BN.com Gift Guide

Meaning and Argument: An Introduction to Logic Through Language [NOOK Book]

Overview

Meaning and Argument shifts introductory logic from the traditional emphasis on proofs to the symbolization of arguments. Another of its distinctive features is that it shows how the need for expressive power and for drawing distinctions forces formal language development.

This volume is ideal as an introduction to formal logic, philosophical logic, and philosophy of lanugage. At each stage of system elaboration and development, the book answers meta-logical questions. Why is a ...

See more details below
Meaning and Argument: An Introduction to Logic Through Language

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook - 2nd, Revised Edition)
$29.99
BN.com price
(Save 42%)$51.95 List Price
Note: This NOOK Book can be purchased in bulk. Please email us for more information.

Overview

Meaning and Argument shifts introductory logic from the traditional emphasis on proofs to the symbolization of arguments. Another of its distinctive features is that it shows how the need for expressive power and for drawing distinctions forces formal language development.

This volume is ideal as an introduction to formal logic, philosophical logic, and philosophy of lanugage. At each stage of system elaboration and development, the book answers meta-logical questions. Why is a particular formalism needed? What must go into such a formalism and why? These questions engage students in a collective inquiry which allows them to see logical studies as a human enterprise aimed at achieving well-understood goals-clarity and good reasoning.

This second edition extends and systematizes the account of anaphora, including "donkey" anaphora, plural anaphora, and cross-sentential anaphora. It also has additional sections on counter-models and semantics, and contains additional exercises and an updated bibliography.

Read More Show Less

What People Are Saying


PRAISE FOR THE PREVIOUS EDITIONS


"Meaning and Argument is especially strong on the subtleties of translating natural language into formal language, as a necessary step in the clarification of expression and the evaluation of arguments. The range of natural language constructions surveyed is broader and richer than in any competing introductory logic text that I am aware of. As such, the book provides a solid and attractive introduction to logic not only for philosophy students, but for linguists as well."

Richard Larson, University Stony Brook


"I can thoroughly recommend Ernest Lepore’s Meaning and Argument, particularly for those seeking to teach or learn how to paraphrase into formal symbolism, a much neglected aspect of logic. It contains a wealth of examples and is informed throughout by a deep theoretical knowledge of contemporary linguistics and philosophy of language."

Alan Weir, Queen’s University Belfast


"Lepore’s book is unusual for a beginning logic text in that it contains no natural deduction proof system but rather concentrates on finding models and countermodels by means of a semantic tableaux method. It is also unusual in containing many translation examples that exemplify constructions that linguists have found interesting in the last decades. In both of these ways the book is well suited for use in educating philosophy students in the importance of logic even when these students do not intend to go further in the study of formal logic as a discipline."

Francis Jeffry Pelletier, University of Alberta


"Meaning and Argument is a beautiful display of boththe power of first-order logic and the complexity of natural language. The book focuses on the use of logic to expose and remedy many difficulties with understanding a sentence’s exact meaning. Lepore’s user-friendly style makes the book enjoyable for beginning logic students, and his coverage of the details makes it useful for advanced students and professionals. There is no logic textbook that comes even remotely close to accomplishing what Meaning and Argument does."

Kent Johnson, University of California at Irvine



"Meaning and Argument is an excellent logic textbook that not only introduces students to the techniques of English symbolization and the truth-tree method, but it also to a fascinating array of topics in linguistic syntax and semantics, including logical form, anaphora, adverbial modification, descriptions, among others. My first-year logic students have enjoyed Lepore’s book immensely and have found it to be very helpful and accessible."

Ray Elugardo, University of Oklahoma


"Here is logic as it ought to be presented to philosophers, linguists, and anyone else who is interested in how language is organized. In Ernie Lepore’s hands grammar comes alive. I recommend this book to all who want to learn what logic is, how to use it, and what it is good for."

Donald Davidson, University of California at Berkeley


"With care, imagination, and infectious enthusiasm, Lepore develops a novel and effective general technique of formalization which complete beginners should be able to grasp and use to deal with virtually any example in a first logic course."

Bob Hale, University of Glasgow

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781118455210
  • Publisher: Wiley
  • Publication date: 9/14/2012
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Edition description: 2nd, Revised Edition
  • Edition number: 2
  • Pages: 496
  • Sales rank: 1,220,172
  • File size: 2 MB

Meet the Author

Ernest Lepore is Director of the Center for Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. He is the author of numerous articles in philosophy of mind and is co-author (with Herman Cappelen) of Insensitive Semantics (Blackwell, 2004), co-author (with Jerry Fodor) of Holism (Blackwell, 1991). He is editor of Truth and Interpretation (Blackwell, 1989). He is co-editor (with Zenon Pylyshyn) of What is Cognitive Science? (Blackwell, 1999), and co-editor (with Robert Van Gulick) of John Searle and His Critics (Blackwell, 1992), as well as general editor of the series Philosophers and Their Critics, also published by Wiley-Blackwell.

