A reviewer
¿During her lifetime, Mother Teresa resisted having her biography written in full¿in 1991, she gave Kathryn Spink, who had known Mother Teresa and been involved with her mission for thirteen years, to proceed with a full account of her life¿It was also understood that the book would be completed only after Mother Teresa¿s death.¿ This is part of the text from the inside of the front dust jacket of the book. No other author received this imprimatur of Mother Teresa. If for no other reason, this reason calls the inquirer of Mother Teresa¿s ¿life and views and of the work¿ (front jacket) to consider the book seriously. It may amaze some Catholics to know that the authorized biographer of Mother Teresa is not a Catholic. Kathryn Spink is a Christian of sorts but not a Catholic. However, she loves the words and work of Mother Teresa and quotes Mother Teresa¿s opinion of the Missionaries of Charity as the, ¿most disorganized organization in the world¿ (Preface, vi). In that quote, it could be said, Mother Teresa was giving, indirectly, an answer to Christopher Hitchens caustic critique of her. It is hard for unbelievers to understand how disorder in the Church is evidence of the order of God¿and yet it is, because God can write with broken pens. There are no footnotes, no notes at all. However, there are many quotes that are gems in the thought and work of Mother Teresa including her Nobel Peace Prize Lecture (Appendix B). Some quotes are what Christian readers expect, ¿I said that even if they helped one person, that was all right. Jesus would have died for one person, for one sinner¿ (p. 87). Others quotes only non-Christians will appreciate, ¿You call him Ishwar some call him Allah, some simply God, but we all have to acknowledge that it is he who made us for greater things: to love and to be loved¿ (pp. 155-56). There is a short but adequate Index. The style is intimate, enjoyable, and flowing from an obvious depth of knowledge of the subject addressed. There are a number of pictures in the center of the book that historically progress through her life as if taken from the family album. There are a couple of criticisms about the book that need to be addressed. First, it does not confront Mother Teresa¿s adversaries. There is only an illusion to Mr. Hitchens and not by name (p. 275). Second, there is a lack of comments, interviews, and commentary from colleagues and associates. Third, there is plenty of data about her life but the depth of how each subject is handled sometimes seems a little thin. In response to the second and third criticisms, authors are painfully aware of this formula, pages plus cost equal higher price plus less audience. Most people do not want to pay a fortune for a book and the numbers of books sold declines as the page number increases. In this instantaneous age, few have the attention span for longer books. Those interested in Mother Teresa¿s thought should inquirer into Kathryn Spink¿s book, The Miracle of Love. It is a shorter work but a fruitful read. Dear reader, I hope this letter helped you understand the pen that was Mother Teresa.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.