured evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and withheld information is usually fiction. Unfortunately, this is nonfiction. The setting is Kern County, CA, where Patrick Dunn was accused of murdering his wife. The county sheriff and the district attorney built a flimsy case against Dunn, ultimately concocting false information to convict him. Humes, a Pulitzer Prize winner, exposes the Kern County judicial system, where several innocent people have been convicted because of prosecutorial misconduct. The tragedy is that the D.A.'s office is rarely punished--in recent years, convictions have become harder to appeal because of strict guidelines. Humes's taut expose hammers home the difficulty of proving one's innocence after being wrongly convicted. After reading this book, people should have second thoughts about a visit to Kern County. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 10/15/98.]--Michael Sawyer, Northwestern Regional Lib., Elkin, NC
Laura Mansnerus
Dunn was not exactly framed by the system, but he was trapped by it....Edward Humes...shows how this is possible anywhere the benefit of the doubt is allowed to shift from defendant to prosecution.
The New York Times Book Review
Kirkus Reviews
Grippingly written, compellingly told, Mean Justice makes other tales on the miscarriage of justice look like pleasant little fairy tales. In the legal world crafted by the founders of the Constitution, a series of checks and balances exist to ensure that innocent people don't go to jail. The crater-size cracks in the criminal justice system today, however, are disturbingly clear in this page-turner by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Humes (No Matter How Loud I Shout, 1996; Mississippi Mud, 1994; etc.). Patrick Dunn is a retired school principal whose wife, Sandy, mysteriously disappears during one of her regular predawn walks. Although Dunn reports her missing, he becomes the prime suspect - indeed, the only suspect - based almost solely on a gut feeling by one of his closest friends, a younger woman who as an appointed official in Bakersfield, Calif., has the clout and stick-to-it-iveness to push the local police and district attorney's office to go after Dunn. Not that they need much prodding. As Hume so carefully chronicles, this is a suburban town that already has a well-documented history of convicting innocent people and, worst of all, making these crimes stick for years. Bakersfield, after all, was one of America's prosecutorial hot spots in seeking out supposed child molestation rings in the 1980's. Humes displays his award-winning style here as he lays out both Dunn's sad tale - he is ultimately convicted with virtually no evidence pointing to him as the killer - and the background that so chillingly puts Dunn's story into perspective. Especially distressing is Humes's research indicating that cases such as Dunn's are occurring with increasing frequency.Dunn, meanwhile, remains in jail. An eye-popping tale of justice miscarried that will shock anyone who believes our criminal justice system still works just fine.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780671034276
  • Publisher: Pocket Books
  • Publication date: 1/28/2003
  • Format: Mass Market Paperback
  • Pages: 688
  • Product dimensions: 4.19 (w) x 6.75 (h) x 1.03 (d)

Meet the Author

Edward Humes
Edward Humes

Edward Humes is the author of eight critically acclaimed nonfiction books, including the bestseller Mississippi Mud and, most recently, Monkey Girl. He has received the Pulitzer Prize for his journalism and is a writer-at-large for Los Angeles magazine. He lives in California.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Chapter 4

In autumn 1986, after Pat and Sandy had been living together in the old Paola house on Crestmont Drive for two or three months, she got up one morning and said, "Let's take a ride, I need to see the lawyer."

Pat said sure, and, once in the downtown law office, he sat in the waiting area watching the secretaries while Sandy met with her attorney privately. It was a law firm that specialized in family law, real estate matters and other kinds of civil litigation, and Pat assumed that the meeting had to do with Sandy's imminent divorce from her second husband. But when they left the office an hour later and settled into the car, Sandy tossed a thick brown envelope onto his lap and said, "Here, put this away somewhere."

He looked at her and raised an eyebrow, and she said, "It's my will. I'm leaving you everything."

Pat thought she was joking at first, but, sure enough, inside the envelope was a simple four-page will prepared by Sandy's lawyer just that morning. The will named Pat as Sandy's sole heir and appointed him estate executor. It left nothing to the Paola family and omitted Sandy's only sister, Nanette, with whom Sandy had been feuding for years since their mother died and left everything to Sandy. The new will also specifically bequeathed just one dollar to any potential heir who contested the will.

Touched and surprised, Pat wasn't sure what to say. Speaking aloud about such emotionally charged subjects still made him uncomfortable. He chuckled to cover the mixture of warmth and embarrassment he felt, then breezily asked, "So, what are you worth?"