Sam Cumming is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface to Revised Second Edition xiii

Preface to Second Edition xiv

Preface to Revised Edition xv

Acknowledgments xvi

Introduction to Teacher 1

1 A Brief Introduction to Key Terms 5

1.1 Arguments 5

1.1.1 What is a Statement? 6

1.1.2 Premises and Conclusion 6

1.2 Putting Arguments into a Standard Format 7

1.3 Multiple Conclusions 9

1.4 Deductive Validity 10

1.5 Soundness 13

1.6 Missing Premises and Conclusions 13

2 Argument Forms and Propositional Logic 17

2.1 Formal Validity 17

2.2 Quotation Marks 19

2.3 Metalinguistic Variables 21

2.4 Non-formal Validity 23

2.5 The Need for Propositional Logic 24

2.5.1 Symbolic Notation 25

2.6 The Type/Token Distinction 26

3 Conjunction 31

3.1 Logical Conjunction 31

3.2 Distinguishing Deductive from Non-deductive Aspects of Conjunction 33

3.3 Phrasal Logical Conjunctions 34

3.4 Series Decompounding 34

3.5 Using ‘Respectively’ 35

3.6 Symbolizing Logical Conjunctions 35

4 Negation 42

4.1 Logical Negation 42

4.2 Some Other Negative Expressions 43

4.3 A Point about Methodology 45

4.4 A Point on Ambiguity 45

4.5 Symbolizing Logical Negations 45

4.6 Ambiguity and the Need for Groupers 46

4.7 Review of Symbols 47

4.8 Using ‘Without’ 48

4.9 Argument Forms Continued 48

4.10 Symbolizing Logical Negations Continued 51

5 Truth Tables 56

5.1 Well-formed Formulas 56

5.2 Scope 57

5.3 Main Connective 58

5.4 Truth Tables 59

5.4.1 Truth Table Analyses of Statements 61

5.4.2 Truth Table Analyses of Arguments 64

6 Disjunction 68

6.1 Logical Disjunction 68

6.2 Disjunction and Negation 69

6.3 Iterations and Groupers 71

6.4 Inclusive versus Exclusive ‘Or’ 73

6.5 Symbolizing Logical Disjunctions Continued 76

7 Conditionals 79

7.1 Conditionals with Constituent Statements 79

7.2 Conditionals without Constituent Statements 80

7.3 Logical Conditionals 80

7.4 Symbolizing Conditionals in PL 82

7.5 Necessary and Sufficient Conditions 82

7.6 Only If 84

7.7 Unless 86

7.8 Since, Because 88

7.9 Conditionals and Groupers 89

7.10 If and Only If 90

7.11 A Revised Grammar for Well-formedness in PL 91

7.12 Summarizing Truth Tables 99

7.12.1 Validity 99

7.12.2 Contradiction, Tautology, Contingency 102

7.12.3 Consistency 104

7.12.4 Logical Equivalence 105

8 Truth Trees 109

8.1 Reviewing Validity 109

8.2 Tree Trunks and Compound and Atomic Statements 110

8.3 Truth Tree Rules 111

8.3.1 Non-branching Rules 111

8.3.2 Branching Rules 112

8.4 Strategies 114

8.5 Truth Trees and Invalidity 117

8.6 Propositional Logic and Counter-examples (Counter-models) 121

8.7 Logical Properties and Relations Revisited 123

8.7.1 Consistency 123

8.7.2 Contradiction, Tautology, Contingency 124

8.7.3 Logical Equivalence 126

9 Property Predicate Logic 129

9.1 Limits of Propositional Logic 129

9.2 Singular Terms 130

9.3 Property Predicates 132

9.4 Quantifiers 134

9.4.1 Simple Existential Quantifier Statements 135

9.4.2 Symbolizing Simple Existential Statements 135

9.4.3 Simple Universal Quantifier Statements 137

9.4.4 Negations of Existentials 138

9.5 Complex Predicates 139

9.6 Well-formedness in PPL 142

9.7 Quantifiers Modifying General Terms 145

9.7.1 Existential Quantifiers and General Terms 145

9.7.2 Universal Quantifiers and General Terms 147

10 Evaluating Arguments in Property Predicate Logic 155

10.1 Quantifiers and Scope 156

10.2 The Truth Tree Method Extended 157

10.2.1 Quantifier Exchange Rule (QE) 157

10.2.2 Universal Quantifier Rule (UQ) 158

10.2.3 Existential Quantifier Rule (EQ) 161

10.3 Super Strategy 164

10.4 Property Predicate Logic and Counter-examples (Counter-models) 166

10.5 PPL Logical Equivalences and Non-equivalences 168

10.6 Other Logical Properties and Relations 170

10.6.1 Consistency 170

10.6.2 Logical Equivalence 170

10.6.3 Contradiction, Logical Truth, Contingency 171

11 Property Predicate Logic Refinements 172

11.1 Literal Meaning 172

