Murder Most Austen: A Mystery [NOOK Book]

Overview


A dedicated Anglophile and Janeite, Elizabeth Parker is hoping the trip to the annual Jane Austen Festival in Bath will distract her from her lack of a job and her uncertain future with her boyfriend, Peter.

On the plane ride to England, she and Aunt Winnie meet Professor Richard Baines, a self-proclaimed expert on all things Austen. His outlandish claims that within each Austen novel there is a sordid secondary story is second only...

See more details below
Murder Most Austen: A Mystery

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$2.99
BN.com price

Overview


A dedicated Anglophile and Janeite, Elizabeth Parker is hoping the trip to the annual Jane Austen Festival in Bath will distract her from her lack of a job and her uncertain future with her boyfriend, Peter.

On the plane ride to England, she and Aunt Winnie meet Professor Richard Baines, a self-proclaimed expert on all things Austen. His outlandish claims that within each Austen novel there is a sordid secondary story is second only to his odious theory on the true cause of Austen’s death. When Baines is found stabbed to death in his Mr. Darcy costume during the costume ball, it appears that Baines’s theories have finally pushed one Austen fan too far. But Aunt Winnie’s friend becomes the prime suspect, so Aunt Winnie enlists Elizabeth to find the  professor’s real killer. With an ex-wife, a scheming daughter-in-law, and a trophy wife, not to mention a festival’s worth of die-hard Austen fans, there are  no shortage of suspects.

This fourth in Tracy Kiely’s charming series is pure delight. If Bath is the number-one Mecca for Jane Austen fans, Murder Most Austen is the perfect read for those who love some laughs and quick wit with their mystery.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Kiely’s pleasing fourth mystery featuring Jane Austen fan Elizabeth Parker (after 2011’s Murder Most Persuasive ) takes Elizabeth and her great-aunt, Winnie Reynolds, to the Jane Austen Festival in Bath, the setting of Northanger Abbey . There they meet an old chum of Winnie’s, Cora Beadle, and Cora’s daughter, Izzy, all of whom are horrified by a professor of dubious repute, Richard Baines, who makes a “preposterous proclamation” on the cause of Austen’s death. When Baines, dressed as Mr. Darcy, is stabbed to death at the opening ball, Cora, who took particular offense at his theory, falls under suspicion of murder. Elizabeth and Winnie soon find several people with better reasons than Cora to do in Baines. Janeites will appreciate the several minor characters and situations inspired by Northanger Abbey. Elizabeth makes an engaging protagonist, ably misguided by her lively aunt, though the straightforward plot offers few surprises. Agent: Barbara Poelle, Irene Goodman Literary Agency. (Sept.)
From the Publisher

"Another stellar entry in the Austen-centric series...Destined to appeal to Janeites and mystery lovers alike, Kiely's latest whodunit should be universally acknowledged as a clever specimen of a crime novel that blends amateur detection with literary flair."--Jay Strafford, Richmond Times-Dispatch

"As the mystery unfolds against the well-constructed backdrop of a fan festival, keen Janites will be excited by the frequent use of Austen’s own words and phrases as characters interact. VERDICT An engaging story with solid surprises awaits cozy mystery readers, Austen fans, and those looking for a charming series to follow."--Library Journal

"Kiely’s pleasing fourth mystery featuring Jane Austen fan Elizabeth Parker (after 2011’s Murder Most Persuasive ) takes Elizabeth and her great-aunt, Winnie Reynolds, to the Jane Austen Festival in Bath....Janeites will appreciate the several minor characters and situations inspired by Northanger Abbey. Elizabeth makes an engaging protagonist, ably misguided by her lively aunt."--Publishers Weekly

"An ingenious whodunnit where laugh-out-loud humour leavens the tension."--Jane Austen Regency

 