He figured Sandy had little left at that point, just whatever the house might bring in, perha.

The will changed little in Sandy and Pat's relationship: It was not as if Sandy, while living, was turning over responsibility for her finances to Pat. Most of the money and real estate holdings she had inherited from Pat Paola remained her sole property, even after she married Pat, and she continued to use her first married name on checks and bank accounts -- "Alexandra Paola Dunn," she'd sign, and when she spoke her full name, it was with emphasis on the Paola, a symbol of status in Bakersfield, at least in her mind. "That's the good Paola," she'd always say with a nervous laugh, "not the bad payola."

In time, she and Pat developed some of the Paola properties together, they held joint accounts, and Pat had access to Sandy's money whenever he asked for it. The pair even opened a line of credit for two hundred thousand dollars at one bank, with either to draw, though it was backed by Sandy's assets alone. Neither of them ever touched it. Still, it remained clear that Sandy's money was hers alone. And though Pat might be present for meetings with business partners and investment counselors, dispensing opinions and advice, he also usually concluded by saying to Sandy, "Whatever you want is fine with me." For most of their time together -- until a year or so before Sandy vanished, when Pat began taking a much more dominant role in their various real estate projects -- it was clear to all that Sandy had the final say.

As far as anyone who knew them could tell, this arrangement never bothered Pat. Nor did Sandy's attachment to her Paola name and identity. If it did trouble him, he never complained to anyone about it. Sandy must not have been overly concerned about Pat having design s on her money, either; when the divorce from Leon came through in March 1987, she sought no prenuptial agreement or any other protection for her assets. She and Pat just piled into the car and drove off for a quiet, private marriage ceremony -- in Las Vegas, the one and only flamboyant gesture they made as a couple.

After a weekend in Sin City, as Pat insisted on calling it, they settled back into the same old house in East Bakersfield, where, with very few exceptions, they led quiet and uneventful lives. Sandy was the much more active of the two, with her daily predawn power walks and her penchant for collecting jade sculpture. Pat ran his foreclosure business out of the house and, in fits and starts, collected antique guns as a hobby. They were known to be creatures of habit who had many casual friends but few close ones, who went to bed by seven or eight o'clock most nights, who preferred backyard barbecues with neighbors and friends to going out on the town, and who both drank prodigious amounts of alcohol daily, which in part explained their early bedtimes. Pat was quite open about his round-the-clock drinking, while Sandy tried, often successfully, to conceal hers. Many friends were under the impression that she didn't drink at all. Together, however, the two of them could easily polish off a fifth of hard liquor in a day, and those who did business with the couple quickly learned to schedule meetings in the morning.

Even with the drinking, their friends and most of their neighbors considered the Dunns charmingly eccentric -- people who genuinely seemed to like and love one another in their own, occasionally crabby way. Pat prided himself on his abilities as a host, never allowing a guest 's glass to stand empty, always putting steak, not hamburger, on the grill. Sandy would sit back and smile at her husband's fussing over visitors -- the kitchen was more his domain than hers. But, in all other matters, she always took care of Pat, catering to him in every way, doing things for him without being asked, making sure he always had fresh stores of shaving cream, enough of his favorite beer, the week's TV Guide. They were little things, really, but things no one had ever done for Pat, a man still stung by childhood memories of having to work just to get new clothes for school. He regularly marveled to friends and family about how Sandy seemed to know just what he needed when he needed it. "And poof, just as something's about to run out, there's a new one sitting there, a fresh toothpaste or a new razor," Pat told one friend, as if he were describing an act of magic rather than Sandy's well-timed trip to the grocery store. This solicitous care would move Pat in ways no extravagant gesture ever could. To Pat's way of thinking, such small kindnesses were the best way of all to say I love you, and he had finally found a partner in life who felt the same way. As Pat told it, Sandy took care of him in a way his first wife, even his own mother, never would or could, which is why early in their marriage he began calling Sandy "Mom."

