Modernism, Media, and Propaganda: British Narrative from 1900 to 1945

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
$26.67
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $19.98
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 30%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (7) from $19.98   
  • New (4) from $19.98   
  • Used (3) from $0.00   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing 1 – 6 of 7
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$19.98
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(952)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

New
0691138451

Ships from: Pennington, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$21.21
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(952)

Condition: Like New
0691138451

Ships from: Pennington, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
$24.62
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(4378)

Condition: New
New Book. Shipped from UK within 4 to 14 business days. Established seller since 2000.

Ships from: Horcott Rd, Fairford, United Kingdom

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$26.66
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(17198)

Condition: Like New
Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.

Ships from: Westminster, MD

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$26.66
Seller since 2008

Feedback rating:

(17198)

Condition: New
Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.

Ships from: Westminster, MD

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
$27.39
Seller since 2007

Feedback rating:

(23157)

Condition: New
BRAND NEW

Ships from: Avenel, NJ

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing 1 – 6 of 7
Close
Sort by

Overview

"This book has everything. It is scrupulously researched, lucidly and appealingly written, interdisciplinary in the most rigorous sense, thickly historicized, and forcefully argued."—Garrett Stewart, University of Iowa

"The thesis of Modernism, Media, and Propaganda is original and Mark Wollaeger's readings in support of it are thorough, ingenious, and illuminating. This is an original, persuasive, and authoritative study."—Michael North, University of California, Los Angeles

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Modernism/Modernity
Wollaeger gives [the debate about art's relationship to propaganda] new purchase by stressing the emergence of modern propaganda . . . and by showing how the last century's propaganda outlets served as both a testing ground and a charger, a model, and a spur, for modernist innovation. . . . Modernism can help us resist propaganda today, Wollaeger suggests smartly, not because it has always kept its distance but because, from the beginning, it absorbed propaganda's tricks.
— Rebecca L. Walkowitz
European Legacy
A carefully researched monograph, Modernism, Media, and Propaganda will likely appeal to those interested in historicist and close textual analyses, and perhaps less to those seeking more theoretical treatments of modernist prose and film.
— David Tomkins
Woolf Studies Annual
Modernism, Media, and Propaganda is a rich and nuanced study of how modernism and propaganda were formed symbiotically as much as defined by difference.
— Elizabeth F. Evans
Choice - D.G. Izzo
Highly recommended. . . . [This] book is well planned, carefully constructed, and assiduously substantiated.
Modernism/Modernity - Rebecca L. Walkowitz
Wollaeger gives [the debate about art's relationship to propaganda] new purchase by stressing the emergence of modern propaganda . . . and by showing how the last century's propaganda outlets served as both a testing ground and a charger, a model, and a spur, for modernist innovation. . . . Modernism can help us resist propaganda today, Wollaeger suggests smartly, not because it has always kept its distance but because, from the beginning, it absorbed propaganda's tricks.
Clio - Debra Rae Cohen
Mark Wollaeger's sophisticated new book adds to the recent reshaping of our understanding of modernist-period media culture. . . . While one would expect such tours de force from Wollaeger, who is known for his work on Conrad and Joyce, it is his chapter on Ford Madox Ford that proves to be the volume's intellectual center.
James Joyce Literary Supplement - Lissa Schneider
While many critical studies of British literary modernism promise to reveal new ways to contextualize modernism, few deliver with such accomplished originality as Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda. . . . Wollaeger's book is a model of exemplary scholarship that . . . aptly speaks to our historical moment.
Studies in English Literature - Yoshino Ayako
Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda: British Narrative from 1900 to 1945 is written in an approachable style with an engaging and often amusing personal voice. . . . This is a book in which the historical contextualising so in trend at the present time is allowed to sit comfortably and rewardingly beside more 'traditional' close readings of canonical works.
European Legacy - David Tomkins
A carefully researched monograph, Modernism, Media, and Propaganda will likely appeal to those interested in historicist and close textual analyses, and perhaps less to those seeking more theoretical treatments of modernist prose and film.
Woolf Studies Annual - Elizabeth F. Evans
Modernism, Media, and Propaganda is a rich and nuanced study of how modernism and propaganda were formed symbiotically as much as defined by difference.
Choice - D. G. Izzo
Highly recommended. . . . [This] book is well planned, carefully constructed, and assiduously substantiated.
From the Publisher
"Highly recommended. . . . [This] book is well planned, carefully constructed, and assiduously substantiated."—D. G. Izzo, Choice