Library Journal
Deep in anticipation of the week-long Jane Austen Festival in Bath, Elizabeth Parker and her Aunt Winnie can almost tolerate the obnoxious in-flight pontificating of Professor Baines. Then he shares his scandalous new theory: Austen died of syphilis. When the professor is murdered at the Regency Masked Ball, angry Janites aren't the only suspects. The shortlist also includes his ex-wife, daughter-in-law, and grad student. Will Elizabeth's previous investigative experiences (Murder Most Pursuasive; Murder on the Bride's Side; Murder at Longbourn) help her unmask the proper person? This fourth series outing subtly provides new readers with key points from the past without annoying returning fans with excessive backtracking. As the mystery unfolds against the well-constructed backdrop of a fan festival, keen Janites will be excited by the frequent use of Austen's own words and phrases as characters interact. VERDICT An engaging story with solid surprises awaits cozy mystery readers, Austen fans, and those looking for a charming series to follow.—Stacey Hayman, Rocky River P.L., OH
Kirkus Reviews
A much-anticipated trip to the Jane Austen Festival in Bath becomes a nightmare for an amateur sleuth. Elizabeth Parker (Murder Most Persuasive, 2011, etc.) is out of a job, living with her cranky sister and unsure whether she wants to commit to her current boyfriend. A trip to England with her beloved Aunt Winnie, a fellow Jane-ite, seems just the ticket to cheer her up, but things go wrong from the minute they meet Professor Richard Baines on the plane. The obnoxious Baines, who contends that all Austen's novels conceal scandalous hidden stories, plans to present a paper at the meeting claiming that the author herself died of syphilis. Elizabeth and Winnie enjoy a day exploring London and a night at Claridge's Hotel until they run into Cora Beadle, another Jane-ite, and her stunningly beautiful daughter, Izzy. Cora is so angry with the news about Baines that she threatens to kill him. When he's found dead after a fancy dress ball in Bath, Cora is the obvious suspect. When Winnie, who's sure that her old friend is not a killer, asks her niece to investigate, Elizabeth isn't surprised to learn that the outspoken professor had quite a few people angry with him, beginning with his ex-wife, his son, his hard-as-nails daughter-in-law and the graduate student with whom he'd been having an affair. As she digs up more dirt, Elizabeth makes herself a target. A light, enjoyable read with just enough homicide to ballast the Austen quotations Elizabeth and Winnie keep swapping.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781250017352
  • Publisher: St. Martin's Press
  • Publication date: 9/4/2012
  • Series: Elizabeth Parker Mysteries , #4
  • Sold by: Macmillan
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 304
  • Sales rank: 136,445
  • File size: 855 KB

Meet the Author

Tracy Kiely

Tracy Kiely has been a finalist for the Mary Higgins Clark Award. A self-proclaimed Anglophile who grew up reading Jane Austen and Agatha Christie, she lives with her husband and three children in Maryland.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt


CHAPTER 1
 
 
There is, I believe, in every disposition a tendency to some particular evil, a natural defect, which not even the best education can overcome.
—PRIDE AND PREJUDICE
 