Given their odd hours and other eccentricities, the Dunns were by no means universally beloved. Some acquaintances felt their relationship seemed to be based as much on bickering as on love, and there was some truth to this. Both could be stubborn and opinionated people at times, and Sandy in particular was known as much for the staying power of her gr udges as for her genteel manner. Their detractors, and there were several right in the neighborhood, saw only this negative side of the Dunns. These people tended to describe Sandy as a flighty snob who at times affected an ostentatious manner reminiscent of Zsa Zsa Gabor. They considered Pat a gold digger who had risen above his station in life. (Still, even their critics had to admit that the Dunns' humble clothes, home and habits suggested that the couple had little interest in flaunting their wealth -- to Pat and Sandy, money was a tool, not something to be displayed.) Those in the neighborhood who had known and liked the legendary Pat Paola seemed particularly unkind about "the new husband," as they called Pat Dunn. They never really forgave Sandy for marrying a mere schoolteacher, and they were particularly scandalized when Pat drove Paola's vintage tail-tinned Cadillac in the Bakersfield Christmas parade, something Paola traditionally had done before senility left him incapable of carrying out the annual ritual. "As if Dunn could take Mr. Paola's place," sniffed one angry neighbor. "He has no right to drive that car."

Pat and Sandy seemed oblivious to much of this, though Pat was known to play the occasional practical joke on neighbors who disliked him. He continually feuded with one next-door neighbor in particular, a retired plumber named Otis Coppock, whose partial deafness exacerbated his and Pat's regular misunderstandings. In one of their more memorable bouts, Coppock's daughter, a former schoolmate of Pat's daughter, yelled over the fence at Pat one day during a Dunn family barbecue, and Coppock later telephoned with a follow-up complaint. Apparently, the Coppocks felt the Dunns were being too noisy. "Listen, Coppock," Pat snarled into the phone, shouting so his neighbor would hear every word, as his daughter, Jennifer, and son Patrick listened. "Meet me outside and bring your dog. And I'll kick your ass and my dog will kick your dog's ass and go ahead and bring your daughter, too, and my daughter will kick her ass to boot."

Pat could barely keep from laughing during this mock tirade. To him and his kids, who were giggling in the background, it was all an absurd joke. But Coppock took it as a serious threat and slammed the phone down. He never spoke to Pat after that day, and made no secret of his animosity toward his neighbors. Though Sandy wasn't there on the day of the barbecue, she battled with Coppock as well, and he once accused her of mistreating the ailing Pat Paola, whom he idolized. Coppock had occasionally seen the naked Paola in the backyard, and believed the ailing financier when he ranted about Sandy taking his clothes and locking him out. The plumber would later say Sandy struck and abused her elderly first husband, thereby contributing to his death, though he also once claimed Sandy drove her second husband to death as well, despite the fact Leon was very much alive.

Still, most people who knew the Dunns seemed willing to accept their eccentricities -- his practical jokes, her unshakable habit of hoarding everything from plastic bags to old clothes. They were known as loyal friends willing to help those close to them when trouble struck. Pat and Sandy helped one financially strapped couple start a business of their own, and Pat gave work and one of his trucks to a troubled young man -- an old friend of his son Danny -- when no one else would hire him.

Most ly, every day seemed the same at the Dunn household. Sandy would rise before dawn to go for her early morning walk, and Pat would have the coffee ready by the time she returned two hours later. As he kept the cups full, Sandy sat at the kitchen table and read the newspaper aloud for Pat. They liked keeping informed about doings in their city, particularly about city politics, as they began laying plans to develop some of the vacant land Sandy had inherited from Pat Paola, still trying to fulfill his visions for East Bakersfield. In the last year of Sandy's life, Pat became much more active in her financial affairs as they worked on two large developments, a housing tract and a movie-theater complex. The theater project had run afoul of certain city officials, and so Pat began to read voraciously about city politics. The city council, the planning commission, the county government -- all had to be understood, massaged and placated if the plans were to go through, he told Sandy.

The Dunns also obsessively read about crime in Bakersfield, their main concern and fear, something they shared with many of their neighbors. Their interest was particularly keen because the College Center mall Sandy had inherited -- where she took her daily walks -- was now in a high-crime area. They also followed the increasing power and prestige of Kern County's tough, law-and-order district attorney, whom they both supported in his uncompromising approach to law enforcement. Pat and Sandy felt Bakersfield needed someone like this DA in control, for the city seemed increasingly prey to the most bizarre and frightening crimes -- escalating violence, serial killers, a Dungeons and Dragons murder ring that claimed the life of the district attorney's own barber, a disturbing number of corrupt cops, judges and other officials, and, of course, the devil-worshiping child molesters who had made national news in recent years. "I was one of the first principals to bring counselors into the school to talk about child abuse and abductions," Pat said every time one of the big molestation cases hit the papers. "I saw it coming."