11.2 ‘Any’ as an Existential 173

11.3 Restrictive Relative Clauses 175

11.4 Pronouns Revisited 176

11.4.1 Deixis and Anaphora 176

11.4.2 Quantification and Anaphora 177

11.5 Only 180

11.6 Restrictive Words in English 182

11.7 Evaluating Symbolizations of English in Logical Notation 185

12 Relational Predicate Logic 191

12.1 Limits of Property Predicate Logic 191

12.2 Convention 1: Number 193

12.3 Convention 2: Order 194

12.4 Convention 3: Active/Passive Voice 195

12.5 Convention 4: Single Quantifiers 197

12.6 Variables 199

12.6.1 Convention 5: Variables and Quantifiers 200

12.6.2 Convention 6: Variables and Property Predicates 200

12.6.3 General Comments about Variables 201

13 Relational Predicate Logic with Nested Quantifiers 207

13.1 Multiply General Statements 209

13.2 Universal Quantifier Procedure 212

13.3 Existential Quantifier Procedure 213

13.4 Double Binding Variables 213

13.4.1 Kicking Out 216

13.5 Systematic and Analytic Procedures 217

13.6 A Grammar for Well-formedness in RPL 218

13.7 Nested Quantifiers, Variables, and Scope 220

13.8 Order and Scope Refinements 221

13.8.1 The Order and Scope Procedure 224

13.9 Summary of the Overall Procedure for Symbolizing English Statements with Nested Quantifiers into RPL 226

14 Extending the Truth Tree Method to RPL 229

14.1 RPL Arguments without Quantifiers 229

14.2 RPL Arguments without Nested Quantifiers 230

14.3 RPL Arguments with Nested Quantifiers 232

14.4 Choosing Singular Terms to Instantiate 233

14.5 Infinite Truth Trees for RPL Arguments 234

14.6 Summary of Truth Tree Strategies 236

14.7 Relational Predicate Logic and Counter-examples (Counter-models) 239

15 Negation, Only, and Restrictive Relative Clauses 244

15.1 Negation 244

15.2 ‘Only’ as a Quantifier 246

15.3 Restrictive Relative Clauses 249

15.3.1 The Quantificational Restrictive Relative Clause Procedure 250

15.4 Quantifiers and Anaphora 252

15.4.1 Repair Algorithm 254

15.5 Anaphora and Restrictive Relative Clauses 257

15.6 Anaphora Across Sentences 262

15.7 Quantification in English 265

16 Relational Predicate Logic with Identity 268

16.1 Limits of Relational Predicate Logic 268

16.2 Extending the Truth Tree Method to RPL= 270

16.2.1 Identity-out Rule 270

16.2.2 Identity-in Rule 271

16.3 Sameness and Distinctness in English 273

16.3.1 ‘Only’ Again 273

16.3.2 Words of Distinction: Except, But, Other (than), Besides, Else 274

16.4 Numerical Adjectives 276

16.4.1 At Least n 276

16.4.2 At Most n (No More than n) 279

16.4.3 Exactly n 281

16.4.4 Counting Pairs 283

16.4.5 Combinatorics (optional) 283

16.5 Definite Descriptions 284

16.5.1 The Definite Description Quantifier Procedure 288

16.5.2 Definite Descriptions as Anaphors 289

16.5.3 Plural Definite Descriptions 289

17 Verbs and their Modifiers 294

17.1 Prepositional Phrases 294

17.2 The Event Approach 296

17.3 Indirect Support of the Event Approach 298

17.3.1 Fixing Referents and Binding Anaphoric Pronouns 298

17.3.2 Quantification over Events 299

17.3.3 Conversational Inferences and Events 300

17.3.4 Methodological Reflections 300

17.4 Adverbial Modification 301

17.5 Problems with the Event Approach 304

Appendix 308

A1 Conjunction 308

A1.1 Prepositional Phrases 308

A1.2 Conversational Inferences and Deductive Validity 309

A1.3 Relative Clauses 311

A2 Negation and Disjunction 314

A2.1 Modalities and Negation 314

A2.2 Disjunction and Conversational Inferences 315

A3 Conditionals 315

A3.1 Explication of the Material Conditional Truth Table 315

A3.1.1 Paradoxes of implication 318

A3.1.2 Conditionals and conversational inferences 318

A3.1.3 Paradoxes of implication revisited 320

A3.2 ‘If ’s and ‘Then’s without Conditionality 321

A4 Property Predicate Logic 321

A4.1 Only 321

A4.2 Conversational Inferences 322

A4.2.1 Existential import 322

A4.2.2 Scalar inferences 323

A4.3 More on Literal Meaning 324

A4.4 Adjectival Modification and Predication 325