"Wollaeger gives [the debate about art's relationship to propaganda] new purchase by stressing the emergence of modern propaganda . . . and by showing how the last century's propaganda outlets served as both a testing ground and a charger, a model, and a spur, for modernist innovation. . . . Modernism can help us resist propaganda today, Wollaeger suggests smartly, not because it has always kept its distance but because, from the beginning, it absorbed propaganda's tricks."—Rebecca L. Walkowitz, Modernism/Modernity

"Mark Wollaeger's sophisticated new book adds to the recent reshaping of our understanding of modernist-period media culture. . . . While one would expect such tours de force from Wollaeger, who is known for his work on Conrad and Joyce, it is his chapter on Ford Madox Ford that proves to be the volume's intellectual center."—Debra Rae Cohen, Clio

"While many critical studies of British literary modernism promise to reveal new ways to contextualize modernism, few deliver with such accomplished originality as Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda. . . . Wollaeger's book is a model of exemplary scholarship that . . . aptly speaks to our historical moment."—Lissa Schneider, James Joyce Literary Supplement

"Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda: British Narrative from 1900 to 1945 is written in an approachable style with an engaging and often amusing personal voice. . . . This is a book in which the historical contextualising so in trend at the present time is allowed to sit comfortably and rewardingly beside more 'traditional' close readings of canonical works."—Yoshino Ayako, Studies in English Literature

"A carefully researched monograph, Modernism, Media, and Propaganda will likely appeal to those interested in historicist and close textual analyses, and perhaps less to those seeking more theoretical treatments of modernist prose and film."—David Tomkins, European Legacy

"Modernism, Media, and Propaganda is a rich and nuanced study of how modernism and propaganda were formed symbiotically as much as defined by difference."—Elizabeth F. Evans, Woolf Studies Annual

Choice
Highly recommended. . . . [This] book is well planned, carefully constructed, and assiduously substantiated.
— D. G. Izzo
Clio
Mark Wollaeger's sophisticated new book adds to the recent reshaping of our understanding of modernist-period media culture. . . . While one would expect such tours de force from Wollaeger, who is known for his work on Conrad and Joyce, it is his chapter on Ford Madox Ford that proves to be the volume's intellectual center.
— Debra Rae Cohen
James Joyce Literary Supplement
While many critical studies of British literary modernism promise to reveal new ways to contextualize modernism, few deliver with such accomplished originality as Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda. . . . Wollaeger's book is a model of exemplary scholarship that . . . aptly speaks to our historical moment.
— Lissa Schneider
Studies in English Literature
Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda: British Narrative from 1900 to 1945 is written in an approachable style with an engaging and often amusing personal voice. . . . This is a book in which the historical contextualising so in trend at the present time is allowed to sit comfortably and rewardingly beside more 'traditional' close readings of canonical works.
— Yoshino Ayako
Studies in English Literature
Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda: British Narrative from 1900 to 1945 is written in an approachable style with an engaging and often amusing personal voice. . . . This is a book in which the historical contextualising so in trend at the present time is allowed to sit comfortably and rewardingly beside more 'traditional' close readings of canonical works.
— Yoshino Ayako
James Joyce Literary Supplement
While many critical studies of British literary modernism promise to reveal new ways to contextualize modernism, few deliver with such accomplished originality as Mark Wollaeger's Modernism, Media, and Propaganda. . . . Wollaeger's book is a model of exemplary scholarship that . . . aptly speaks to our historical moment.
— Lissa Schneider
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780691138459
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Publication date: 9/15/2008
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Pages: 368
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.10 (h) x 0.80 (d)