Like most of their neighbors and peers, Pat and Sandy had been horrified when, one by one, these molesters began walking out of prison after appealing their convictions. Now, the newspapers said, the molesters were supposed to be the victims -- of tainted evidence, of prosecutorial misconduct, of mass hysteria. But the Dunns, along with nearly everyone they knew in Bakersfield, didn't buy any of it. They believed their district attorney when he declared that the appeals judges were wrong, that these jurists were misguided liberals who cared more about criminals' rights than crime victims. "It's those damn judges," Pat agreed heartily when Sandy read him the latest news about convicts appealing their way out of prison. "They won't let the police do their job."

It never seems to end, Pat often said when Sandy finished reading the crime news. Just a few months before Sandy disappeared, the Dunns had followed the case of a high school track star named Offord Rollins, convicted of murdering his former girlfriend to clear the way for a new girl. It was an ugly case that, because of its racial overtones, tore an enormous rift in the community. Rollins was black, the murdered girl Latina, the judge and jury all white. The prosecutor pointed to violent rap lyrics penned by the young athlete as evidence of his v iciousness; the defense lawyer complained that official racism and misconduct, not hard evidence, put his client in prison. Even an arch-conservative like Sandy had wondered aloud one morning over her newspaper whether the defense lawyer might be right. "That case just doesn't make sense --" she had started to say.

"They wouldn't have arrested him if he hadn't done it," Pat interrupted reflexively, adamantly -- a true believer. "He must be guilty." To Pat's way of thinking, no innocent man could ever be prosecuted in America without the truth sooner or later coming out. "There'd be no reason to do it," he told Sandy, applying free-market reasoning to the justice system. "What would the cops and the DA get out of framing that kid? It's not like they get paid by the arrest. There's nothing in it for them."

Pat's law-and-order attitude, his trust in "the men in blue," never seemed to waver, not even after he and Sandy had their own brush with the legal system three years after moving in together -- the one documented instance of marital discord in the Dunn household.

On October 19, 1989, shortly before nine in the evening, Sandy dialed 911 on her bedroom telephone. When the dispatcher answered, Sandy said, "He hit me. My husband hit me. And I want him arrested." She reported that the assault had happened five minutes before she placed the call to the authorities. The dispatcher promised help would be there quickly.

When sheriff's deputies arrived exactly six minutes after Sandy placed the call, they found Pat sitting calmly in the den of the Crestmont house. He was chatting with one of his best friends, Kate Rosenlieb, a former student who, at Pat's urging, had gone on to take a seat on the Bakersfield City Planning Commission, which reviewed every proposed real estate project in the city. The two were sitting and drinking beer, and Rosenlieb clearly had arrived before Sandy called the police and had been there for some time. Pat had telephoned her earlier in the evening and asked her to come over for a visit. She would later say she had seen nothing untoward happen, and hadn't even set eyes on Sandy until the deputies arrived.

Once the police walked in, Sandy emerged from the back of the house. She had a small cut behind her right ear that had left a touch of blood on her earlobe and in her hair, though she refused any medical treatment. "He was angry with me, I don't know why," Sandy told the deputies. "He was drinking and yelling. I came in the bedroom and pulled back the covers to go to bed, and that's when he hit me. Twice, with his fist."

The deputies arrested Pat on the spot for misdemeanor spousal abuse. They asked him no questions, but he volunteered, "No, I did not hit her." Later, they took him to the county jail, where he asked for a lawyer, though he never actually saw one or hired one.

Kate Rosenlieb, meanwhile, offered to stay at the house to help, but Sandy said, "No, I want you out of here." Sandy looked dazed, but Rosenlieb still left -- without the deputies asking her a single question, not even taking her name. She left feeling deeply disturbed, certain that her friend Pat, someone she long admired, had indeed struck Sandy. The incident would leave a long-lasting impression on the young city official, one that would return to haunt her and Pat Dunn. No one -- not Pat, not Rosenlieb and not the sheriff's department -- realized Kate actually could have provi ded an alibi of sorts for Pat, as she was sitting talking with him over beers when Sandy claimed to have been beaten. Something was wrong with Sandy's account, though no one knew it at the time.

