Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment

by Fen Osler Hampson, Michael Hart (Editor)

Overview

Unlike conventional bilateral negotiations, multilateral negotiations are characterized by intensive international discussions that involve multiple actors and interests, highly complex agendas, and differentiated international settings. Political scientist Fen Osler Hampson, with the assistance of trade specialist Michael Hart, studies the component parts of the multilateral negotiation process to identify those factors making for success or failure. The authors argue that multilateral negotiation is, in essence, a coalition-building enterprise involving states, nonstate actors, and international organizations. Individual case studies include discussions on security, the environment, economic issues, and non-governmental actors—such as scientists and environmental groups like Greenpeace International—in prenegotiation and negotiation phases.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780801861970
Publisher:	Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication date:	04/05/1999
Edition description:	Revised ed.
Pages:	432
Product dimensions:	6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.89(d)
Age Range:	18 Years

About the Author

Fen Osler Hampson is professor of international affairs at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University. In 1993-1994 he was a Jennings Randolph Peace Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace.

Michael Hart was formerly senior advisor, trade policy studies, at the Canadian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. He is currently a professor in the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs.

Editorial Reviews

Although there are more instances and many case studies of multilateral negotiations, there are almost no conceptual—let alone theoretical—studies of the subject . . . Fen Hampson has rendered a great service in helping to fill this gap by testing and deriving insights about multilateral decision making from a number of empirical exercises. The work is a major contribution to understanding an important diplomatic activity and to opening up a new field of analysis . . . This book is a major step in putting multilateral negotiations on the map and in the curriculum as a subject to be taught and analyzed.
—I. William Zartman, American Political Science Review

Hampson and Hart offer detailed evidence that multilateral negotiation can be a viable alternative to global disorder or imposed regimes. Multilateral Negotiations gives cause for reasoned optimism by showing how individual leaders, epistemic communities, small countries, and international bureaucrats can all help reduce complexity to manageable proportions.
—Nancy W. Gallagher, Mershon International Studies Review

How are scholars to comprehend the rapidly changing world? One valuable tool for their intellectual arsenal should be this book by Fen Osler Hampson with Michael Hart.
—Frederic A. Bergerson and Patrick J. Flores, Perspectives on Political Science

From the Publisher

Hampson and Hart offer detailed evidence that multilateral negotiation can be a viable alternative to global disorder or imposed regimes. Multilateral Negotiations gives cause for reasoned optimism by showing how individual leaders, epistemic communities, small countries, and international bureaucrats can all help reduce complexity to manageable proportions.

Mershon International Studies Review - Nancy W. Gallagher

How are scholars to comprehend the rapidly changing world? One valuable tool for their intellectual arsenal should be this book by Fen Osler Hampson with Michael Hart.

Perspectives on Political Science - Frederic A. Bergerson and Patrick J. Flores

Although there are more instances and many case studies of multilateral negotiations, there are almost no conceptual—let alone theoretical—studies of the subject . . . Fen Hampson has rendered a great service in helping to fill this gap by testing and deriving insights about multilateral decision making from a number of empirical exercises. The work is a major contribution to understanding an important diplomatic activity and to opening up a new field of analysis . . . This book is a major step in putting multilateral negotiations on the map and in the curriculum as a subject to be taught and analyzed.

American Political Science Review - I. William Zartman

How are scholars to comprehend the rapidly changing world? One valuable tool for their intellectual arsenal should be this book by Fen Osler Hampson with Michael Hart.

— Frederic A. Bergerson and Patrick J. Flores

Perspectives on Political Science

Hampson and Hart offer detailed evidence that multilateral negotiation can be a viable alternative to global disorder or imposed regimes. Multilateral Negotiations gives cause for reasoned optimism by showing how individual leaders, epistemic communities, small countries, and international bureaucrats can all help reduce complexity to manageable proportions.

— Nancy W. Gallagher

Mershon International Studies Review

Although there are more instances and many case studies of multilateral negotiations, there are almost no conceptual—let alone theoretical—studies of the subject... Fen Hampson has rendered a great service in helping to fill this gap by testing and deriving insights about multilateral decision making from a number of empirical exercises. The work is a major contribution to understanding an important diplomatic activity and to opening up a new field of analysis... This book is a major step in putting multilateral negotiations on the map and in the curriculum as a subject to be taught and analyzed.

— I. William Zartman

American Political Science Review

Political scientist Hampson, with the assistance of trade specialist Hart, studies the component parts of the multilateral negotiation process to identify those factors making for success or failure. Ranging from the 1963 Test Ban Treaty to the Climate Change Convention (1192) and the completion of the Uruguay Round of GATT (1993), individual case studies include discussions on security, environmental, and economic issues. Of particular interest is the attention given to nongovernmental actors--such as scientists and environmental groups like Greenpeace International--in prenegotiation and negotiation phases. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

Booknews