Meet the Author


Mark Wollaeger is professor of English at Vanderbilt University. He is the author of "Joseph Conrad and the Fictions of Skepticism", the editor of "James Joyce's "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man": A Casebook", and coeditor of "Joyce and the Subject of History".
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Modernism, Media, and Propaganda

British Narrative from 1900 to 1945
By Mark Wollaeger

Princeton University Press

Copyright © 2006 Princeton University Press
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-691-12811-5


Introduction

MODERNISM AND THE INFORMATION-PROPAGANDA MATRIX

COMMON SENSE, that mysterious repository of unarticulated assumptions, may suggest that modernism and propaganda have little to do with each other. The case of Ford Madox Ford indicates otherwise. Ford is central to the larger argument of this book (and therefore receives extended treatment in chapter 3) because his passionate engagement with both literary aesthetics and the contemporary media environment reveals the sense in which modernism and propaganda are two sides of the same coin of modernity. Setting out to define literary impressionism (which is to say, modernism) early in 1914, Ford proclaimed that an impressionist "must not write propaganda." But within weeks of completing his modernist masterwork, The Good Soldier (1914), Ford began writing two books, Between St. Dennis and St. George (1915) and When Blood Is Their Argument (1915), for the propaganda operation run by C.F.G. Masterman out of Wellington House. With respect to style and narrative technique, the three books are indistinguishable. The conjunction of propaganda and modernist style is not in itself surprising. Just as Dziga Vertov's film Man with a Movie Camera (1929) is at once a brilliant city symphony and a piece of Leninist propaganda, so Picasso attacked fascism through the cubist abstraction of Guernica (1937). But by grounding his theory of impressionism in a refusal to propagandize even as he wrote propaganda grounded in impressionist technique, Ford betrays a deeper connection between modernism and propaganda. Understood in relation to his belief that modern writers had a civic duty to repair a dysfunctional culture of information, Ford's modernism and propaganda begin to look less like strange bedfellows than like conjoined twins.

Ford, like George Orwell and Joseph Conrad, wrote both as a novelist and as a propagandist, but whereas Orwell felt compelled to theorize the relationship between art and propaganda, and Conrad, like Virginia Woolf, felt threatened by their cultural adjacency, Ford largely shrugged off perceived tensions. With information overwhelming the processing capacity of consciousness, Ford's impression is designed to resist the onset of the posthuman by reinvesting facts with feeling. That is, where T. S. Eliot posited a dissociation of sensibility that began in the seventeenth century with the English Revolution, Ford, more attuned to recent media history, described a split between factuality and the human caused by the surfeit of quantitative data spewed out by the mass press, reference books, and sociology. In Ford's theory, the impression mediates between the human sensorium and a body of facts that otherwise cannot be held together by the mind; propaganda steps in later to manipulate the reunified individual into the greater unity of a collective cause. Rehumanized to appeal to the modern citizen's overtaxed powers of synthesis, the impression is Ford's less direct method for controlling reader response. Propaganda, in this understanding, is acceptable so long as it does not advertise itself as such. The British Ministry of Information (MoI), as I shall describe in this chapter, held a similar view.

This is not to say that the shared subjectification of the fact in impressionism and British propaganda elides all distinctions between the two. Even in Ford, who wrote for the government, friction persists despite the close meshing of gears. Rather, the ease with which Ford moved between impressionism and propaganda indicates how important it is to grasp what modern writers thought propaganda was. To some it recalled the dead hand of Victorianism; to others it heralded a new age (now recognizable as our age) of informatic indeterminacy. By tracing the concept's significance through a range of modernists, and by looking closely at the distinctiveness of the British propaganda campaign, this chapter seeks to show how modernism and propaganda were constituted within an information-propaganda matrix.

MAKING SENSE OF PROPAGANDA: FROM ORWELL AND WOOLF TO BERNAYS AND ELLUL

Understanding what "propaganda" meant to modernists requires us to see the word's problematic status in light of its complicated history in the twentieth century. Specialists in propaganda studies today disagree so much about terminology that some have argued that "propaganda" is useless as an analytic tool and use "persuasion" instead; but "persuasion," others counter, covers too much ground. In mainstream discourse, "propaganda" is regularly used to dismiss purportedly documentary accounts for their deceptive inaccuracy or deliberate bias, as if "propaganda" were the accepted name for the capacious category of politically motivated falsehood. But slinging the term rarely settles the case: one person's propaganda is another person's information, and the distinction between the two is often difficult to draw.