As Pat would later tell it, this incident marked the first time that he noticed Sandy display a memory or mental problem. He didn't recognize it at the time, but he would later come to see this episode as a first symptom, perhaps, of the early onset of Alzheimer's disease. According to Pat, there had been no fight and no hitting that night -- Sandy simply went rigid, her face blank as she stood in the bedroom. Then she lost her balance, slipped and struck her head on a bench at the foot of the bed. As Pat bent to help her up, she looked up at him with a dazed expression and said, "You hit me." She then refused to listen to his denials, refused his offers of help, and insisted she just wanted to be left alone. So he left the room and called Kate Rosenlieb, who came over a short time later. He didn't realize Sandy had called the police until they walked through the door and arrested him.

After that night, Sandy rarely talked of this incident, so only Pat Dunn's account survives. What is known is that Sandy immediately went down to the jail and posted Pat's five-thousand-dollar bail, and he returned home with her. They continued living together, and most of their neighbors remained unaware that anything had happened. Even Otis Coppock, who watched every move at the Dunn house, was unaware that Pat had been arrested. The case against Pat was eventually dismissed after Sandy told prosecutors that nothing had happened, that she had made a mistake, and that she would not press charges. Legally, this meant Pat w as innocent of spousal abuse, just as he had claimed all along. Given that Sandy initially claimed Pat struck her at a time when he apparently was sitting having a beer with a friend, there is every reason to accept her recantation at face value. It is also true, however, that many wives lie to protect abusive husbands. Though she never let him know it, Pat's good friend Kate Rosenlieb secretly suspected this was exactly what Sandy did: She lied to protect him. It was an assumption that would later have grave implications for Pat Dunn.

Whatever happened between the Dunns that night -- accident or violence or the beginning of a long, slow mental decline for Sandy -- their marriage and their daily rituals continued as if nothing had happened. If anything, the couple seemed to grow closer. They searched for retirement homes in Hawaii and Cabo San Lucas, putting bids in on several properties, but in the end deciding to stay in their comfortable home in Bakersfield, at least for the time being. And when Pat grew ill with a ruptured appendix in January 1992, Sandy withdrew twenty thousand dollars from one of the Paola accounts and paid cash for the surgery, as neither of them had medical insurance. Then Sandy nursed Pat back to health at home, caring for him constantly for nearly a month. Several of their friends remarked on how solicitous Sandy seemed throughout Pat's convalescence, and how grateful he was for all the care and attention she lavished upon him. He repeated his now familiar boast: "Nobody takes care of me like Mom."

During this time, however, Pat's business began to falter for lack of attention. Normally, he aggressively telephoned banks and mortgage lenders daily, pursuing their busine ss and seeking new homes in foreclosure. But since falling ill, he had let things go. "Why don't you just close it down?" Sandy finally asked. "We don't need the money. Let's play with what we've got."

Pat felt hesitant at first, but Sandy got their accountant to pull together some figures to show that the business was now costing more than it brought in, and Pat finally said, "Good idea. Let's play with what we've got."

A short time later, Sandy made an appointment with Kevin Knutson, a financial planner, to discuss forming a living trust. Knutson lived with Teri Bjorn, the Dunns' real estate attorney, and the couples occasionally socialized. At a barbecue at the Dunns' house, Knutson and Sandy began chatting about investments, and she mentioned her desire that Pat have greater access to her finances and the Paola properties, particularly if she were to slip mentally, from Alzheimer's disease or any other cause. When Knutson remarked on how trusts could be used to shield assets and avoid inheritance taxes far better than a simple will would, Sandy seemed very interested. She invited Knutson over to discuss the details of setting up such a trust for her and Pat. The meeting was set for the morning of June 30, a Tuesday. "Come at lunch time," Sandy said. "We'll feed you." It would be the very day Sandy disappeared.

By this time, the night that Sandy had Pat arrested for spousal abuse seemed a part of the distant past, almost forgotten and never discussed. There had been no recurrences -- if anything, the incident had served only to strengthen Pat's faith in the hard-as-nails justice system of Kern County. Indeed, he considered the experience a demonstration of how well the system worked. "The p olice had to err on the side of protecting her," he would later say. "I understand that, and I think it's right. The truth came out in the end. That's the way the system works."

To almost everyone's astonishment, it was a faith Pat Dunn seemed to retain right up to the day he was convicted of first-degree murder.

Copyright © 1999 by Edward Humes

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)