A4.5 A Non-standard Quantifier – Most 329

A5 Relational Predicate Logic 330

A5.1 Passive Voice: Another Argument for Variables 330

A5.1.1 Passive voice for nested quantifier procedure 332

A5.2 Properties of Relations 333

A5.2.1 Symmetry, asymmetry, non-symmetry 333

A5.2.2 Transitivity, intransitivity, non-transitivity 334

A5.2.3 Total reflexivity, reflexivity, irreflexivity, and non-reflexivity 335

A6 Relational Predicate Logic with Identity 337

A6.1 ‘Only’ and Existential Import 337

A6.2 Descriptions and Anaphora 338

A6.3 Plural Anaphora 339

A6.3.1 Plural definite descriptions as anaphors 344

A6.3.2 Singular indefinite antecedents of plural pronouns 344

A6.3.3 Partitives 346

A6.4 Existence 347

A6.5 Intensionality 348

A6.6 Properties of the Identity Relationship 348

A6.7 The Superlative 349

A6.8 Identity and Predicative Adjectives 350

A7 Verbs and their Modifiers 350

A7.1 Infinitives and Gerunds 351

A7.2 Reference to Events 353

A7.3 The Logic of Perceptual Verbs 354

Answers for Selected Exercises 356

Chapter 1 356

Chapter 2 357

Chapter 3 358

Chapter 4 361

Chapter 5 363

Chapter 6 364

Chapter 7 366

Chapter 8 373

Chapter 9 378

Chapter 10 381

Chapter 11 392

Chapter 12 397

Chapter 13 398

Chapter 14 400

Chapter 15 413

Chapter 16 419

Chapter 17 426

Appendix 427

Logical Symbols 429

Index 430

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3.5
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(1)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 13, 2013

    Another uninspired text book of logic

    For the potential buyer who is thinking in buying this text book, I will say that I used it for a semester in my teaching logic. I will not use it more. The good: plenty of examples to practice logic. The bad: no philosophical interest. Pedagogically is mediocre. The author does not understand the way students learn logic.
    This book is not different from the other hundreds of logic text books in our century. Nothing to offer from the original Copi, "introduction to logic", from where is an uninspired copy. And with similar mistakes than the original Copi, whose most annoying issues is the way they understand particulars, the existential quantifier, induction, classical logic, conditionals, etc.
    There are many other logic texts for beginners that are better written for students. However, I was, in some way, present when the author, Ernie, started to write this book (1998?) based on his personal teaching experience, at Rutgers University, and I have to say that the method of the book fits Ernie's style, but it does not work well for teachers who are very interactive with the student. The methodology of the book is very static, it does not move with fluidity, it is more a book for the teacher than for the student.
    "Meaning and Argument" is essentially practical (almost as a cook book) and it does not explain concepts very well, so it is more another technological book of logic than a philosophical book of logic. There is very little philosophical insight in what is an inference, conditional, etc., it tells you how to cook an argument (some of them are problematic in my opinion), but it does not teach you how to think logically, and it is not well written to think philosophically.
    The book is good in translating natural language into the artificial formal language of symbolic logic that is standard in the US, but unfortunately it continues the (cripple) tradition, from Russell, to translate universals into conditionals in a way I have doubts, existential quantifiers as real existence, etc., which conceal an uncritical metaphysics (a very naive metaphysics in my opinion).
    I noticed that this text book has good reviews from all the people in the same (parochial) circle, I doubt that outside of this narrow circle there is interest in a book that is supposed to reach everybody interested in logic.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)