"Propaganda" has not always been so difficult to define. The English word derives from a Latin term that originally referred to a committee of Cardinals, or Congregation of Propaganda, established by Pope Gregory XV in 1622 to propagate Roman Catholicism. The word was later extended to designate "any association, systematic scheme, or concerted movement for the propagation of a particular doctrine or practice" (OED). But with the professionalization of advertising in the late nineteenth century, and the emergence of public relations specialists and the rapid development of mass media in the twentieth century, "propaganda" became increasingly difficult to pin down. Although the word began to acquire some negative connotations over the nineteenth century owing to government distrust of secret organizations designed to sway public opinion, the OED does not record until 1908 the now-common definition of "propaganda" as tendentious persuasion by interested parties. At that time, with so much of modern society dependent on the rapid exchange of information, "propaganda" usually denoted persuasive information or mere boosterism. The information propagated might come from interested sources, but its integrity or reliability was not necessarily suspect. That would change over the first half of the twentieth century, when two world wars helped link "propaganda" to lies and deception without completely erasing the notion that "to persuade" might simply mean "to inform."

By the forties, when the propaganda techniques pioneered by the British had been refined and deployed around the world for over two decades, propaganda seemed inescapable, and the sinister connotations it had began to gather by the twenties were firmly established. For the Western world, Soviet domestic propaganda had begun to blur distinctions between propaganda and education, and the Nazi campaign added associations with obfuscation and systematic deception. With the surge in global propaganda in the interwar years, artists felt the pressure acutely. Themselves engaged in acts of communication within a media ecology that was changing rapidly, artists were forced to compete not only with increasingly pervasive new media but with organized efforts to use those media to manage the public. When in 1918 Ezra Pound referred to poets as "the antennae of the race," he was already tuned in to the new medium of radio, which he himself exploited as a propagandist during World War II.

But modernists responded to propaganda and the media that made it possible in diverse ways. D. H. Lawrence, for instance, was in one sense a born propagandist. He wrote entire books of doctrine urging readers to live their lives differently, and his fiction sometimes turns away from his characters to advocate alternative modes of being. Perhaps for that very reason, recruiting tactics during World War I enraged him. In December 1915 he spent some time in Battersea Town Hall at a recruiting station. He was there because when British recruitment fell off drastically in the spring of 1915, Lord Derby, the newly appointed Director-General of Recruitment, devised a program under which men of military age would come forward "to attest" their willingness to serve if required. The so-called Derby Scheme was intended as a compromise between conscription and volunteerism. And so Lawrence, confident that his poor health would earn an exemption and needing to attest before he could apply for a passport to America, went to the town hall to proclaim himself ready and willing. But the next day Lawrence wrote to Ottoline Morrell that after waiting for several hours he left before securing an exemption because he "hated the situation almost to madness." Lawrence was not put off by the recruiting officials or the potential recruits: "waiting there in the queue, I felt the men were very decent, and that the slumbering lion was going to wake up in them: not against the Germans either, but against the great lie of this life." Taken out of context, Lawrence's remarks simply repeat one of his familiar metaphysical points: men fail to live in truth because they do not live in harmony with their leonine passions. Yet the context of recruitment suggests that Lawrence's visceral hatred-in the letter he underscores "hated" five times-was catalyzed in this instance not so much by the men's capitulation to the bogey of mental consciousness as by their "spectral submission" to the untruth associated with war propaganda. The real enemy is not Germany but, as Stephen Dedalus puts it in Ulysses, the priest and king within. And like Stephen, Lawrence declares that he will not serve: "I had triumphed, like Satan flying over the world and knowing he had won at last."