IF I HAD KNOWN that someone was going to kill the man sitting in 4B three days hence, I probably wouldn’t have fantasized about doing the deed myself.
Probably.
However, as it stood, I didn’t have this knowledge. The only knowledge I did have was that he was a pompous ass and had not stopped talking once in the last two hours.
“Of course, only the truly clever reader can discern that it is beneath Austen’s superficial stories that the real narrative lies. Hidden beneath an attractive veil of Indian muslin, Austen presents a much darker world. It is a sordid world of sex, both heterosexual and homosexual, abortions, and incest. It is in highlighting these darker stories to the less perceptive reader that I have devoted my career,” the man was now saying to his seatmate.
I guessed him to be in his late fifties. He was tall and fair, with those WASPy good looks that lend themselves well to exclusive men’s clubs, the kinds that still exclude women and other dangerous minorities. His theories were so patently absurd that at first I’d found his commentary oddly entertaining. However, as Austen herself observed, of some delights, a little goes a long way.
This was rapidly becoming one of those delights.
From the manner in which the young woman to his right gazed at him with undisguised awe, it was clear that she did not share my desire to duct-tape his mouth shut. Her brown eyes were not rolling back into her head with exasperation; rather, they were practically sparkling with idolization from behind her wire-framed glasses. While both our faces were flushed from his words, the cause for the heightened color on her elfin features stemmed from reverence; the cause of mine was near-boiling irritation.
I closed my eyes and tried to drown out their conversation by thinking happier thoughts. After all, I was on a plane—and not just any plane, mind you, but a British Airways flight headed to London. London! From there I was headed to Bath to attend the Jane Austen Festival. A week-long celebration of all things Jane, and attended by Janeites from all over the world. For an Anglophile like me, this was about as close to nirvana as one could get. I tried to think of scones heaped with clotted cream, red telephone boxes, gorgeous accents, and the off chance that I might spy Colin Firth—anything to distract myself from the man in 4B.
And yet, I could not.
“Now I grant you that mine is a special talent,” he droned on. “It is not everyone who can unravel the secret messages—the ciphers, if you will—that are embedded in each of her works. In fact, it could be said that I am the Rosetta stone of Austen.”
I wondered how much trouble I would get in if I threw my shoe at his head.
Next to me, my aunt Winnie shifted in her seat and cast an idle glance in the man’s direction before turning to me. “Is it morning already?” she asked, stretching her arms out in front of her.
“No,” I said, checking my watch. “It’s still the middle of the night.”
Her eyes sought out the man again as if perplexed. “But the cock’s crowing.”
“Oh, well, in that case,” I said agreeably, “it’s been morning for a long, long time now.”
“Well, I just think it’s amazing,” the young woman said now. “I studied Austen as an undergrad and no one ever even hinted at these other stories. Although some of my professors discussed the moral teachings found in her works, they mainly focused on her social satire. I never saw any of the intended stories until your class. I mean, I never realized that in Persuasion, Sir Walter Elliot’s relationship with his eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was incestuous, or that in Sense and Sensibility, Marianne Dashwood’s illness was really the result of a botched abortion until you pointed it out.” She beamed obsequiously at him.
I tried to remember if I’d ever treated any of my professors with such a groveling display of worship. Hmmm. Let me think.
Nope.
Granted, I’d liked and respected a great number of them, but I hadn’t had any crushes on any of them. Then again, I’d attended an all-girls Catholic school, largely taught by the Sisters of Notre-Dame, so that last part probably isn’t too surprising. I might be somewhat jaded at the ripe old age of twenty-eight, but witnessing this dual display of academic love—for this fool of a man—did not arouse even a minuscule atom of regret at this apparent gap in my academic career.
The man nodded sagely at his seatmate. “I’m not surprised. Unfortunately, most of today’s English professors—and I use that term very loosely—are completely ignorant of Austen’s true objective.”
I gave up trying to ignore them, shifted in my seat, and craned my neck to look for the flight attendant. If I was going to be forced to listen to this drivel, I needed a drink. A Chardonnay drink. Aunt Winnie saw my movement and easily divined my intention. “Order me one, too, sweetheart,” she said.