Somewhat less satanic, George Orwell and Virginia Woolf both devoted relatively measured attention to propaganda. Woolf thought about the problem more than she wanted to, while Orwell devoted more attention to propaganda than any British writer of his generation. Although both were ambivalent, both sometimes wrote as propagandists, and their explorations of the blurred boundaries between art and propaganda shed light on problems of definition that were newly emerging as matters for public debate.

Orwell's various writings reflect the polarized thinking of the thirties even as they suggest why it is difficult to generalize about relations between art and propaganda. In a 1941 BBC radio broadcast, "The Frontiers of Art and Propaganda," Orwell tries to draw some conclusions from the propaganda wars of the previous decade. For Orwell, art since the 1890s took for granted the notion of art for art's sake, even after the slogan itself was driven underground by the trial of Oscar Wilde. Writers still emphasized "technique" throughout the twenties, but in the thirties Nazism and the global economic depression made it impossible to preserve the "intellectual detachment" required by aestheticism: "any thinking person had to take sides, and his feelings had to find their way not only into his writing but into his judgements on literature." Orwell has mixed feelings about this development. Although he is happy to wave goodbye to the notion that literature ever could wholly detach itself from politics, the politicizing of literature, now "swamped by propaganda," also caused "countless young writers ... to tie their minds to a political discipline"-"official Marxism"-that "made mental honesty impossible" (Collected Essays 2:123, 126). Orwell draws the reasonable lesson that writers can neither remain wholly detached from their times nor sacrifice their "intellectual integrity" to political exigency (ibid., 2:126). Unsure how to reconcile "aesthetic scrupulousness" and "political rectitude," Orwell can only conclude that the decade's events at least "helped us to define, better than was possible before, the frontiers of art and propaganda" (ibid., 2:126-27).

Relatively inconclusive here, Orwell remains illuminating as a guide, in part because he refuses pat solutions to real problems, in part because he wrote both as an artist and as a propagandist. Orwell reflected at length on his dual identity in his diaries-and on whether his roles could even be separated. As a novelist, Orwell probed deeply into propaganda's colonization of everyday life. 1984 is the most powerful novelistic indictment of propaganda ever written in English, perhaps in any language. But the most frightening and prescient element of the novel is not so much the state's "rectification" of the news or the invention of Big Brother, for which the book remains famous. With Big Brother, Orwell simply anticipated Michel Foucault's extension of Jeremy Bentham's nineteenth-century fantasy of the panopticon from the prison to the whole of society, and "rectified" news, sad to say, was already a fact of life as Orwell was writing in 1948. More shocking is Orwell's implicit claim that modern propaganda is able to restructure desire to such an extent that the very concept of internalizing authority breaks down. By the end of 1984, the distinction between private and public no longer exists: Winston Smith truly loves Big Brother. Authority cannot be internalized when authority has always and already occupied the inner life of the mind. Or to borrow Stephen Dedalus's formulation again, how can the priest and king within be killed if to do so means extinguishing consciousness itself?

Orwell nevertheless felt that propaganda had its uses: the object of his critique in 1984 is not propaganda per se but the totalitarian system it serves. In Homage to Catalonia(1938), Orwell expresses disgust over the fact that propaganda during the Spanish Civil War is being produced by noncombatants sheltered from actual bullets, but within five years Orwell (who did fight against fascism in Spain) was writing propaganda for BBC radio and confiding in his diary: "All propaganda is lies, even when one is telling the truth. I don't think this matters so long as one knows what one is doing, and why" (ibid. 2:416, 411). Nietzsche never put it better. Nor did Orwell restrict himself to anti-Nazi propaganda. In August 2003 the Public Record Office in England released a list of "crypto-communists" that Orwell compiled in 1949 for the Information Research Department, a propaganda bureau that operated out of the Foreign Office. The important point for my purposes is not that a leftist would collaborate with the government to root out suspected communists. Although the notion of Orwell as a McCarthyite is alarming, there is no evidence that his handing over of the list did anyone any harm, and Orwell was not alone in believing that the Soviet Union had betrayed the left and that many British Marxists had in effect become Soviet nationalists. More significant is that Orwell, anticipating the analysis of Jacques Ellul, had correctly seen that modern governments cannot survive without propaganda. Rather than decry the decay of organic communities, he decided to help hold things together against the perceived threats of Marxism, fascism, and Nazism.