“Already on it,” I replied.
The man continued. “They have interpreted her works in a manner appropriate to what they believe a spinster writing during the Regency period intended. While they view her works as containing some biting satire, they don’t grasp the whole picture! But, as I have diligently maintained, that is the true beauty of Austen’s work. She was subverting society’s precious rules all the while pretending to live by them. She described life as it really was—rough, extremely sexual, and, at times, evil and dark. She dressed it up and let the dull see what they wanted and hoped that the astute reader—a reader like myself—would see it for what it was: a forceful condemnation of the sanctimonious hypocrisy of both society and the church.”
Honestly, it was beginning to amount to auditory torture. It almost made me yearn for a teething baby or gassy seatmate. And besides, wasn’t this technically a form of assault? Because that’s what this boiled down to—assault with an unwanted opinion. And just where the hell was the flight attendant?
“It’s all very exciting,” the women murmured. “Your discoveries will not only revolutionize how Jane Austen’s work is viewed, but how that whole period of literature is viewed.”
“Yes, they will,” he agreed without modesty. “And I anticipate that after I deliver my latest paper, I will also revolutionize people’s views on how her life was lived.
“Do you have a copy with you?” she asked, her voice hopeful. “I’d love to read it, if I may.”
He dipped his sleek head condescendingly. “I’m sure you would, but unfortunately I don’t have it with me. My assistant, Byron, is putting the finishing touches on it. He’s already in London tweaking it. We’re to finalize the details tomorrow. Perhaps I could show it to you then.”
The young woman was silent for a moment. “I see. Of course. Is, um, your wife coming as well?”
He gave a slight nod. “She is. She flew out yesterday.”
The woman’s eyes fell to her lap in obvious disappointment, but she said nothing. If the man noticed, he didn’t let on. “Tell me, Lindsay,” he said, “what did you think of my last lecture, where I detailed how Austen’s works, when taken in total, are really a kind of early manifesto for the ideals of communism?”
I glanced down at my shoes. No thick boots here, only ballet flats. Even if I threw them really hard, they wouldn’t be able to inflict any real damage. I sighed.
“I loved it, of course,” the woman answered immediately. “But do you really believe that Austen herself was an atheist?” There was the barest suggestion of doubt now lurking in those adoring brown eyes.
“Believe it? I defy you to prove otherwise! How else do you explain a character like Mr. Collins? He was a pompous, silly egomaniac,” was his assured reply.
“There appears to be a lot of that going around,” Aunt Winnie said in hearty agreement. She made no attempt to modulate her voice. But to be fair, Aunt Winnie has never been a huge proponent of modulation, whether in voice, appearance, or opinion. One needs only to see her curly red hair and bright green eyes—both of which have intensified in color over the years thanks to Clairol and colored contacts—to deduce that. She is the personification of Tallulah Bankhead’s observation, “I’m the foe of moderation, the champion of excess.”
Not surprisingly, both the man and the woman turned our way. Aunt Winnie smiled brightly at them. I knew that smile well. It combined all the warmth of Machiavelli with the subtlety of the Cheshire Cat. It also signaled to those who knew her well that it was—as she herself put it—“on like Donkey Kong.” I gestured again—a little more impatiently now—for the flight attendant to bring the drinks cart.
The man’s full lips drew back into a condescending smile; his teeth were very large and very white. “I take it that you don’t concur with my views on Austen,” he purred silkily. Next to him, the young woman blinked with owl-like alertness.
“I most certainly do not,” Aunt Winnie replied with the cool politeness of a society matron. She then ruined the effect by adding, “In fact, I think they are utter bullshit.”
“No, no, I completely understand,” he continued with a patronizing air. “Many women—especially women of a ‘certain generation’—find my discoveries to be somewhat off-putting.”
“Stewardess!” I called out, it having now become paramount that I get her attention if I was going to prevent Aunt Winnie from physically demonstrating just what she did and didn’t find off-putting.
Aunt Winnie leaned forward. “Women of a certain generation? Are you suggesting that women of ‘my generation,’ as you so clumsily put it, are unable to discern reality from perversion?”
Thankfully, the flight attendant arrived, providing a momentary diversion, and no doubt preventing Aunt Winnie from throwing her shoes at the man. And as they were three-inch platforms, they might have actually done some damage. “May I help you?” the flight attendant politely inquired.
“I certainly hope so,” I muttered to myself.
Her round face pulled in confusion. “Sorry?”
“I’d like to order a drink, please—” I began, but the man in 4B cut me off.
“I fear I may have offended you,” he said. “Please let me offer the proverbial olive branch and order us all a glass of champagne.” Before any of us could answer, he addressed the flight attendant. “Four champagnes, please. Your very best, of course.”
“We only have the one kind,” she replied.
“Well, nevertheless, put it on my tab,” he replied with a lofty wave of his manicured hand. I noticed he was wearing a gold pinkie ring. It suited him.
“It’s complimentary, sir,” she said and briskly strode to the kitchen area to ready the drinks.
Turning his attention back to us, the man asked, “I gather you are a fan of the dear lady, Miss Jane Austen?”
“We are,” Aunt Winnie replied, brushing back her trademark red curls.
“Well then, we are well met!” he replied with a practiced smile. “For I don’t think you will meet anyone who reveres Miss Austen or her work more than I.” He twisted his long body in his seat, the movement producing nary a crease in his perfectly pressed tan slacks. “May I introduce myself? I am Professor Richard Baines and this is … one of my graduate students, Miss Lindsay Weaver.”
Lindsay nodded somberly at us. She was a tiny little thing, her pixie features not being limited to her face alone; her thick blue cardigan and wool skirt practically swallowed up her small frame. She wore no makeup, but her complexion was nevertheless clear and smooth, and her jet-black hair was cut short with thick bangs that skimmed the top of her glasses.
“I am Winifred Reynolds,” replied Aunt Winnie, “and this is my great-niece, Elizabeth Parker.” I produced a weak smile.
“And are you on your way to the Jane Austen Festival in Bath?” Professor Baines asked.
“We are,” I answered.
“Excellent! We are, as well. I attend every year, of course. In addition to being a professor of English literature, I’m a frequent lecturer at many of the Jane Austen regional societies.”
“I see,” Aunt Winnie replied. “And how do they generally react when you tell them that Austen was not only an atheist but a Communist to boot?”
He shrugged, unconcerned. “Some don’t like it, of course. They see it as a heresy of sorts. Others, of course, are able to catch a glimmer of the truth. It is to those advanced minds to whom I chiefly address my papers.”
“Uh-huh, and do you mind sharing the basis for this rather astonishing revelation that Jane Austen, daughter of a clergyman and by all accounts a God-fearing Christian woman, was actually an atheist, Rich?” Aunt Winnie inquired. I glanced at her in bewilderment. Why was she engaging this man in conversation, especially since it was clear he was a complete dolt? Then I saw the answer. She had finished her Elizabeth Peters paperback and was looking for a new form of entertainment. Inwardly, I groaned. A bored Aunt Winnie was always a daunting prospect.
“It’s Richard, actually, and I’d be happy to enlighten you,” replied Professor Baines. “Through Miss Austen’s character Mr. Collins in Pride and Prejudice, we can perceive her true feelings for the church and the clergy. Mr. Collins is, of course, a buffoon and a hypocrite. He is no man of God, which was Miss Austen’s way of saying that none of the clergy are men of God. They are all quacks and charlatans.”
Well, if Aunt Winnie was going to play, then I saw no reason not to join, particularly when Jane Austen was the subject. I mentally buzzed in to the game: Alex, I’ll take “The Clergy in Austen” for $800.
“I agree with you that Mr. Collins is a fool,” I said, “but he’s just one of the many examples of clergymen that Austen presents us with. We also have Mr. Tilney in Northanger Abbey, who is sensible, kind, and wise.”
Not posed in the form of a question, perhaps, but still correct.
Professor Baines and Lindsay, however, exchanged glances of sympathetic derision. “I thought exactly as you did, Elizabeth,” Lindsay said kindly but knowingly, “until I realized, thanks to Professor Baines, that Mr. Tilney is an even bigger hypocrite than Mr. Collins. Mr. Collins is a fool, but Mr. Tilney is an educated man, and so his crime is more the worse.”
“His crime?” Aunt Winnie asked, her artfully enhanced brows drawn together in confusion. “What crime did poor Mr. Tilney commit?”
“Poor Mr. Tilney, indeed! Why, madam, he helped his father cover up the crime of murdering his mother! He was an accessory after the fact!” Lindsay exclaimed.