Orwell's ambivalence toward propaganda opens onto complex attitudes shared by many of his fellow writers and citizens in the early twentieth century. Orwell believed that literature should participate in politics, but he did not want to dispense with distinctions between the aesthetic and the ideological. His famous essay "Politics and the English Language" is based on the premise that the operations of language should not be subordinated to political exigencies and on the belief that language can shake off ideology. And yet, as Orwell knew, this was easier said than done.

Virginia Woolf found herself in a similar bind in the thirties. Feeling the unwelcome pressure of propaganda while writing "The Pargiters," Woolf decided that even though "this fiction is dangerously near propaganda," she could not "propagate at the same time as write fiction." But if she was dismayed with a new era in which "people must have things written in chalk and large and repeated over and over again," she was more than willing to enter the fray: with Three Guineas(1938) Woolf earned the title of "the most brilliant pamphleteer in England" from the Times Literary Supplement (Diary 5:148). Not that Woolf would have appreciated being called the most brilliant propagandist in England. Keenly attentive to National Socialist propaganda, Woolf had come to see "propaganda" as a dirty word.

(Continues...)



Excerpted from Modernism, Media, and Propaganda by Mark Wollaeger Copyright © 2006 by Princeton University Press. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations ix
Preface xi
Acknowledgments xxiii

INTRODUCTION: Modernism and the Information-Propaganda Matrix 1

Making Sense of Propaganda: From Orwell and Woolf to Bernays and Ellul 2
Propagating Fictions: Wellington House, Modernism, and the Invention of Modern Propaganda 13
Modernism and the Media of Propaganda: Heart of Darkness and "The Unlighted Coast" 26

CHAPTER ONE: From Conrad to Hitchcock: Modernism, Film, and the

Art of Propaganda 38
Manipulation and Mastery: Film, Novel, Advertising 42
From Novel to Theater to Film to Hollywood: In Search of an Audience 48
Killing Stevie: Death by Literalization/Death by Cinematography 55
Picking up the Pieces: Modernism, Propaganda, and Film 62

CHAPTER TWO: The Woolfs, Picture Postcards, and the Propaganda of Everyday Life 71

Postcards, Exhibitions, and Empire 77
Woolf and the Culture of Exhibition 84
Education as Propaganda: Bildungsroman, Sex, and Empire 88
Scripting the Body: Colonial Postcards and the Journey Upriver 93
Leonard's Jungle, Conrad's Trees 105
In Virginia's Jungle 111
Destabilizing the Ethnographic Frame and the Returned Stare 117
Empire, Race, and the Emancipation of Women 120
From Male Propaganda to Female Modernism 123

CHAPTER THREE: Impressionism and Propaganda: Ford's Wellington House Books and The Good Soldier 128

Ford and Wellington House 130
Ford's Critical Writings: Propagating the Impression 135
Impressing Facts: When Blood Is Their Argument and Between St. Dennis and St. George 145
Navigating the Pseudo-Environment in The Good Soldier 151

CHAPTER FOUR: Joyce and the Limits of Political Propaganda 164

Recruitment and the Art of the Poster 166
Reading Posters/Reading Ulysses 176
Maeve, Bloom, and the Limits of Propaganda 192
Identification, Cultural Predication, and Narrative Structure 200
Carnivalizing Propaganda: Bloom and Stephen in Nighttown 203
Reinventing Ireland: Ulysses and the Art of Dislocation 213

CHAPTER FIVE: From the Thirties to World War II: Negotiating Modernism and Propaganda in Hitchcock and Welles 217

War, Propaganda, and Film: Pairing Hitchcock and Welles 222
Orson Welles: Theater, Film, and the Art of Propaganda 229
Autonomy and Innovation: From the Studio to the MoI and CIAA 239
Citizen Kane and It's All True: Documentary and Propaganda 242
Bon Voyage, Aventure Malgache, and the Materiality of Communication 251

Coda 261
Notes 269
Index 323

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)