I stared at her in horrified amusement. “But his mother wasn’t murdered!” I interjected. “That is the whole point of Northanger Abbey—to illustrate the dangers of an overactive imagination.”
“No, that’s what you are meant to think,” said Professor Baines. “That’s the cover story that Austen wrote to hide her true tale—one of murderous deeds and the sins of hiding them. Did you never notice that it’s called NorthANGER Abbey? Austen is very angry about her topic. It is no coincidence that Mr. Tilney is one of the most heinous of all Austen’s villains.”
“Mr. Tilney?” I repeated in disbelief. “But that’s absurd! He’s … he’s … well, he’s Mr. Tilney!” Inarticulate perhaps, but true. Aunt Winnie patted my hand in silent commiseration.
“It most definitely is not absurd,” Professor Baines replied testily. “There is much more than meets the eye in Austen, especially with regard to her antiestablishment views about the church. Take for instance Mary Crawford’s comment about the clergy in Mansfield Park. Do you recall what she said? ‘A clergyman has nothing to do but be slovenly and selfish—read the newspaper, watch the weather, and quarrel with his wife. His curate does all the work, and the business of his own life is to dine.’” He smiled smugly at us. “How do you explain that passage, if not as a condemnation of the church?”
“I think that you are forgetting that Mary’s not the heroine—Fanny is. Mary’s words were meant not as a jab at the church but as evidence of her own selfish character,” I said. “Remember, in the end Mary is revealed to be a woman of indifferent morals.”
Professor Baines shook his head. “You are incorrect. That’s how she’s portrayed in the film adaptations, perhaps, but not in the book. You just have to know where and how to look for it. You are like so many of my younger students. You rely only on Hollywood’s interpretation of Austen’s works to form your opinion.”
“I don’t, actually,” I said, not knowing whether to laugh or scream. “I’ve read each of her novels many times over—Mansfield Park included. And I’m sorry, but I don’t see any evidence to support what you are saying.”
“Well, it takes a special kind of reader to see the clues,” he said.
“‘There is, I believe, in every disposition a tendency to some particular evil, a natural defect, which not even the best education can overcome,’” Aunt Winnie quoted rather pointedly.
Professor Baines arched his eyebrow. “Are you suggesting that mine is a propensity to hate everybody?”
“No, of course not,” Aunt Winnie answered with a saccharine smile. “Only to willfully misunderstand.”
The flight attendant finally arrived with the champagne. After dispensing the glasses, she returned to the kitchen area. Professor Baines regarded the pale bubbles in his flute suspiciously before lifting it in a kind of salute. “Although we may disagree on Austen’s intended message,” he said, “we can at least agree that we enjoy her work.”
Aunt Winnie lifted her glass in turn and tipped her head in acknowledgment. “Agreed.”
Professor Baines’s aristocratic nose wrinkled as he brought the glass to his mouth, but then with a what-the-hell smile, he gamely took a large sip. Lindsay was less daring. Her face pulled into an expression of indecision; she reluctantly took a teensy sip before quickly setting the glass back down on her tray table. Professor Baines patted her hand with understanding. “I grant you that it is not a tête de cuvée, but we must make do,” he said sympathetically.
Catching Aunt Winnie’s eye, I indicated my glass. “It is tolerable, but not bubbly enough to tempt me,” I whispered.
She grinned. “Good God, man! I would not be so fastidious as you are for a kingdom!” Then, to prove her point, she downed half the glass.
I took another sip without complaint. But then it was rare that I was in such poor humor as to not give consequence to free champagne slighted by pompous pseudointellectuals. Putting my glass down on the tray, I picked up the latest issue of SkyMall with feigned interest. I hoped that my apparent fascination with lawn-aerating shoes would deter Professor Baines from continuing the conversation, but he persisted in trying to prove his point. “You have to understand that the general opinion of Austen is incorrect,” he said.
Oh, sweet baby Jesus. Really?
“‘Where an opinion is general, it is usually correct,’” countered Aunt Winnie.
Professor Baines ignored her and kept talking. “I think that much of the conventional wisdom regarding Austen’s work comes from our perception of her chaste, quiet life. Had she been a different kind of woman, her works might be viewed differently. Wouldn’t you agree?”
“Not necessarily,” I answered, reluctantly putting down the magazine. “Take Hemingway, for instance. He was a bullying, alcoholic misogynist, but knowing that doesn’t change his Nick Adams stories and their theme of redemption through dignity in deeds.”
Professor Baines shot me an indulgent smile as if I were a petulant child. “That’s different, of course, because Hemmingway was a man. Hopefully, you’ll figure that out when you’re a little older.”
Okay, now he had gone too far. Because he was a man? He was officially in the boat with Fredo. Aunt Winnie put a restraining hand on my wrist. I paused and put my shoe back on.
Professor Baines continued on, unaware. “That’s why I’m so excited to deliver my latest paper. Finally, I will provide the proof that Jane Austen wasn’t merely writing clever little romances. After much research and by breaking the codes apparent both in her letters and works, I believe that I have finally discerned something truly shocking, something that the literary establishment doesn’t want you to know.” His voice dropped ominously. “In fact, what I’ve discovered is nothing short of a bombshell.”
“Oh, I’ve no doubt it is,” Aunt Winnie replied, lowering her voice in turn. “But don’t tell me. Let me guess.” She leaned forward, her face serious. “You’ve discovered that Edward Ferris rather ‘enjoyed’ the company of horses, haven’t you?”
While I attempted to mop up the champagne I’d spit all over my chin and sweater, Professor Baines’s mouth twisted in annoyance. Despite his obvious irritation, however, he was determined to go on and impress us with his discovery. “I have uncovered proof—although coded proof—that Jane Austen did not die from Addison’s disease or tuberculosis.” Pausing dramatically, he said, “Jane Austen died as the result of syphilis.”
After making this preposterous proclamation, he leaned back in his seat, clearly pleased with himself and his so-called discovery. I’m not sure what effect he expected this “bombshell” to have on us, but I doubted it was the one he got. After a brief moment of stunned silence, I began to giggle. Then Aunt Winnie joined in. Then we couldn’t seem to stop. It was like when you’re in church and you know you shouldn’t laugh but that somehow makes it all the funnier. Soon tears were streaming down my face, and Aunt Winnie was snorting inelegantly and muttering, “Capital! Capital!”
“This is no laughing matter!” Professor Baines exclaimed angrily. Next to him, Lindsay glared indignantly at us on his behalf.
“I’m sorry, but what you are proposing is ludicrous!” Aunt Winnie finally said when she got her breath. “Honestly, I don’t know how you think that’s even remotely possible. But, Rich”—Professor Baines winced—“I can tell you this, if you plan on presenting that paper during the festival, you are going to find yourself on the wrong side of an angry crowd.”
“The uninformed masses do not frighten me,” he replied coolly. His earlier spirit of magnanimous condescension had vanished. His eyes had sharpened while we were giggling until his pupils were tiny black dots anchored in icy blue pools. It would seem that Professor Baines did not like having his “shocking discovery” so openly mocked, especially in front of one of his adoring students. And he really didn’t like being called “Rich.”
“I’m sorry to have wasted your time,” he said stiffly. “I can see now that your mind is closed to that which you do not wish to see. I will trouble you no more.” With that he turned his back to us and resumed his lecture to Lindsay.
Aunt Winnie shook her head and wiped the moisture from her eyes. “I’ll tell you this much,” she said to me in a low voice, “if he gives that paper at the festival, he’ll be drawn and quartered.”
“Which is, I believe, what happened to Mrs. Tilney,” I whispered back.
For the next hour Aunt Winnie and I tried to outdo each other with outrageous perversions of Austen’s novels. I thought I had her with my “discovery” that Louisa Musgrove didn’t jump down the stairs but was pushed by Anne Elliot, until she topped me with her revelation that Jane’s cold at Netherfield was actually the clap.
After a while we both fell asleep, neither of us giving any more thought to Professor Baines and his fate once he presented his thesis. Of course, we knew that whatever it was, he wouldn’t be drawn and quartered—even though, as Jane herself might opine, his name was Richard. No one was going to do that in this day and age.

 
Copyright © 2012 by Tracy Kiely

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4.5
( 3 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(1)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 5, 2013

    Kyle

    Hello

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 16, 2012

    Wonderful! !

    I recommend this entire series!

    I have read each and every one of these 4 books in the series and they are delightful!

    A great cozy mystery! Love all the characters and always a great murder mystery.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 7, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)